« Obama Nets Iowa Delegates From Former Edwards Backers | Home | Gallup: Obama Leads Hillary Nationally By Three Points »

Obama Discusses Wright Controversy In New Web Video

Barack Obama has released this Web video, essentially a video version of yesterday's blog post responding to the Jeremiah Wright controversy:

"Because these particular statements by Rev. Wright are so contrary to my own life and beliefs, a number of people have legitimately raised questions about the nature of my relationship with REv. Wright and my membership in the church," Obama says, then talking about his long-time membership in the church's community and with Wright as a human being.

"In other words," Obama said, "he has never been my political advisor — he's been my pastor."

(Via Ben Smith)


132 Comments

| Leave a comment

Brilliant.

Simply brilliant.

How smart of him to request making this video "go viral" at the end of the clip. Freakin' brilliant. Anywhere anyone sees a post where some stupid comment about Wright is made, just simply post the link to the video and nothing more needs to be said. What a brilliant campaign.

user-pic

All of his supporters need to redouble their efforts. There will be more and more stuff to fight because Obama has embraced a diverse community and put himself out there - he is a wonderful man, and we can't miss the chance to put ourselves on the line for him.

DeeDee, you are right. We all need to redouble our efforts. This is our big chance. And the status quo is going to throw everything at him they can, desperate to hang onto power.


----

When is Hillary going to give her video response to this offensive stuff:

http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2008/03/hillary-in-da-house.html

Now that is troubling stuff.


This is terribly unfair. Obama should be judged on his own words, not the words of a surrogate, friend or anyone else. This is "guilt by association" pure and simple.

I think the media shouldn't roll over for FoxNews, Rush Limbaugh and other GOP hacks who just want to push attacks and "guilt by association" smears against Democrats. Just because the rightwing really really wants something to be news (think John Kerry's "botched joke") why does the MSM have to always play along?

The GOP-driven foodchain of rightwing spin "news":

GOP, Rove > Rush, blogs > FoxNews > CNN, MSNBC, nets > NYT, WP, newspapers

Wake up, folks!


I definitely agree that there is a huge knee-jerk inquisition going on right now. I would like to amend your maxim a bit, though:

No-one should be held responsible for another person's comments unless they agree with those comments in some manner. Explicitly agreeing is obvious, but this should also encompass the wink-wink nudge-nudge type of "strong condemnation" but then continuing to use the person, their influence etc.

That said, it is also not necessary for anyone to be constantly pestered to vet every single statement that comes out of other mouths.

When is Hillary going to give her video response to this offensive stuff:

http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2008/03/hillary-in-da-house.html

I love that man.

Damn.

I actually think this might end up helping Obama.

Are you on crack?

Are you about to live up to your name ?

Observer2:

Wake up, folks!

Yeppers. Your whole post goes right to the crux.
It is indeed time to wake up: From Dean to Edwards to Gore to Hillary to Kennedy to Kerry to Richardson to Webb.

This is a right wing attack of major proportions that demands united Democratic Party action.

Exactly right. What an eloquent response.

Jeremiah Wright's sermon on "The Audacity To Hope" -- the one that actually did influence Obama -- has been posted on YouTube as well:

Audacity To Hope (part 1)

Audacity To Hope (part 2)

good sermon

Here is something interesting from Edwards campaign, doing their bit

http://www.thebluestate.com/2007/11/video-hillary-c.html

Living from moment to moment. Hillaryous.

Yep, people in middle America will totally accept this.

If they are already Obama supporters.

user-pic

I think 'readytoblowagasket' has a point: us Obama supporters already understand who Obama is and are fine with this because we know Wright's comments are inconsistent with Obama's character. We've read his books and seen how he operates. But for others - especially undecided voters and those who's support for Obama was soft - this kind of thing could push them away.

Obama's response was good, but I think it won't be enough. Obama has strived to not let his campaign be defined by race, but, issues of race and racism are forcing themselves to be heard. Maybe that is as it should be: the issue of race is like the elephant's head in the corner. While the candidates pretend the head isn't there, their supporters and surrogates keep stepping in the puddles of blood. The solution isn't to denounce the bloody footprints, but to do something to clean up the mess.

While it is easy to rise above the fray when surrogates from other campaigns 'step in it', it is a different matter when someone close to Obama does it. Obama must say more than that he disagrees with what his pastor said. At a minimum, Obama must come out and tell people what he stands for in contrast to Wright's inflammatory remarks. Beyond that, Obama has an opportunity to take the issue of race head-on; to use his great mind and oratory skills to elevate the conversation to a higher plane. In the process, he will show who he is and what he stands for and possibly put the issue of race to rest in this campaign, once and for all.

I wrote more on this subject yesterday in my blog titled:
"The Gulf Between Ferraro and Wright; Another Legacy of Racism" (link below)

http://tinyurl.com/2sexzh

user-pic

I don't know if you've noticed.

But most of them are.

I wonder how pissed off the right wing smear machine is going to be when they fail to make a impact on Obama and he only grows stronger.

"Yep, people in middle America will totally accept this."

I think that going into the lion's den on Fox gave him some cred. It was a grilling but he handled it well. People respect the quick and forthright response.

They also heard lots of Jesus stuff. Your Fox viewer digs that sort of thing.

A major effect of this is the 'angry black follower of Jesus' thing starts killing the whole 'he's a Muslim' thing.

It's actually a net plus.

Great to see this posted!

If Obama is doing community organizing in the poor black communities, he has to belong to their Church. Period.

This top Harvard law school graduate could have gone to a safe, pleasant church with upscale members, but he chose to work in the poorest community. Once elected, he kept representing the poorest of the poor, and kept worshiping among them.

I respect him for not taking the easy way out.

This guy has more class and offers more depth of understanding than any politician I've ever seen, and I've been voting since 1972.

I'm guessing that part of the "firestorm" he's referring to has to do with the fear a lot of people feel at the change he represents and expresses. It ain't easy to let go of the past. I'm having trouble with it myself. The last 7 and 1/2 years have made me increasingly angry: between Dubya's unbelievably bad presidency and the lack of will in Congress to oppose him, I don't trust politicians any further than I can throw them.

Having said that, I'd rather take a chance on Obama than settle for anybody else. Can you imaging any other politician you know creating a video like this one?

I just posted this elsewhere on this website: I just looked up the part in Obama's autobiography where he describes hearing the sermon that Wright preached and used the phrase "audacity of hope." The lead up to the antecdote appears on page 293 of the Three Rivers Press edition: "While the boys next to me doodled on their church bulletin, Reverend Wright spoke of Sharpsville and Hiroshima, the callousness of policy makers in the White House and the State House. As the sermon unfolded, though, the stories of strife became more prosaic, the pain more immediate." Though, Obama glosses over them in the passage above, we now have a pretty good idea what Wright's prelude to the audacity of hope would likely have sounded like. Although Obama denies having heard Wright make the kind of inflammatory remarks that have been telecast the last couple of days, the likelihood is that he was present but just didn't focus on them, just like he didn't elaborate on them when he mentions them in "Dreams from My Father." The most generous interpretation we can give Obama's denials is, that while he heard Wright's vitriol, that vitriol was not the part of the sermons that he "listened" to.

Or we could step around your pointed and fact-free conjecture and actually read the sermon that inspired Obama's book title right here.

Inconveniently for your hit piece, the sermom makes no reference to 9/11 or politics at all. And is a quite moving testimony of the spiritual power of hope.

This may help Obama? This has got to be a joke.

I know a lot of people are saying that this is a *good* thing because people will actually now know he is not a Muslim. This is certainly true. However, I can't help but think this is what they call whistling past the graveyard.

You simply cannot take Wright's incredibly awful comments and combine them with Obama refusing to wear his flag pin, Michelle saying she has until recently never been proud of the United States, and the fact that Obama has called him his "mentor" and "moral compass" and not come out a loser in the end.

Wright's comments about 9/11 were made the very next Sunday after 9/11. A reporter in 2003 brought this to Obama's attention, yet Obama continued to attend the chuch. Not only that, but Obama even had the 'audacity' to make the disgusting fool a part of his campaign...and I don't care how 'honorary' the position was. This alone destroys any claim Obama can make to having better judgment than either Clinton or McCain.

And, please, lets not kid ourselves. We all know there is much more to come. There are thousands of hours of footage out there. I'd be willing to bet, not too long from now, we're going to have a clip of Wright saying some incredibly idiotic thing and a cutaway right to Obama's mug, sitting right there in the pews. I, for one, hope this happens before anymore primaries!

If Obama is the nominee or is even on the ticket as VP, the GOP will use this to all its advantage. If anyone saw CNN last night, they saw the deplorable Newt Gingrich deliver an absolutely blistering critique on Obama-Wright. If you saw this, you saw, I think, a fairly accurate pre-view of what is to come. I have no doubt that it will work and bring down the ticket.

Notice how I did not mention or imply in anyway that Hillary Clinton does not come with her own baggage. She certainly does and it is a lot of baggage. However, there is nothing there that will make a huge part of the white electorate recoil in disgust like Obama's preacher and his adoring admiration for the man will do.

I personally find this all very upsetting, to be perfectly honest. I like Obama a lot. I do not think Obama hates America or is in any way an ignorant fool like his pastor. Unfortunately, it doesn't matter what I think. After being involved in and studying politics for the last 15 years, I find I am no longer surprised by the sheer stupidity of the American public.

If Obama is on that ticket, again, the GOP will come at us like the fate of civilization is at stake. They will cut ads with Wright in them and ask the public if the person who called him their "moral compass" and refuses to wear his pin and then they'll play the clip of Michelle Obama,etc. they'll ask the American public if they want them anywhere near the White House. The answer will be a resounding NO.

And all the stupid liberals (yes, I am a liberal) will say, oh, no, whheeee, they're swiftboating us! Nonsense, because this stuff is absolutely fair game. Don't think for a second we wouldn't try to do the exact same thing to McCain-Hagee, although the two are hardly comparable...with Obama-Wright being the much worse situation, for very obvious reasons.

Think about it folks. This is a reality we all must familiarize ourselves with.

Thank you, MKyleM. Thank you very much. Thank you for reminding me why I support Obama.

Why don't we start a "troll alert" for people like MKyleM in TPM ?

user-pic

Every politician is judged by the company they keep and red state America is not going to separate the views of Obama's religious and political advisers. Just think of the last few general elections and how politics and religion have merged.

I too am a liberal and proud of it, but I'm also a realist. I live and work in red counties and I work every day with those on the right, so I hear political comments regularly. This is a very liberal blog but between the blue coasts there are a majority of red states and with our Electoral College system all votes are not equal, those small red states have power.

Posters on this blog should lurk on some of the right wing blogs and get a taste of the other side. The right wing is preparing their big guns and nothing is off the table.

I'm sorry you are choosing who to vote for out of fear of what the GOP will say about the candidate. I am choosing my candidate based on who he is and what he says. The video is a prime example of why he has my vote.

Why wait for the GOP? You're already using it like the "fate of civilization is at stake."

How is Obama-Wright worse?

Wright now has no connection to the campaign, and Obama has done his job distancing himself from the man.

McCain on the other hand still accepts Hagee. If anything, this just makes McCain look worse - if Obama can throw the man he knew for 20 years under the bus, why can't McCain simply refuse the endorsement of a radical fundamentalist?

Obama is still alive, Hillary is still losing.

I realize that some with not take lightly to my phrase "thrown under the bus."

It was not meant as a slam on Obama, but more as my opinion for how far Obama has gone in order to preserve his integrity.

In comparison to McCain - much further indeed.

Thank you, MKyleM. Thank you very much. Thank you for reminding me why I support Obama.

Yeah verily.
I get a kick out of posts like that too.

It is all about fear.
Fear that the right wing slime machine is driving the agenda and will ruin Barack Obama.

Jesus...
Talk about being out of touch.

Let me put this as clearly as possible MKyleMS:

Barack Obama has raised 150 million in one month from grass root supporters. He has over 1 million individual donors. Do you have any fucking idea what that means in terms of the sheer numbers of people who like his message and believe in his candidacy?

Obviously not.
Else... you would cease and desist from the puerile bullshit fear you post with religious fervor.

The game is over.
Our candidate is Barack Obama...
And we are going to kick republican ass in the Fall.

And you and others have got to decide really quick: Are you in, or are you out?

What liberal historian said. Kudos.

user-pic

Wait a minute! Church of Christ? You mean he is not Muslim...

That vid's fabulous.

Thanks for posting that vid, Erick.

Notice how I did not mention or imply in anyway that Hillary Clinton does not come with her own baggage. She certainly does and it is a lot of baggage. However, there is nothing there that will make a huge part of the white electorate recoil in disgust like Obama's preacher and his adoring admiration for the man will do.

So your plea to Obama supporters is to drop him because his pastor said some stupid shit. His PASTOR! Please!

As a Hillary supporter, you're advocacy is reduced to the possible negatives of her opponent, versus the positives of her campaign. That's not a healthy position to be in. It's a plea of fear. Sort of reminds me of the quote of the Big Dog himself, when he said in 2004 (and I paraphrase): "If someone is peddling hope and someone is peddling fear, you better buy from the guy who's peddling hope!" Truer words never passed from the forked tongue of Bill Clinton.

Sure, there are "low information" voters in the midwest that won't vote for Obama in the general election due to Jeremiah Wright's comments, but I think it's also true that they probably wouldn't vote for him anyway, because, um, well, he's "dark". Rather than deal with the last vestiges of race in this country, you'd rather throw to the side of the road the most talented, thoughtful, articulate, inspirational candidate to grace the stage in over 40 years. This is truly the "Audacity of Cynicism".

Hillary is a smart, seasoned politician, but she's Salieri to Obama's Mozart. She is the moon to his sun. Any other election cycle running against any other candidate, I would've supported Hillary. But then I heard Obama's speech shortly after losing New Hampshire. I was mesmerized. I'd never heard any speech like it in my lifetime.

In sum, I will continue to support Obama. He's clearly the best of the lot, and I think the American people will flock to him in droves. Including many "low information" voters who aren't subjected to the nauseating influence of Fox Noise.

Deep doo doo.
SOS as yesterday.
Toast. Make a deal, take VP.

Senator Obama, name all comments that were inflammatory you heard from Reverend Wright and when?

Describe your Church and its beliefs?

There seems to be a bit of Baking Soda in your excuses, Senator. Those REV Wright tapes do not lie. Church members seem to agree with the good REV's anti-US view and the good REV HIV accusations against the government, 911, God Damn America, etc.


Obama has known about the good REV since March 2007:


March 6, 2007
Disinvitation by Obama Is Criticized
By JODI KANTOR

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/06/us/politics/06obama.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print

In addition why the deviation in stories on Rezko as a fundraiser?

The REV Wright's political comments in Church, the N word, his hate speech, this is news to you. The choice to remain in this church after March 2007 was yours and your completely.
Obama: A manufactured image with no philosophy

Why don't you live up to your name and go away ?

Am I raining on your parade?

Wait until more tapes are released on Monday and talk radio has another week to stir it up. The empty suit has much explaining to do in a live press conference.

This is Kool-Aid for the devout. Problem is, voters have many reasons to support Obama. Now, 60% white men are gone, 75% white women are history. That is one mean REV. Senator Obama: Deer in headlights.

Also what is the quantified net worth for rich? Senator Obama ain't rich per the REV? Really?

Senator Obama, glass jaw, not ready for his close-up. Not ready for prime-time.


You come across to me as a racist more than a Republican or Hillary supporter if that's who you're suppose to be. Does it tear you up that White people are supporting a African-American candidate for president?

Marginal Player. Physically incapable. Of writing in complete sentences.

user-pic

The Rezko horse is dead already.... you can stop kicking now.
Obama met with reporters for 90+ minutes for Q&A on this single issue the other day. The final word on Rezko:
http://tinyurl.com/2gncfb

Closing paragraph:
"Less protection, less control, would have meant less hassle for his campaign. That said, Barack Obama now has spoken about his ties to Tony Rezko in uncommon detail. That's a standard for candor by which other presidential candidates facing serious inquiries now can be judged."

Hi There, Mr. Republican,

Can I call you Thug? OK, Thug. Did you go to the various news outlets this morning? What did you see? Some articles on HRC exaggerating her experience? One about the sexist/racist claims of both campaigns? Several about Obama's gain of 14 delegates yesterday? My favorites were graphs of the candidates negative/positive ratings over time. That was cool.

You can scream into the wind, but your words are nothing but air (OK, electrons). They have no substance to back them up. No one with any shred of honor or integrity could believe the swiftboat thing would work. Now we know better and we're ready for you.

Fear works. Meditate on it.

user-pic

Absolutely true! The Republicans love to play the terrorism threat card and it works just like they played the Communism card for so many years in the past. If fear and negative campaigning didn't work then no politician would use those tactics, but they do work.

To quote HL Mencken:

"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."

By the way, this thing is far from over. Obama could win every contest remaining and lose both the popular vote and delegate count. With just one day into the Wright mess, he is already in a free fall in daily tracking polls.

Obama is the one now trying to play the inevitability card. Just as it was with Clinton, it is simply a mirage....or, dare I say, politics as usual.

Lets not feed the troll who sounds like this airhead resident of clownhall


[Sorry, in that last post, I mean that Obama could *lose* every remaining contest.]

So, if you don't tow the Obama line and dare to question his divinity and have your own opinions, then you are a troll.

What are you if you do tow the line? I guess a foot-soldier fighting to usher in a new dawn and era of contention-free politics? Or are you just anti-Bitch? Or maybe you are just a unit.

MKyleM

Sorry, that was not meant for you. I was for the poster above you. I meant to make that clear but hit send before I got that clear. Apologies!

trollus interruptus

Having had some time to let this whole thing marinate, the only people who would let something like this (or McCain/Hagee) influence them are people who weren't going to vote for Obama anyway.

The swing voters are what matter most, IMO. And even they won't be influenced by this kind of bottom-feeding sensationalism.

Like I posted before, its THE ECONOMY STUPID! THAT will trump the rest of this (or Iran/Iraq/Afghanistan) in the G.E.


Thanks, Evainee. However, unfortunately, I've been dismissed as such many times before. I apologize for jumping to conclusions with you and your post, but I'm sure you will understand.

I just have this crazy idea in my head that the more ideas that are thrown into the mixture and the more we slice and dice them all, the more we all benefit in, what should be, our common goal: electing a Dem in 2008. That's all I, for one, care about.

But, perhaps I should slink off back under my bridge....or NOT!

WHO ARE YA KIDDIN’ OBAMA!!!? Trustworthy, Naïve, Poor Instincts – All the qualities of a good Chief Executive?!

All of these are quotes from the Chicago Tribune Story:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/chi-obama-rezkomar15,0,2968927.story

His first big contributor

Asked if he ever thought Rezko would expect something from their relationship, Obama was emphatic: "No.

Obama said voters should view his Rezko dealings as "a mistake in not seeing the potential conflicts of interest." But he added that voters should also "see somebody who is not engaged in any wrongdoing . . . and who they can trust."

Obama said he asked his friend about them. Rezko assured him there was nothing wrong. "My instinct was to believe him," he said.

My Comments:

Either he is sincerely naïve and inexperienced and therefore not qualified to be a good chief executive OR he is just another politician caught trying to triangulate his way out of a mess. Get real. All those years and all that money and he never wanted any thing from you? Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaase!

user-pic

Right, except that the record shows Obama never really did Rezko any real favors either. SO, which candidate would you prefer? The guy who has lobbyists run their businesses on the 'Straight-Talk Express", or maybe the woman who's got more money and lobbyist issues than any other candidate in the campaign?

As I posted above:

The Rezko horse is dead already.... you can stop kicking now.
Obama met with reporters for 90+ minutes for Q&A on this single issue the other day. The final word on Rezko:
http://tinyurl.com/2gncfb

Closing paragraph:
"Less protection, less control, would have meant less hassle for his campaign. That said, Barack Obama now has spoken about his ties to Tony Rezko in uncommon detail. That's a standard for candor by which other presidential candidates facing serious inquiries now can be judged."

WHO ARE YA KIDDIN’ OBAMA!!!? Trustworthy, Naïve, Poor Instincts – All the qualities of a good Chief Executive?!

All of these are quotes from the Chicago Tribune Story:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/chi-obama-rezkomar15,0,2968927.story

His first big contributor

Asked if he ever thought Rezko would expect something from their relationship, Obama was emphatic: "No.

Obama said voters should view his Rezko dealings as "a mistake in not seeing the potential conflicts of interest." But he added that voters should also "see somebody who is not engaged in any wrongdoing . . . and who they can trust."

Obama said he asked his friend about them. Rezko assured him there was nothing wrong. "My instinct was to believe him," he said.

My Comments:

Either he is sincerely naïve and inexperienced and therefore not qualified to be a good chief executive OR he is just another politician caught trying to triangulate his way out of a mess. Get real. All those years and all that money and he never wanted any thing from you? Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaase!

user-pic

Right, except that the record shows Obama never really did Rezko any real favors either. SO, which candidate would you prefer? The guy who has lobbyists run their businesses on the 'Straight-Talk Express", or maybe the woman who's got more money and lobbyist issues than any other candidate in the campaign?

As I posted above:

The Rezko horse is dead already.... you can stop kicking now.
Obama met with reporters for 90+ minutes for Q&A on this single issue the other day. The final word on Rezko:
http://tinyurl.com/2gncfb

Closing paragraph:
"Less protection, less control, would have meant less hassle for his campaign. That said, Barack Obama now has spoken about his ties to Tony Rezko in uncommon detail. That's a standard for candor by which other presidential candidates facing serious inquiries now can be judged."

How many threads are you going to post this in?
What you, Mr Bush and Ms Clinton need to learn is that by saying something enough times will not make it true.

You should also note that the Chicago Tribune is satisfied with Obama's response. They have been after him for 2 YEARS on this story and have been relentless (they are a very conservative newspaper). If the Trib is satisfied, that says a lot. You don't want to get into a discussion about HRC's or McCains campaign contributor past.

The amount of bile being spewed at Obama in the comments sections of the NYT, WP, et all has been really shocking in the past week or so. Are these die-hard Clinton/McCain supporters, or true rank-and-file democrats?

Partly it's the HRC campaign getting a little oxygen- not enough to change anything, but enough to give her supporters renewed hope. Hope is very powerful, something HRC dismisses to her own detriment.

The rest is the wing nut (such as Marginal Player, as opposed to honest republicans) operation ramping up against the nominee. They have no hope, merely a mindless shriek of hatred they believe might bring down destruction on all so they can scavage the corpses.

You Obamabots are simply singing past the graveyard.......smell that...it's toast.....it's Obama toast burning..........yumyum.

You Obamabots are simply singing past the graveyard.......smell that...it's toast.....it's Obama toast burning..........yumyum.

The problem with Obama's video and latest round of lies is that he will convince only the already converted.

Two days ago Obama said that until the uproar over Wright he was totally unaware of the inflammatory and racist comments.
That was proven to be a lie by Wright himself.
Now Obama very very careful tries to walk back his lies telling us that he never "personally" heard exactly those racist rants from the despicable Wright.
Note the wriggle room. Obama is saying that he has known of Wright's inflammatory speech and has heard other equally extreme examples and if he was present when Wright denounced Israel or blamed the Towers' victims for their own deaths well then Obama just wasn't paying close attention.
Further he now demotes Wright, the man he has in the past called friend, mentor, advisor, spiritual guide to "only" his pastor. Obama's own words and history put the lie to that.
This is not spin.
Obama continues to tell such basic lies, such outright distortions of reality, that it must be called the mendacity it is.

So what do we have? What do the facts tell us?
As an ambitious young politician and egged on no doubt by the racial grievance politics of Michele (by the way where did her loud mouth disappear to of a sudden?) Obama joined and worked with the racist Wright, supporting the madman in every way possible.
Fully aware of the despicable and hateful sermons spewed forth by Wright what did Obama do? In almost 20 years did he even once publicly object to the hate being vomited forth from his "Christian" church?
Hell no.
We have seen this ObaSleaze before.
In SC Obama openly embraced and advertised and gave venue to gay baiting "preachers" to gin up the vote in his black campaign and then gave a speech decrying the very attitudes he had helped promote. That speech, which should have warned the nation what a fucking fraud Obama is, was allowed to send down the memory hole Obama's promotion of homophobia.
After all they only hated the fags right?
Now we learn that Obama's "Christianity" hates everyone and everything that isn't black, that it denounces Jews and Israel and praises Palestinian terrorists, that it blames the firemen who died on 9-11 for their own deaths, and like Michele it despises America.
That is Obama's religion. Those are the tenets of his church.

ObaFans think this weak assed lying video is going to erase the truth about Obama and the disgusting racist politics he aligned himself with all these years and that he used to advance his political career.
They are delusional.
If the Democratic party is so stupid as to nominate this lying race baiting sob then they will deserve the damage done to them. Do you think for one moment that a Congressional candidate will not be asked what he thinks of Obama's church and its message? Obama will tar every Dem in every race with ObaRacism and ObaHate.
You think the Right hates HRC? Ha ha ha ha ha!
Obama supports a church and minister that in turn support midEast terrorism. Oh yeah, that will sell well in all those red states Obama "wins".
Have you seen the video going round of Obama and Wright with the "Yes we can HATE!" soundtrack? Will i. am is lost in the dust.
The Republicans don't need to smear Obama just let the world hear Obama praise Wright and Wright's ideas and words.
And Obama will have to explain why, even after he knew of Wright's antiSemitic (as but one example) rants, BHO gave Wright tens of thousands of dollars to promote Wright's racist hateful speech.
Obama helped fund the DVD's and tapes that were made of Wright's venom and then sent out into the world to infect others with their stupidities.
Listen up: Obama knew what was on those tapes, sat through some of those sermons, and then gave money to saturate the atmosphere with that poison. He is ObaToast.

Do even the most gullible ObaFans believe middle America will buy into Obama's lie upon lie?
Would all of you holier than thou "progressives" actually continue to attend a church and give money knowing that the "minister" used his sermons and your money to spread Wright's kind of "Christian" filth?
Well Obama did exactly that.
That is the truth.
Those are the facts.
Obama can't lie and weasel his way out of them.
Obama is one over done self igniting cooked goose.
It is about time the ugly truth oozed out from under his rock.


Cripes, you really have no idea what you're talking about.

Take your trolling elsewhere.

There's nothing like a FAILED Swifboating attempt tp strengthen, immunize and engender sympathy for a candidate. Thanks for the inadvertant help, racist slimeballs.

Oh yeah, for objecting to Obama's racist, Jew baiting. homophobic, hate America first campaigns WE are the racists!
Ha ha ha ha ha!
Tell that to middle America.
Michele can go back to her trash talking career as a political ho and Obama can always get those Trinity Church aholes in Chicago to elect him dog catcher.
Meanwhile all you ObaBots get to fulminate in impotent rage.
Well you were warned.
We told you that Obama had overplayed the race card.
We told you what a fraud your new Best Black Friend is.
But of course his words and those of his mentor and advisor are our fault.
ObaToast all round!

JTHB,

I almost snarkly went through your posts just in this thread to cobble together something that would be internally inconsistant, but that wouldn't have been fair because, unlike MP, I think you're being honest to some set of core values.

I can understand someone wanting an honest person in thier lives, but I think you've gone over the edge here because you've found someone so imperfect that if you pick through everything they've ever said, you think you may be able to pull out various inconsistancies that immediately brand them a liar. Context, growth and meaning are lost on you. Do you hold everyone in your life to this standard?

Only the guy who lies on such a grand scale about their campaign of unity which supposedly transcends racism and antiSemitism and sexism and all the other hatreds of the 21st century while in reality embracing the most vile prejudices of the human nightmare.
And it would be bad enough if Obama really believed the Wright trash; I pray Obama does not. But what is clear is that Obama embraced and supported the very worst of Wright in order to advance his political career.
Like Essau Obama sold his soul for a mess of pottage and wants us to make the same Devil's bargain.
I refuse.

Once we strip away the lies what is Obama left with? Only a mindless reflexive scream of racism thrown at anyone who objects to his duplicity.
Who can sincerely believe in or want for that sort of "change"?

Start at the beginning: Where does Obama (not his advisors or supporters or Obamabots on the comment threads) say his campaign is to transcend racism, anti-semitism and sexism?

Ha ha ha, you think this issue has gone away? The point wasn't Rev. Wright. The point was the naive Obama who spent 20 years as part of his flock. Sure, Rush Limbaugh will say, "oh, he disassociated himself, no more story". Some folks do live "fairy tales". Unfortunately, the Republicans deal in horror films. Hat tip: don't open the door when you hear scratching.

I refuse to live my life in some sort of swamp of fear over what the wing nuts will do. If Jesus Christ were running for president, they'd point out he was a long-haired, pacifist-coward, hippy- freak who said he loved guys.

If Jesus Christ were in a horror film, he'd get a chainsaw. That's why I support Hillary - she'll have a flamethrower ready if she opens the door. Obama followers would say that's too divisive.

You might want to take a tranquilizer to help you deal with all that hate. It's very bad for your cardiovascular system.

Yes I despise racists, sexists, homophobes, and anti Semites even if it is bad for my blood pressure.
And worse I especially despise those who enable them.
I despise them even when their skin is brown or black.
And you can scream racist all you want but that doesn't change the facts about Obama.
But thanks for your heartfelt concern over my well being.

And now, now, we have Donna Brazille who declared "fairy tale" a racist slur saying "Can't we all get along and put these charges of racism behind us?".

Is there no end to the outrageous hypocrisy of the Obama camp?
Do ObabFans really think another round of screaming "racist!" will win over mid America?

Face it. Obama is toast. He may very well win the nomination but it will be an act of mass suicide by the Democratic party.
Again.

Previous comment was addressed to JTHB.

By the way, if Obama really had been deeply influenced politically by Wright, he wouldn't be such a wishy-washy, indistinguishable from Hillary on domestic issues, centrist. And I'd be more positively enthusiastic about his candidacy instead of regarding him as a guy who's personally quite impressive but politically only the less bad (primarily due to foreign policy and to internal Democratic party issues) of the remaining alternatives after Edwards's exit.


http://youtube.com/watch?v=bOOL3BYaIEQ

"Don't let anybody make you think God chose America as his divine messianic force to be a sort of policeman of the whole world. God has a way of standing before the nations with justice and it seems I can hear God saying to America "you are too arrogant, and if you don't change your ways, I will rise up and break the backbone of your power, and I will place it in the hands of a nation that doesn't even know my name. Be still and know that I'm God. Men will beat their swords into plowshafts and their spears into pruning hooks, and nations shall not rise up against nations, neither shall they study war anymore." I don't know about you, I ain't going to study war anymore."

Martin Luther King Jr.
Address to the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (1967-08-16)

user-pic

Perfect fodder for right wing radio, shock jocks on the right will just love this video. John McCain doesn't have to say a word, the far right wing conspiracy will handle everything. To paraphrase, one video is worth a thousand words. In 2006 a You Tube video did in George Allen's Virginia Senate reelection campaign and his 2008 Presidential hopes.

It's naive to believe that centuries of racism will be swept under the carpet and that it won't be an issue in the general election. Prejudice is deep seated and it will be a factor in the privacy of the voting booth. The gender bias will also be played if Hillary wins the nomination.

Pastor not political advisor? This is someone who has been personally and closely involved with Obama and his family for 20 years. He is his spiritual advisor, married him, baptized his kids, lent his thoughts and ideas to Obama. This is likely one of the more important people in Obama's life, definitely more important than a political advisor. It is simply NOT credible that Obama did not know the racially charged and anti-American hate Rev. Wright spewed at the pulpit. This does help explain Michelle Obama's hatrid. Obama was either asleep for 20 years or is blatantly lying.

Can anyone who hates America and lies about his church be president? Is this the candidate that progressives so cultishly want? Is progressive now Anti-American and hate filled? (Granted, many Obama Cult writers are definitely hate filled in comments on TPM and elsewhere, but Obama's religious affiliation and apparent beliefs -- yes, guilt by association -- are very, very damning.)

Again, 20 years as a member of this church won't be undone or disappear because Rev. Wright retired or Obama fires him from the campaign. Especially, as he still retains his ties and -- yes, guilt by association.

Sorry Matt, Still waiting to hear how I'm responsible for everything my priest has ever said (here's a secret- I used birth control even after my priest said I shouldn't)

user-pic

Haven't seen you in a while mattie. What's factually false in this article?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/helping-to-elect-other-de_b_91454.html

That's a huge problem for the dems if your candidate steals the nomination.

"Perfect fodder for right wing radio, shock jocks on the right will just love this video."

So let's live our life according to what Rush thinks?


"It's naive to believe that centuries of racism will be swept under the carpet and that it won't be an issue in the general election. "

I think you are wrong and here's why. The racist/sexist contingent would never have voted for BO, but they were **already counted** in polling that shows both HRC and BO competitive if not ahead with McCain. The racists/sexists/rightwingers are already within McCain's 45% (and Bush's hardcore 29% deadenders). Not a swing vote but who cares.

I think either BO or HRC will beat the GOP this year. It's just a fact. Ohio is bleeding jobs. It's grim. We are in bad shape. Even troops are donating to Dems far more than to the GOP. Obama is leading in donations from the troops!

I say: Dems get a backbone. Nominate who you like, not who Bill O'Reilly likes. If he doesn't like our nominee, so much the better, because if he did it would be a problem. This isn't 2002, it's 2008, and the GOP is toast.


The MSM tone about Wright is fundamentally prejudiced. We have white pundits gets all huffy and scared because a popwerful black preacher is angry at American arrogance and racism. I note that the MSM doesn't invite any black commentators to give THEIR view. It's only the white perspective. (And of course, conveniently, white fire-and-brimstone preachers get a pass -- why? because of the white comfort level) The response to this is totally irrational. Wright is proudly black and indignant about Americas failings. BO aside, I think the MSM is, to borrow a phrase, truly engaging in a "high tech lynching" here.

As an aside, the WaPo columnist Colby King, a black man, said he has heard preachers like Wright many times before. He said it is a way for the black community to vent their frustrations. And he pointed out that the most segregated day of the week is Sunday morning. Apart from him, I haven't seen anyone ask a black person for their perspective on this. Just whites talking about white's feelings.

Confirmed:

June 27, 2007... should have walked out of the sermon. Problems are coming.

We have a confirmed Obama attendance...one of what will be many come tomorrow on talk radio...June 27, 2007.

Newsmax.com:

Presidential candidate Barack Obama preaches on the campaign trail that
America needs a new consensus based on faith and bipartisanship, yet he
continues to attend a controversial Chicago church whose pastor routinely refers
to "white arrogance" and "the United States of White America."
In fact, Obama was in attendance at the church when these statements were made on July 22.

. . . Wright's strong sentiments were echoed in the Sunday morning service attended by NewsMax.

Wright laced into America's establishment, blaming the "white arrogance" of
America's Caucasian majority for the woes of the world, especially the
oppression suffered by blacks. To underscore the point he refers to the country
as the "United States of White America." Many in the congregation, including
Obama, nodded in apparent agreement as these statements were made. [Emphasis added]

The sermon also addressed the Iraq war, a frequent area of Wright's
fulminations. "Young African-American men," Wright thundered, were "dying
for nothing." The "illegal war," he shouted, was "based on Bush's lies" and is
being "fought for oil money."

In a sermon filled with profanity, Wright also blamed the war on "Bush
administration bulls--t."


If one thinks this is over, pass the bong, filled please.

??? I dont think someone saying the War was Illegal and that Bush lied is going to hurt Obama's chances in the GE in fact people seeing the pastor saying stuff like that will prolly help Obama.

NewsMax: Supplying troll talking points since the Clinton era!

NewsMax, providing Right Wing Talking Points for all your insanity needs.

Yes, observer2, I totally agree with you. I think there is a bigger discussion brewing under the surface here and I'd love to see it talked about rationally by people who have first-hand experience.

The media seems to be condemning anyone who attends this kind of church, and I'd wager there are millions of Americans who find this outrageous and offensive.

I find the condemnation of Wright to be misplaced and ignorant. Unfortunately, I am sure there are many voters who have been played like fools...read the one-liners, passed judgment, and left it at that.

I think citizens who venture outside convention and decorum to challenge a flaw they see in their town, school or country...these individuals are the most involved, the most devoted to their cause and the most patriotic. Empty, inert, blindly-accepting patriotism means nothing.
A truly anti-American individual wouldn't bother to try and change things for the better.

The condemnation of Obama by association is just ludicrous. As another poster stated eloquently, Obama should be lauded for taking Wright's coarse passion and desire for a better country and incorporating it into his own honest, enlightened and optimistic vision for our country.

The best among us have been shaped by a broad spectrum of influences.

.
.
Rae wrote:


It's too little too late.


American has now gotten a glimpse into the real Barak Hussein Obama. And it ain't pretty.


We got a peak into their mindset when Michelle Obama stated that "for the first time in [her] life, [she] was proud to be an American." And this was confirmed by her writings in which she stated that U.S. was a "mean" country.


We see now, these views are in perfect alignment with their pastors' views. It wasn't just Michelle's mis-speak.


Obama dis-invited the pastor at his nomination announcement because he knew it would be better to keep him in the background, and not surface. He wanted to keep this dirty little secret hidden. The point is, he knew about it. That is the kind of judgment he has.


He sat in that church for over twenty years, being pumped up with that racist, hatefilled speech for that 20 years - he and his wife. And now he wants to run this blessed country? No. I don't think so.


Even if he can convince enough blacks who willingly buy into that hatred, to continue to vote for him, and enough liberal clueless whites, many of which never lived through the 60s & 70s civil rights struggles, he will never convince regular Americans to put him in our beloved White House to stain it with his hate and Michelle's hate. Hate breeds hate. And that is what we are now seeing.


For the first time in many many years, we are seeing a race war re-ignited: A war that had been won and laid to rest many years ago, thankfully. And it is Obama and his wife Michelle that are fueling that debate with such talk as "for the first time in my life, I'm proud to be an American" talk and "America invented Aids to kill the black man".


Obama, like Bush, campaigned as the "uniter". Maybe from now on, we should run as far away as we can from these self proclaimed "uniters", as it has proven in recent history to be the rhetoric of the Most devisive of all the candidates who we hear proclaiming it. To paraphrase Shakespear, me thinks you proclaimeth too much!


Obama now will no doubt try to turn lemonade into lemons by claiming surprise at this explosive hate and sentiment and the need to heal such feelings and claim he is the one to do that... All the while ignoring the fact that he and his co-parishioners and his pastor, are the ones perpetuating such hate and devisiveness.


But the American people, black and white, are too smart this ploy to work.


If the superdelegates are willing to roll the dice on him and elect him anyway, he will be bloodied and go down in defeat in the general election and the democratic party will once again lose the white house and be ridiculed.


The far leftists, like Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy and John Kerry are about to snatch failure from the jaws of victory yet once again and in an election that was thought to be almost inevitable at one time and which should have been.


It is so disgusting to me and many others, that it will almost be worth seeing Barak Hussein Obama get the nomination to watch the attack machine that is the Republican party, do its job on these stooges. Maybe then, we will get rid of them all once and for all and a stronger and more united democratic party can then emerge in the future.


Rae

You're not here because you'd like to see Hillary Clinton, or any Democrat (unless maybe David Duke got back into the game -- it's not too late!) win back the White House, are you, RaeK.

Baah, baah, little troll, baah, baah!

Ick. Until now I'd classed you with JTHB as someone who was peeved that Obama wasn't as perfect as he should be or an honest HRC supporter who was over the edge with rage she wasn't going to win. Now I think you're .... not.

Cue the scary music and thunder and lightning track. The Repubs are a-scared of Obama!

He's a secret black nationalist Muslim sleaze-machine with ties to al Qaeda and Satan with a Secret Plan to overthrow America when and if a naive population, hypnotized by his rhetorical skills and having consumed oceans of Kool-aid spiked with Hope and Change, votes him into office.

He MUST NOT be trusted. He has, after all, been a member of the same church for 20 years, where he assumed the posture of a passive idiot and sat in a pew ingesting and tacitly agreeing with the torrents of anti-American propaganda issuing forth from his radical, ex-Marine preacher. You just wait for all the tapes to surface of this pastor's anti-American sermons and all the other church members who will testify THAT OBAMA WAS RIGHT THERE TAKING DICTATION! And even though similar anti-American commentary is not present in anything Obama has ever said, written, or supported, HE WAS THERE AND THAT'S WHAT THIS IS REALLY ABOUT! I predict World Net Daily is ALREADY beginning its thorough AND LEGITIMATE investigation.

And then there is this SLEAZY Rezko character. A developer of low-income housing projects (WINK, WINK - always a first sign of a money-rapacious mercenary), who Obama KNEW FOR 17 YEARS. It doesn't matter that Obama has never been charged with anything - in spite of the Chicago press devoting reams of paper investigating every tedious nuance of their relationship and still coming up with nothing. THIS ISN'T ABOUT FACTS, FOLKS! This is ABOUT HIS CHARACTER! That's right. The candidate of hope and change has been revealed! NEWSMAX IS ON IT - already interviewing people who know people who know people who know people who live in or near Illinois!

AND DON'T YOU TRY TO CALL ME A RACIST, like all you Obamabots are programmed to do whenever you're faced with our half-truths, phony arguments, and excitable!, sky-is-falling rhetoric! We're onto you people and your boring facts! We've got a candidate to smear and we're not going to let you and your new politics get in the way! No way! And just to prove it, I AM LEAVING MY CAPS LOCK KEY ON UNTIL NOVEMBER!

TAKE THAT!

YOu Obama-mites better pray, he just found out about Wright's statements "recently" as he claims.


Rae

user-pic

I'd rather bleat. Baaaaahhhhhhh!

I live in Indiana (one of the reddest states in the union) and went to the Obama town hall yesterday in Plainfield.

There were 2,000 tickets available to the public and they were gone in within 30 minutes.

I showed up anyway (without a ticket) and was put into an "Overflow" room with about 200 other people. The school finally opened up an additional balcony so everyone got a chance to get in. The AP reported today that 3,200 were in attendance. It is my assumption that voters don't care about what surrogates say..preachers, finance managers..etc. They care more about their jobs, economy, and the war. Obama did a fantastic job yesterday by answering those questions to voters.

One wonders what kind of splicing Republicans might do with those videos come election time...to make it seem as if Obama was at certain speeches...

In the general election, if Americans use the Pastor Wright issue to move from Obama to McCain - they are just LOOKING for a reason. To have been a previous Obama supporter, especially because of his good judgment on the Iraq issue, how can you in good conscience move to McCain? McCain is the ANTI-Obama, so if you make the switch that easily - you WANTED to.

Can you really have been an Obama supporter, and then switch to the candidate who believes in a pointless war that has killed 4,000 of our citizens - who will stay for 100 years if 'necessary' - and who jokes about bombing Iran? You will do that simply because of who Obama's pastor was? NO. If you make that switch in the general election, it has to be because you were never serious about Obama to begin with. You'd be looking for a cheap, ridiculous reason to support war supporter McCain - who wants to do nothing but be a continuation of the Bush administration.


~

JTHB-

"(Michele Obama) is a trash-talking political ho."

Thanks for contributing to the sophisticated political discourse here.

Earnest-

Bingo!

One thing I think needs to be pointed out...

There are no portions of past speeches by Obama, or of his writings, that reflects the same message and tone as these preacher's cherry-picked rants.

None.

user-pic

Though I haven't analyzed his speeches I'd agree that there like is not the same message. However very few of Joe and Jane PUblic are going to read Obama's writings and will draw their conclusions from what they saw or were told was posted on Youtube.

Call it guilt by association but Obama and his wife attended that Church for many, many years. People will ask why he and his wife didn't attend another church where they agreed with the pastor's sermons, people do change churches.


To Obama fans here at TPM.

Shouldn't we just ignore HRC / Repug trolls like MaeK, JTHB, marginal player, readytoblowgasket, et.al and move on to positive territory ? BHO has.

To Patriotic Americans here, who love their country and are proud to be Americans, shouldn't we just send a signal to all people, dem and repug alike, that we reject the views of Obama and his church by rejecting Obama?

It takes very few trolls to spoil an internet forum, and it's not realistic to ignore them because a boycott is only as strong as its weakest noob.

Ultimately, the only solution for dealing with highly motivated trolls is moderation. If the TPM people can't handle that, discourse will move elsewhere.

To Obama fans here at TPM.

Shouldn't we just ignore HRC / Repug trolls like MaeK, JTHB, marginal player, readytoblowgasket, et.al and move on to positive territory ? BHO has.

Newsmax? Newsmax?! The best you can come up with to bolster your specious and empty arguments is a notorious right-wing megaphone? What's next, World Net Daily? Or maybe you can quote directly from the Great Oracle himself, Rush Limbaugh.

The marriage of convenience between Klinton Kooks and lunatic right-wing fringe says everything we need to know about these anti-Obama trolls. The circle was officially closed when their official deity, the newly repellent Bill Clinton, appeared on the Limbaugh show himself.

Folks, let them troll on. This crew is as close to genuine Democrats as Pat Buchanan. Oy, what Hillary hath wrought.

O has to share some of Wright's extremism or he would not have sat in those pews for twenty plus years listenting to a man as anti-semitic as any Nazi.

In 1984, long before his daughters were born, O knew Wright had been to Tripoli with his friend, another antisemite, Farrakhan. Wright and Farrakhan visited Moammar Kadafi.

Kadafi. This is serious stuff.

If Hillary's minister of 20 years were anti American, antisemitic, her career would be over!
Obama supporters would be all over her with criticism; Mathews and Russert would be gleeful in their unloading upon Hillary as they made sure to end her career in politics.

If you support O, you're an ostrich.
McCain will come along and knock your legs out when you're not looking.

user-pic

Myra, Thanks for your news from Indiana! I was looking for some news about that speech and didn't come across anything while browsing the news. I'm so glad to hear that Obama was well received!

All the "concern trolls for Hillary" are out in force.

Well, if Obama had raped a woman like Bill Clinton did, I can't imagine the GOP wouldn't use that either. Juanita Brodderik anyone? LOL

"The marriage of convenience between Klinton Kooks and lunatic right-wing fringe says everything we need to know about these anti-Obama trolls. The circle was officially closed when their official deity, the newly repellent Bill Clinton, appeared on the Limbaugh show himself."

HRC is turning into George Wallace. To hell with them.


---------

Wright is not a racist. I think some white racists are attacking him just because he is angry about racism in America. Unfortunately, some of the comments here seem to show that Wright is probably right.

It seems like we have lots of white people who are afraid of Wright's angry castigation of an arrogant, warmongering and racistly unfair America.

I love my country, but not blindly. I agree -- instead of wagging your finger at Wright, you should perhaps point it right in the mirror. How have YOU treated minorities, the poor, the suffering?


http://youtube.com/watch?v=bOOL3BYaIEQ

"Don't let anybody make you think God chose America as his divine messianic force to be a sort of policeman of the whole world. God has a way of standing before the nations with justice and it seems I can hear God saying to America "you are too arrogant, and if you don't change your ways, I will rise up and break the backbone of your power, and I will place it in the hands of a nation that doesn't even know my name. Be still and know that I'm God. Men will beat their swords into plowshafts and their spears into pruning hooks, and nations shall not rise up against nations, neither shall they study war anymore." I don't know about you, I ain't going to study war anymore."

Martin Luther King Jr.
Address to the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (1967-08-16)

My oh my, all the rednecks are out in force. Sadly, it is getting hard to tell the Klinton Kooks from the regular GOP racist trolls.

Wright is not a racist. I think some white racists are attacking him just because he is angry about racism in America. Unfortunately, some of the comments here seem to show that Wright is probably right.

It seems like we have lots of white people who are afraid of Wright's angry castigation of an arrogant, warmongering and racistly unfair America.

I love my country, but not blindly. I agree -- instead of wagging your finger at Wright, you should perhaps point it right in the mirror. How have YOU treated minorities, the poor, the suffering?


-----
The black church has had a long history of speaking out against American hubris:


"Don't let anybody make you think God chose America as his divine messianic force to be a sort of policeman of the whole world. God has a way of standing before the nations with justice and it seems I can hear God saying to America "you are too arrogant, and if you don't change your ways, I will rise up and break the backbone of your power, and I will place it in the hands of a nation that doesn't even know my name. Be still and know that I'm God. Men will beat their swords into plowshafts and their spears into pruning hooks, and nations shall not rise up against nations, neither shall they study war anymore." I don't know about you, I ain't going to study war anymore."

Martin Luther King Jr.
Address to the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (1967-08-16)


-------

Even John McCain defends Obama on this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3-WQ1vX3PE

. I hadn’t heard what all the uproar was about (we don’t watch TV and I had been focusing on the economic news) and had seen an article in the NYT and so went off trying to find out what was going on. I found endless videos of Wright, and the ‘gee whiz, I made a poor judgment about Rezko’ interview in the Chicago Trib. And this is very very bad folks. Wright alone is devastating.

Now we are highly educated Quakers (the group reknown for tolerance and understanding.) We watched a huge number of the tapes – and sat here in stunned disbelief at the hatred, vitriol and conspiracy theories that poured out of Obama’s 20 year friend/pastor/”major influence”/source of his book title and campaign theme/moral and spiritual guide/counselor. It was clearly a radical black ‘blame whitey’ church. When Wright said that Clinton had not been subject to prejudice or that her ‘people’ had not been considered non-persons, that was it for me with respect to Obama. Women were ‘non-persons’ for far longer than black men, In the 1850’s free black men could own property – women could not. Black men got the vote before any women ever did. White women may not be called ‘nigger’, but they are still routinely called ‘bitch’ and ‘cunt.’ When Wright said Obama is not white, all I could think is ‘what does that say about Obama’s view of his white mother and her family that he would associate with someone who would literally say they do not exist.’ Race and racial attitudes are now a major issue and factor in the outcome - and it has been put there squarely by Obama's 20 year ties to Wright and a 'hate whitey' church.


Yet Obama has been deeply deeply involved with this man for 20 years, claims that the Wright brought him to Christianity through his preaching, and relies upon his moral counsel. Since one’s religious views and world views are inseparable, there is no way that Wright could have preached a gentle loving, inclusive Christianity and preached hatred, blame and divisiveness on social matters and public policy. Obama’s denials of any knowledge about Wright’s views rings patently false.

(BTW, this is nothing new for Wright. We are from Chicago and he has been spewing this line for decades. You would have had to be deaf dumb and blind not to have know what he preached if you lived in the Chicago area. He was the Christian version of Farrahkan and anyone who paid the slightest attention to the Chicago-area news knew it.)

As far as political analysis goes, I was a Congressional aide and ran political campaigns when I was younger. My first political involvement was at the age of 16 taking campaign literature door-to-door for McGovern and I have never voted for a Republican in my life. Here is my analysis of the political fall-out.

You can’t spin the tapes of Wright. The typical voter is Caucasian, 40ish or older, has an income under $85,000 (bottom 75% of households) and/or does not have a college degree (72% of the voters), lives in a community just like them, and thinks the US was innocent in the events leading up to 9/11 and that the terrorists are going to come and blow up the playground in their town. No one can spin those tapes now enough to persuade average Aunt Tilly and Uncle Jake who just got home from the Lutheran Church in their suburban/small town and who get their political news from TV. Never underestimate how very shallow is the pool of information upon which the vast majority of voters base their decision.

These voters will see the tapes with ‘God damn America’, ‘whites invented AIDS to kill blacks, ‘the US is evil and causes genocide’, and ‘hate whitey’ rants – and they will be horrified. They have spent their lifetimes being told it is wrong to judge people on their color (and that saying such things can get them sued or fired from their jobs) – and they see the tapes of Barack Obama’s 20 year minister - his close friend, ‘major influence upon him’, ‘moral and spiritual guide’ and the pastor of the church he choose because of the pastor - ranting that ‘whites are to blame’ for everything and created an evil world; and you have lost them as voters.

They hear Obama do the ‘gee golly whiz, I didn’t know he said this kind of thing even though I have been very close to him for 20 years and have attended his church for 20 years’ and they look at the tapes and see the congregation whooping it up in response and conclude that Wright’s statements must be normal to them. They conclude Obama is lying through his teeth (or too stupid to be dogcatcher if he could sit there in that church for 20 years and not notice what was being said.) They will hear Obama say ‘trust me – I’m for inclusiveness and not being divisive” – and they see the tapes of his chosen minister and church preaching divisiveness, racial anger, blame and hatred; and think ‘actions speak louder than words.’ Obama has no credibility on his claim that he didn’t know what his minister and church preached and believed – non, zero, zip, nada.

Now you have to explain away Wright to all these voters who make decisions based upon news clips and soundbites. Good luck.

You can’t reach all these voters and try to do the explanation of why a 60ish year old black man spews such hate and venom at them based upon their race. All these posts trying to explain it, justify it and rationalize it are too much and too long for the typical voter. They are not going to read them, they are not going to believe them as an excuse. They make decisions based upon soundbites and images.

Even if you could get them to listen to the rationale of ‘well, the guy grew up under Jim Crow, they are going to respond ‘that was 40 years ago – get over it and besides, I had nothing to do with it and I’m sick and tired of hearing about it.’

Even if you could get them to listen to and consider that the US’s Israel policy is irrational and unfair, you are not going to persuade them because of the way Wright expressed such a view. He alienated them.

Even if you could get them to listen to why Wright says that the US policies led to 9/11, you most definitely are not going to persuade them because the average voter clings to the myth that the US is on the side of truth, justice and right – and is always the ‘good guys.’

And you will never persuade them that the ‘whites created AIDS to kill blacks’ is merely a misunderstanding of a scientific theory that was rapidly discredited and not just wacky looney ravings of a racist (with whom Obama has been, for 20 years, and still is, intimately connected.)

It doesn’t matter that Clinton and McCain have taken the ‘hands off, we won’t use it’ approach. Why should they? With this stuff coming out, Obama is self-destructing. The Swift-boat type groups haven’t said they will keep hands-off. They will use it – use it hard. A reprimand and disavowal by McCain won’t matter squat. It will be out there. A 30 or 60 second commercial funded by the Swift-boat type groups will sink Obama so far down in the general election that he will make the Herbert Hoover’s electoral returns look good. And for those who don’t know what that means, Hoover got 59 electoral votes from Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Vermont. In this case, you would have to deduct Pennsylvania.

I am finding it hard to comprehend that the Democrats managed to turn a shoo-in election into a near certain lose by narrowing it down to the 2 worst possible candidates that have been seen in decades. One is has negatives over 51% - and those haven’t budged in months – complicated by misogyny and too many vicious old political battles.. The other has no real experience beyond a part-time state legislature, does the ‘trust me/visionary’ thing and turns out to have close personal ties to a racist ‘hate whitey, blame whitey’ church which he denies knowing about throughout a 20 year association. The Democrats have turned a sure thing into a potential debacle in their desire to be politically correct and progressive by supporting either a woman or a man who is half black/half white without really seriously considering the background of either (and actually digging into to their backgrounds rather than merely accepting facile self-serving assertions by the candidate) and how it will play with the voters at large. The point was to WIN the 2008 election, not to make history by running a candidate who may make history because of their race or gender but will end up losing because of underlying inadequacies. Sheesssshhhh! Thanks a lot people. Looks like you are going to land us with McCain!


The haters today are very long-winded. This Wright thing has been a get-out-of-jail-free card for a whole lot of crazies.

Ann, sorry your candidate is no longer in the race, but rather than help tear down Hillary and Obama, maybe you should come to their defense, unless you really believe Obama is a racist.

The GIFT that will not end:
Tapper (He's part of the Obama team, isn't he?), ABC.COM
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/03/obamas-church-b.html

Obama Church Claims Character Assassination, Rips Media

“AN ATTACK ON OUR SENIOR PASTOR AND THE HISTORY OF THE AFRICAN AMERICAN CHURCH”:

"...

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. preached the Christian tenet, “love thy neighbor as thyself.” Before Dr. King was murdered on April 4, 1968, he preached, “The 11 o’clock hour is the most segregated hour in America.” Forty years later, the African American Church community continues to face bomb threats, death threats, and their ministers’ characters are assassinated because they teach and preach prophetic social concerns for social justice. Sunday is still the most segregated hour in America."

Obama: Not ready for prime time.

Today in WaPo, no less a conspiracy theorist and radical left-winger than Alan Greenspan is quoted as saying that the Iraq war was engaged to a large extent because of oil. I'd like to see the administration wiggle its way out of that one.

Typically OBama loon.

Anyone who criticizes the deity is a "hater" or "racist"

Yep - you are really going to persuade Aunt Tilly and Uncle Jake who don't pay attention until the last couple weeks of an election with that gatbage.

It is called An Electability Problem.

It is called a HUGE Electability Problem.

Try to grasp that fact.

Try to grasp that recognizing that something will create problem with voters does not mean that one agrees with the voters viewpoint.

It is called "Dealing In Reality"

Another useful concept for the 'keyboard-only strategists."

Um, yeah Ann. You come in here, type a pages long screed telling us how totally educated and unbiased you are, then call people Obamaloons. I'll completely ignore you from here on out.

Why can't we get people who aren't pro-Obama and can still be even a little bit civil in their disagreement.?

Stuck a nerve, eh, AnnScott?

There's no electability problem. Only you and your fellow haters trying really, really, really hard to find some anti-Obama screed that you believe in your infinite wisdom will really, finally make a difference (heads up: you're all talking to yourselves) to some amorphous, undefined class of voters into whom only you and your brethren have any insights.

But, hey, have fun with your game of pretend. At the very least, you have each other.

I deal in political realities in pedicting voter behavior - have done for years and even got paid for it.

Sitting at a keyboard blogging only with those who do the same thing and reinforcing each others views is so insular. Go out and talk to Aunt Tilly and Uncle Jake who don't join in the online club and are the majority of voters.

If you don't deal with the realities - pro and con of a candidate - you are in a fantasy land.

For me personally, I have had over 30 years of holding my nose and voting for the weak candidates of the Democrats - and that includes Bill Clinton who was politically somewhere to the right of Nixon and Eisenhower on economics. The Dems haven't had a true viable progressive candidate since FDR died.

This time I may say enough is enough and stay home. I'm out of anti-nausea medication.

Ann, my parents are dead end Bushies. They voted for Obama because they hate HRC and McCain, but they think Obama is such a nice young man. They were joined by many of their friends.

Aunt Tilly and Uncle Jake were over at the house today, as a matter of fact. Both Obama supporters already.

Together we tried to reason our way through your tortured casuistry to uncover exactly what it is that has you so clearly and apoplectically vexed about Reverend Wright. All we could come up with is that you are an anti-Obama opportunist eagerly exploiting the out-of-context comments of his beleaguered pastor to score cheap and easy political points and advantage either Hillary Clinton or John McCain.

Tilly, Jake, and I all agree that you need some rest.

Oh no! A Daily Kos post just brought another dangerous, angry radical preacher to my attention! Guy by the name of Jesus! I would never vote for anybody who follows that guy! Just listen to him (Luke 6:24-26 as translated in the Scholars Bible):

Damn you rich! You already have your compensation.

Damn you who are well-fed! You will know hunger.

Damn you who laugh now! You will weep and grieve.

Damn you when everybody speaks well of you!

Anybody influenced by this dangerous man is clearly unfit to be President!

link

When Clinton claimed Obama hadn't been vetted yet, I wonder if a little birdy whispered in her ear...

MLK: "America, you are too arrogant"

http://youtube.com/watch?v=bOOL3BYaIEQ

"Don't let anybody make you think God chose America as his divine messianic force to be a sort of policeman of the whole world. God has a way of standing before the nations with justice and it seems I can hear God saying to America "you are too arrogant, and if you don't change your ways, I will rise up and break the backbone of your power, and I will place it in the hands of a nation that doesn't even know my name. Be still and know that I'm God. Men will beat their swords into plowshafts and their spears into pruning hooks, and nations shall not rise up against nations, neither shall they study war anymore." I don't know about you, I ain't going to study war anymore."

Martin Luther King Jr.
Address to the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (1967-08-16)

Many of the mega-churches that have some of the folks we need to cross over don't preach what Jesus taught, they teach "prosperity".

They are also the most flag-waving and likely have many voters who will recoil at Wright's sermons. Now, the question is, would they have ever seriously considered Clinton or Obama anyway?

Yesterday's Politico's story on how this story mushroomed. Excellent read.


Thank Sean Hannity (a big truly Hillary fan), Brain Ross (not Obama kiss-up Tapper), Bill-O, FOX, John McCain, WSJ and now the Good Rev's Church. No thanks to MSNBC or CNN. In fact, Cooper complained on air about even doing a story.

Hopefully Bill Clinton when he goes on Fox (tomorrow?) will suggest Obama come clean on what BO knew when BO knew it with regard to the Reverend's statements. Bill already said today no need for discussion until the voters have voted.

Lets not feed the rage spewing trolls.


Check this out---

Pastor Jeremiah Wright (a name that belongs in the pages of Elizabeth Gaskell novels...IMHO...) pealed jeremiads upon his congregation. OMG! What will we tell the children?! Fellow TPM’rs lets just bypass this fake wingnut shock and awe and horror over a non-shocking event.

Yes, he said many things over a period of 20 years of preaching, some unusual, some crazy and many good – just like many pastors and religious people say and have said from pulpits across this country. It is an old tradition and not unusual at all. What’s silly is the way ABC and Faux News made a mockery of Wright’s life by diminishing him and his pastorship of 20 years to three minutes of incendiary soundbites sans context and then viralling it to the rest of the cloddish MSM.

I’m not Christian. Yet, when I heard Pastor Wright’s jeremiads, particularly that bit leading up to "God damned America" I heard the echoes of the Rev. Jonathan Edwards’ sermon "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God"

So all this crying and gnashing of teeth and flinging of poo, shock and rage because this Presidiantial candidate's not perfect is over the top. Let’s just come off that ledge and have a civil conversation.

See y'all on another thread 'cause I'm outahere. This topic is already going cold in spite of Faux's continous flogging of it. For people who don't want to vote for this candidate - well, this is the USA and they don't have to.

http://blog.beliefnet.com/jwalking/

Above is a link to David Kuo blog Beliefnet.
He offers some very good insight - and praise - for Sen. Obama's ability to separate the "sin" from the "sinner"

Anyone who bothers to research Sen. Obama's writings, read any of his books understands that when he went to Chicago as a community organizer at 27 years of age - not a as a child -- he was advised to join the Church to understand the plight of the black man. That this would help him do a better job in the community.

Obama came to Chicago with a black face but as a white man.

The multiple culture and as Obama says "little bits of America" in him are what makes him truly unique. He stayed at the Church for the good works they did for the community. This is not in dispute.

That over the course of 20 years Rev Wright said some deplorable things is also not in dispute.

What is most upsetting about this whole episode is that if thinking people are willing to abandon a cause and a movement based on a few minutes of targeted, isolated video - how commited were they in the first place?

Obama is the same man he was before FOX and co started incessantly replaying the same clips over and over again.

Was what Wright said about 9/11 vile? Yes but I hate to tell you what my Rabbi said at the service after 9/11 and am glad for his sake no one videotaped it

Obama is to be commended not derided for being able to separate the messenger from the message --
Maybe if we had people in government who could do this we would not be having the fifth anniversary of a pointless war this week

If we allow ourselves to be manipulated by YOU TUBE then shame on us all

We all know this and appreciate it. But this is not what the bile-spillers on this post are interested in. It's all anti-Obama hate, all the time - a merry-go-round on which they spin and spin and spin. Don't waste time arguing. If it weren't Wright it would be something else.


AnnScott, very good posts. About time to see some serious writing here that is not hate from the Obama Cult.

That's rich coming from you Matt.

I always try to respond politely to reasoned Hillary supporters...

But only a handful exist.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address