Looks like Ickes shot his wad a little early with his comments. Hate when that happens.

Is this the plans that include that democrats and independents who voted in the republican election because they thought their votes would not matter, can not vote in the new primary.

I've read that 35% of the votes in the Republican where these switchover votes.

Seeing as Hillary only received 55% of the vote with only her name on the ballot, it is possible Obama really 'won', and they're trying to count these people out?

the Clinton campaign’s views on voting are dependent on their own political interest.

Yep. Oh, and did the Clintons ever follow up on those horribly unfair at large caucuses in Nevada where Bill saw cheating and intimidation with his very own eyes? I suppose since she won that one, it was fair after all...

Florida is a no go according to the state party.

Cool, now as Hillary falls further and further behind, we can all look forward to this thing dragging out until at least June.

This re-vote is all she needs to stay in it, despite her winning the nomination being a mathematical impossibility.

I just got this in the mail today from the Yellow Dog (ie Texas) Dems. It reeks of passive aggression...

Below is a statement by Texas Democratic Chairman Boyd Richie regarding the Delegate Selection Process:

The Texas Democratic Party and local Democratic Party organizations around our state are working to turn the enormous opportunity created by the record Democratic turnout experienced on March 4th into a positive outcome for Texas Democrats this fall and in 2010. We are proud of both our Presidential candidates who helped create that turnout. We ask now that the campaigns work with us rather than become an impediment to this extraordinary opportunity to build our party.

On March 4th, our Democratic precinct conventions experienced record turnout of roughly one million precinct convention attendees, a ten-fold increase from the previous high attendance mark. As expected in any record turnout involving hundreds of thousands of people, there were reports of problems caused by long lines and crowded facilities. These problems are not unique to Texas. Similar problems, in proportionately similar numbers, occurred in pure caucus states like Iowa and Nevada.

The overwhelming majority of problems reported in Texas do not affect the legitimacy of delegate allocation. It is important to remember that the precinct conventions are just the first of three steps where delegates and alternates are selected. "Final results" will not be determined until June 6-7 at the Texas Democratic State convention. And at each convention step, Texas Democratic Party rules provide a credentials process to address problems and provide an avenue to register complaints and make formal challenges

For that reason, the Texas Democratic Party will not do as suggested by one campaign and circumvent Party rules to set up an unnecessary, ad hoc "verification" process that could effectively disqualify delegates selected at their precinct conventions after the fact. The Party has never stated any intention to set up a verification process of this nature because Party rules already provide for "verification" through our credentials process. Candidates who wish to disqualify delegates must pursue formal challenges based on evidence filed appropriately in accordance with our party's rules.

The Texas Democratic Party plans to conduct our district and county conventions on March 29 and our June State Convention in accordance with procedures set forth in Texas law and party rules. Both campaigns have the opportunity and responsibility to do their jobs by documenting evidence, filing challenges if warranted, and turning out their delegates in a system that rewards such an effort when final delegate results are determined at the State Convention in June.