« Asked Whether Advisers Are Pushing Wright Story, Hillary Demurs | Home | Breaking: Bill Richardson Endorses Obama »
Edwards Didn't Endorse Anyone On Leno Tonight, NBC Flack Confirms
John Edwards just finished up taping his appearance on Jay Leno tonight -- it hasn't aired yet. The fact that he was appearing on the show prompted many to wonder whether he would use the appearance to endorse Hillary or Obama.
The answer: Nope. He didn't endorse either, according to Leno's publicist, Tracy St. Pierre, who emails me this:
No news...it was a catching up interview, but he didn't throw his support either way.
So no Edwards endorsement for now.
Advertisement















Did any one really expect that is how he would have announced an endorsement, instead of appearing witht candidate at a press conference. How naive are people becoming.
March 20, 2008 9:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Foregt Edwards (for now). Bill Richardson endorses BHO. Will appear on Friday in Oregon with BHO.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Obama-Richardson.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
March 21, 2008 3:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Guess what.
As a Kos diarist, I think I share the opinion of many there when I say that the two biggest surprise pleasures of the primary season have been the TPM comment section and Al Giordano's blog, The Field.
Sage commenters (like Fly on the Wall) and posters like idiotic (who gets invoked like a deity when he/she is not around), plus a general spirit of fair play make these threads more fun to read than many Kos comment threads. Is it the avatars? Dunno.
As for Giordano: check this post, today.
http://ruralvotes.com/thefield/?p=917
Al has seemed destined to be added to Kos' blogroll. Kos has quoted Al Giordano in several stories recently.
So it's a pretty big deal to find out that Giordano was mentored by Abbie Hoffmann. It's an even bigger deal to see that on the day when Al is able to get a "Colbert bump" (via a diary by Markos), Al decides to publish what must be considered the ultimate answer to the Clinton kitchen sink strategy.
Has Al gone too far?
March 20, 2008 9:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for that, Obambam. Some great discussion there, too. Love this suggested ad:
Opening: Photo montage of explosions and carnage in Iraq. Dissolve to exterior shot of Capitol Building, then camera pans along Senate office hallway, stopping at door with brass nameplate: Senator Hillary R. Clinton. Title overlay with dateline: "Washington, D.C., 2002." Inside, an aide knocks on door of senator's inner office, then opens it a crack.
"Senator, Bob Graham called to remind you to make sure you read that National Intelligence Estimate report on Iraq, the one he says shows Bush is hyping all that stuff about Saddam and the weapons of mass destruction."
http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0812,hillary_attack,381225,4.html
March 20, 2008 10:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ad continued:
Clinton's voice, heard from within: "Oh gosh, I forgot. Can't we have someone go down and take a look for me? Take some notes? I'm swamped."
The aide, leaning inside the door, addressing an unseen Clinton: "Oh, I wish we could but, y'know, it's classified. Senators only."
Clinton's voice: "Well, for gosh sakes. I can't just drop everything. Besides, he said it's 90 pages long. It'll take me hours."
Aide: "OK, no sweat. Just wanted to let you know he'd called."
Cut to clip of Clinton speaking at the January 30 debate in Los Angeles: "Certainly I did an enormous amount of investigation and due diligence to try to determine what, if any, threat could flow from the history of Saddam Hussein being both an owner of, and a seeker of, weapons of mass destruction."
Voiceover: "Due diligence? Senator Bob Graham was so disturbed after reading the classified intelligence report that he decided to vote 'No' on the Iraq war. Clinton never read the report. And she voted for the war."
Fade to shot of Senator Obama, seated in Kennedy-esque rocking chair, reading late at night in a pool of golden lamplight. A pile of big heavy books is beside him.
Closing title: "Obama: He's diligent. And he loves to read."
March 20, 2008 11:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ad continued:
Clinton's voice, heard from within: "Oh gosh, I forgot. Can't we have someone go down and take a look for me? Take some notes? I'm swamped."
The aide, leaning inside the door, addressing an unseen Clinton: "Oh, I wish we could but, y'know, it's classified. Senators only."
Clinton's voice: "Well, for gosh sakes. I can't just drop everything. Besides, he said it's 90 pages long. It'll take me hours."
Aide: "OK, no sweat. Just wanted to let you know he'd called."
Cut to clip of Clinton speaking at the January 30 debate in Los Angeles: "Certainly I did an enormous amount of investigation and due diligence to try to determine what, if any, threat could flow from the history of Saddam Hussein being both an owner of, and a seeker of, weapons of mass destruction."
Voiceover: "Due diligence? Senator Bob Graham was so disturbed after reading the classified intelligence report that he decided to vote 'No' on the Iraq war. Clinton never read the report. And she voted for the war."
Fade to shot of Senator Obama, seated in Kennedy-esque rocking chair, reading late at night in a pool of golden lamplight. A pile of big heavy books is beside him.
Closing title: "Obama: He's diligent. And he loves to read."
March 20, 2008 11:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great link! thanks!
March 21, 2008 1:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obamban,
I'm with Al. As one of Obama's mentors once said, "you can't put new wine into old wineskins."
March 21, 2008 3:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for those links. Good stuff! I hadn't looked at Wonkette for a while and I'm glad I did. Very funny in their typical Onionesque stinging way: http://wonkette.com/370498/obamas-crazy-preacher-actually-bill-clintons-beloved-preacher
March 21, 2008 4:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
I do not think we'll see Edwards endorsing anyone in the primary. Especially not Obama now as his is reeling from being outed as a racist and anti-American candidate. Plus, can you imagine Edwards endorsing someone dumping on their grandmother as a 'typical white person'. First, to trash their own grandmother, but to also share a blatantly racist stereotype on them and all White people. I'm waiting for a serious explanation from Obama on his comment today...
March 20, 2008 9:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know, I see what you're doing there, but it's a bit too wordy. You should really try following idiotic's example. When you're going for funny, keep it short.
Just an idea.
March 20, 2008 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Matthew, you're becoming an unthinking crank. I do not think even you believe in your heart that Obama is anti-American. Please, next time, check with your own conscience before you post.
March 20, 2008 10:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
On what occasion has Obama EVER uttered the phrase "typical white person"? Links, please.
One of the reasons Obama appeals to so many, including me, is that he doesn't lump groups of people together as "typical." He recognizes that people are individuals, and don't all think or act or vote like sheep. I defy you to find any instance where he has EVER referred to a person or group as a "typical (fill in the blank) person."
March 20, 2008 11:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
610 WIP host Angelo Cataldi asked Obama about his Tuesday morning speech on race at the National Constitution Center in which he referenced his own white grandmother and her prejudice. Obama told Cataldi that "The point I was making was not that my grandmother harbors any racial animosity, but that she is a TYPICAL WHITE PERSON. If she sees somebody on the street that she doesn't know (pause) there's a reaction in her that doesn't go away and it comes out in the wrong way."
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDg1MTk0YjQ2YjI1ZDBhNDYzMTA4Y2NhMDA4ZWRlOWU=
March 21, 2008 3:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lol. Not only have you jumped the shark, you're making love to it on a daily basis. Seriously bro, you sound like a lunatic.
March 21, 2008 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
OK, OK, I made a pretty bold statement without actually checking to back it up. I WAS WRONG . . . I denounce and reject myself for making an unvetted comment. But please don't write me off as having jumped the shark. I'd like to think I may someday have something constructive to add to the discussion. :)
March 21, 2008 10:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, and FWIW, I'm a girl. But feel free to call me bro if you like.
March 21, 2008 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/Jeremiah_Wright_was_White_House_guest.html
I guess you are who you associate with...
March 21, 2008 12:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
"The truth is, the typical black person only earns 75% of what a white person, which is why things like Affirmative Action are still important"
I don't think Hillary or McCain could get away with that statement.
Anyway, I did find Obama's comment a little annoying, and I think he's using too broad a brush here. Obviously there are lots of white people who are not afraid of black men, and there are lots of blacks who are not still super pissed about segregation.
That said, I think this stuff is really only going to affect a small percentage of the population. Conservatives are not going to vote for Obama, but they're not going to vote for Hillary either.
March 21, 2008 12:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think Hillary or McCain could get away with that statement.
FYI: I meant that sarcastically. Re-reading it, that's not too obvious.
The point is, there are some contexts where "the typical black person" wouldn't be a death sentence for a politician. In fact, the media has been going on and on about the "black vote" in the primary.
March 21, 2008 1:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Women also earn significantly less than white men. It has nothing to do w/ the work performed. When their numbers increased in the public relations field (where they actually performed better), the salary for the entire field dropped.
March 21, 2008 3:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
i keep hearing that hillary sacrifices chickens every sunrise in honor of satan. i demand an explanation IMMEDIATELY!!!!!!
March 21, 2008 2:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mr. Matthew, Sir,
You have one-track obsession with this complete racist garbage that you're spouting out. You're spreading the same boulderdash like a broken record all over this site as if you think that people here are naive enough to buy it. It's getting old.
Perhaps you should just start off your rants with "Wake Up White People" like that crazy Daniel Carver guy. ( I invite you to do a YouTube search on him to see how you are perceived.)
What do you think John Edwards would say to your deranged comments? I'm sure you'll rehash the same thing as a reply, but he would dismiss you and your crazy divisive opinion as would Hillary Clinton (maybe I'm giving her too much credit) and Bill. Her surrogates after listening to Lanny Davis and Ferraro, maybe not.
Either way, your point of view has influenced filmmaker Robert Greenwald to make a short film:
http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/32376-fox-attacks-obama-part-2
March 21, 2008 3:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mr. Weaver
You claim that you are not a Democrat, so what business is it of yours which candidate my party nominates. All you do is race bait. Go back to the sewer from whence you came.
March 21, 2008 9:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
You going to report the breach of Obama's passport files? It just broke on MSNBC.
March 20, 2008 9:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
wait for it ... Hillary Clinton - SMART & BEST CHOICE.
Probably this weekend.
March 20, 2008 9:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Paging idiotic…
March 20, 2008 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course he didn't endorse either candidate......He just a "typical white person."
Imagine if HRC referred to someone as a "typical black person."...wooaahhh Lord.. there would be some hell to pay. We'll see if BO has more problems
March 20, 2008 9:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
If she referred to her grandmother as a "typical black person", I'd give her a pass.
March 20, 2008 10:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Also, don't get caught up in his skin color, but Barack Obama is just as white as he is black.
If Hillary Clinton was bi-racial, and referred to her grandmother as a "typical black person," I'd be fine with it.
When is TPM EC going to post on Obama's passport!
March 20, 2008 10:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Another example of 5 second clip politics brought to you this time by AzAttorney. Don't try to understand what he's saying, just hang on a single line, taken out of context, that bolsters your preconceived notions.
March 20, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
How would a statement like "A typical black person would be excited by being able to vote for viable black candidate" or "A typical black person makes less then their white counterpart"
March 21, 2008 1:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
John who?
March 20, 2008 10:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Edwards. I think that I remember him. A mill worker's son, right?
March 20, 2008 10:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just think, if Edwards had won Iowa, we'd be getting carpet bombed with "LOL 200 DOLLAR HAIRCUT" comments from Clinton supporters right now
March 20, 2008 10:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
No kidding.
March 20, 2008 11:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Edwards actually came in 2nd in Iowa, after Obama. And Hillary ran anti-Edwards push polls in SC.
March 21, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ah yes...that John. Handsome fellow. Smart, too, I believe?
March 21, 2008 7:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe my next post will be titled, "Edwards, is he a pussy or what?"
March 20, 2008 10:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!!
March 20, 2008 10:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Becoming? More like always was.
He's a Libertarian who always tend to be the least educated and most shallow ideologues. He has an American flag for his blog graphic which again indicates the kind of person who wraps themselves in the flag and knows no difference between nationalism and patriotism. Which is again pretty much all Libertarians who are chronically frustrated by complexities in the real world they simply can't grasp. It's safe bet he's also miserable most of the time and ostracized in the real world.
Not surprisingly he looks like a real hillbilly in his photo. One can only hope that's not actually an orange jumpsuit. There's plenty of his type around. Typical common variety wingnut.
It's tempting to feel sympathetic. But only to about the extent as someone panhandling while shouting obscenities and urinating on themselves is sympathetic.
March 20, 2008 11:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don in Seattle,
Wake up Don, if Clinton or McCain ever said 'typical Black person' in a racial context they would be railroaded out of the Campaign. That Obama can say 'typical white person' in a racial context without recourse is, unfortunately, proof that his is becoming the affirmative action Black candidate who can show, demonstrate, and maintain racist and hate-America past and present without being discredited.
And anti-American?! He is associated with and personal friends for 20 years with his preach, church, and community that hold blatantly anti-American beliefs. If Obama didn't agree with them, he'd surely have left the church years ago--even Oprah did--and if he didn't agree with them he surely wouldn't be taking his daughters to the same church to be indoctrinated in this racism and hate.
March 20, 2008 11:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Matthew, you're hyperventilating. Chill, bro.
March 20, 2008 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Honestly you should spill your puke on the RNC-TN website. They'll savor the shit that comes out of your mouth with pleasure.
March 20, 2008 11:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
For those of you are new, welcome to racial politics
American style. Remember the blast from the past Willie Horton, Law & Order ala Nixon, Trent Lott caressing the deceased Strom Thurman, Clarence "Nothing but the Best" Thomas, etc.
This another
March 20, 2008 11:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
So anti-American and anti-White that the Clintons brought him to the White House during the Lewinsky Scandal? And have you forgotten that Obama is half white, so HALF of him is an Affirmative Action candidate, but the other half is working hard to get elected? Seriously, you need to get a grip. Loosen your chin strap, push back from the computer and go grab a drink... Wait, scratch that last part....
March 20, 2008 11:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
The new racism: "I'm not racist. Black people are racist."
March 20, 2008 11:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly.
March 21, 2008 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Matt
Are you into sadomachism? Your repeated rants here and responses to them seem to indicate that.
March 21, 2008 12:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
I swear I hadn't read this comment by Matthew before posting a response to his earlier nonsense when I suggested that he start his rants off like Daniel Carver with "Wake Up White People."
March 21, 2008 3:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Matthew Weaver is simply repeating himself - go to his page and you'll see it's simply the same mostly cut and paste text.
I'm getting tired of the "blacklash" I hear from people like Matthew Weaver, who I won't hesitate to call an out-and-out racist.
I think it's racist to tie Obama to Wright in a way that would not happen to a white person. If Bill Clinton had a black pastor friend like that, people would not attempt to render him guilty by association - because he is white. Even in white on white pastor-politician relationships, the guilty by association stuff doesn't stick - I know McCain is not like John Hagee, and a simple statement of distancing is fine with me. Why was it not enough for Obama? Is this typical white person behavior. Fortunately he rose to the challenge, as he always has, in the face of white America, turning the other cheek and desiring to build something better than the cities of racial fear and ignorance that make up our body politic.
As for generalizations about white people, why not? Whites have been doing it all the time to blacks, Latinos, and Asians (me), so it's high time (and sometimes high comedy) to see the shoe on the other foot.
http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.wordpress.com/
Why don't you asks someone who isn't white, if there are typically white ways of interacting with racial minorities?? Ever seen Harold and Kumar? Instead of getting offended at the characterization why aren't we equally (if not more) offended the casual racism and fear that has contributed to segregation, English First laws, welfare "reform", and the Minutemen??
It's unbelievable how much in denial many white Americans are about white racism. All you have to do is browse the Internet comment boards, read Craigslist personal ads, count the number of black Senators.... C'mon, don't treat us like we're two year olds!
Obama is a fundamentally and thoroughly honest intellectual, and mention of his grandmother - well that's something I hope every American with white forbears comes out and says - the truth!!
March 21, 2008 4:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Edwards is an idiot, it's no wonder he's lost so many elections. i deeply respect the message he took during this campaign, but his political and reasoning skills leave much to be desired.
March 20, 2008 11:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's just making sure nobody forgets HIM.
March 20, 2008 11:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
YES...i love idiotic.
March 20, 2008 11:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
And Father Guido Sarducci is still dead.
March 21, 2008 12:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Matt:
You forgot to include in your fair and balanced opinion that he is an empty suit whose two books were really ghost written.
Oh wait... shucky-poo!
That was really your heroine Hillary wasn't it?
From the wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_Takes_a_Village
My god. Perchance we should consider Sir Edmund Hillary to be an "empty pantsuit" too?
Note:
She lied about being named for the famous first man to the top of Everest:
http://www.slate.com/id/2182065/
Sort of reminds me of the Chimp: Full of self-aggrandizement and buffoonery. Very sad indeed.
March 21, 2008 12:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Edwards is either being peevish, fully aware of just how powerful he is, how itchy the combatants are, how only he can scratch the itch, and eating it up as only a truly peevish person can. Or else he's watching to see who finally looks like they're going to be victorious, so he can endorse that one and be VP. I think ALL of them, except for Dodd, are being damned peevish.
About Obama calling his grandmother a typical white person. What in the name of God Almighty is wrong with what he said? DON'T TELL ME. Anyone who can "answer that" is pre-judged an idiot by me. You can only split a hair a hundred times. This one is done, except by those of you with McVile, McUgly, ulterior McMotives for feigning "outrage."
About TPM, from what I see, the thing that makes it nicer than sites like d-kos and the former huffpo and let's say C&L is that THIS place is not a free-for-all. You people have style AND class. (Most of you.)
Quotie:
"The only thing worse than soldiers dying for nothing ... is MORE soldiers dying for nothing!"
-- Mike Gravel (more or less)
March 21, 2008 2:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
So I glanced at CNN.com as I'm getting ready for bed here...there's a breaking news banner at the top: "New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson plans to endorse Sen. Barack Obama for president, according to the Associated Press."
It's not completely unexpected - if he supported Clinton, you think he would've endorsed her long ago, given his ties to Bill's administration. Still, a high-profile endorsement is a nice vote of confidence now that the Clinton Camp is trying to persuade superdelegates that Barack would be General Election poison because of his ties to Rev. Wright.
March 21, 2008 3:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Forget Edwards. Richardson just endorsed:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080321/ap_on_el_pr/obama_richardson;_ylt=AifhjZXGT3Lg9JaJHo0WnquyFz4D
Obama, of course.
March 21, 2008 3:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
You don't need an ad exec to write up - just refer folks to eminent historian Timothy Garton Ash's piece,
"The tragedy that followed Hillary Clinton's bombing of Iran in 2009: In retaliation, suicide bombers trained by Tehran massacred civilians in Tel Aviv, London and New York"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2006/apr/20/comment.iran
March 21, 2008 3:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
RE: Richardson endorsement. Sweet. I like Bill as Obama's Veep. Could happen.
March 21, 2008 4:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Edwards lacks courage, he should have endorsed Obama by now, since he is going to win N.Carolina.
March 21, 2008 7:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
The longer Edwards waits to endorse, the less wait his endorsement will carry... Just get on board, John!
March 21, 2008 7:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
There is no point in Edwards getting on board either Obama's train or Hillary's. They're in the middle of a train-wreck. I support John to this day as the superior candidate to the kids fighting in the backseat right now.
It isn't being peevish. It is being sane.
March 21, 2008 8:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
If this was meant to suggest that Edwards is going to step into the spotlight in Denver and wrestle the belt away from the two bloodied combatants, he'd better not step in two quickly or he'll get a steel chair to the back of the head. Or didn't you know? Al Gore is also the sane, sage, superior candidate waiting in the wings to save the Democratic Party from itself...
March 21, 2008 9:24 AM | Reply | Permalink