Hillary Finance Committee Member Compares Wright And David Duke, Says Obama "Used Race Where It Suited Him"
The Wright Stuff is coming fast and furious from Hillary and her supporters.
First Hillary criticized Obama today for not sufficiently distancing himself from the controversial pastor.
I've now learned that a member of Hillary's finance committee and a longtime ally of the Clintons has made some very explicit statements about Barack Obama's ties to his controversial minister, Jeremiah Wright, saying that it's "legitimate" to raise questions about those ties, comparing Wright to David Duke, and claiming that Obama has "used race where it suited him."
The finance committee member, Niall O'Dowd, made the comments on Saturday in an unnoticed interview with RTE Radio in Ireland. The Wright issue has been raised by Hillary surrogates Lanny Davis and Joe Wilson, making O'Dowd the third Hillaryite (or fourth, if you include Hillary herself) to hit Obama over Wright.
The interview is worth a listen, because it's another example of supporters of the candidates (see Power, Samantha) getting themselves in potential trouble by saying things abroad in settings where more candor is possible, and indeed expected, than here in America...
The comments from O'Dowd -- who's long been close to both Clintons, having served as a key adviser on Irish affairs to Bill Clinton and hosting a big fundraiser for Hillary last year -- go farther on Wright than Hillary and her supporters have thus far.
O'Dowd said that the Wright comments raised "a legitimate question" and observed that "it's interesting that Barack Obama sat in the pews while all this was going on, and never once in any of his books or anything else" did he denounce Wright, adding: "He worshipped this man."
O'Dowd also compared Wright to Duke and inadvertently said that the Hillary campaign is actively making an issue of the Wright controversy, something the campaign (Hillary's comments today notwithstanding) has been careful to avoid doing. O'Dowd said:
"I think the issue that the Clinton campaign has seized on is that Barack Obama, you know, never once raised his voice to his pastor and said, `I think your language is quite extreme here, and I think you language is probably wrong.' Because let's turn this around. If this was David Duke and he was preaching on behalf of, and Hillary Clinton was in the pew, there would be outrage about this. And there can't be this double standard. Barack Obama has used race where it suited him, but when it doesn't suit him he backs away from it."

Comments (212)
In other words, the Wright "issue" was dying a natural death, so the HRC campaign must try hard to resuscitate it.
March 25, 2008 2:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
To suggest that Wright for speaking his opinion is similar to David Duke who is/was a member of the KKK which terrorized Black families for decades and lynched innocent Blacks is REMARKABLY DISGUSTING AND OFFENSIVE! There is NO comparison whatsover and it just shows that some people just don't freaking get it.
This isn't about "well if Blacks can say it why can't I"...this is serious stuff these people are messing with and it's not going to be pretty.
The Clintons are disgusting VILE people and so are their supporters.
March 25, 2008 4:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do we eat here or at the next place?
March 25, 2008 2:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought the Clinton campaign kidnapped you. Welcome back!
March 25, 2008 2:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
YAY! SINBAD!
March 25, 2008 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you comparing david duke/kkk with Jeremiah Wright?
Given the history of duke/kkk, do you believe that comparison is legitimate?
I Just want to clarify.
March 25, 2008 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry that was his (O'Dowd) quote. My apology.
March 25, 2008 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
A racist is a racist. The only difference between these two men is that Duke loves America. One is a patriotic racist and the other is not.
March 25, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hate this time of year when a big thaw sets in and flushes vermin like you out of your sewer habitat!!!!!
March 25, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you ever have the misfortune of meeting me, I assure you, sir, that I am going to piss on your shoes.
That is all.
March 25, 2008 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey! Stop shoving, just wait in line with the rest of us.
March 25, 2008 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sounds like you may be damning him with faint praise.
March 25, 2008 6:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
How do figure that someone who hates Blacks, Jews and all non-whites loves America?
March 25, 2008 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Go FUCK yourself, you diseased, rotten troll.
Just where the fuck do you get off saying Wright doesn't love America?
Is it because he refused to stand idly by while NeoCon Oil whores sent hundreds of thousands of MY COUNTRYMEN to get slaughtered and mindfucked for some Straussian manifest-destiny wet dream?
In my book he's a PATRIOT of the HIGHEST ORDER for standing against an immoral, unprovoked invasion of a sovereign nation, and the bloodthirsty warmongers who cheered us into this mess are the goddamn cowards.
March 25, 2008 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jeremiah Wright is a cause of the hate-mongering white racists like David Duke. The hate and bitter racial divide that still exist in our country today are most prevalent in the more technologically-challenged, rural areas of our country, like the south, where people like David DuKKKe can still win elections. that is pathetic.
March 25, 2008 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Marine veterans hate America when they aren't being jingoistic?
March 25, 2008 3:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I posted some of this on another thread, but felt it needed to be said here, too.
What does the Clinton campaign have against Oprah's Church?
Perhaps Sen. Clinton and her staff and advisors might want to watch something other than FOX News before she decides to comment on a colleague's church?
Comparing Rev. Wright to David Duke is utterly absurd and completely offensive.
A recent press release from Trinity UCC, issued by the new Senior Pastor, the Rev. Otis Moss III, identifies Trinity's generosity and accomplishments, and then says that on Sunday mornings alone, over 36 years, Pastor Wright has spoken for 207,792 minutes. The video clips represent perhaps 15-20 seconds of that time. Those clips represent .0000012 of his total preaching at Trinity, and yet many - including Sen. Clinton - are quick to judge him, his church, and, indeed, the entire denomination, on this statistically ridiculous sample.
David Duke, on the other hand, has decades of consistency being a racist.
Quite the opposite of the Klansman turned politician, Rev. Wright, like other UCC ministers, regularly spoke about important issues of justice, and racism is surely one of them. To deny the reality of racism in our
nation — both historically and in the present day — is to ignore one of the most pressing social justice issues our nation faces.
But Jeremiah Wright needs no defense. Anyone who has built a congregation from 87 members to some 8000 and whose congregation has modeled ministries to one of the poorest areas of Chicago has provided a body of work that speaks for itself.
Thirty-six years later, as he retires, Rev. Dr. Wright's legacy includes more than seventy active ministries and eight corporations, including a credit union, a community development corporation, a health and hospice corporation, a higher education corporation, a day care center, two senior housing complexes, a federally chartered credit union, and an elementary school which has received a charter from the Chicago Public Schools Board of Education.
Trinity UCC is known for its benevolence and commitment to education. During his pastorate, Trinity UCC has given in excess of $1 million dollars in scholarships to high school graduates entering college. The congregation has also given in excess of $1.5 million dollars to assist members pursuing seminary education, and given over $500,000 to the Fund for Theological Education and several fully accredited (by the A.T.S.) seminaries including Chicago Theological Seminary, United Theological Seminary, The Lutheran Theological Seminary in Philadelphia and the Samuel DeWitt Proctor School of Theology at Virginia Union University.
I have first-hand experience of Trinity UCC, its leaders and its ministries, and I know it to be a faithful, generous and justice-minded congregation that takes seriously its ministry within and among the African American community on Chicago’s south side.
The United Church of Christ includes many of the oldest congregations in this country. More than 10 percent were formed before 1776. It is socially, racially, economically and theologically diverse, and its membership includes 10 members of Congress — five Republicans and five Democrats, including Sen. Obama.
I'm still waiting to hear Sen. Clinton's speeches on race and religion... (does she really want to dredge up all that "Fellowship" stuff??)
And, oh yeah, where's Sen. Clinton's comments on Sen. McCain's religious buddies like Pastor Hagee?
Where is her campaign statement against MSNBC commentator and David Duke impersonator) Pat Buchanan telling an African-American commentator to "shut up" recently? Or a statement denouncing his recent column "A Brief for Whitey" where he contends that black folks should be thankful for slavery?
Where's her outrage over what Pat Robertson and Jerry Farwell said around the same time as Rev. Wright?
March 25, 2008 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oops, I meant to say thank you to low fi db for his informed response regarding Rev. Wright. No offense Kravitz - your response is good too!
March 26, 2008 4:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
you disgust me, and you have no idea what America is about in the first place
March 25, 2008 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
He said that the Wright comments raised "a legitimate question."
Repeating any question does make it is legitimate it appears.
Another Power play, here!
March 25, 2008 2:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
In other words, the Hillary campaign is touting the exact same talking points as Sean Hannity.
March 25, 2008 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Was he the one who invited David, I mean Jeremiah Wright to the White House back in 1998?
March 25, 2008 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is a campaign of opportunistic political whores. Where is the leadership of the Democratic party to put a stop to this?
March 25, 2008 2:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
You expect the what of the what to put a stop to this? Dream on!
March 25, 2008 3:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Precisely the talking points we've been hearing for the past three weeks. So now it's news because it's coming from the Clinton Camp? Not surprised one bit. I say the more they bring this up the better. People will be tired of hearing it by Mid-April. By June, it's a non-issue.
March 25, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is overall a bad development for Obama and the party, I think, but I agree there could be a silver lining here finally. To some extent, she's stealing the Republicans' thunder, and associating this line of attack with the last throes of a dying campaign.
Soon we'll all be singing along with this every time someone brings it up. "How could you" "Sit there in that pew" "And for twen-ty years" "You brought your children, too"
Sorry, trying to stay upbeat while watching the Democratic Party's version of Godzilla smashing Tokyo.
March 25, 2008 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is not even close to Samantha Power. Saying Monster or stating a position in phrasing the candidate has to explain (but by all logic is true) is just nothing like this0. This is trashing, calling racist and hateful the leading candidate to be the nominee of our party.
How could he keep going? Yes, he needs to answer that. Too bad he didn't explain it by saying something like:
It's a diverse congregation "that does not merely preach social justice but acts it out each day, through ministries ranging from housing the homeless to reaching out to those with HIV/AIDS.
Most importantly, Rev. Wright preached the gospel of Jesus, a gospel on which I base my life. In other words, he has never been my political advisor; he's been my pastor. And the sermons I heard him preach always related to our obligation to love God and one another, to work on behalf of the poor, and to seek justice at every turn.
The statements that Rev. Wright made that are the cause of this controversy were not statements I personally heard him preach while I sat in the pews of Trinity or heard him utter in private conversation."
Since I copied that from the post he made on March 14th I guess that he DID explain why he kept going
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barack-obama/on-my-faith-and-my-church_b_91623.html
Should I still be aghast? Let me try it.
Shame on you Barack Obama! How can you sit and listen for 20 years and even expose your children to the gospel of Jesus. What kind of man would listen to someone preaching week after week about your our obligation to love God and one another. That kind of love speech soaking into your head would make you all about hope and unity and we can't have that crap.
Working on behalf of the poor, seeking justice at every turn? You leftist! Just because you choose to live your life with a loving heart, compassion and justice it does not give you the right to expose your children. And we know those code words.
Listen Mr. Barack Obama, we do not let people into the white house that could do dangerous things like honor the constitution, threaten to be honest and respectful and care about people in out nation. That is just not the American way.
And if you think we are dumb enough to think that the values Christ taught and lived are in anyway Christian you've got another thought coming. We've learned what Christian is and so we judge and condemn and seek not truth! But many wear a flag pin, yes sir.
So shame on you!
There. I guess I told him. OK so that was sarcasm since obviously he must be lying as we know the whole story from listening to a few short snips culled out of years and years of sermons. Cause the media doesn't distort things. Oh, darn I am being sarcastic again.
Look I realize not everyone wants to go beyong the impression we are given by the media but having read his words I thought they might be true. It doesn't take a lot of research to find out that they are. I have sent links to videos or text of his sermons, letters and posts and videos from those who know or go to the church and know well the Rev Dr. Wright, an educated and honored man...sent it to all the networks (well not Fox) and all of the shows. They don't seem to care.
I have heard more and more comments on panels from people who do know, my hope is they will do their research and report the truth. If nothing else it might stop the hate mail and threats the church has done nothing to deserve but go to this church to worship, commune and serve...when the preacher's words were about to be twisted and shaped into a weapon to attack a candidate who goes there. This should never have been allowed, whoever we support, the media should never have the power to invoke hate and divisiveness with extreme misrepresentation.
And for another candidate to try to stir it up and one of her people trying to flame it up overseas. Who is it damning America now.
Oh yes, it's Obama's fault. I almost forgot.
March 25, 2008 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Joyn,
Apologies if my post was unclear. I meant to be a little sarcastic myself with the song idea, since these criticisms of Obama on the Wright issue I think increasingly become a mindless refrain with nothing signified, like a popular song you sing the words to without really registering their meaning. I'm hoping that takes a little of the shock value out of this mindless line of attack over time.
Godzilla is as Godzilla does. No sarcasm intended there. And I don't think anyone would take much exception to Power's comment at this point. Prophetic, really. I think she and the Obama campaign planted that seed with just this sort of storm in mind.
March 25, 2008 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Still staying classy, I see.
I'm truly sorry to see the Clintons doing this. There's no good to come from it. None. She already has a big lead in PA, so what's the point? To get North Carolina? Indiana? What?
Crash and burn, and bring the rest of the party with you, Hillary.
March 25, 2008 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
What's her point? For Obama to lose the general. This will "validate" her and allow her to come back against McCain in 2012. The Clintons will do more to stop a President Obama than even McCain.
March 25, 2008 4:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whoa! Turn the tables!?! David Duke was not a member of a group of people subject to systemic legal oppression and discrimination in America. Obama stressed in his speech that the persepctive of the African Americans community and the voice they give to that perspective is rooted in that horrible history. I ask you or anyone else sit on the business end of 200 years of that horrible history, and then we can talk about turning the tables.
I'm utterly convinced that the Clinton campaign is in a state of willful blindness engendered by a sense of entitlement. I predict it only gets worse from here. Someone please stop the madness of this!
Sincerely,
Little Fish.
March 25, 2008 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama feels entitled to the nomination because he is black. That is the image he puts forth.
March 25, 2008 3:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Only to moronic fuckwads like yourself it seems.
March 25, 2008 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you kidding? What planet do you live on?
March 25, 2008 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
What's your argument here? You can't just make a statemetn like that and not substantiate it.
March 25, 2008 3:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, the candidate who has won the most elected delegates is entitled to the nomination. So what the hell is your point!!!!
March 25, 2008 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
cough-cough-Jackass-cough-cough
March 25, 2008 3:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I once saw a rat eating the corpse of another rat, and that's pretty much the image you're putting forth yourself.
March 25, 2008 4:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
You Obama supporters are brain dead or something. You are using all kinds of excuses to defend infensible. Suppose someone rapes your wife and tells you his great-grandmother was raped by someone of your great-grandfather's race, what would you say?
March 25, 2008 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
What? Raped? What on earth are you blabbling about. Let me guess, the rape happened at 3AM while our children were sleeping!!!
DUCK! SNIPER FIRE!!
March 25, 2008 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are as stupid as other Obama supporters. I was using a metaphor to say you morons were trying to defend infensible. If you stupid morons think other people will give Wright and Obama as many as excuses as you, you are stupider than people think. You are so stupid and out of your mind that you will find excuse if Obama was caught smoking cocaine. Oh, yes, he did. How about if he was found raping your sister? You would think he was once in a life time guy and just had a moment of lapse of judgement. You people are sick!!!
March 26, 2008 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wait - did Wright rape someone's wife or advocate raping someone's wife? I'm confused -- but it may just be your stupidity that's so confusing. Yup, that's it. Nevermind, carry on.
March 25, 2008 3:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I did NOT have sex with your great-grandmother!!!
March 25, 2008 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
But did you have sexual relations with her? =) And while we're on the subject, what exactly is the definition of is??
March 25, 2008 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent bvd.
See, you stupid Mae. Your own words and the obamites hit for six. Eat your crow with feather and all. Will you never learn ?
(Frankly, given your level of stupidity displayed many times here at TPM, I doubt whether you "got" what bvd was saying,)
March 25, 2008 3:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
are ALL of Hillary's supporters totally illiterate?
March 25, 2008 4:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Only the situational one's that are trying to make her the nominee that the Republicans feel would be the easiest to beat. Most of those creeps are from The Big Fat Pillbilly Ditto Head Cult.. There are lot of decent honorable Hillary supporters that would never stoop to race baiting. I wish that they had a candidate that was as honorable as them.
March 25, 2008 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, I would say that's horrible and illegal. Rape of any kind is unconscionable. Wright made inflammatory remarks, but I don't recall (from those clips) that he told his congregation to go out and 'rape' because they were 'raped.' I don't recall that he told his congregation to oppress and discriminate. He told his congregation that, god damn!, we've not only got a long way to go to achieve social justice, but we seem to be going backwards as a nation. And not just for African Americans, but for whites, Latinos, Asians, native americans... pick your group.
Brain Dead? I keep my comments respectful. I wish you'd do the same. I and many, many others are reasonable, after all.
Sincerely,
Little Fish.
March 25, 2008 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
suppose someone punches you in the face? someone...please?
March 25, 2008 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
little fish(?)I don't care what Rev. Wright says. I don't care if Sen. Obama sat there for twenty and agreed with him. I don't think Rev.Wright is a racist. What I do object to is the way in which Sen. Obama's supporters are attacking Sen. Clinton on a personal level and then accusing her campaign of going negative. Fifteen years ago the Republicans spent fifty million dollars in taxpayer money investigating both Pres Clinton and Sen. Clinton. Ken Starr was anointed by them to dig into every aspect of the Clinton's life starting before he was elected Governor of Arkansas. He investigated their tax returns from the year 1975 and he dug into their personal life. Now David Axelrod is bringing up Whitewater and other Obama campaign members are bringing up Monica Lewinsky. In case you don't remember, Ken Starr found nothing to link the Clinton's to any crime in the first instance (and he tried real hard), but he found a dress with Pres. Clinton's DNA. Monica was a young woman who went to Washington, according to one friend, with her knee pads. She has issued a public apology to Sen. Clinton and her daughter and has started a new life in England. When Obama supporters use her name, they are damaging her also, but I guess she is just a name to them. Sen. Obama's campaign is talking about the tax records for the past two years to cast doubt on her integrity. Sen. Clinton has been investigated more than any woman in the country's history and she is an intelligent woman. Why would anyone believe she would enter the presidential race if she had something to hide? It makes no sense at all and David Axelrod knows it, so the only logical conclusion is "Dirty Politics". There are some on the blogs who spew out more hate speech than Rev. Wright did on the video and at least Rev. Wright's race has a history which would explain his outrage. I have read horrible words about Sen. Clinton without any explanation and misrepresentation of her husband's words in direct contradiction to the history both of them have had in the fight for civil rights and improvement of conditions for African Americans in particular, but also other minorities including women's rights. I doubt there is a single Clinton supporter who doesn't understand the defection of African Americans to Sen. Obama. There is no need for explanation needed, but why say hateful things about her?
March 25, 2008 9:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
thank you
March 25, 2008 11:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Look- when you examine the record of Clinton comments over the last few months, neither Ken Star nor foaming Obama supporters forced her to utter words that were certifiably false. It's called taking responsibility for the words that come out of your mouth. I'm not sure what Ken Star has to do with any of the most pressing questions today. If it wasn't him, it would be someone else with an (R) after their name. It's how this game is sadly played.
Otherwise, I guess the gist of your comment is that you're disgusted Obama supporters say hateful things about your candidate. I agree. Anyone who visits this site can see that for themselves. And it cuts both ways. And, you'll have to ask those supporters why they say hateful things about your candidate.
March 26, 2008 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
I can definitely agree with you that supporters of both candidates need to make a conscious effort to lift this debate back up out of the sewer. I'm making an honest effort to soften my perception towards both Senator Clinton and her supporters. I believe we can disagree about who started what and still come to the same conclusion.
But there is one delicious piece of irony here that I would like for you to comment on. Why is Senator Clinton trying to revive the Wright kerfluffle in fron of the man most responsible for those fifteen years of personal attack and smear the Clintons suffered through, Richard Mellon-Scaife?
March 26, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
When's the last time Niall O'Dowd stood up and even asked Hillary Clinton about something he disagreed with?
Like, never.
March 25, 2008 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's a sad time for the democratic party.
March 25, 2008 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Its not a sad time. Its about time that the party actually deal with race instead of hiding behind it.
March 25, 2008 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
If by "deal with race" you mean comparing people to David Duke, then no.
March 25, 2008 6:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I really don't care what the clinton's have to do.... all i care about is that they win, i don't care how as long as it happens.... we can't have a crazy person like obama trying to run the white house, we already have one and we know how that turned out...lets don't do that again.... Hey, it took a clinton to clean up the mess the first bush made and it just might take a second one to clean up the second bush mistakes.... I enjoyed the 90's ... lets have that again.... time for hillary clinton to run this country not obama who cries when some ones says his middle name... or says he is black or whatever, he cries :( poor thing... well if he bets clinton, i will vote john mccain:)
March 25, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Incapable of original thought?
March 25, 2008 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Could you please cite one example of Obama acting "crazy"?
March 25, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or crying?
March 25, 2008 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hope your comment is satire.. otherwise...
March 25, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
And would you care to discuss Hillary's Bosnia delusion?
March 25, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well Hillary Clinton O8
Since you just stated that you will vote for John McCain that makes you a supporter of a Republican War Monger who wants to continue with Bush's Iraq War policy for up to a hundred years. That makes you a Republican War Supporter, so stay to hell out of our Democratic nomination process. Hillary Rodham Clinton has also endorsed John McCain for Commander in Chief, so that puts her in the War Monger supporting category with you. Go enlist since you are so eager to have other people die for your whims, just like Hillary was, and is.
March 25, 2008 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I really don't care what the clinton's have to do.... all i care about is that they win,
welcome mark penn to the board!
March 25, 2008 3:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
It took a Clinton to make the election of the second Bush possible. Woefully incompetant and demostrably inept George W Bush was only able to accede to the nation's highest office because he was able to ride a tidal wave of anti-Clinton animus. To put another Clinton in office is to invite another, equally insufferable Republican stooge four to eight years hence. She is a darn sight better than McCain so I would certainly vote for her in the fall if she were to win the nomination, but the idea that she will create as many problems as she solves in office, because she will set the stage for another W-style nightmare administration.
March 25, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg, will you be posting the radio interview Hillary gave today where she said she hasn't mis-spoke for 12 years, yet there are FOUR counts of her on the campaign trail mis-remembering the sniper incident?
Just wondering...
March 25, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Only in the minds of the Obama supporters was this story dying. It has yet to begin.
March 25, 2008 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow... you know, I am glad to hear that. I never knew that I was imagining all the polls from the last few days. I'll have to go see about that....
March 25, 2008 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Only in the minds of the Obama supporters was this story dying. It has yet to begin."
You mean Obama closing the PA gap to 10 and widening the NC gap to 21 wasn't proof enough for you - stop freebasing.
March 25, 2008 3:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
yep, a Hillary Clinton White House would be a very
classy group indeed. They would make us all very proud.
I wonder, has she contributed dollars to the McCain campaign or just supplied Swift Boat talking points to help
him get elected over Mr. Obama?
March 25, 2008 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
the issue that the Clinton campaign has seized on is that...
good verb, that. reminds one of cardiac arrest. get the defibrillator for the HRC campaign!
March 25, 2008 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
They just had to keep throw this back into the public consciousness ONE MORE TIME... Enough already!!
March 25, 2008 3:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Paging Mister Al Gore...
Mister Jimmy Carter...
Ms. Nancy Pelosi...
Mr. Harry Reid...
Please put a wrench in the gears of this out of control machine.
March 25, 2008 3:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Something very strange just happened. Drudge put Hillary's attempt to revive Wright on the top of his page, but after about 15 minutes, he buried it down in the body, well below other stories. It's almost like the muckiest of muckrackers just said: "Not this time."
March 25, 2008 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I really can't see how Obama supporters can claim to be uniters if they can't see the other point of view.
March 25, 2008 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmm
So we should be able to see the point of calling someone a racist who cries out against the historical injustices of racism and war.
That make sense in bizzaro world, but here in reality on planet earth what you suggest is pure bullshit.
March 25, 2008 8:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
This could make for one odd family reunion: Barack Obama is a distant cousin of actor Brad Pitt, and Hillary Rodham Clinton is related to Pitt's girlfriend, Angelina Jolie.
Researchers at the New England Historic Genealogical Society found some remarkable family connections for the three presidential candidates — Democratic rivals Obama and Clinton, and Republican John McCain.
Clinton, who is of French-Canadian descent on her mother's side, is also a distant cousin of singers Madonna, Celine Dion and Alanis Morissette. Obama, the son of a white woman from Kansas and a black man from Kenya, can call six U.S. presidents, including George W. Bush, his cousins. McCain is a sixth cousin of first lady Laura Bush.
Genealogist Christopher Child said that while the candidates often focus on pointing out differences between them, their ancestry shows they are more alike than they think.
"It shows that lots of different people can be related, people you wouldn't necessarily expect," Child said.
Obama has a prolific presidential lineage that features Democrats and Republicans. His distant cousins include President George W. Bush and his father, George H.W. Bush, Gerald Ford, Lyndon Johnson, Harry S. Truman and James Madison. Other Obama cousins include Vice President Dick Cheney, British Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill and Civil War General Robert E. Lee.
"His kinships are across the political spectrum," Child said.
Child has spent the last three years tracing the candidates' genealogy, along with senior research scholar Gary Boyd Roberts, author of the 1989 book, "Ancestors of American Presidents."
Clinton's distant cousins include beatnik author Jack Kerouac and Camilla Parker-Bowles, wife of Prince Charles of England.
McCain's ancestry was more difficult to trace because records on his relatives were not as complete as records for the families of Obama and Clinton, Child said.
Obama and President Bush are 10th cousins, once removed, linked by Samuel Hinkley of Cape Cod, who died in 1662.
Pitt and Obama are ninth cousins, linked by Edwin Hickman, who died in Virginia in 1769.
Clinton and Jolie are ninth cousins, twice removed, both related to Jean Cusson who died in St. Sulpice, Quebec, in 1718.
The New England Historic Genealogical Society, founded in 1845, is the oldest and largest nonprofit genealogical organization in the country.
*** I found the above information on yahoo...... well if obama and bush are 10th cousins, that realllllllllly sucks, its like putting another bush in the white house again.
March 25, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
You mean the Black House.
March 25, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whaaaaa?
March 25, 2008 4:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
well, fletch, that's because of the persistence of propaganda - what the media do and don't write about affects the audience.
I'm actually surprised that all of you above commentators really believe that the Wright issue has not hurt Obama in any way? that in the GE, he is still viable? why is that?
To me what Drudge is doing is very simple - bury the controversy, help Obama win the primary - skewer him to the point of crying uncle in the General Election. Very simple.
March 25, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Aren't there any e-mail id's for the so called fu--king party elders, so that we gatecrash them to move their collective fat and quivering asses ? What a bunch of lily-livered poltroons ?
March 25, 2008 3:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I totally agree with what O'Doud said. I remember well how Hillary was pounced upon in the run-up to the S. Carolina primaries for her comments about Martin Luther King. She simply said that it took Lyndon Johnson to push through the civil rights legislation. And that was a fact. But a number of black political and religious leaders insisted that it was a slight to MLK. And then, very importantly, Obama joined in the condemnation of Clinton. Obama very much needed to pry away black support from Hillary in S. Carolina and nation-wide. Remember that the Clintons were seen as heroes to most blacks during the Clinton years. So Obama decided to use that highly racial issue to turn blacks against Hillary. Remember when Bill Clinton was referred to as "the first black President"? After all the Clintons had done for black people, many were now painting her as a racist, and Obama participated in this. He used race. It was then that I first realized that Obama was not a uniter. And I have seen more examples since. All of this is something that should be examined by all of us. To say that Hillary should not raise this issues is to say that we should not examine Obama's character.
March 25, 2008 3:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can you provide a list of "all the Clintons [have] done for black people"? Not other Americans, just African-Americans? Thanks.
March 25, 2008 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Publicus; Ebony, 1993,"For the first time in history, four African Americans, Ron Brown, Mike Epsy, Jesse Brown and Hazel O'leary, will hold seats in the presidential cabinet." "Never before has a president appointed so many Blacks to the highest ranks of the Executive Branch." " with the appointment of Clifton Wharton Jr.as the number two man at the state department, Black America has achieved yet another historic first."
in 1994 African American unemployment was at a twenty five year low and the median income for Blacks was up $3,354. There were two and a half more small business loans to the African American community during the administration of Pres. Clinton.The African American poet, Maya Angelou, wrote the poem read at his second inauguration and called him "America's first Black president." Pres. Clinton has said he understands why African Americans moved from Hillary after Sen. Obama won Iowa and they realized he was a serious candidate, but what I don't understand is why you have to be so nasty about her?
March 25, 2008 10:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
excuse me if you're around, please give us an example of "All the things Clintons have done for Black people"? A link maybe? you just can't walk away without providing A FACT.
March 25, 2008 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pathetic. The desperation is simply pathetic.
Maybe it was because Obama wasn't around when Wright said those things? Also could be because if you watch the actual videos, in context, instead of just the sensationalized Fox News smear clips, nothing he said was all that out there:
http://www.thepersonalispolitical.com/2008/03/in-defense-of-rev-wright.html
To put it simply, the Hillary campaign is shameless. They just can't get enough of using right-wing smears, which is pretty pathetic given that both McCain and Huckabee have defended Obama. Also pretty pathetic given Hillary's own sketchy church associations:
http://www.thepersonalispolitical.com/2008/03/hillarys-own-church-problem-plot.html
March 25, 2008 3:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
May I ask, Why are you guys helping revive this BS? You need to call for release of her income tax. Talk about her lying about Bosnia.
March 25, 2008 3:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary doesn't need to revive it. Obviously the reporter would not of asked her the question if it wasn't on his and his listeners minds.
March 25, 2008 3:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
did you even read the post we're commenting on?
March 25, 2008 4:42 PM | Reply | Permalink