Gallup: Obama Retakes Lead Over Hillary

Today's Gallup tracking poll shows Barack Obama retaking the national lead over Hillary Clinton, after the Jeremiah Wright scandal had badly damaged his numbers and put him behind for nearly a week. Here are today's numbers, compared to yesterday:

Obama 48% (+3)
Clinton 45% (-2)

It would appear that Obama's big speech on Tuesday, combined with the Bill Richardson endorsement, have gone a long way in fixing his poll numbers for now. But he still has yet to fully recover the six-point lead he had in Gallup a little over a week ago.


Comments (107)

These daily nationwide tracking polls are sooooooooo meaningless. The didn't matter when he was down and they don't matter when he is up. Who cares!!!!!!

On another note, please madam speaker put a stop to the clintons and the damage they are causing to the dem nominee in November. Please. We are begging you. For the good of the country, please stop the clintons.

avatar

Those polls matter to the superdelegates.

He's also back to 80% chance of winning nomination on Intrade.

That was also likely the worst hit he's going to take, since it was based on a story that's been out their for a year. I'd say he's pretty well "vetted" now, thanks to Hillary and crew. He was wounded, but she was mortally wounded by the fight, increasing her nationwide disapproval to near 55%, with only about 40% of voters viewing her as honest and trustworthy.

avatar

Congrats! You don't have to eat the cracker in this latest TPM commenter Circle Jerk for Obama! Hurry up and spew your masturbatory Obama fan mail comments, everyone, or you might have to eat the cracker!

That's absolutely horrendous. Seriously, go away. If you've got no intelligent discourse to add at least have some dignity.

avatar

"Dignity?" Blog comment? Does not compute.

avatar

I really am worried now about how the Clintonite concern trolls will take this.

avatar

I seem to recall a lot of "this is the beginning of the end for the Great Deceiver, he won't recover, he's in freefall" garbage from them. It's been like a week and he's bouncing back. Freefall, indeed.

avatar

"But he still has yet to fully recover the six-point lead he had in Gallup a little over a week ago."

EXCELLENT NEWS FOR HILLARY!!!!

avatar

Rasmussen disagrees---I did challenge you to keep postin the Gallup poll---figuring it would turn around for Obama, who I favor. I feel honor bound to point out---Rasmussen has it the opposite---so far.

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows ongoing volatility in the Democratic Presidential Nomination. Nationally, Hillary Clinton now holds a very slight advantage over Barack Obama, 46% to 44%. Before the story broke about his former Pastor, Obama led Clinton by eight percentage points

avatar

I dont understand Rassmussen. They showed him WAY ahead all during Wright and has shown him downward ever since the speech.
It is not even counterintuitive ... it just doesnt make sense.
Wonder what is about their methodology that would mess things up like that. It cant be the four-to-three day rolling average difference

Rasmussen uses 4 days of polling to calculate their percentages (Gallup uses 3) and that seems to make a difference in their tracking. They seem to be slower to pick-up trends than Gallup.
I think it will rebound over the next week providing there aren't any more controversies like that.

avatar

Quick reaction:

Gallup said that their Tuesday night interviews (same night as the speech) still showed strong Clinton leanings. Obama has made gains on her every day since, taking the lead based on the strength of Friday night(!!) interviews being apparently much more favorable than the Tuesday night ones.

The two exclamation points are because of the long-documented problems with Friday night and Saturday night polling, problems that tend to favor Clinton over Obama. Friday night polls are much more likely to hit working-class and older people, who are more likely to be home, than upper-middle and younger people, who are more likely to be out. Now, to be sure, it'd not be the first time Obama ticked up on Friday night interviews, and they are problematic in general, so I wouldn't read too much into this. But between the glowing coverage of Obama's speech, the two big Iraq and Economy speeches, the Richardson endorsement, the Nagourney piece in the times speculating on whether Clinton can even win at this point, the follow-up Richardson interview where he basically urges Dems to start wrapping this thing up, and now some in the cable news catching on to the meme of "Clinton can't catch up"...and the problems with weekend polling...

I would wait until Wednesday's report on the Sun-Mon-Tue rolling average to try to figure out where the race stands now. That's the thing about these polls, they're somewhat trailing indicators..it's only after all this news has had a chance to trickle down, all these messages to get saturation, and all the problematic weekend polls and polls of days where the message had not yet reached saturation, that we can get an accurate picture of where things are. So, we'll see where things stand Wednesday.

Now Obama just needs an Edwards endorsement, and we're good to go.

"It would appear that Obama's big speech on Tuesday, combined with the Bill Richardson endorsement, have gone a long way in fixing his poll numbers for now. "

No, this is just the speech. The endorsement momentum is yet to be felt.

avatar

"long way" Isnt 3 points HALF way there in less than a week ?

We all know polls taken at this point mean very little to the actual outcome of these elections, but this poll does show that Sen. Obama was able to take the best 'swift-boating' Fox News et al could throw at him and still stand tall. I don't see how anyone (john edwards!!) can continue to doubt his toughness and tenacity...

Fox news and the rest can manufacture anything, but if achieves nothing - accept to make them look small - then why be afraid. Let's be ready and prepared for anything, but let's also remember that Barack Obama is not John Kerry!

avatar

Hillary is a cheap slut. Americas knows it.

avatar

Urgh. Idiot.

avatar

Hey now. I love Obama, and I'm psyched this bullshit didn't hurt him, but don't say that.

avatar

Not. This. Time.

We're not going to get swift-boated...

AND...

We're not going to throw out cheap and insipid attacks at fellow Democrats.

This Obama supporter disagrees with the Clinton campaign, but we're above petty name-calling.

Let's keep it civil.

avatar

What the heck? This has no place in discussion about the primary.

In fact, it's so nasty it sounds like it's someone trying to make Obama supporters look bad.

Can't wait for that flagging system in the works to make abusive post go awaaaaay!!

Agreed.

Sounds like a botched parody of the last statement by one of our regulars about Casey Knowles.

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/profile/JTHB

ROFL...

avatar

(a) "put him behind for nearly a week"?

(b) "fixing his poll numbers for now"?

(c) "has yet to fully recover"?

(a) A whole week he was behind... (b) But the fix is probably temporary... (c) Still pretty lame and maybe crippled for good...

Are you kidding? From down 7 to up 3 in three days! That's what I would call a stunning reversal. It indicates great residual strength in Obama's support. If he can emerge that quickly from something as potentially fatal as the Wright scandal -- lord, that has to be rotten news for Hillary. And as for those missing 3 points? I bet they'll have come home by Tuesday at the latest, with a friend or two in hand.

These polls don't do much- at best they capture the swing in public opinion, and the depth and length of it is almost unmeasurable. But I agree, Richardson endorsement gives certain validity and will help. Especially, when Hispanic voters begin to know the the H camp compared the governor with Judas and dismissed his endorsement as insignificant;

They are saying Richardson is today is because of Bill Clinton. So, can we now say Whatever Hillary is today is because of her husband? Nonsense

Give the man some credit for his own intellect, talent and politics- the way you should also give the credit for Hillary.

avatar
But he still has yet to fully recover the six-point lead he had in Gallup a little over a week ago.

Everyone's a critic. Ah, well. Not sure why you think this is only a temporary improvement, Eric...seems to me a 9-point swing in his favor in less than a week is more accurately described as a "stunning reversal".

I'll take these numbers.

They're obviously moving not just in the right direction, but quickly so. This has to look good to the superdels.

avatar

Let me be the first concern troll to step up to the plate. As to the endorsement power of the mighty Bill Richardson--well, I hope he has more mojo than Obama's Boyz from Massacusetts. (The beard doesn't help, either. Is he on vacation?) And I don't think we've heard the last sound bite from Rev. Wright. They'll be played every time Obama tries to unite us under his banner of hope. If he wants to win, he'd better drop that loser rhetoric and start talking like somebody who can actually do something.

avatar

Under the circumstances, I'll give you about an 8 out of 10 for effort. :)

I like the beard

A vice-presidential look about it...a vice-president for the 21st century

avatar

Nah, sorry. ^_^ OBAMA/BIDEN '08!!!!

avatar

Good Christ, Kleefeld, he's come back from what would have KILLED a lesser politician.

Is your negative view of Obama going to be telegraphed this transparently in all future posts?

Nope, sorry...it's:

Obama/Webb 2008!!!!

Now now. It's not Eric's fault. He's trying. It's his EDITOR, DT.

Last Dog Death Watch Continues.....

avatar

8/10? Is that all? Check out the CBS poll. Obama's "uniter" numbers don't look very good. (But thanks for not calling me nasty names.)

avatar

On another note, please madam speaker put a stop to the clintons and the damage they are causing to the dem nominee in November.

I rather think that Harry Reid would have a bit more influence over Senator Clinton. She's going back to the Senate and he runs it.

Otherwise, I agree that it's time to quit fighting over the nomination and turn all our money and energy on the real enemy - the Republicans.

avatar

The bigger reason why these polls are meaningless is because Hillary has already lost the nomination. It's just that she, Bill, a bunch of her supporters and the media aren't ready to face the facts.

avatar

Hey Tena! Glad to see you around. Guess who?

Silver herron,

Clinton is not cheap . . . She is broke . . . Just like her running-mate McCain.

McCain-Clinton '08
avatar

Bah, I think the "uniter" thing was impractical for the general, anyway.

As soon as Hillary concedes, watch Obama pivot from, "Unite America" to "Unite America to Kill The Lobbyist Scumbags(Who Run McCain's Campaign)."

avatar

Hi Jenn.

No need to guess - I get it. Nice to see you, too.

avatar

For this and the previous post:

Bill "BUBBA" Clinton is an embarrassment!

http://osi-speaks.blogspot.com/2008/03/someone-let-bill-bubba-clinton-loose.html#links

avatar

"l really am worried now about how the Clintonite concern trolls will take this.
Posted by observer2"

Funny...

Spirited Clinton adviser tells the New York Times that New Mexican governor's backing Obama during Holy Week was "appropriate" and "ironic" because it was like Judas selling out Jesus.

"Mr. Richardson's endorsement came right around the anniversary of the day when Judas sold out for 30 pieces of silver, so I think the timing is appropriate, if ironic," Mr. Carville said, referring to Holy Week.

TOTALLY AGREE!!!!!!!!!!!

You seem to have the Clintons mistaken for a Royal Family to whom a mere servant and subject like Richardson is bound to serve even unto its very wives, children, and cattle.

Got to break it to you that this is a republic, and a guy who gets appointed to an office by a President doesn't owe his wife anything beyond civility.

avatar

If you did not know how stupid that sound allow me too tell you! In this modern word Hillary could not be compared to Jesus no more then Bill Richardson could not be comparied to Judas. To say that speaks volumes about you.

This country is made of freedoms, the freedom to change your mind. Go with the best for person for the job. Who better to choose if not Bill Richardson working close with the clintons. If Bill Richardson does not think she is Jesus, How can you?

Free choice

avatar

"An act of betrayal," said James Carville, an adviser to Mrs. Clinton and a friend of Mr. Clinton.

"Mr. Richardson’s endorsement came right around the anniversary of the day when Judas sold out for 30 pieces of silver, so I think the timing is appropriate, if ironic," Mr. Carville said, referring to Holy Week."
James Carville, the "Golem" of the Democratic Party? :-):
"During his centuries under the Ring's influence, he developed a sort of split personality: "Sméagol" still vaguely remembered things like friendship and love, while "Gollum" was a slave to the Ring and would kill anyone who tried to take it."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gollum

HC '08, I really admire your enthusiasm and what has been, thus far, a very positive energy. But I think comparing Richardson to Judas is a bit much. Is he not free to endorse whomever he thinks would be the best president? And if he is only endorsing Hillary out of loyalty to Bill, wouldn't that, then, make the endorsement worthless, and, in fact--not corrupt--but certainly not in the height of honesty either? Shouldn't be aspire to something higher than I-gave-you-a-job-so-you-endorse-my-wife-and-if-not- we're-going-to-make-you-pay? And wouldn't you rather have people endorsing Hillary on her own merits, rather than on the basis of what her husband did for them? Is every HRC supporter who served under Bill just doing it out of loyalty, and therefore should I not pay attention to them?

I knew there were some people who think HRC is Jesus. I just didn't think Carville was one of them.

avatar

Carville has a history of this kind of Godfather type revenge for perceived betrayal of loyalty. When Stephanopoulos wrote his "All Too Human" memoir of life in the Clinton White House in the late 90's, right around the time of Monica, Carville savaged him in the press for it and even wrote a book, "Stickin," about how important it is to Never Turn Your Back On A Friend.

I think it's ridiculous, of course. I remember seeing and liking the "War Room" documentary about the brilliant strategy both of them employed to help get Clinton elected. Along with Clinton himself, I've lost a lot of respect for Carville with his mindless pro-Clinton ranting. Just because Bill did some good things in the 90's, it doesn't excuse in advance all the rubbish that came later, from him or Hillary.

avatar

I agree that the polls are irrelevant.

Obama The Great Deceiver will be shown for what he is more and more.

Clinton will win the remaining important primaries and have momentum going to the convention.

New scandals will taint Obama (the homophobic angle has not even seen the light of day....yet).

The DNC rules committee will establish new rules at the convention to resolve the stalemate as both candidates will be unable to clinch the nomination. All delegates will be released to vote as they wish. There will be lots of horse trading. Obama will cry foul.

By the convention Clinton's star will be rising, Obama The Deceiver's setting.

Neck and neck in the stretch, at the wire it's...it's...Clinton by a nose!

Whew. That was exciting.

Clinton vs. McCain.


avatar

Are you being sarcastic, or are you really that dumb?

"The Great Deceiver?" Wouldn't that be Damien Thorn?

Between you and HC08, such apocalyptic imagery. Whatever ails you?

You have to admit, it's a bad sign when you have to work that hard to come up with a scenario where Clinton wins. Good effort, though.

avatar

Also, he isn't homophobic. In spite of the nonsense surrounding Rev. Wright, the one thing that everyone agrees with is that his church has been active in the gay rights community in Chicago.

But hey, whatever helps you sleep at night...

avatar

So if Richardson is Judas and Hillary is Jesus then Bill must be Mary Magdelan. Yeah, I can see kind of that.

Hardly. On Easter morning Mary Magdelene was the most honored person of all by being the first to whom the risen Lord appeared. For this, the early Church called her "the Apostle to the Apostles" because she took the news to them.

It is often rightly seen as the most feminist circumstance in all history.

Hardly the kind of thing you meant to attribute to Hillary. (I assume yours was a clumsy reference to the tradition that M.M. had been a prostitute. It was her glory to have become a great saint despite this. To use it to her dishonor is to go against the whole Gospel. It is clear that you did not mean to do that.)

Actually, he's likening Bill to MM, not Hill.

I'm picturing this whole thing as Jesus Christ Superstar, with Bill bringing down the house for his searing rendition of "I don't know how to love (her)."

avatar

fogu2,

Yeah, that was probably exciting for you, but before long you'll wake up from your wet dream into the cold light of reality.

Or maybe you won't. But if you're actually a Democrat we could use you in the real world the Fall when we try to take the White House away from the Republicans. Which will be a very important thing to do.

Amen!

(Christian readers please excuse this bad pun for I know not what I've done. Not trying to undermine the most important holiday on the calendar)

With all this talk of Judas and and who is Jesus in the carville quote, I would say that these poll numbers give us our answer

He is risen!!

(hat tip to my friend Michael)

HC08

I knew Jesus, Hillary Clinton is not our savior.

Ok, so Obama is God, what is the big deal?

Obama is my kind of guy, he learns from his own mistakes. He is humble and caring. He is a level headed individual, with tremendous amount of wisdom.

I don't know how he became what he is today, but I am glad he decided to show up on the national scene!

I have to think his background has something to do wth it. Does he speak another language? I know he can say: "Si, se puede." which is "Yes we can in Spanish. I can say: "Fuck yeah we can."

Now, we also know that Obama has been VERY successful at communicating. Basic, down to earth, old fashion communicator. People like to see him talk, just talk, 20K or so, or maybe even more, show up when he shows up! I always say, I LOVE to watch him THINK! Yes think. To me, he is the most articulate, clear thinking, logical, pragmatic leader...I do love to watch him think.

When he gets a question, no matter what it is or from whom, he pauses, focuses, and then gives you this brilliant response, then you go WOW! I usually stand up and start clapping in my living room.

Obama also says STUFF about hope and our future, he makes you want to be positive, he makes you want to work HARDER to help your country move forward. He says things about all of us working together to accomplish more. His words are like those posters you see in the office of your Sales Manager at work (if you ever worked in sales), highly motivational, soaring with the eagles, instead of pecking with the chicken, type of advice!

Obama himself is an example of what America could be. When I am feeling down I find myself playing videos of some of his speeches. I go back to the 2004 convention speech, makes me cry every time.

I also watched his speech this week about race, about 12 times. I also watch the Ted Kennedy endorsement speech, then from now on, I will be watching the Richardson endorsement over and over.
Kennedy and Richardson are people I respect, the words they used were powerful and touching. I love to watch grown man, experienced man, show affection, when they KNOW that there IS a there, there!

Nutshell: I am not suprised to see Obama rise to the mountain top!

avatar

Sheesh! Carville must have had a little more whiskey than usual when he made this statement. It's just silly. And ridiculous. And insulting. And it doesn't say much about his view of public service. At least Richardson has now shown that he puts the good of the Democratic Party above the good of the Clintons.


Besides, I thought Mark Penn said Richardson's endorsement was basically worthless. Oh, right, Penn might choke if he ever tried to make an accurate, truthful statement.

avatar

You think it is far fetched that neither candidate will clinch the nomination?

You think it is far fetched that Clinton will win many of the most important upcoming primaries?

You think that it is far fetched that the rules committee will have to figure out a way to break the deadlock at the convention?

You think that the scandals will not continue with Obama? (ask him why he repeatedly refuses to have his picture taken with the mayor of San Francisco, who temporarily legalized gay marriage, even though he appeared at Obama fundraisers.)

You my Obamish friends are the ones that need to exit the Thetan spaceship and come back to Earth.

This is not even close to being over.

"You think it is far fetched that Clinton will win many of the most important upcoming primaries?"

Define *many*. (PA and Puerto Rico?)

Define *win*.

Officially you don't *win* a primary.* You win the *nomination* by virtue of the total number of delegates.


*Not understanding this leads to the absurdity of Clinton's insisting that she *won* Texas when the events in Texas increased Obama's lead. It's so barmy.

These Obama anti-homosexual insinuations are just nonsense.

I'd direct you to Andrew Sullivan's blog for a rather comprehensive take on Obama and the LGBT community.

"Many of the most important upcoming primaries."

You mean the ones Hillary wins after she wins them? I'm just trying to be certain I follow you. Not the boutique states? Or the ones where latte' is served? Or where there aren't African Americans in large numbers?

Here we go again. A minute ago I was aiming for the goal post and it was a chip shot, but when I strode up to the ball, not only had it mysteriously gotten further away, it had also been moved from center.

In all honesty, if this continued race is no good for the Democratic nominee, how on earth does anyone who supports Hillary convinced that not only would it be good for her to continue but to smash and grab the nomination at the convention through these means?

avatar

is this really necessary?

Sorry for the spamming, but I just noticed this today.

Is Obama really closing in on 2 million donors?

http://my.barackobama.com/page/contribute_c/sofar08_sidebar/graphic

(from the battle deck of the Klingon bird of prey...fck some Thetans)

fogu2 wants to know why Obama wouldn't have his picture taken with Gavin Newsom (San Fran mayor)

As Lewis Black would say - It's them queers! (fogu2 wants you to think Barack is a homophobe!)

Or maybe it's just because Newsom endorsed Hillary?

No, no, there's something else...because it was the fact that Barack ducked out on photo-ops with Newsom that made Newsom piss off and endorse Clinton

Oh, I remember. It was the fact that Newsom, even though married to something close to a supermodel, still had to bang and rebang the wife of his best friend and chief of staff...and then drag all parties through a humiliating press conference (which he seemed to enjoy)

Got his own agenda much?

So, fogu2...looks like you just fogged yourself

Seriously folks...limbic brains like this don't just walk in to TPM off the street. They are getting paid. Don't feed the trolls!

avatar

The brightest aspect of this news is how quickly Barack bounced back from this major setback.

All the superdelegates whom the Clintons have subjected this past week with pleas about Barack's "unelectabilty" would have quickly discovered how hollow this argument is.

There is a benefit to all this mud the Clintons are thwoing at Barack: The Republicans would unlikely create anything more jarring.

The Wright controversy would be ancient history by the fall. Rightwing talk show hosts have already beaten it to death in the past seven days or so, so much so that people are already getting bored by it.

Roll out the 527 ads about Wright, and people would say "But we've heard this before."

I watched last night how Jack Kemp firmly rebuffed Fox's Sean Hanity when Hanity brought up the Wright matter. Hanity was choked for words because he had nothing else to rail against.

For those who may be wondering who Jack Kemp is, he is a prominent Republican, who ran as vice presidential candidate in the Bob Dole ticket in 1996.

The superdelegates should do the right thing now and support Barack, to put an end to this BILARY nonesense. And those who have pledged to support Clinton should start the exodus now!

avatar

fogu2,

No, you're right. It's not really over, and neither candidate can clinch the nomination based on the remaining primaries. But it's close to over.

It's fine with me if HC plays it out a while longer. I just want her to maintain some sort of focus on what's good for the Democratic Party, and be less willing to damage Obama, who will very likely be the Party's nominee in the Fall. That's all I ask, and due to the obvious importance of this election, it shouldn't be too much to ask. But she, Bill and her campaign continue to have problems with this.

avatar

THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!!

Obama is terrific on GLBT issues. He wants a full repeal of DOMA (which Clinton does not) wants to include GLBT in the non-discrimination act and wants to repeal (BIll's) don't ask don't tell. A good portion of Edwards' GLBT steering committee has gone to Obama.

And it is, unfortunately, a far greater

Yes. Been keeping the numbers myself since the beginning (I'm a bit nerdy, I admit.)

First of all, the pledged delegate count has been Obama's since the Potomac primaries (thank you Virginia! Clinton's campaign never expected that 35% to 64% loss.)

In the remaining primaries, Obama wins in IN and NC should offset Clinton's win in PA. Clinton win in KY is offest by Obama win in OR. Clinton win in WV is offset by Obama win in MT and SD. Puerto Rico and Guam are unknown, but not enough delegates to matter.

Richardson was my first choice, so am more than happy to see him support Obama, and hope other super delegates follow quickly. Hillary's knee-capping has to end. Carville gave his life up when he married Cheney's gal Mary, and he and Bill Clinton have both lost what it takes.

Hasn't the pledged delegate count been Obama's since Iowa?

Hasn't the pledged delegate count been Obama's since Iowa?

Well, yes, in a way. And Obama has won every month so far. But the % win that Clinton could expect, in looking at her history, made it improbable to expect a win of the nomination after the Potomac. The numbers (probabilities) really stacked up against her at that point.

Oh, I see. You're saying he clinched the pledged delegates after the Potomac.

avatar

the longer hillary stays in the more it is hurting our other democrat candidates. many republican senators that are running would be toast if the democrat challengers could ride along on obama's coattails. Instead, hillary & obama are fighting and mccain is getting away with major errors.

avatar

Jack Kemp. Just WOW!

That statement by Carville is one of the most vile things I've heard in this campaign.

When is Billary going to renounce him?

(not holding my breath...)

Yes, precisely, Mr. Hyperrevue.

"Oh, I see. You're saying he clinched the pledged delegates after the Potomac."

When you see the post-mortem of this primary, Virginia will be the key.

The definition of a turdblossom ad hominem, grow up.

avatar

Obama and Hill are playing for second place. Neither one of them has a chance in the general election.

Get used to it- President McCain

avatar

Hillary and Obama are playing for second place, no chance in the general election.

Get used to it-President McCain

avatar

the wright matter is a molehill -- what worries me is that americans always shiver with fright when the warmongers start forcing the leading democrats into a corner -- americans have little at stake in a war, or so they think, because military service is voluntary: as long as it's just the neighbor's kid who's stationed in iraq, americans can sit on their ample haunches, munching on anything that will make them fatter -- if charlie rangel were to succeed in bringing about a national service program, all families would have a stake in war, so they would be likelier to oppose war -- but as things are, when bush & cheney launch an attack against iran, leading democrats will cheer & americans will shift toward supporting mccain -- the american anti-war movement is a front: it's actually an anti-draft movement & it thrives on the continuing war in iraq, which only adds to the ranks of those opposing charlie rangel's plan -- in sum, our country is fated to keep waging war till it collapses

avatar

Well, you're not correct about Newsom and Obama. Obama's refusal goes to way before any "scandals" broke about Newsom and long before he endoresed Hillary.

It was about his fear of being seen with the guy who legalized gay marriage.

Your guy is a homophobe. It's going to come out (pun intended) and once again he will have to explain.

When the explaining begins it is all over.

avatar

It's easy to make charges without supporting evidence. Especially charges which can't be disproved, even by evidence to the contrary.

avatar

Freetospeak,

Thank you for posting your comment. I think you summed up why a lot of us feel the way we do about Obama.

avatar

Obama came out with a truthful and heartfelt discussion of his reasons of his pros and cons concerning Rev. Wright, after days and days of criticism from the MSM and most of their pundits. I will be awaiting MSM response to Hillarys connection to the elite sect of Washington know as "The Family" as per the recent article in The Nation. This article should be a must read for all serious people looking for truth.

avatar


Your guy is a homophobe. It's going to come out (pun intended) and once again he will have to explain.

Any other black stereotype you want to come up with about Obama and post?

Jesus.

avatar

I'm not too worried about any of this Obama/homophobe nonsense. The majority of the LBGT community is savvy enough to seek out his true feelings. Also, if the Repubs want to try and smear him with that, it will only play well with Repub voters. Good luck losers.

Right. A homophobe who advocates for gay civil rights?

In Illinois he co-sponsored a bill prohibiting workplace and housing discrimination against gays AND transgenders. In the Senate he's co-sponsored bills to extend domestic benefits to gay federal employees. On the stump he advocates for the Matthew Shepard Act and for a federal non-discrimination act.

I was cut off above, but I was going to say that, alas, it is less damaging politically to be homophobic than to advocate for gay civil rights. I wish I lived in a world where homophobia could cost someone an election, but unfortunately this is not the case. Obama is taking the politically difficult, but right route. I wish he would call for full marriage, but I think this is best done a step at a time, too--and at least he supports a full repeal of DOMA, unlike Hillary.

If I've said it once, I've said it a hundred times

The Clintons are parasites

If Jimmy Carter, Al Gore and Nancy Pelosi are the dealmakers, it won’t take Hercule Poirot to figure out who had knives out for Hillary in this “Murder on the Orient Express.” Carter, who felt he was not treated with a lot of respect by the Clintons when they were in the White House, favors Obama. “The Clintons will be there when they need you,” said a Carter friend.

MoDo
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/23/opinion/23dowd.html?hp=&pagewanted=print

.

Well I had determined that I was going to quit my Obama bashing and hope that the media would do a better job now that Obama's true colors had started to emerge.

I should have known better; This morning on the Chris Mathews show, Mathews tried to spin the "For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country" statement by using the corrected speech that Obama campaign put out to try to correct the record on what she had been saying on the stump.

The first time I heard this spin - this lie - was by Bill Schneider of CNN: When an outraged Lou Dobbs interviewed him regarding her statements, Bill Schneider kept correcting Dobbs that she said "really" proud meaning that she was always proud but now she was really proud.

She had given the original version of the speech several times before it came to her campaign's attention that people were feeling outraged by the statement and it might hurt the campaign when it was re-played as it was then sure to be. They then made the calculated decision to put out a new version of the speech rather than dropping the statement altogether, adding the word "really" to distort what she had orignally stated.

They had to do that since to just stop making the speech would not solve their problem since the statement was already out there on video. So they did the next best thing; Put out a video with the modified speech and hope it would be copied as much as the former and thereby mitigate the damage done. So they started making the modified speech to spin that argument.

And now Chris Mathews who is an Obama cheerleader like everyone else over at MSNBC, actually corrected his guest this morning who referred to that now infamous statement, saying that "she said 'really proud' " .

So I looked for a clip of the original speech and found this video which I was glad someone made, which shows how she changed the speech that day. After her modification, she stopped giving the speech altogether.

We know what she meant just like we know now, what her Pastor Wright meant. Neither, love this country or respect it.

SEE VIDEO BELOW AND JUDGE FOR YOURSELF:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGjR81pFJI4

Ridiculousness beyond reproach.

Keep digging, friend. Keep digging. I'm pretty sure there's one out there about how Obama doesn't wear an American flag (though there's one in his f*ing campaign logo, but whatever). I'm also pretty sure there's one about how he doesn't salute the flag, or is it that he doesn't cover his heart? Or won't recite the pledge of allegiance? Or, correct me if I'm wrong, that he was schooled in a radical madrassa?

Or that he smears peanut butter between his toes? Fox News and Newsmax with video at 11!

Oh, the humanity!

avatar

RaeK, I'm curious. Did you