« Obama's Church: Pillorying Wright An Assault Upon African-American Culture | Home | Boston Globe Notices Limbaugh Dems For Hillary »

Gallup: Obama Leads Hillary Among Dems, But Trails McCain For The General

Today's Gallup tracking poll gives Barack Obama a three-point national lead over Hillary Clinton, a margin unchanged since yesterday:

Obama 48% (-1)
Clinton 45% (-1)

On the other hand, Obama now trails John McCain by a three-point margin, a possible sign that the Jeremiah Wright controversy has been a drag on his general election numbers:

McCain (R) 47%, Obama (D) 44%
Clinton (D) 46%, McCain (R) 46%

30 Comments

| Leave a comment

Of course it's going to have a modest effect in the immediate aftermath. This has been a bad couple of days for Obama. But long-term, I don't see this having a lasting impact. Obama's advantage should return in a week or so.

No, this SHOULD have a long and lasting impact. He's been supportive of a racist, hate-mongering person who masquerades as a pastor on Sundays. In what alternate-reality world would this NOT have an impact.

I can only conclude from your comment that you are a racist, hate-mongering individual yourself, and as a result you don't see any problem with the close relationship.

More racist than Hillary?

Anyway, hyperbole aside, this will not effect Obama enough for him to lose the delegate lead.


Why do we care? This doesn't matter at all. National polls don't matter, either for the primary or the general, and picking some polls and not others, all with statistically insignificant changes is a waste of time. We can read the polls on the right, I don't see any reason to keep posting the same old news, yes, both races are tight nationally, that hasn't changed, and neither matter.

I'd like TPM to post about Hillary not being able explain her false assertion that winning a state in a primary has any relation to how she will do in the general against McCain:

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/hillary-cant-answer-the-most-b.php

Hey Einstein, the last time I checked there were no Caucuses in the general election either. And yet Obama loves to taut his lead in states and pledged delegates based largely on the strength of these faux-election results.


Anyone who has changed their mind about Obama after hearing Wright is a fool.

the mentor:
"God damn Amerika"
"we started AIDS"
the spouse:
"for the 1st time I'm proud of this country"
"this country is downright mean"

anybody detect a pattern?

So, were you an Obama supporter before, but now you're not? If you changed your mind, why?

The answer to your question should have been EXTREMELY obvious to you if you had read the response to your comment with any objectivity. You may not be able to fathom this, but some people just have a problem with a candidate who has a close relationship with someone who says the kind of things that Wright has said. If you can't understand that, then I suggest you are the fool.

Wright has zero impact on Obama policy, unlike, say, James Dobson (of the weekly white house briefings). Obama has never in his life expressed anything along the lines of Wright's more outrageous statements.

some people just have a problem with a candidate who has a close relationship with someone who says the kind of things that Wright has said.

Those are the fools.

Are you one?

By his own admission, Wright has had profound influence on him, PERIOD. To suggest that this influence doesn't affect his thinking in ALL THINGS would be stupid.

I was wrong about you. You're not a fool... you're a barely-functioning, half-wit moron that someone has taught to operate a keyboard. Critical, objective thinking is beyond the scope of your pea-brain.

user-pic

The most important thing to pay attention to, especially for semi-automatic delegates, is that Obama was thirty points behind Hillary, and in state after state, he has cut the margin, either winning, or not losing as badly as earlier polls indicated.

Hillary has a harder time overcoming less than encouraging poll results.

THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!!

The analysis of the results is incorrect. It should read something like: "No significant difference was found between the support between any of the candidates in either the primary or general election."

While there is surely someone in the lead this data insufficient to come to any conclusion as to who that might be.

Of course the language should make more sense and someone should have edited it before hitting "send" but you get my point. I'm analyzing lab data right now and it's starting to get to me, gimme a break.

Sigh.

This may also reflect a change completely within the margin of error. But I will nevertheless argue that this is totally based on a story I've been personally following.

Please stop blaring headlines and speculating about daily tracking polls. if you want to find out what people think of the Wright scandal, commission your own G-D poll. Kos manages to do it.

Well, I, for one, will go ahead and speculate.

It appears that general election movement away from Obama, if that is what may be happening, marginal as it may be, does not benefit Hillary. For a certain group of swing voters, it's either Obama or McCain.

Let's assume for a second that Obama can "unite the country" and Hillary is "polarizing." Where is this in the poll results? Sure, this is just one poll, but Obama has never significantly (3+ points) led Hillary in G.E. match-up averages.

The media and blogosphere narratives on this question are completely divorced from the empirical evidence. The two Democrats have different strengths and weaknesses but they are both EQUALLY ELECTABLE.

If it comes down to who knows the government better once he/she arrives with a slim mandate, I pick Hillary. But I like Obama very much as well -- I think each candidate should make the argument for the candidacy on the merits, not with this bogus "electability" argument

user-pic

RyanM said "Let's assume for a second that Obama can "unite the country" and Hillary is "polarizing." Where is this in the poll results? "

If the pollster's asked who would accept Mrs. Bill Clinton as president of the United States and leader of the world, you would see. Even if she squeaks out an elecction by some electoral college fluke or Supreme Court decision, like her kindred spirit George W. Bush, much of the nation will never accept her leadership. We will be back to the constant, deep, mean-spirited partisan warfare that is vintage Clinton.

Hillary has shown what type of leaders she would be with her Iraq war vote and her dishonest, cronie-filled campaign. We've had eight years of a presidency built on lies, family ties, loyalty over compentency, corporate dollars and spin spin spin. NO MORE Bush-Clinton-Clinton-Bush-Bush-Clinton.

user-pic

Obama seems to be in a very strong position, particulary in advance of a release of the Clintons' tax returns, Hillary's budget earmarks, the list of major donors - foreign and domestic - to the Clinton Library and Foundation (and associated favors?), and Hillary's shallow record evidenced in the First Lady papers.

My prediction is that both Obama and McCain will look like Saints in contrast to the true Clinton record once revealed and scrutinized.

Why isn't the press holding Hillary accountable for her secretiveness? There must be a lot to there to hide.

These numbers are statistically identical to those from the day before.

Here is Al Giordano's take on tracking polls along with other things that don't matter including Edwards endorsement.

http://ruralvotes.com/thefield/?p=900

Obama seems to be in a very strong position, particulary in advance of a release of the Clintons' tax returns, Hillary's budget earmarks, the list of major donors - foreign and domestic - to the Clinton Library and Foundation (and associated favors?), and Hillary's shallow record evidenced in the First Lady papers.

My prediction is that both Obama and McCain will look like Saints in contrast to the true Clinton record once revealed and scrutinized.

Why isn't the press holding Hillary accountable for her secretiveness? There must be a lot to there to hide.

Do you really think that Clinton will actually release anything? I don't. Their tone on the issue is defensive and accusatory. They most certainly are not going to release Clinton Library or Foundation donors, the White House records, or the earmarks. They may release something loosely passing as their taxes or they will decide not to. They are getting a free cover since everyone in the media is hyperventilating over the Wright deal anyway.

Well Obama seems to be fully vetted, unlike Hillary. I'm beginning to fear that unless she is scrutinized to the extent that he is, this whole thing is going to change dramatically.

I'm a big Obama supporter, but I'm having a hard time seeing how he moves past this Wright thing. His pastor says "God damn America"... that's going to be a hard thing for American voters to be ok with, even if Obama has nothing to do with it. It's 100 times worse than a Swift boat.

Even if I do agree with Wright.

Funny how we are ok with vetting the entire history of our candidates, but god forbid you vet the dirty dark history of our country (like Wright is doing for the African-America congregation).

I think Obama has already moved past this.

I think this will have little to no effect on the campaign as a whole.

Obama still loses PA, then regains any losses in the states that follow, and he is elected the Democratic candidate for President in Denver.


How to people look past this? When the Iraq war is still going on, and the economy is in the tank, and McCain is the worst choice.

That's how people will look past it.

I'm with the email that was posted on Josh's front page this morning. How about BOTH candidates AND the brain-dead media cut out all this crap for a while and address the fact that the financial sector is in full meltdown and likely to take the real economy with it? Something tells me voters in s state like PA are a lot more worried about putting food on the table than about Obama's church or Hillary's tax returns. How about it candidates- what are you going to do if you inherit this disaster in January?

To all those Obama fans who seem to be rattled by the latest Wright non-issue.

The real issues here are Iraq war with resultant US status in the comity of nations, economy, human rights, poverty, pragmatic politics etc. For all this to happen, Obama and with a coat tail of senate and congress is needed.

So, stop being wuzzies and stiffen up to meet the kitchen sink non-issues head on.

Obama's negatives

TODAY
Obama
44% Favorable
50% Unfavorable (highest in campaign...going up please)

Clinton
46% Fav
52% Unfavorable


http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
Monday, March 17, 2008


The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows John McCain with a six-percentage point lead over both potential Democratic opponents. McCain currently leads Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton by an identical 48% to 42% margin. McCain has a double-digit lead over Clinton among unaffiliated voters and is essentially even with Obama among those same voters. However, McCain makes greater inroads among Democrats with Obama as the nominee.

McCain has gained ground against both Democrats in recent days as stories about Obama’s former Pastor, Jeremiah Wright, have been widely discussed(see recent daily results). Wright is viewed favorably by just 8% of American voters and 73% consider his comments racially divisive.

The dialogue about Wright’s controversial comments appears to have had at least a short-term impact on public perceptions of Barack Obama. The Illinois Senator is viewed favorably today by just 47% of voters nationwide. That’s down five points since last Thursday (see recent daily results). The number with an unfavorable view of Obama has risen from 44% on Thursday to 50% today. Among White voters, Obama is now viewed favorably by 43% and unfavorably by 54%.

Looked at from a slightly longer perspective, Obama’s overall favorable ratings peaked at 56% on February 21, shortly after he won the Wisconsin Primary. At that point, Clinton began raising questions about Obama as part of the campaign that ultimately enabled her to win the Texas and Ohio Primaries. Since then, Obama’s net favorability ratings have fallen seventeen points (from plus 14 points on February 21 to minus 3 points today).

McCain, visiting Iraq and left out of the Democratic mudslinging, is now viewed favorably by 54%, unfavorably by 42%. Clinton is viewed favorably by 46%, unfavorably by 52%. Her unfavorable total has been at or above 50% for most of the past month (see recent daily results). Negative attitudes towards Clinton remain more firmly entrenched than for the other candidates—35% have a Very Unfavorable opinion of Clinton, 29% say the same about Obama, and 18% hold such a negative view of McCain.

In the race for the Democratic Presidential Nomination, Monday’s numbers show Obama with 46% support from Likely Democratic Primary Voters while Clinton earns 44% of the vote (see recent daily results). Among Democrats, Clinton leads 48% to 42%, but Obama has a substantial lead among unaffiliated voters likely to participate in a Democratic Primary.

Obama continues to enjoy overwhelming support from African-American voters while Clinton leads by seventeen points among White voters. Robert Novak takes a look at the Democrats’ Racial Divide and Geraldine Ferraro’s puzzling role in highlighting the divide. A recent Rasmussen Reports poll found that just 37% hold a favorable opinion of Ferraro and that most disagree with her recent comments.

Democrats now lead in states with 214 Electoral Votes while the GOP leads in states with 189 Electoral Votes. When “leaners” are added, the Democrats lead 247 to 229. Recent polling shows that, over the past month, McCain has gained ground in Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Both Democrats continue to lead in New York, Connecticut and California (see summary of recent state general election polling).

Democrats also retain a modest lead in the Generic Congressional Ballot.

Daily tracking results are collected via nightly telephone surveys and reported on a four-day rolling average basis. The next Presidential Tracking Poll update is scheduled for Tuesday at 11:00 a.m. The results are also compiled on a full-week basis and crosstabs for the full-week results are available for Premium Members. See crosstabs for general election match-ups, favorable ratings and Democratic primary.

Rasmussen Markets data now give Obama a 72.0% chance to win the Democratic nomination while expectations for a Clinton victory are at 28.9%. Market data also suggests that Obama has a 43.7% chance to become the next President. Expectations for McCain to become President are at 39.4% while Clinton’s prospects are at 17.6%. Numbers in this paragraph are from a prediction market, not a poll. Using a trading format where traders "buy and sell" candidates, issues, and news features, the Rasmussen Markets harness competitive passions to provide a reliable leading indicator of upcoming events. We invite you to participate in the Rasmussen Markets. It costs nothing to join and add your voice to the collective wisdom of the market.

Each Monday, full week results are released based upon a seven-day rolling average. While the daily tracking result are useful for measuring quick reaction to events in the news, the full week results provide an effective means for evaluating longer-term trends.

Daily tracking results are collected via nightly telephone surveys and reported on a four-day rolling average basis. The general election sample is currently based upon interviews with 1,600 Likely Voters. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence.

Excellent post! Notice how you don't hear a peep from the Obama-zombies when you post negative info about him?

user-pic

Yes, this may have as long-lasting impact as Gennifer Flowers did on a certain other Clinton.

Leave a comment

Recommended Reader Posts

  • Unwritten...
    by stillidealistic
  • BABIES, RACCOONS AND HEALTH CARE
    by dickday
  • Two Dreamers, by Dorothea Lange
    by Rutabaga Ridgepole
  • Tsunami Wave: Will Wipe Out Republican Party
    by coonsey
  • OBVIOUSLY, YOU AREN'T A HUNTER.....
    by wvbiker
  • The Stupack Amendment played politics with women's lives and won.
    by J. Clarence
  • wooden projects
    by kubaser
  • holly colorado
    by blumun
  • figures geometry
    by muberul
  • short stories
    by lumacer



  • Resources

    The Palin Effect

    GOP Map Of Sleaze

    Tire Swinging

    The Final Debate

    World of Sleaze

    All About Sarah

    The Presidential Debates: Round 2

    The Vice-Presidential Debates: Biden v. Palin

    Critic or Cheerleader The Definitive McCain Iraq Timeline

    The John McCain John Hagee Timeline

    Masthead

    Editor-in-Chief
    Josh Marshall

    Reporter-Bloggers
    Elana Schor
    Eric Kleefeld



    Subscribe to this blog's feed.

    Advertise Liberally
    Share
    Close Social Web Email

    "To" Email Address

    Your Name

    Your Email Address