« Poll: Obama Ahead Of Hillary Nationally For First Time | Home | Hillary: Obama Is So Friendly, He Won't Fight »

Sources: Hillary To Be Endorsed By John Glenn

As I suggested below, former Ohio Senator John Glenn will endorse Hillary, according to two Democratic sources familiar with the decision.

It's a decent get in a state that's pivotal to Hillary's hopes of turning the race's narrative around in early March. Glenn, a former astronaut, is a major figure in Ohio politics and is the first American to orbit the Earth.

Of course, it's unclear whether endorsements can change the trajectory of the race this late in the game, so we'll see how much this matters. Still, it's noteworthy.


101 Comments

| Leave a comment

What's the evidence that this is a "key get"?

I remember Glenn's endorsement of Kerry being touted as something that would help him win Ohio and it didn't really help much at all.

Ted Strickland is more important than Glenn.

same info posted twice in 90 minutes.

couldn't you just update the old one?

unless that was technically impossible, the situation raises questions about an agenda.

user-pic

hah, if you're gonna point to that as proof of an agenda, well, you must have...an agenda

c'mon now.

John Glenn was the first American to orbit the Earth, not the moon.

Apollo 8 was the first manned orbit of the moon in 1968.

That's nice.


Obama 2008

I don't think it's an agenda so much as Greg trying to publicize his breaking of this story. That also explains why he's hyping it as something bigger than it really is.

user-pic

Yet another geriatric for Clinton . . . Talk about conquering the old by ignoring the brave new one.

I guess this is so much needed good news for Clinton.

Should be "some" not "so".

Yeah, wow. An endorsement from one of the Keating Five. I'm sure that will boost Hillary's stature.

One less thing she could slam McCain with in the general. How can you criticize someone for being involved in a scandal that one of your supporters was in himself?

Stop BASHING THIS SITE
GO BACK TO MARCUS AT DAILY KOS

that is where the CULT is!!

now if OBAMA turns out to be the NOMINEE i will be a staunch supporter !!! end of story
i wonder if you guys can say the same? (consider what michelle obama said about this)

*HILLARY 2008*

Of course this site has a bias.
Just like all the others.
Just like you.
Just like me.

When the bias swings against your bias enough, you will leave.

user-pic

This is perfect.

Really.

Except, of course, I'm not biased. Oh no.

Um, that's MarKOS of Daily Kos. See where the site name comes from?

I read it right off of my cult card.

user-pic

Runchadrun is correct.

Glenn was a Mercury astronaut, not an Apollo astronaut. John Glenn was the first American to orbit the earth in capsule Friendship 7. Alan Shepherd was the first American "in space" in a sub-orbital flight in capsule Freedom 7.

Frank Borman, James Lovell and William Anders were the first men to orbit the Moon in Apollo 8.

The fact that these facts have been forgetten shows that the Glenn endorsment isn't a big deal. It means something to a very narrow demographic, a demographic already firmly in Clinton's camp.

user-pic

John Glenn is still extremely popular in Ohio. The fact that some of this blog don't know who is means nothing in a statewide primary endorsement. Glenn's popularity in Ohio however does.

He isn't even a superdelegate is he?

user-pic

John Glenn as a ‘BIG’ endorsement?
You’re kidding, right?

Not to be disrespectful, but I’m 49, and
I didn’t even know he was still alive.

I find it hard to believe that anyone who
wasn’t already voting for HRC would be
affected by Senator Glenn’s decision.

This may not result is anything, but I picked this campaign to send a letter to Richardson to endorse Barack before TX primary. No harm in trying.

Here is the link:
http://action.richardsonforpresident.com/page/st/contact


Letter Below:

Dear Governor Richardson,

Your endorsement is one that many will receive with great interest because you have brought the same brand of caring and pragmatism that Senator Obama is providing. Your early endorsement could sway many.


Thank you for your consideration
Your Name,

lol...shes definitely going to win now!

user-pic

I remember thinking, in 2004, that this was going to be a huge thing for Kerry. I'm inclined to agree with joejoejoe (and this has to be the first time, I think, that I will) that this will help but only with a group that was with Clinton already.

Unfortunately for Hillary, in the short term this endorsement will have a brief shelf life since tomorrow's coverage will be consumed with the returns coming in from the Potomac. The pundit class will then spend the rest of the week talking about an 8 contest sweep by Obama. I'm not versed in the dynamics of Ohio politics but at first glance I don't see how this will substantially change that contest.

At this point any good news is great news for Clintons.

But, endorsing three weeks before the primary: It's says:We're in the race too rather than we've the Mo.

Also, Hillbillies have dozens of endorsements in Ohio- so Obama is fighting them against the establishment- which is hard but not a bad thing.

user-pic

CT Voter - I grow on people. You're OK too!

You know things are bad when Greg is posting the same endorsement twice from an irrelevant 90-something year old pol. Isn't the Obama endorsement by Gonzalez in TX today a bit more newsworthy, Greg?

Why does nearly every Clinton campaign commenter insist on using CAPITAL LETTERS all the time. It is really annoying.

Sen. Glenn did great things for Ohio. This is not one of them. I wonder if she has Howard Metzenbaum and Chalmers P. Wylie on board yet? Or any other dinosaurs of ohio politics? She will not get former Gov. Dick Celeste or his brother (and friend of mine), Ted. Ted was recently elected to the Ohio State House and is an Obama supporter.

And yes, I will vote for whomever is the Dem nominee in Nov. McCain is more bush/cheney.

Bravo,

I want Obama to win tomorrow and in Ohio for you.
You have suffered enough at the hands of the SEC in football & basketball.

Clearly your Metzenbaum reference gives you street cred in Columbus.

From a Cleveland Indians fan in New York State, I say
Go Obama & Go Ohio State!

On to Victory!

Word. Thanks for the plug/sympathy on Ohio State. After Nov. 04 i tried rooting for michigan bc i was so pissed at what my state ended up being responsible for. i had the "go blue" shirt and everything...just couldn't go through with it. scarlet blood i reckon.

me and the rest of the ohioans? we learned our lesson. in 2006 democrats reclaimed all but one statewide office. our governor was elected by one of the largest margins in state history. mean jean schmidt OH-02 is vulnerable. so is steve chabot in OH-01. another vacant house seat up north. an upset somewhere else. who do y'all think the dem challengers in these house races want at the top of the ticket? hillary clinton? i think not my friends.

beat army!

By the way I looked at Clinton News Network's "political ticker" the dumbest idea since the invention of CNN itself.

They usually post even if a street dog wags the tail for Clintons.But on this nothing.

However, big news in Gore. He is not going to endorse any body- Clintons would take ahuge sigh. That no-news is much much bigger news for the Billary camp.

Weird. I remember back when only Limbaugh fans used phrases like "Clinton News Network" and "Billary."

user-pic

This from Politco:

Clinton also suggested that she was getting more fair coverage from Fox News than from MSNBC

Wow, FAIR coverage from FOX NEWS?

If anybody has questions on who the Republicans think they can win against, see the above sentence.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8453.html

I am an Obama supporter, and I wish people would not make light of any endorsements from distinguished Democrats. If Senator Glenn had decided to endorse Senator Obama, we would have welcomed it, so let us not pretend now that it is not a good piece of news for Senator Clinton.

Let us be gracious in our hours of triumphs and in the hours of our opponents triumphs.

Let us not let down our gracious candidate by acting petty and small.

Hear, hear.

Well said.

Old people love Hillary!

user-pic

Well this "old" person loves Obama. Neener neener. Nice get for Hillary. Glenn's not a super-del, but still, nice get.

user-pic

Right ...

"Of course, it's unclear whether endorsements can change the trajectory of the race this late in the game"

Yes you must be right they (endorsements) don't matter ...

FYI - Edwards endorsement for Hillary is coming

Bill Kristol even endorsed Obama today - I wonder who he's rooting for?

Whatever Obamaniacs ...

Wait...Did you really just do that?

If you're going to do that, you really shouldn't quote the person.

And by "that," I mean completely ignoring the first half of a person's sentence so that you can more easily attack a general idea that you find unpalatable. For example:

the beginning of the sentence you quoted was "Of course, it's unclear whether..."
You know what the second half said.

And then your first sentence in reply is "Yes you must be right they (endorsements) don't matter ... ". Acting as if he made a statement that he said was an absolutely certain sure thing, and thus a sarcastic response implying the opposite was needed.

Of course the whole basis of his statement was predicated on the fact that it is "unclear whether" endorsements have an effect this late in the game. And yet somehow you took that to mean "Come On! It is SO COMPLETELY OBVIOUS that endorsements don't matter anymore!" And if that was what he said, then yes, your reply would have been warranted if you disagree with that idea.

But that's NOT what he said, and therein lies the problem.

Wow, this is HUGE news! I think most Ohioans will be thrilled to hear this -- mostly because they thought Glenn was dead.

Who's she going to drag out of the crypt next? Robert Taft?

user-pic

How Obama is going to unite the country when his base are people like Fred App?

Because humor is the universal language

user-pic

Among Obama supporters hate is universal language.

That was my reaction. John Glenn is still alive?

(I know he is, that's what I'll bet a lot of people are saying, though...)

Yeah, that's too bad for the Obama campaign. I don't know how much pull Glenn has in OH, but from where I sit he's one of our certifiable space heroes.

Ah well. We've still got the Big Mo. I just wish everyone would stop talking about the Chesapeake primaries as a done deal. It makes me nervous and reminds me of NH.

user-pic

That's nice that he is endorsing Hillary. She's a decent candidate.

From the beginning she was the frontrunner while Obama was still back in the pack of also rans. He broke out of the pack and started to gain on her, is still gaining.

She can't have momentum as the frontrunner, can only try to hold onto the lead. It's always the one coming from behind who has momentum. The only question is whether the one who broke out of the pack can pass the one in front before the finish line.

Hmm, now I see why they call it a presidential race.

I suspect part of the strategy to counteract this string of losses is to get some endorsements out in the Press. The only one that comes with significant delegates is Edwards.

For Ohio, though, the Mayors are going to have the most impact on the ground, aren't they? Those are the guys who can get out the vote.

Ted Strickland already endorsed Clinton.

I have no idea how this reply ended up here. I was trying to reply to MikeMo's comment at the top of the thread.

Gov. Strickland has been a man on a mission for Hillary. I had to unsubscribe to his email list bc it was all Hillary, all the time. I think he's a national co-chair for her campaign. He came on board early.

bill kristol's column for NYT hasn't offered any insight to anything whatsoever... today's column was a total rehash of the "common wisdom" (and i hesitate to use the word "wisdom") that is available anywhere... but he needed to fill up the page with 1500 words to get out the real message: both clintons are the devil reincarnate... the man is a complete ass... why did the NYT have to hire a neocon to handicap the democratic race for their nomination? why doesn't he stick to what he knows like how the neocons (including mccain)can ruin the country for future generations of america?

user-pic

Well, the big thing is that it gets her one, maybe two days worth of news in Ohio, which, in her situation, is nothing to sneeze at.
The problem is, they keep going for the Big Media Win, whereas Obama keeps his head down, and focuses on the ground game, using his rallies to boost media attention. It's clear from the MSNBC debacle, however, that they can only play that card so many times.

I have always thought I would be happy with whichever candidate won the primaries but more and more if there is some flaw in Obama that draws the type of posters on all of these sites. Why on earth would you denigrate John Glenn or any other person because they decided to back someone else? Are you that insecure? Have any on you come close to his achievements? I doubt any of you are in the same ballpark, the same city or even the same continent when it comes to stacking your lifetime accomplishments next to his.

Man, you Obama enthusiasts are so unbelievably rude and ungracious.

I thought you were supposed to transcend politics, uniting the country in one giant hug.

Like I've said before, the more I see of Obama's fans, the less I like him.

Nice picture of her, for once.

Nice picture of her, for once.

Usually you post the really haggy ones

Melvo and Angry Mouse, if you want to see unrepentant nastiness, go check out the threads about the Kennedy endorsements. This is one of those tit for tat deals.

I, for one, am broken hearted about it because I really wanted to be an astronaut when I was a kid. On the other hand, now I'm an Ohio voter and I'm going to get to vote for Obama instead. Not quite the same thing, but still a lot of fun.

word. well said.

in response to the earlier post about degrading john glenn, please. saying that he is old and may be a bit behind the power curve is not denigrating him. i will defend john glenn and any ohio democrat. am i disappointed he endorsed hillary? of course. do i think he still has time to see the light? absolutely. john gless will be campaigning for barack obama in ohio this fall. how do i know this, you ask? well, b/c he has kids and grandkids.

John Glenn is kind enough to return the favor, but it is just one vote that he can ascertain for Hillary. Can he nullify or weaken the Obama momentum? Not even the Glenn children are sure about that unless one is too delusional. Since the momentum is too volcanic, she cannot do anything else except dream of rewriting (spinning) the Democratic Party statues, "Only the states that I have won and will win count. The rest is Red state or Africa, including Maine (evidence: An AP picture shows that one Sudanese American was working for Obama). The illiterate, poor, and women only in those states I won count because they are the true illiterate, poor, and women. The poor, illiterate, and women in other states where Obama won are fakers. The caucuses do not count because only the party activists decide them, and party activists do not like me. Although the grass-root activists do not count, the super-delegates count. Super-delegates count because most of them owe me and my husband for the favors we did to them during those 8 years and now they are obliged to return the favors to us and support me. "
Here are other Hillary's thoughts: "I cannot afford to lose this election because I fear I might lose my mind. I might lose my mind because it has been a while my White House has been taken away by the Bushes, which I already subscripted earlier in one of the debates, "After the 1st Bush, my husband cleaned up the mess he left, now after the second Bush, it is the 2nd Clinton's turn to clean up his mess." And there is the question of whose dynasty has how many terms in the White House. Bushes' already have 3, so I have to match at least one more term. But it looks like this opportunity is slipping away. I am out of cash. The super-delegates are re-thinking of their endorsements. My campaign manager left. Obama wins 10 states in a row after Super Tuesday. In desperation, I went to see Edwards for their support, but it looks like they are not gonna support me because they do not like my taking donations from Washington lobbyists and interest groups. Maybe, I should use my last weapon that my experience of 35 years has prepared for this moment. Maybe, this is Day One: Attack Obama in Carl Rove style and divide the party. If I cannot have it, nobody should have it. I remain truthful to my love for White House, and I will not abuse it like others did in the past. I am Hillary, and I know how to play self-destructive game.

You are right about the endorsement though.

The Kennedy/Kerry endorsement of Obama did jack squat in Mass. I expect Glenn's will do the same in Ohio

One wonders why these guys even bother? They end up being embarrassed, or they should be.

What is wrong with saying, "I think it is important that the voters decide this race, so I will stand down until after the primary is over, and then enthusiastically support the candidate that the voters have chosen."

Too much ego involved, I guess.

To Liam:

Your fair minded post is appreciated, it is rare, but I admire you for it.

S Green,

nice rant... there's probably a job waiting for you at MSNBC...

John Glenn is a good man, but part of the old guard here in Ohio. Anyone who would be impressed by his endorsement is already voting for Hillary.

Is it me or are the hillbots grumpier than ever?

All the recent losing followed by impending losing is just killing them.

Senator John Glenn was involved with John McCain in the Keating 5 scandal back in the 80's. Does this raise any eyebrows, or an I just being suspicious?

yeah, pabalive, i agree... and the obamabots don't seem grumpy at all! S Green seems sounds very magnanimous and fair-minded...

Just to clarify: I was not ridiculing John Glenn. I like John Glenn. I once voted for him in a presidential primary. But he's been out of the public eye for so long that I'm not sure his endorsement is going to mean much. The people most likely to be swayed by his endorsement are the 60+ crowd, and they're already solidly in Hillary's corner, anyway. As "gets" go, this one seems fairly irrelevant to me.

Both McCain and Glenn came out of the Keating thing relatively unscathed.

I wish people would be a little practical here:

a) Ted Kennedy is a sitting Senator, Glenn is in retirement.

b) This is HRC's grab at the JFK legacy. True, Glenn is a politician, but the visuals of that magic moon-time will by the real HRC value: tap into the magic and myth of JFK and the New Frontier. It will make for a great 30 second spot.

c) As I said on the other thread and people have noted here, the problem is that Glenn's 1st flight was over 40 years ago and for the voters that Mercury means something, well, they were probably going for HRC anyway (e.g. they are over 55 years old). Glenn's second flight was a political stunt -- an unfortunate marriage between Glenn's ambition (and Senatorial influence) and NASA wanting a media sound bite.

Wasn't Glenn another one of the Keating Five, along with our old friend John McCain? Just more corruption...

To those moronic refugees from just left of RedState who have decided to add ageism to their list of obnoxious behaviors - I can only sincerely hope that they will never suffer the fate that is growing older.

And if someone so stupid and narrowminded as these boors are, manages to somehow outwit natural selection and actually grows old themselves, they will see how gratingly infuriating such predjudice is.

To think I got beaten by the police and spent time in jail in order to help secure some of the rights that you take for granted, you freakin' ageist azzholes. Show some respect you little snots, like Senators Obama and Clinton and your other betters do, and stop being such an irritating embarrassment to his other more reasoned posters here.

Richard L. Adloff, nielrlca, you know who you are.

Did Glenn ever pay off his campaign debt? Seemed to owe that thing forever.

user-pic

John Glenn is how old now? Born 1921? 87 or so.

I haven't heard a lot from John Glenn recently.

Guess this seals the over 85 vote for HRC.

All this talk about whether it's the Hillary or Barack supporters who are less tolerant is just silly. Krugman piling on today with yet another stream in his anti-Obama invective, suggesting it's the OBama supporters who are worse. Come on guys, most supporters in both camps are good people (Unlike those troglodyte Republicans!) and a few get so worked up in their enthusiasm that they say stupid things (i.e. New York NOW's comments about Ted Kennedy). Anyone who can definitively state that one side or the other is more partisan or ugly is clearly partisan themselves (like me:))

THis Obama supporters will vote for HIllary if she wins. I admit to having been furious with her during the South Carolina race baiting stage, but I'm over it now, especially as I see that McCain is the alternative. And polls seem to indicate that the average Democrat (as opposed to the average Democratic blogger) is happy with whichever of these two win. I won't be any more thrilled to vote for Clinton in '08 than I was to vote for Bill in '96 after we lost the Congress in his first term, but I'll do my duty.

Pablo

user-pic

I could never vote for Mrs. Bill Clinton to be president of the United States under any circumstance.

Long before Obama emerged as an electrifying candidate, Mrs. Clinton showed ack of the integrity, good judgment, and capacity to unit the nation that I believe is essential for a president in this challenging times.

I also find the prospect of more Bush-Clinton-Clinton-Bush-Bush-Clinton to be unhealthy for our democracy. This nation does not need to depend on two families for its leadership, particularly two untrustworthy families.

My thoughts, my vote. You have yours.

user-pic

Lol. Let me try that again with some edits.

I could never vote for Mrs. Bill Clinton to be president of the United States under any circumstance.

Long before Obama emerged as an electrifying candidate, Mrs. Clinton showed lack of the integrity, good judgment, and capacity to unite the nation that I believe is essential for a president in these challenging times.

I also find the prospect of more Bush-Clinton-Clinton-Bush-Bush-Clinton to be unhealthy for our democracy. This nation does not need to depend on two families for its leadership, particularly two untrustworthy families.

My thoughts, my vote. You have yours.

Where was your complaint of Bush, Clinton, Bush 2 etc, when Bush 2 arrived. Where was it after Bush 2's first term? When you use gripes like the succession one, you only show who you read and listen to.

As for never supporting Hillary Clinton, that argument is fine for the primary season, but if she should win the nomination, what are you going to do, stay home and let McCain win, or vote for him in November and help him win? You can't complain about Clinton as if she is not a good enough Democrat for you, then fail to do whatever is necessary to insure that someone vastly worse (McCain) loses in November.

Lectric Lady: I don't think Kerry vote brought anything. He has no politcal capital left in him- if anything he is a negative. I'd strongly encourage Obama camp to keep him away from cameras.

But I do think Kennedy endorsement was a huge deal. While the MA women went to the booth angry- he stepped in at the right time. He stepped at the moment when Clintons were branding him as "Black" candidate and were forcing him to wrestle in the mud. Barack was about to lose some of his most cherished capital- a leader above politics.

Then came Kennedy Daughter endoresed via New York Times and then Ted Kennedy stepped in and kept him above the fray. He rescued Obama- the brand- nationwide.

Also, he helped him with Old folks in Maine and latino voters in NM.

party-of-one:

What do you have against President Obama's kids that they should never realize their American dream of perhaps being President themselves someday? How UnAmerican is that?

It's a good thing there's no Adams or Roosevelts running this time.

What an idiotic reason for not voting for someone. Their surname. Gives your other opinions a lot of weight.

And BTW, nobody gives a rat's ass who you AREN'T voting for.

kensdad,
I admit I have my biases, and I apologize for not being the kind of fair-minded person you were looking for. Except in the last part ( and Carl-Rovian politics is "self-destruction," which will happen if she returns to the bitter attacking mood like once when she evoked "slumlord" in one of the debates. One thing admirable about Hillary is she could fight Carl Rove machine better than Kerry and Gore did, but after the nominee is finalized, we are not going to play the game by his rules this time because it is not going to work any more except to the ears of Limbaugh and Coulter and the like), every thing said is said by Hillary in different phraseology. I simply responded to what Hillary said at General Motors facility, White Marsh, MD, in the aftermath of the weekend losses and campaign staff reshuffling:
Glenn Thrush of Newsday got the last question, and it was a rough one. "It's not just the string of losses that you've had, it's the magnitude," he said. "You got your doors blown off. . . . Does it surprise you that you've lost these states by as much as you have?"

"No," the candidate answered. "These are caucus states. They are primarily dominated by activists. They don't represent the electorate." She also attributed her poor results in Louisiana to "a very strong and very proud African American electorate." Blaming the voters is rarely good politics. (Source: Dana Milbank, WP).

Are their any strong women leaders in TX or OH who can endorse Barack?

This just in!!!! Wilford Brimley has switched his support from John McCain to Hillary!!!! Woo-hooo!

John Glenn is pretty much, no longer relevant in Ohio politics, It's about as relevant as Alfonse D'Amato endorsing McCain is in New York. People scratch there heads and say, "Oh D'Amato's still alive" huh, that's something.

He's a pretty good symbolic endorsement to solidify the over 60 crowd, but he's nowhere close to being key.

Hillary's key endorsement in Ohio was and remains Ted Strickland. Number one, he's a super delegate. Number two, he has an active policitical machine within the state of Ohio which can lend support to Hillary, and number three he's got a line into most suepr delegates and other politicos with actie political machines who can help Hillary.

Hillary could never do any better than Ted Strickland as a key endorsement in Ohio. But Glenn gives her a headline during a tough period. The biggest problem is, she cannot produce a Glenn endorsement each week between now and the primary.

...SPACE DUDE ENDORSED HILL...
SPACE DUDE...I AM RECEIVING YOU.
MUST VOTE HILLARY.
MUST VOTE HILLARY.
MUST VOTE HILLARY.

I work in the aerospace community in Houston. This endorsement will have an impact on the Democrats in this community who are very concerned with Obama's proposal to delay the Constellation program for five years. We have little choice but to retire the Shuttle fleet in a couple years. Without a replacement, America will lose the ability to support manned spaceflight for the first time in fifty years.

I know several engineers that have been reluctant to support Obama because of the impact of his proposed budget. This endorsement will certainly push some into Hillary's camp.

dfx13 writes:

Without a replacement, America will lose the ability to support manned spaceflight for the first time in fifty years.

That's simply not true. Between the end of Apollo and the start of the Space Shuttle we didn't have a vehicle for manned flight. We survived just fine.

I know many, many NASA folks. I know you are a one-issue candidate and I will never sway you. But I will say this:

More science has come out of the robotic missions (Mars rovers and planet fly-bys) than the ISS. Going to the moon isn't going to really do much for us -- and it's a pipe dream to think about going to Mars. For starters, we will be overwhelmed by peak oil and energy needs here will consume our hi-tech.

I suggest you read an excellent book on James Web called THE MAN WHO RAN THE MOON by Piers Bizony to get some real insights into how NASA ran and how by 1963 JFK was ready to pull the plug on anything other than getting to the moon.

Constellation will never fly. I know that statement will upset you, but it's a prediction that is based on many factors -- including political will and national priorities. That's why it's so very important to take care of this planet. We are stuck here for a long, long time.

I know many, many NASA folks. I know you are a one-issue candidate and I will never sway you.

Your assumptions are invalid. This will impact your ability to "sway" my opinion. However, you have piqued my curiosity. What is my "one-issue"? The Constellation program? Many NASA folks? My unease with the things that may or may not fly? Please, indulge me. I love to know what my single issue is.

The (elected) gap between Apollo and Shuttle may have precluded manned spaceflight for a couple years, but the circumstances are somewhat different today. America has a vested interest in providing transportation to the International Space Station. There are many good arguments regarding the merit of manned spaceflight. You can pick your side with or without the aid of books. I believe that I provided a valid point related to this endorsement and the impact it will have in my working community. (And one that I am hardly invested in myself since my skillset is applicable beyond any perceived "single issue" assumed here.)

You are Aerospace in Houston and talk of Constellation. So, it's a reasonable assumption that you are either a JSC employee or a contractor associated with JSC or NASA in general. Certainly the average rank-and-file TPM wouldn't immediately recognize talk of "Constellation" without a Google. NASA, and the moon, hasn't been much of a focus for the country for years now -- basically since Bush announced the "return to moon" idea. It certainly hasn't played a role in the current campaign. So, when someone brings it up, I assume it's central to at least their livelihood if not their life.

You secondary comment simply reinforces that you want to vote your candidate mostly on the basis of where they place manned space flight on the agenda, because, as you say, it affects your "working community". That's your one-issue.

I would be interested in your arguments supporting NASA/manned space flight, because you didn't list any. I also think books are a valuable source of information and a place where you can learn things. I hope we can at least agree on that!

Earlier I posted about the Keating Five. I want to be clear, Keating Five is a fact and both Glenn and McCain were implicated. To me this fact discredits him.

I see no justification for all this ageism or disrespect for Glenn. I do disagree with him. Clinton is DLC and DLC is an attempt to steal the Democratic party for Republican ends.

I'd like to go to the moon. Sadly, most liberals don't have to guts to consider going to the moon, let alone funding others to go to the moon. It takes a strong and determined character to go to the moon, and these are qualities that President Bush has in spades.

President Bush has so much strength and determination that he's pushing for NASA to go to Mars! Heh. Most liberals don't have the strength or determination to go to Starbucks in the morning.

History shows you are way off base.

Eisenhower didn't want the moon because it was just a stunt (turns out he was right).

JFK (liberal) wanted the moon as a goal that the Russians couldn't get to first.

LBJ (liberal) saw the largest of NASA budgets ever.

Nixon cut NASA to the bone as soon as he could. That's why we had a shuttle that went to nowhere (the other two prongs of the program were supposed to be a moon base and a space station).

This isn't a liberal/conservative issue.


user-pic

I think president Bush SHOULD go to Mars. In fact, I'd pay to send him there.

After Hillary lost the Cleveland Plain Dealer's endorsement to Obama, the Glenn endorsement will be a definite positive in the state (I grew up in Cleveland and lived in Cincinnati for 10 years). It's actually a good thing that Glenn is so old (86), because when Ohioans learn that he's still alive, his status as living legend will outdazzle Obama's annointment as adopted heir to Camelot. Glenn is a symbolic bookend endorsement to the popular Gov. Ted Strickland: oldschool and new. Plus, Glenn fits perfectly into the theme of "experience matters." That little subliminal reminder will resonate well with rural and middle-aged voters as well as long-time residents.

The blue collar vote and African American vote might ultimately cancel each other out, but the large university populations might tip OH in Obama's favor. However, Ohio has been through a lot since the 2004 election, and chagrined Democrats may gravitate in droves toward Hillary's "Ready on Day One" incantation. Ohio will be a true test of Obama's momentum.

John Glenn is not to be mocked. A highly decorated combat vet of 2 wars, he is one of only two Mercury astronauts left today. He was in the senate for 24 years and was a credit to Ohio and the Democratic party. The Keating 5 business he and McCain got sucked into is totally flimsy, look it up. Cranston (D-CA), Riegle (D-MI), and DeConcini (D-AZ) were the real culprits.

I suport Obama, but Glenn is a real American hero that puts wieners like Cheney Busy to shame. He was against the Iraq war btw. I'm sure Hillary and her campaign are very proud to have his endorsement even if he is long-since retired.

Too bad he never panned out in '84. He was probably the only Democrat who could have given Reagan a competitive run (Reagan, btw, was another GOP stay-at-home soldier).

BTW: To all these posts by supporters who refuse to vote for the Democratic nominee unless it's their guy or gal --ARE YOU PEOPLE OUT OF YOUR MINDS?

Not everyone that supports a Dem candidate is a Dem themself.

It's a country-over-party thing.

user-pic

JOHN GLENN!?! WHOA!!!! Hillary's on her way to the Oval Office for sure! Ain't no stoppin' her now! WOW! JOHN GLENN!! That's just (yawn) amazing.

user-pic

Master Adolf:

I don't see the endorsement of Senator Glenn meaning that much. What is more meaningful to me is that your reference to Senator Glenn's geriatric status suggests to me that, assuming that you are a supporter of Senator Obama, you are not only rude but you have nary a clue about what his message is supposed to be about.

Moreover, the endorsement's significance or lack thereof aside, do you have any idea who Senator Glenn is and what he represented when JFK, whose legacy is discussed side by side with Senator Obama's campaign, was president? Apparently not. Master Adolf, when some of us were young and inspired by JFK, John Glenn embodied what JFK spoke about; he was a tangible example of JFK's quest for the moon and beyond. John Glenn was and is an American hero. You, sir, are simply rude.

And, finally, so there is no ambiguity, you sir with your snide reference to the age of Senator Glenn betray that you are yet another Obama "supporter" who has no idea what his message is all about. In short, you sir, are a divider and not a uniter.

Other than perhaps Gore's endorsement, I don't know of any endorsement that will really change Hillary's position in the race. Endorsement's are important for candidates who are starting out, or, as with Kennedy's endorsement of Obama, give some credibility to a young politician taking on the establishment. Everyone knows Hillary and everyone knows where she stands on the issues. John Glenn's endorsement does nothing for her.

The fact that people are defending John Glenn and calling him an American hero proves his endorsement means something.

Ha ha ha. So bring on the next endorsement for us to analyze . . .

user-pic

The real question is when did the Clinton camp know that Glenn was endorsing Hillary.

I bet they found out before today, and they are just releasing the info on the day they expect to lose 3 important races to try to maintain some positive news b/t now and March 4.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address