Source: Obama On Track To Raise More Than $36 Million In February
A source of mine tells me that an Obama fundraiser confided to him that the Obama campaign is on track to raise a startling sum in the month of February:
More than $36 million.
Obama raised $36 million in January, and given his victories and momentum, it makes sense that he'd be on track to exceed that and have his best month ever right now. An Obama spokesperson declined to comment.
Separately, here's another astonishing statistic: The campaign will soon report that it has enjoyed its millionth donor.
As I reported earlier today, the Obama camp quietly passed the half-million mark in donors for just this year. Now, in an email to supporters that just went out, the Obama campaign wrote:
"We've crunched all the numbers and discovered that we are within striking distance of something historic: one million people donating to this campaign...We're already more than 900,000 strong."















The sheep continue to multiply. What a silly bunch.
LOL
Rae
February 20, 2008 3:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bahhhh.
February 20, 2008 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, it's a real shame about this democracy stuff, isn't it? All these 'sheep' getting together and voting,... and persuading the whole country to become 'sheep,' too. How terrible that everyone's turning out to donate and vote!
Especially since we all know that it's Hillary's TURN to be president, right? First a Bush, then a Clinton, then another Bush, and now another Clinton,... how much clearer could it be? And how disgusting that all these voters - er, 'sheep' - think they should have something to say about that.
February 20, 2008 3:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton supporters are just smarter, and have better judgment. But of course, they also claim that Obama supporters are elitists.
February 20, 2008 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Er, isn't that supposed to be Prius-driving, latte-sipping, trust-fund baby sheep? Did you miss the Clinton talking points circulated this morning?
February 20, 2008 4:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
And then Krugman claims that Obama followers are vitriolic.
February 20, 2008 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
BAAAAHAHAHAHAHA. I just donated another $50 in your honor.
And I donated $25 to Kirk Watson because I've been there and done that. Just not on national TV. I probably wouldn't have thought to do it if the Hillary video weren't fronted on TPM.
February 20, 2008 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
well played, generica.
February 20, 2008 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
WAAAHHHH....
February 20, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
The sheep are going to eat your lunch, loser!
February 20, 2008 6:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Moo!
(Didn't want to plagiarize the others!)
I donated $25 before I saw this thread. I'm brainwashed!
(Why is it that RaeK has a black sheep as an avatar? I just noticed it.)
February 20, 2008 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
so lets call it $36(jan)+$24(two-thirds of feb) million to date this year. that's $60M.
Divided by 500,000 donors = $120 average per donor. Amazing.
February 20, 2008 3:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oddly enough that is almost exactly what I've given since the start of the year.
Oh, my god, I'm average! This is great news, listening to Hillary talk I thought I might be "insignificant" because I support Obama.
But I'm not insifnificant, I'm average! Whoopee for being average!
February 20, 2008 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jesus God, this thing is huge. How much can Obama raise (primary and general) before this is all said and done? $400 million? Half a billion?
February 20, 2008 3:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
One million donors???
Oh my god. This thing is bigger than anyone thought.
McCain/Clinton are simply doomed. Doomed.
No wonder they are panicked!
February 20, 2008 3:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rae! Love seeing you around. You can call us sheep all you want, but the fact is, I think a lot of people are supporting Obama because of what he's accomplished, who he is, and what he stands for. Stuff like this:
-- Graduated first black president of Harvard Law Review having won trust and support of conservative members.
-- Passed over 600 high-money law firm offers to work for civil rights practice at fractional pay.
-- Added health insurance for 20,000 children, welfare reforms, earned-income tax credits, and increased minimum wage in Illinois.
-- Reformed death-penalty cases, requiring that interrogations be video-recorded. Passed Illinois Senate 58-0. Signed into law by Illinois governor who first opposed Obama’s bill. Obama succeeded by building consensus with conservative opposition.
-- Opposed Iraq war publicly, long before invasion. Accurately depicted it as of undetermined length, undetermined cost, undetermined objective, with a great likelihood of civil war breaking out.
-- Expanded program to locate and dismantle stray Russian WMD with Republican Senator Lugar.
-- Passed major ethics and lobbying reform bill with Russ Feingold, insisting upon tougher restrictions around gifts, meals, etc. And extended the interval preventing exiting congress members from moving directly into lobbyist positions.
-- Toured Kuwait, Jordan, Israel, and Palestinian territories, telling Palestinian Authority Abbas that US would never recognize Hamas leaders until they renounced mission to attack Israel.
-- Cosponsored Secure Orderly Immigration Act by John McCain. Passes Senate 62-36. Makes undocumented persons who have been here 5+ years only allowed to stay and apply for citizenship if they pay back-taxes, learn English, and have no criminal record.
-- Communicated frankly to Michigan automaker executives of need to increase fuel-efficiency standards by at least 3% per year.
-- Many aisle-crossing bi-partisan solutions throughout 10 years of senate experience (8 state, 2 federal).
-- 100% approval rating from the League of Conservation Voters, Planned Parenthood. National Education Association gives him an “A” on their most recent scorecard.
-- In Illinois State Senate sponsored 780 bills, 280 were signed into law.
-- In first year as US Senator, held 39 town-hall meetings throughout his state, sponsored 152 bills and resolutions, and cosponsored 427 more.
-- Designated US Senate point person on ethics by Speaker Harry Reid.
(fyi, this list was totally stolen from another poster on this site)
February 20, 2008 3:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wish Kirk Watson had read this post...
February 20, 2008 5:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Big time Hillary Clinton supporter, Senator Bob Kerrey said today, on the Ed Schultz radio program, that he thinks 527s are corrupt and they are not the way to go. Hillary is using one to attack Obama in Ohio. She needs to talk to Bob Kerrey, since he says that is a corrupt way to go about campaigning for the Presidency.
February 20, 2008 3:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just a thought:
And remember 1968 vs. 2008 -- the power of internet!
This train won't stop.
February 20, 2008 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
So he's on pace for what, about $100M in the first quarter?
That would top the quarterly record - that he currently holds - by about $70M.
Good lord.
February 20, 2008 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great news, that. My wife and I just sent another donation, just to push the train a tiny bit further on down the track.
February 20, 2008 3:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
All Hillary can do is tap her maxed out donors for $100K/pop to try and raise ten megabucks to finance her advertising.
The train is rolling, and Hillary is standing on the tracks.
February 20, 2008 3:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I should have specified, that $100K/pop is for the 527.
February 20, 2008 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I say let's make it happen. It puts pressure on Clinton and McCain.
February 20, 2008 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
900,000 donors for him, and a handful of wealthy ones putting together 527s to keep her campaign alive.
February 20, 2008 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama would be a damn fool to give this up for public financing. He needs to take the hit on the semi-pledge and steamroll Walnuts all the way to the election.
As an aside, it looks like people are FINALLY starting to wonder what all these accomplishments we keep hearing about from Hillary. Not a minute too soon.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/adam-hanft/the-curious-myth-of-hilla_b_87613.html
February 20, 2008 3:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, I may be biased, but I'd understand if he backed out of the public financing pledge.
February 20, 2008 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
To Sand who wrote: Just a thought:
And remember 1968 vs. 2008 -- the power of internet! This train won't stop.
LOL
That train is headed for a "train wreck".
What's that light at the end of the tunnel?
Oh my, its another train!
Rae
Bahhhh!
February 20, 2008 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rae, did you read this article?
February 20, 2008 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Such sour grapes. Tell us how it feels to be irrelevant. Yell it on the mountaintop! Go out swinging.
And then join the train in November, or vote for McCain if you like.
February 20, 2008 8:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Must it be pointed out that the first act a leader must take is to convince others to follow him? That's just about the first thing I was taught as a Navy (and, later, Army) NCO.
"Inspire. Its original meaning was to 'breathe or blow upon or into.' The word was derived from the Latin spiritus, which means 'breath, courage, vigor, the soul' as well as from the Ecclesiastical Latin spirare, meaning 'to blow, breathe.' How apt! When you think of how leaders inspire, it is as if they are 'blowing life into' their people to give courage and vigor to their souls...Hope is the outcome of inspiration.
"Hope is not something you wish for; it must be earned through example and courage. It emerges from a unity of spirit and purpose. Sun Tzu, the ancient military strategist, addressed the need for a commander and his army to be one with the Tao,/i>. As he explained in the Art of War, 'Tao is what causes the people to have ths same purpose as their superior. Thus they can die with him, live with him and not deceive him.' The reason for such unity was a shared set of values. It was the commander's responsibility to earn the respect of his soldiers so that they would follow him into battle if war were necessary."
-From Great Motivation Secrets of Great Leaders by John Baldoni
February 20, 2008 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
The problem is that McCain can't control the astro turf groups or the 527s that are BOUND to pop up over the course of the fall campaign. This is much ado about nothing.
February 20, 2008 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama would be a damn fool to give this up for public financing. He needs to take the hit on the semi-pledge and steamroll Walnuts all the way to the election.
He won't. If, big if, McCain takes him up on his offer to negotiate a reasonable agreement on general election spending limits, I guarantee you that the only acceptable plan for Obama would be completely unacceptable to McCain. Obama would make sure of that. In other words, no agreement will be reached.
But I doubt the discussion will even happen because McCain knows this will be the likely outcome and that he would come out looking like the loser.
February 20, 2008 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Meh, the only reason McCain/Clinton are harassing Obama about the public funding is because they don't want to be at a disadvantage, nothing more. The Republicans have been stomping the Dems in fundraising forever and as soon as the tables are turned the Republicans want to call a truce, give me a break. This at the same time McCain has been using public financing as collateral for his campaign loans, way to go Mr. Campaign Ethics.
February 20, 2008 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.laweekly.com/news/news/ob.../18247/?page=1
"The money men: Jeremy Bernard and Rufus Gifford are lovers and business partners. They are also the fund-raisers who keep the Barack Obama presidential campaign alive and competitive."
...
So he's got about 90% of black vote and now maybe 90% of the gay vote, and a huge chunck of the youth vote (who don't know any better).
No wonder he's been doing well.
And of course the sheep will see the crowd and continue to line up at the back and none of the little sheep behind the front line will see that they are all about to go over the cliff!
Rae
Bahhhh!
February 20, 2008 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
You tell 'em, Rae! Down with black, and queers, and young'uns!
February 20, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't put words in my mouth billysumday simpleton. I wasn't saying that at all.
Its a fact that when you get the entire voting block behind a candidate, they have a distinct advantage.
February 20, 2008 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh Rae, you rascally rabbit. I know that you don't just hate black and queers and young'uns. You hate impressionable elites, people who drive Priuses, people who drink lattes, the Teamsters, white men, my 88 year old Republican grandma who voted for Obama, and Ben and Jerry's ice cream. But let's be real for a second. Based on your comments, you really honestly do hate blacks and queers.
February 20, 2008 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ah, no wonder I'm a Barack Obama supporter: I'm a white man! I was beginning to wonder, because none of the other categories fit me at all, and there had to be SOME reason I was such a 'sheep.'
Baaa...
February 20, 2008 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.laweekly.com/news/news/obamas-gay-gold-mine/18247/?page=1
Oops! New link...
February 20, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, you're an ass. For whose team are you batting, anyway? Seemed to me that this was a site patronized by left-leaning, polite readers... Where did we find you?
February 20, 2008 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
You don't find trolls. Trolls find you.
February 20, 2008 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
90 percent of those who voted yesterday in the Democratic Primary in Wisconsin are White people, so take your racial hatred back down the hole you called out of, you stinking sewer rat!
February 20, 2008 4:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
no way obama has 90% of us homos.
he's got me, but, i swear, you'd think she'd given birth to hundreds of these queens that go on and on about her on queer message boards.
there's definitely a diva fantasy in play. she's bigger than cher.
considering DADT and DOMA turned me off the clintons long, long ago, makes me doubt my tribe, but i think they'll come around.
February 20, 2008 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, Rae, Hillary Clinton has the majority of the support of gay voters, and won 63% of the gay vote in California.
February 21, 2008 4:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yet another sheep here!!!
Thing is, Obama's Internet fundraising is really another form of public financing. Something tells me that most of this money is coming from people like me, giving $25-50/month. Makes sense if you think of the number of donors, multiply it by $50, you get nearly $50 million.
Most importantly, Obama's proving to manage a formidable, incredibly run campaign. I don't feel that a penny of my investment is being wasted. It's been said before but, taking campaign management as a guide, Obama's far better prepared from Day One.
February 20, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ditto for me. And a few times I've chipped in a one-time donation.
February 20, 2008 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm a sheep too. I've donated four times. I'm also volunteering in Ohio (I'm from IL). Does that make me even more sheep-like?
February 20, 2008 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please Obama, don't take public financing!
I am all for getting the money out of politics and I know this is contrary to that but a) money will never come out of politics with the repubs in the white house and b)there is something about a million people making their voices heard with something that politicians really care about...money. Who do you think Obama is beholden to now? Special interests or the public who financed him?
February 20, 2008 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't worry. Barack won't take publis financing
because he is not a man of his word. As a matter of fact, he's a man of other people's words.
February 20, 2008 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rae - guessing by your responses and "analysis", I am guessing you are either:
A 65+ year old woman, or
Someone with less than a highschool education.
Because those are the only two groups Hillary's still holding on to these days.
February 20, 2008 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love Lattes and I have a Prius!
I just sent Obama's campaign some CA$H, AGAIN. I have never given to a campaign as much as I have this year - TO OBAMA!
February 20, 2008 4:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
What is one of the core principles of the Fiscal Conservative Republicans; it is that the Federal Government should stay out of collecting and redistributing money from people.
John McCain has started to preach that as a part of his born again tax cuts for the rich conversion.
Isn't it a bit ironic, that the same John McCain is now demanding that Senator Obama join him in forsaking small private campaign funding in order to take IRS collected taxpayers' money.
Shall we call it the John McCain Federal Campaign Earmark Policy!
February 20, 2008 4:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
going to be 906,000 soon
February 20, 2008 4:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, texas is going nuts. In travis county 8,000 people voted today on the first day of early voting already. In 04 only 16,000 voted early in total. They are expecting a huge, huge turnout in texas. Video is on the yahoo election page. Wow!!!!!!!
Go obama!!!!
February 20, 2008 4:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rae: It's time to get some help.
Mocking a political candidate is one thing, but being so mentally, personally and emotionally disturbed is troubling. Your acute hatred outstrips any reason, even the reason that the candidate you support is loosing.
It's sad you find gratification in such smear;
February 20, 2008 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Assuming that they had 400K donors last year and 500K new donors this year (mark hit around 7am this morning) they got an additional 20K since this morning. Yesterday around this time their counter said they had 460K since Jan 1 so they got 60,000 new donors within the last 24 hours!
I have never seen anything like it.
Granted for those of us with trust funds, there is a little bit of gamesmanship involved in this and this campaign is a master at milking that with the counters and goals but I wouldn't be giving up my lattes to participate if Obama didn't give me something to want to give them up for.
February 20, 2008 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm with you Rae! This is discusting. In the good ole days (before 2008), ties to the establishment money machine was a certin election clincher. Now all these damn communist sheep keep donating to this empty suit/Islamofacist. If this continues, how do we expect bundlers, PACs, and lobyists to keep up? At this rate, we could eventually end up with a democracy again :(
February 20, 2008 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know, its terrible. A democracy? I would never have thought that I would have seen it in my lifetime. I thought that's what the king and his cronies only promoted overseas. Democracy is for suckers, that's what I thought. Wow, what a concept a democracy. Next thing you know we'll get a constitution. Wouldn't that be a shocker.
February 20, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I actually have a Black Gay Friend here in New York- and he's as great guy, we often go for a latte at Star Bucks.
I'm not kidding: I called him just now- apparently he voted for Hillary in the primary- but still he is a great guy.
February 20, 2008 4:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I had no idea there were 1,000,000 latte drinking, Prius drivers in Birks out there. Wow.
I'm torn. Now I want this primary season to go on forever. If we let Obama keep raising money, maybe he could pay off the national debt.
February 20, 2008 4:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
sounds to me like a good reason to reject public financing.
Obama's money is coming from people in small donations. He doesn't take PAC money or lobby money and thats good enough for me.
It seems, if McCain wants to push the issue (and i'm sure he will because there is NO WAY he can keep pace with Obama's fundraising) this is the line i would take.
ONE MILLION DONORS. The Vast majority of them in small increments. It's hard to "buy" influence in Washington for $25, especially if a million other people have donated too. This, in my opinion, IS public financing.
I do believe that money is bad for the system. But that seems to be when there is a lot of money coming from a very few sources. With Obama, the opposite is true, in that you have small amounts of money coming from lots of different sources. It's hard to see how that could corrupt or buy influence.
February 20, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hit send by accident -- With needing 100K donors to reach the 1,000,000 mark...the extra 20,000 that they got since 7am means they are 1/5 of the way there in 1/2 day. At this rate they will have reached the Mil mark by Tuesday at the latest.
*shakes head in amazement*
February 20, 2008 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
A little bitter are we? Someone's candidate looking weak and tired? There's a reason HRC's campaign can't keep fundraising pace. Actually there's several. But she's fundamentally a tired candidate. The Clintons served 8 years in the White House, last century. The 1990s are now in the past. And those swooning with Clinton nostalgia are dwindling.
February 20, 2008 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
New rule, in honor of John and 527-Hill: I'll donate $500 to Obama everytime we bomb Pakistan.
February 20, 2008 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
i pray he gets no more money from you. don't worry the rest of us will keep him solvent.
February 20, 2008 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
1968 + internet X disgust in current administration = Obama win in Nov.
February 20, 2008 5:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Almost 907,000 now.
Approx. half of this number is just since Super Tuesday. They are 1st time donations. As others have mentioned, yesterday around this time the number was around 460,850. That is a huge 24 hour jump.
February 20, 2008 5:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Approx 1,000 new donations while I typed last post!
February 20, 2008 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about they create an agreement that is better than public financing. Put the donations cap at $500 per individual, and eliminate the use of PACs and outside groups. For some reason, I think that McCain (the self proclaimed hero of the taxpayer) would rather rely on the good people's taxes to fund his campaign.
February 20, 2008 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
People!
I'm starting to sense a little hostility..
"I love you back!"
Bahhh!
Rae
February 20, 2008 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fair enough. We have been sensing rather a lot of hostility from you for about a week now, so it is only natural that you should begin to see the favor returned. Surely it will come as no surprise to you to learn that few among us esteem it a compliment to be likened to the Hitler Youth.
February 20, 2008 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Another live counter! So exciting. I love these things. Not quite as much fun as the money counter last time, though.
February 20, 2008 5:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
910,000
February 20, 2008 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Obama is so loved by Prius driving, Latte drinking, Birkenstock wearing folks....
.... why'd he lose California?
February 20, 2008 5:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Orange County and San Diego. Bush country.
February 20, 2008 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've been tracking this since Super Tuesday with an estimate of $75 per new donor - my current estimate for February that figures in their last public numbers - $7.5M around Feb 6th is $36.3M (only 29 days) with an upside closer to $46M. They'll probably hit 1,000,000 donors before February 26th at the current pace - it'll be a big news item to hit the airwaves before March 4th.
It's also possible the February donations will reach as high as $50M which would be unbelievable - and coincidentally the money raised in Jan/Feb would then equal the $85M Fed Funding target for the General Election. That would be an interesting footnote.
February 20, 2008 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know this sounds like a dumb question, but can he use left over primary money in the general? I assume so, but you never know. Also, if bfk is correct and she bails by chance when he has a ton of money in the bank, then he can say no on the public financing as he already has the limit and it wouldn't be right to take taxpayer dollars and give all the donations back.
February 20, 2008 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Only $36 million? I honestly was expect his campaign to hit somewhere in the ball park of at least $40 million. His donations always seem to spike whenever he wins or loses and seeing as he's won 10 contests now, I would have expected his campaign to be raking several millions for each of those victories.
Anyways, its nice to see that presidential candidates are finally able to enthuse enough people to donate and finance their campaigns with small amounts of dollars, instead of relaying on the mega rich, corporate fat cats and the top 5% of this country.
February 20, 2008 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the Hitler comment was so outrageous I couldn't get serious, but some how suggesting that a Black majority or a Gay majority would be negatives for a campaign- seem like Alabama right wing talking points.
No offense to Alabama BTW- I went to Auburn for a semester and if you pay attention you'll find many good people living in silence.
February 20, 2008 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
kash79 wrote: I think the Hitler comment was so outrageous I couldn't get serious, but some how suggesting that a Black majority or a Gay majority would be negatives for a campaign- seem like Alabama right wing talking points.
Okay, this is really outrageous jump. Di I say it was a negative thing? Its clearly an advantage.
No one can criticize Obama for fear of being accused of playing a race card. The press and every one is tip toing around him because of it. Things that had nothing to do with race was being cried "racists!" This is disgusting.
This article link I posted was about the huge amts. of money being raised by some gay businessmen, Obama supporters who have big connections and can tap a LOT of money for him.
So now we can't mention who the big money raisers are or we're gay bashing too?
So let me get the rules right:
1) We can't mention anything regarding race or that could possibly be interpreted as racist and its up to us to figure that out ahead of time;
and
2) We can't mention anything about his gay support because that's automatically a bad thing.
Do I have the rules straight? Uh, excuse me Do I have the rules right?
And you call yourselves "democrats". You're acting more like hypocrats if you ask me.
Rae
February 20, 2008 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, if you win and if you decline public financing you can use the money in GE. But if you loose, you can give money to the DNC or DNC affiliated candidates. I think you can also give it to charity.
February 20, 2008 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's grass roots structure is feeding his campaign in every sense, now i see why Mcain wants him to pledge to only take fed money...He needs to reject that pledge and take the hit publicity wise for a few days...the one time a Dem looks like he is going to raise more money than a Rep, the Rep wants to call for a pledge not to take public money...come on!
On another note, Chris Matthews is really milking his interview with the state senator from Texas last night...I am watching his show and he has mentioned it in every segment so far, plus MSNBC has been playing it just about all day. anything for ratings i guess...
February 20, 2008 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think for Rae and the Hillaryis44ers there's this horrible problem because since Hillary is objectively god's gift to women and she's the bestest ever and her victories are our victories and when someone puts her down they are putting us down there's no reason for anyone to vote against her. So there has to be conspiracies, and Hitler, and kool-aid, and magic juju, because it cannot be possible that someone has looked rationally at their deity and decided that they want to vote for someone else? Because that would be, in a way, rejecting them. So, instead, you have to pathologize and insult, because otherwise you have to come to terms with the fact that someone might not think Hillary is a goddess of awesomeness, and apparently that's too much to bear.
Plus, homos! Evil, rich homos!
February 20, 2008 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rae, sheep say BAAAHHHH not BAHHH. And it's lemmings, not sheep, that are said to commit mass suicide (btw, they don't). Get your metaphors straight.
February 20, 2008 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
What is it with you and lemmings anyway?
Rae
February 20, 2008 7:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't understand why people are getting so worked up about Obama raising money from average people who donate small amounts. People have been going on and on for years about getting rid of big money in presidential campaigns and when someone comes along and is able to raise small money...suddenly its horrible!! If Hillary or McCain could tap into small money, I would say good for them also. Its about time that democracy means the common people, not the oligarchy of America.
February 20, 2008 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
We can thank the internet and Howard Dean, and the laws limiting campaign donations, for this democratizing of elections. People are voting at the polls and voting with their credit cards. Barack Obama is on track to bring in $50 million in Feb. Good for him and good for us. We can beat the corporate Republicans and the corporate Democrats that way.
February 20, 2008 6:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
The counters were 'broken' on the website for a bit - but now they replaced the 'since Jan 08' with just the million donor one. They were just over 906,000 when they first started and are already up to 917,000 in a couple of hours.
It is a bizarrely fascinating thing to watch.
I wonder if people can afford to donate since they are driving economical Prius's....
February 20, 2008 6:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just got the email that I had sort of been waiting for and curious if was coming. As I'm under $1k to reaching my match, the campaign has finally given up asking me for $100 or $250, and listed the specific number I need to give to reach the max of $2300. It's a smart email. I know it's not a terribly difficult e-mail merge (although I have given via fax, in person and on-line so lots of opportunities for errors), but still a smart one. My calculations were off, so with the info in hand, I can accurately give to the max if I want.
They are obviously targeting donors intelligently.
February 20, 2008 7:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
kash79 wrote: I think the Hitler comment was so outrageous I couldn't get serious, but some how suggesting that a Black majority or a Gay majority would be negatives for a campaign- seem like Alabama right wing talking points.
Okay, this is really an outrageous jump. Did I say it was a negative thing? Its clearly an advantage.
No one can criticize Obama for fear of being accused of playing a race card. The press and every one is tip toing around him because of it. Things that had nothing to do with race was being cried "racists!" This is disgusting.
This article link I posted was about the huge amts. of money being raised by some gay businessmen, Obama supporters who have big connections and can tap a LOT of money for him.
So now we can't mention who the big money raisers are or we're gay bashing too?
So let me get the rules right:
1) We can't mention anything regarding race or that could possibly be interpreted as racist and its up to us to figure that out ahead of time;
and
2) We can't mention anything about his gay support because that's automatically a bad thing.
Do I have the rules straight? Uh, excuse me Do I have the rules right?
And you call yourselves "democrats". You're acting more like hypocrats if you ask me.
Rae
February 20, 2008 7:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's getting tough to be a bigot these days, huh? Hard to know what to say. All this minority this, minority that, it's so confusing. African Americans, gays, and other weirdos are overwhelming you a bit?
Maybe you can just click your red shoes a few times and get back to Hillaryland.
February 20, 2008 8:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Keep reaching for the stars, Rae.
You're making less sense today, and, frankly, I thought that was impossible.
February 20, 2008 7:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Plus you can't even liken him to Hitler without a bunch of people getting up in your grill! What is this world coming to?
February 20, 2008 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Screw the haters. Obama has big wide-spread support and the DC establishment (media included) don't know what to do about it. Maybe this is the year that we remind them that there are more than 3 or 4 states in the union.
I don't mind Hillary. I'd vote for her if she got the nod, but her avid supporters have to accept a fact: quite a few people are turned off by her and the idea of a new Clinton era. If that's the sentiment in the primaries of her own party, how will she fare in the general?
February 20, 2008 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Calling US "sheep" ???? ... you're the ones taking the ****ing
February 20, 2008 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
.... in case you haven't heard Obama has a speaking style that excites people JUSS LIKE HITLER, now don't get me wrong I am not saying it's a bad thing and don't blame me for bringing it up I heard someone else say it first. I am NOT teh bad guy for mentioning Obama and Hitler in the same sentence (and on a tangent why would the Obamas EVER lower themselves to respond to anything that anyone ever affiliated with FOX news says? If they did how would Obama ever gets ethics legislation passed on help to corral loose nukes?)
February 20, 2008 8:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Churchill also had a speaking style that excited people. So did MLK. Does that mean that Churchill and King were just like Hitler? Can you understand why it is very difficult to take seriously folks who make the Obama/Hitler comparison, but easy to regard them with derisive contempt?
February 21, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Rae - guessing by your responses and "analysis", I am guessing you are either:
A 65+ year old woman, or
Someone with less than a highschool education.
Because those are the only two groups Hillary's still holding on to these days."
Wait -- you're forgetting the anti-plaigarists and the ones who start salivating every time she says the word "solutions"!
February 20, 2008 10:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
11:25 pm, Wed. 2/20
928,988 donors at barackobama.com
11:30 pm, Wed. 2/20
929,075 donors at barackobama.com
February 20, 2008 11:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
New rumor: Barack Obama supporters are thinking of asking Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream (you know, those two guys in Vermont who publicly announced their endorsement of Barack this past week?) to come out with a new flavor: Yes, Pecan!
I love it.
I can just picture the commercial: "I'm Barack Obama, and I approved this ice cream."
February 20, 2008 11:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
11:36 pm, Wed. 2/30
929,226 donors
Bah...baah...
Good night. I'm off to count sheep.
February 20, 2008 11:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Probably because he never got a chance to campaign there. He was criss crossing the country hitting 20 other states.
February 20, 2008 11:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, Rae, Hillary Clinton has the majority of the support of gay voters, and won 63% of the gay vote in California.
February 21, 2008 4:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, Rae, Hillary Clinton has the majority of the support of gay voters, and won 63% of the gay vote in California.
February 21, 2008 4:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Within 24 hours after winning Wisconsin, the Obama campaign brought in a whopping 60,000 NEW donors and they now stand at over 932,000! This is truly a grassroots movement as we have never seen before in this country.
PS - on the Gay voters for Hillary, HRC controls HRC - thus the 63%. Get it?
February 21, 2008 9:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
The lack of money in the HRC campaign explains the emergence of the 527. Perhaps they thought Obama would not be smart/tough enough to nail them RE the 527 in tonight's debate.
BHO should nail her on that, then segue smoothly into her lobbyist money, the ownership of Congress by K St, and his closing in on 1 million indiv. donors.
It'd be nice to have a Kerrey statement RE 527's and swiftboating as a campaign tactic. Rove and HRC would say it's just playing hardball. Obama and we sheep say it's dishonorable, an act of public political pornography that poisons the process and creates the cynicism that's progress's greatest enemy.
Baaaaaaaaaaaa ......... just donated another $5.27 in honor of this final flailing HRC error ....
-- stan
February 21, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Over 942,000 now.
The "1,000,000" figure will be great press for Obama in the middle of this stretch between Wisconsin and Ohio-Texas (+ RI-VT).
February 21, 2008 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink