This isn't anywhere close to the worst attack ad coming from the Clintons, are you serious?? Her campaign has been lying about his positions left and right this entire campaign. TV spots aren't generally their favored media, they usually go for dropping fallacious mailers the day before an election, or having Bill or other surrogates running around spreading lies themselves, and then you have your robocalls, and then your dutiful surrogates and staff spreading Obama is a muslim rumors, and then there is the race baiting and that drug dealer talk...oh, there has been tons of negative attacks flying from the Clinton campaign, so what are you talking about this is the worst?

With all due respect to Joe Wilson, he in no way attempts to conceal his endorsement of Hillary, thus it shouldn't be surprising that his article is one long Hillary talking point. He has about as much credibility to me as Paul Krugman does (hint: none). He makes excuses for her horrible vote on Iraq (what about her years of support for that war until it because unpopular?). Obama stated once that if there was good intelligence that bin Laden was near the Pakistan border, and Musharraf the dictator refused to do anything about it, he would go after bin Laden himself. I guess if catching bin Laden is a bad thing, then okay, I guess that is bad, but what I call bad is not having the courage to stand up to a dictator who isn't supported by 75% of his own country just because we have a political arrangement setup by the Bush clan. And while Wilson attacks Obama for this, there is no mention of Hillary stating, I believe at that very same debate, that she wouldn't take using NUCLEAR WEAPONS against terrorist targets off the table! That is the kind of crazy shit I'd expect from Bush! Of course Wilson conveniently overlooks that. There is also Hillary's opposition to the International Criminal Court, and hostility toward the UN for condemning human rights violations by Israel. Way to show leadership Hillary! (No mention of this from Wilson) Then there is Hillary's opposition to arms control agreements that would ban the US selling weapons to governments who abuse human rights, which isn't surprising given that she receives more money from US arms manufacturers than any other candidate. (Again, no mention of this from Wilson, how odd) Oh, and then there was the similar opposition from Hillary to a landmine ban. (Again, where's Wilson?) Oh, and then there was the flag burning amendment put forth by the Republicans in a transparent attempt to exploit this non-issue as a patriotic rallying call against free speech, and Hillary not only voted for it, she co-sponsored that monstrosity! Great leadership Hillary! Way to be a sheep! Oh, what was that Wilson? Nothing? Imagine that. All he has is some crap story about the Kenyan government blah blah blah, well excuse me if the Kenyan government has a little bit bigger fish to fry at the moment, and I'm pretty sure no one gives a damn one way or another, true or not. Wilson is a lapdog to the Clintons just like Krugman, and it is pretty pathetic that you would try to cite that piece of biased crap as evidence of anything. Give me a break, Hillary is no leader, and she is no progressive on foreign policy, and she has more skeletons in her closet to exploit than any other presidential nominee in recent history.

I was speechless.

Isn't that Hillary video scary?!

Eric, You've got too post the video. I saw it at originally AmericaBlog:

http://www.americablog.com/2008/02/no-comment.html