I realize the source is satanic, but this article has merit:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120241915915951669.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries

If I were in LA I'd be pretty jacked up by this ad. Hell, I'm not in LA and I'm still moved by it.

Does anyone know of any polls coming out of LA? I have seen polls showing that Obama is up big in VA but I have a feeling that it is going to be pretty close in LA.

And Obama's plan to rebuild New Orleans is - surprise!- the same as W's. Wow! That's really change!

"Look, middle class under educated people support HRC...gee, i wonder if they bother to read the news and get informed about each candidate and their positions. Or, do you think they just say to themselves, "Oh, I know Hillary, but this Obama guy I know nothing about....nor will I take the time to find out because I am comfortable with HRC". Stupid logic, but then again stupid people seem to be voting for HRC."

Posted by pabalive

Wow look! Obama's elitist supporters are alive and well. Perhaps next they'll suggest that an IQ test be a prerequisite to voting. Look at how much they believe in bridging the divides and bringing people together! Keep posting stuff like this, you're bringing a lot of people over to your side. Just look at how he surged and overcame Hillary on Super Tuesday...

Obama is slowly making inroads in the demographics in which he is weak - women and the working class. It's true that blue collar workers typically have less access to media and less time or interest to devote to politics. This doesn't mean that they are unintelligent or uninformed, it means that they do not necessarily go out of their way to decipher all of the differences between candidates. They remember the 90's, they have a favorable opinion of Bill Clinton, and so they are voting for Hillary. There's no malice there. In fact it makes a lot of sense. In addition, they are worried about the economy, as we all are, and so are probably hesitant to pull the lever for the new guy who may promise change but does not have the track record to compare to a Clinton presidency. The more Obama reaches out to these voters and the more they learn about him and his past, the more they will come to like him and perhaps even vote for him. Both Democratic candidates will be much better for the working class than the president we currently have.

There are very, very few differences in their positions on policy. But those willing to "roll the dice" on Obama seem to believe that he will be able to help the party win more down-ballot candidates. A larger Democratic majority in the House and Senate means an easier time pushing through liberal legislation. The difference is about the future of the Democratic party. If Hillary wins the general election (and that's a big if), she may be a good tonic for the problems of the Bush administration, but the significance of her and Bill's return to the White House does not bode well for future Democrats.

Bill Clinton raised a whole lot of money after Katrina and people in LA remember that. If you look at the comments to the stories in the LA newspapers, you will see that Hillary has a lot of support because of this.

Don't forget that Edwards political career is over now. He has to be sure to pick the right person to endorse to be able to get a cabinet position. He would be wise to wait until after March 4. At that point the Dem party will likely broker a deal. He would be best positioned to jump on whoever takes Ohio and Texas.

I heard Hillary giving a speech yesterday, in which she said (several times): "YES WE CAN!!! AND YES WE WILL!!!"

She's pathetic and shameless.