McCain Lobbyist May Release Her Own Statement Today
I'm told by the office of Vicki Iseman, the lobbyist whose relationship with John McCain was scrutinized in today's New York Times, that she is weighing whether to make her own statement about the story and may do so later today.
If so, that would obviously give this story another jolt.
Meanwhile, her firm, Alcalde & Fay, has released this statement:
The allegations and malicious innuendo reported by the New York Times yesterday are completely and utterly false. Alcalde & Fay’s relationship with Senator McCain has been professional, appropriate and consistent with his legislative, jurisdictional and constituent duties. The story is based upon the fantasies of a disgruntled former campaign employee and is without foundation or merit. Ms. Iseman is a hard working professional whose 18 year career has been exemplary and she has our full support. It is beneath the dignity of a quality newspaper to participate in such a campaign of character assassination.
A statement from her, however, would be considerably more attention grabbing, since she would probably address the allegations, such as they are, of a romantic relationship with McCain.
Also note that the statement blames the story on a "disgruntled former campaign employee," even though The Times story quotes multiple sources.
More on this story right here at The Horse's Mouth.















"The story is based upon the fantasies of a disgruntled former campaign employee..."
How do THEY know who the UNKNOWN sources are?
February 21, 2008 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
The New Republic's backstory on this is well worth reading.
February 21, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
so it's come full circle. the progressive blogs are all over this like hyp on ocracy.
lame lame lame
February 21, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
What?
February 21, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Phrases not included in the lobbying firm's statement:
"Ms. Iseman's relationship with Senator McCain was professional, not romantic."
"We deny that Ms. Iseman claimed any special degree of access to Senator McCain."
"It's not true that Ms. Iseman was warned away from Senator McCain by his staffers, informally barred from his office, or otherwise forcibly distanced from the seantor."
The firm denies "allegations and malicious innuendo." Well, sure. But that's not the same as denying reported facts, or specifying the individual allegations that you're denying. They defend the relationship of the firm as professional, but don't say the same about Ms. Iseman. (Am I parsing too finely? Perhaps. But it strikes me as damned odd to characterize the relationship of the firm itself, when the allegations relate to a specific staff member.) It'd be easy for them to subsequently say that they considered Iseman's personal life, well, personal, and were simply asserting that they believed it had not affected her professional conduct.
February 21, 2008 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm beginning to think this was released NOW because the GOP felt that the Democratic nominee would USE it in October against McCain. Get the story out now so it can die early.
coonsey's view
www.freewebs.com/coonsey/
February 21, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Some suggest that they ran the story before another news agency ran first. McCain & lawyers have been trying to keep them from running this. Indeed, it looks as if they managed to chop the meat out of the story.
You can be sure that they were going to release more until the LAWYERS got at it.
Let's not miss the most important part; Keating.
February 21, 2008 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not saying there isn't something to this story, but I do think it was irresponsible for the Time to go forward with what they had. At least the WaPo names a source.
Also with these stories you have to carefully parse what is the news and what isn't. Undo influence from a lobbyist is news. Private romantic episodes of politicians are not necessarily news unless they are blatantly hypocritical (i.e. a homophobic politican getting caught in a homosexual act.) As much as I don't want McCain to win, I think that some of these things are still family business.
February 21, 2008 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink