« Report: Liberal Bloggers Mostly Skeptical Of Times Story About McCain | Home | Hillary And Obama Square Off In Opening Statements »

Hillary-Obama Debate Starts In Moments -- Stakes Couldn't Be Higher

We're blogging the CNN debate in Texas right here.

Hillary needs to win Ohio and Texas. And the polls are really tightening in both states, but more so in Texas. So the stakes for tonight couldn't be higher.

Stay tuned.


15 Comments

| Leave a comment

Taking Pictures..

What is this!? Obama is already causing snoozing with is opening Edwards-like statement. Clinton was positive and inspiring. Wow, what a difference!

user-pic

Matthew Weaver climbs out of his candidate induced 10-straight-loss-in-a-row stupor to post inane drivel. And in other news, dog bites man and rumors of sun rising in east may just prove true.

Pure BS on your part but what should one expect from the Obama Cult. He'll still lose, now or in November. But humerous all with your Obama Cult, candidate can't do wrong, no substance, plagiarism, shifting agreements, lies about friendship with his slumlord benefactor, and so much more. But, oh, can't have any wrong about him, right? Yep, a Cult.

user-pic

What part is BS? So Obama hasn't won 10 straight contests in a row, leads in delegates, states won and total votes?

Or just the part where you have been in recent a stupor because your candidate is losing?

But please, feel free to continue to foam at the mouth about "cults" while vomiting fraudulent smears, just be sure to wipe the spittle off your screen when you are done.

It's pure Republican hate-like posts (referring to Obama supporters as "cultists" and inflating minimal issues) like yours that make someone like me who is leaning towards Senator Obama feel considerably stronger about voting for him. Seriously, I will remember your hate when I vote. Democrats should be thankful to have two excellent candidates to choose from to rid this country of the damage eight years of Bush has brought us. Spreading Republican-style hate does nothing to help that cause.

user-pic

Exactly. I have issues about CLinton because of her views and actions on foreign policy (UAMF vote for example) which is why I am an Obama supporter at this point, but I would support her fully in the general against any GOP candidate.

I just don't get these scorched earth dead-enders like Matthew Weaver and the Taylor Marsh, MyDD'ers who attack other qualified Dem candidates who are on course to be our parties nominee.

Makes zero sense to me, but there it is.

user-pic

Ugh.. should have read as "AUMF vote" (i.e. the authorization of the Iraq war.

Its early, and it looks like they both are play nice....

user-pic

Let's hope that continues. Neither candidate can afford to go negative since we will all need to be able to rally behind the eventual nominee.

Actually, for pure enjoyment, I'm pretty amused by "humerous all with your Obama cult."

But there may very well be a difference between Clinton and Obama supporters. Follow the link for a discussion of those differences. http://undercoverblackman.blogspot.com/

You'll need to scroll down a bit, but not far.

Baghdad Bob, is that you?

For someone who doesn't believe in words I sure can gab.

I hope no one is doing a word count!

I hope no one noticed that I didn't answer the question:

What will you do different from Obama on day 1?

But I sure did bloviate.
Anybody count the number of words?

I am noticing that BHO isnt stammering as much...he has gotten better in these debates as they went on....

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address