Hillary Says It Herself: I Know What It Means When That Phone Rings At 3 A.M.
Hillary hit the 3 A.M. phone call theme herself at an event in Texas a little while ago, defending herself against Obama's denunciation of her new ad as fear-mongering by saying: "I don't think people in Texas scare all that easily."
Take a look...
Clearly, the Hillary camp is trying to swing the late-breakers her way by sowing last-minute doubts about Obama's readiness to be commander-in-chief. It seems like a pretty big gamble -- we'll see if it works, or if it sparks a back-lash among voters turned off by tactics such as the use of kids in ads.
Transcript after the jump.
Transcript:
“I know the difficulties that our men and woman in uniform face everyday and I also understand completely what it means when that phone rings at 3 a.m. There isn’t any time to convene your advisors, to do a survey about what will or will not be popular – you have to make a decision. In the world that we face with both the challenges and opportunities, we need a president who picks up that phone ready to decide.Senator Obama says that if we talk about national security in this campaign we are trying to scare people. Well, I don’t think people in Texas scare all that easily.
The American people aren’t afraid of the challenges and dangers we face in the world. They want a president with the strength and wisdom to take those challenges and dangers head on. There’s a big difference between giving speeches about national security and giving orders as commander in chief. There’s a big difference between delivering a speech at an anti-war rally as a state senator and picking up that phone in the White House at 3 a.m. in the morning to deal with an international crisis.
Senator Obama talks about these issues but when it came time to act, he was missing in action. He gave a speech in 2002 against the war in Iraq and I commend him for that speech. By 2004 he was saying he wasn’t sure how he would’ve voted because he never had to vote and that he basically agreed with the way President Bush was conducting the war. And by the time he got to the Senate, he voted exactly as I did. There’s a difference between making a speech when you have no responsibility and having to step up and take charge and take responsibility for your actions.
He was missing in action when he failed to show up for a vote dealing with Iran. He was missing in action when he failed to hold a single substantive hearing on a committee that he chaired that had responsibility for Europe and NATO and NATO’s policy in Afghanistan. Protecting and defending this country is the most solemn duty of our president. It is the pledge you take when you put your hand on that Bible and take the oath of office and you swear to protect and defend our Constitution and America.
I understand that. That’s why I have been endorsed by 25 generals and admirals who know that I will be there to answer that phone and that my experience equips me to give the right answer when I do. They know that national security is the most important duty of our president. We’ve never had a presidential campaign where national security wasn’t an issue and we’re not about to start now especially if the Republican candidate will be Senator McCain. We know the Republicans will run a campaign about national security. I feel absolutely comfortable standing on that stage with John McCain and going toe to toe about national security.”















He made the speech, but she NEVER picked up the phone. First ladies dont do that.
February 29, 2008 5:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I also understand completely what it means when that phone rings at 3 a.m."
Yeah, it means Bill is calling to say he'll be home late again ("Shhh! Quiet, baby!")
Another brilliant Penn remark, from the NY Times:
"Mr. Penn in the Clinton camp said that he was “curious” why the Obama campaign decided to have Mr. Obama respond to the ad himself, suggesting it showed his campaign was super-sensitive about the issue of his readiness."
Right - or maybe he has the guts to respond himself to attacks Hillary uses anonymous narrators to make for her.
February 29, 2008 5:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, my mom knew what it meant when the phone rang at 3:00 a.m. for my dad, who was the fire chief for my town. It meant someone's house was on fire and he had to leave to go put it out. Being in the bed when the calls came in didn't make her a fireman. Had she decided to join the department herself, the fact that she'd been there when the calls came would not have subtracted a single minute from her training requirements. And, indeed, the fact that he would often talk with her about the fires, the things he had seen and the decisions he had to make did not, in any way, make her qualified to put on the white helmet herself.
My moms is the bomb, but she ain't no fireman.
February 29, 2008 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
And, indeed, while I'm on the subject, the analogy actually works better the other way. My Mom got more than her fair share of 3:00 a.m. emgergency calls in her job. She'd often talk about her cases with my Dad, though her dicussions were always highly circumscribed by the strict limits of confidentiality imposed by her profession. I expect she got important insights simply through the process of talking it over, even within the limits imposed by her confidentiality requirements. Those discussions, however, most definitely did not make my Dad qualified to do her work.
They were both competent people who were good at what they did. Being married to each other did not make them qualified to do each other's jobs.
So what, exactly, was Hillary's security classification during her White House years? How much time did she spend down in the Whie House Situation Room? How many National Security Council meetings, or private meetings with Bill and Sandy Berger, did she sit in on during the Balkan crisis?
Yeah, that's what I thought.
February 29, 2008 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Which Hillary will take the 3AM call?
February 29, 2008 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!!
February 29, 2008 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guarantee their next ad will have Hillary doing a windmill jam over a Barack lookalike on the basketball court.
February 29, 2008 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Honestly, is this not the same approach she has tried everywhere else to this point, to little obvious effect? Was that not the whole point of the "ready from day one" and "roll of the dice" memes that she was projecting at every possible occasion starting in Iowa?
I support Obama, so I am perfectly content to watch her repeat the same mistakes again and again, but I would have to imagine that this is a painful business for Clinton supporters to watch.
February 29, 2008 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Breaking: Hillary plagiarized 3 AM concept from McCain.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/2/29/155558/168/352/466445
February 29, 2008 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry, but if someone in the media doesn't challenge this, I'm going to scream. She doesn't know jack. For the one millionth time, sharing pillow talk with the president doesn't count as 'experience.'
If Obama's campaign was as classless as hers has so often shown to be, he would have pushed this line ad nauseum for months now.
February 29, 2008 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ask and you shall receive:
http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2008/02/pregnant_pause.html
excerpt reporting on Clinton campaign conference call:
"Responding to the release of HRC's new TX TV ad, which asserts in no subtle terms that only she has the experience to deal with a major world crisis, and, relatedly, to keep your children safe, Slate's John Dickerson asked the obvious question:
"What foreign policy moment would you point to in Hillary's career where she's been tested by crisis?" he said.
Silence on the call."
February 29, 2008 6:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Holy crap. Now there's an ad waiting to be made. A picture of a phone with some text to explain what it is and when it happened and then just play it.
February 29, 2008 7:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Once again, every aspect of that ad was designed to maximize its visceral fear response in the voter, as I've noted in my complete point by point analysis (including a look at Hillary's next fear-ad):
http://thepersonalispolitical.tumblr.com/post/27622528
February 29, 2008 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama supporter.
Don't think there's anything wrong with the ad.
I want Obama to answer that phone and I think his response is a good one.
But there's nothing wrong with the ad. National security is about...security. What's wrong with suggesting that you're the best candidate for Commander-In-Chief? Seriously, if you don't worry about your kids, you must not have any.
I'm actually disappointed that Obama has said he won't do one like it.
Maybe in the alternative he can do one with President McCain calling at 3 a.m., telling your teenager to report for the draft.
February 29, 2008 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
What is she talking about? What crisis has she ever managed at 3 AM? Heck, what crisis has McCain ever managed at 3 AM?
You know, the fact that she's able to draw these "contrasts" without any challenge sort of puts the lie to the notion that Obama has been getting preferential treatment. That's not to say they're Clinton biased. Just, if Clinton were not the nigh-presumptive nominee, I have to think the press would finally be putting a microscope to all these claims of experience.
I mean, damn, Hillary, you'd make a fine president, but you need to, you know, cite things from *your* record to substantiate this rhetoric. I honestly just don't know what the heck you're talking about.
February 29, 2008 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
uh... huh-huh-huh. Hillary its three o'clock can we like be a automatic delegate so we can score. heh-heh-heh,eh good one butthead.
February 29, 2008 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh.
Wow.
Nothings wrong with the ad except it's a ripoff of a McCain ad...
I did not see that a minute ago before I posted.
Wow.
Couldn't they have at least changed the time to, say, 4am?
What the hell are they paying all of this money to consultants for?!
That campaign just sucks.
And I'm okay with that.
February 29, 2008 5:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary has never picked up the phone at 3am. Never.
She never had to deal with an international crisis.
She has never had responsibility for 1 national security decision, ever. (and I'm not talking about the kind of responsibility a legislator has for votes). She's never ordered anyone to do anything involving national security. Ever.
She has no executive experience, at all.
Oh, never mind. She is just getting really, really gross.
I think the garbage disposal on their kitchen sink was backed up....
February 29, 2008 6:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Alas, when will Hillary drop the pillow talk?
February 29, 2008 6:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, there is one major difference between the McCain and Hillary ads. McCain's ad is all text, Hillary's is all voiceover narration.
So the difference is McCain assumes his potential voters know how to read.
February 29, 2008 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
In the sound track, the phone keeps ringing and ringing. Does this an inadvertently bad message? Was Hil picking out her pearls first, before answering the phone?
February 29, 2008 6:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
NCSteve, spew alert please!
that was hilarious, your mom being in the bed with your dad when he got the fire emergency call at 3 AM didn't make her qualified to be fire chief. oh, jeebus, really good.
Oh, and on that plagiarism thing, Hillary may have plagiarized from the ad made up by an amateur McCain fan (it wasn't McCain's campaign, just a fan who put up a YouTube). But over on FDL a couple folks pointed out the ad concept may have originated with Walter Mondale's campaign when he was running against Gary Hart. Somebody may have a way to drill into that.
Either way, not original.
February 29, 2008 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fractal.
You are correct. In fact the same guy who created the ad for Mondale is now advising Hillary.
Now, why does that not surprise anyone?
The thing is Mondale LOST.
February 29, 2008 6:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
" By 2004 he was saying he wasn’t sure how he would’ve voted because he never had to vote and that he basically agreed with the way President Bush was conducting the war. And by the time he got to the Senate, he voted exactly as I did"
She is lying and someone needs to call her on this. Obama has not once ever said he agreed with how Bush was conducting the war...but Hillary DID!
He voted exactly as you did Hillary because you made sure to FOLLOW his votes, so you could claim the same record.
The truth is that 127 DEMoCRATS voted AGAINST the war and you voted EXACTLY as they did, because there are only so many options for ENDING the WAR.
Hillary is trying to blur the lines between GOING to war and ENDING the war.
She is conflating the issue to make herself sound like Obama's judgement is the same as her and it is a SPECIOUS argument.
Like Obama said in the debate it was a huge strategic blunder, they drove the bus in the ditch and Hillary was one of the drivers of the bus...and now they have to get the bus out the ditch and there are only so many ways to get the bus OUT.
So, of course, in HINDSIGHT Hillary's votes are exactly the same cause there are so few options.
I can't STAND this LYING Heffa!!!
February 29, 2008 6:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's more of the shotgun approach that will never work. It might have worked if she'd hammered Obama on it for weeks, but one ad will serve only to muddy her message, if she can even be said to have a message at this point.
February 29, 2008 6:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are sexist. Bringing up Bill's affairs as if to say she is responsible for keeping her husband in line. And the idiot who called her a heffer, you are sexist too. I'm glad that I'm finally seeing Obama supporters for who they really are.
February 29, 2008 6:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
NO, crumbrye...you're a moron if you think calling her a heffa is sexist..I just think Obama is the bull in this instance...now whatcha got to say?
What would be sexist is if I most people realize that when the call comes at 3AM...it is the MAN who gets up to see what is wrong...not the woman and Hillary hasn't had one next to her in bed in so long that she forgot the sexist undertones in her own message.
Even single mothers, wish they had a male to turn to when they hear noises or the phone rings at 3 AM...after all
crumbrye...like James Brown said...This is a MAN's world.
February 29, 2008 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, the pundits are already noticing that when Hillary answers the phone at 3am in her ad, she is fully dressed with make-up and jewelry. The ad is typical of Hillary, contrived and untrue.
February 29, 2008 6:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well to be fair, Hillary was just getting home from having worked "The Late Shift" where she was also dressed up in the same attire and pearls.
February 29, 2008 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmm if there's a 3 am crisis, will Hillary have time to call her pollster or assemble a focus group?
February 29, 2008 6:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
White House, 3:15 a.m.
"Honey, who was that?"
"No, one Hill. Go back to sleep."
February 29, 2008 6:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary Says It Herself: I Know What It Means When That Phone Rings At 3 A.M.
And she knows how to handle those calls:
"Don't you ever call this number again, you trailer trash Bimbo"
February 29, 2008 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
My very first reaction to Hillary Clinton more than a year ago was a cringe response to hearing her voice tonality. After so many years of listening to Bush's stick-up-his-b#tt forced-toughness utterings, I remember thinking, 'oh no...... I do NOT want to have to listen to Hillary's voice for four years'.
Yeah, I castigated myself for being so shallow about voice tones, and went on to study and review her candidancy in more sensible terms. Then, I noticed that her voice improved over time, which really, at some visceral level, pleased me inasmuch as back then, I thought she probably would become the nominee and the president.
But in this posted clip of her today, yikes, its completely the old finger-on-blackboard voice tones resurrected. What happened?
February 29, 2008 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
She's watching her life dream slip away rapidly and is in shock. The one person who should help her emotionally, her husband, hasn't been doing his job for whatever reason.
February 29, 2008 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
how does she know?
Was she the one who answered when it rang? Does that mean Bill abdicted his authority to her in an unconstitutional and dangerous way?
Or does she mean that she sat in on foreign policy and national security meetings when decisions about the 3am phone call were made?
Or is she just playing into a perception the electorate already has that she's "experienced" and she's using that to her advantage and telling an untruth that cant really be proven false so its true?
She doesn't know. She can't possibly know. NOt unless one of the scenarios i've suggested above is true, and if they are that means serious trouble.
February 29, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
As anyone who was the parent of a teenager would know...
If only Hillary had run her campaign that way...
Refreshing honesty. Hillary decided on the AUMF without having to read pesky National Intelligence Estimates. She was "ready to decide."
Kinda sounds like how GWB made decisions.
I guess that's why they were on the same side of the issue.
Very true. Obama made a speech as state senator. Neither he nor Hillary has ever had to pick up a phone.
Of course you would, Hillary.
As long as you weren't asked a question first.
February 29, 2008 8:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Man but the Clinton campaign is on the downhill jog to the crapper! They're beginning to make Republicans look dignified. No wonder Ann Coulter has endorsed Clinton. They speak each other's language.
I feel dirty.
February 29, 2008 8:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
VOTE CLINTON OR DIE!!!
IF YOU VOTE OBAMA WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!!
CLINTON IS THE ONLY CHOICE OR WE'LL ALL DIE!!!!
Reminds me of the Bush 2004 ad strategy.
February 29, 2008 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now THAT is EXCELLENT NEWS!!! FOR HILLARY!!!
February 29, 2008 8:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rumor has it that phone call hillary got at 3am was bill-o asking "What are you wearing?"
February 29, 2008 8:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Vicissitudes you are a clown.
I'm a man that knows that men that run off at the mouth like you never get their dead asses out of bed to "see what is wrong". Take your act back to the street corner you came from.
The candidate you claim to support would slap the hell out of you for saying that sexist stupid shit. Huckabee really needs your backwards-ass vote. You're doing Obama no favors.
"James Brown said..."?! "James Brown said..."?!
WTF?!?!
February 29, 2008 8:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks. Having taken a vow of silence until Wednesday, I couldn't reply to that lame f**k. Appreciate you taking up the slack.
February 29, 2008 9:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
oh please quit your kvetching and whinning...you must have run out of cheese
Bglad you are nothing but slack in every thread you add nothing substantive...you must be one of those clinton supporters...yak yak yak and no one knows what the heck you said cause you just yada yada yada...all the time
your posts sound like a signifying monkey in each thread
February 29, 2008 10:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
chrislrob
how come you wanna go and accuse me of being a man...that sounds mighty sexist of you
you must not know the next line in that James Brown song...do you...google it
lol
February 29, 2008 10:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excuse me if somebody already mentioned this, but there's a great takeoff on HRC's ad at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99oat5t-w9w
February 29, 2008 9:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great spoof!
I loved it...lol lol
February 29, 2008 10:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Hillary campaign was asked today which international crisis she had handled that prepared her to answer the red phone and be commander in chief. Couldn't come up with one.....
I have to think people are scratching their heads. In today's world there's a threat of war, an international incident, a terrorist strike... who does the National Security Advisor or the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs call? Why Laura Bush of course.. She's the most qualified to handle a national security crisis. She should be running for president now. (In her case she is probably more qualified by disposition, temperament, and intellect than W.)
February 29, 2008 9:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Riiiing
Riiiing
Riiiing
Riiiing
"Mmmmhello"
"Who?"
"Yeah yeah yeah, I know."
"Okay! Okay! You said that already, I'll wake him up..."
"BILL!!"
"BIIILLLL"
March 1, 2008 2:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
For fans of David Letterman:
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/02/one-ringy-dingy-two-ringy-ding.php
March 1, 2008 3:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think the following quote by Mr. Danzig is better than the ad counterattacking Hillary
"I would encourage you on March 5 to call Sen. Clinton at 3 a.m. and ask that question."
-- Obama adviser Richard Danzig, after a reporter asked whether Clinton should drop out of the presidential race after Ohio and Texas vote on March 4.
March 1, 2008 5:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
" There isn’t any time to convene your advisors, to do a survey about what will or will not be popular – you have to make a decision."
Interesting that doing a survey to figure what would be most popular seems to be standard operating procedure during regular business hours.
March 1, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary: "I also understand completely what it means when that phone rings at 3 a.m."
It means Bill is in trouble again.
March 1, 2008 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
The difference between Clinton's and McCain's ads is that Clinton's ad has living, breathing people in it. With not one living soul in McCain's ad, it has a spooky, deserted look—like everyone's already dead. Even the WH windows are black. Message misfire, if you ask me.
March 2, 2008 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
No one commented on the audience behind Clinton in the clip of her speech: all white men (except for 1 possible Latino).
Visuals have persuasive power too.
March 2, 2008 10:57 PM | Reply | Permalink