« Lantos Announces Cancer Diagnosis, Retirement From The House | Home | Mississippi AG Sues Over Senate Election Date »

Hillary To Do Letterman Tonight

We've just heard from an in-the-know TPM reader that Hillary will be making an appearance on David Letterman's show tonight, which is an interesting move given that it's right on the eve of the Iowa caucuses.

The Hillary campaign confirmed the appearance to us. More in a bit.

Late Update: Asked for a comment, Hillary spokesman Howard Wolfson emailed: "Tune in!"


109 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Letterman demographic: Youngish college aged males

Suggested Hillary message: "I just want you all to know that the Iowa Caucuses are on February 25th, 2010 at 8am"

user-pic

In related news, Bill Clinton is expected to do this cute little NYU masters student tonight.

user-pic

Great move Hillary!

user-pic

Well, I am a DEMOCRAT FOR HILLARY but your joke was very funny.

user-pic

So she's thumbs down to labor unions. Is she REALLY GOING TO CROSS A PICKET LINE???

IS THERE EVEN GOING TO BE A PICKET LINE?? There should be, if not then shame on the writers.

Wait until this summer, when Verizon goes on strike. We'll show them how to have a picket line. We're going to fight to keep medical benefits for our retirees intact. Verizon wants to get rid of them for retirees completly.

So when workers go on strike, Clinton puts herself ahead of the workforce? I think I'm not going to vote for her.

user-pic

Looks like another late night!

I agree, good move.

user-pic

She's warming up the old cackle as we speak.

user-pic

Obviously given up in Iowa
If she has time for this appearance
Also campaign workers are being pulled from Iowa to NH for Hillary's last stand.

Bye Bye Goldwater Girl
The end of the Bush-Clinton era is coming.
Celebrate

user-pic

Relax, Letterman worked something out with the Union. Its Leno (I believe) who is going against the union.

user-pic

It was my understanding that there is no picket line to be crossed to enter Letterman's studio. He is honoring the writers strike - not employing scabs - so the complaint by Anonymous at 4:21 is vacuous. I have no great love for scabs and picket-crossers, but neither Letterman nor Clinton belong to these categories.

user-pic

To the contrary, anonymous, Letterman entered into an independent side deal with the strikers, and has their blessing.

Her appearance will rally the labor vote tomorrow. Very shrewd.

user-pic

Now, this seems kind of odd. Why wouldn't she be barnstorming all over iowa and getting in the local evening news? Its seems to be a slap in the face to iowans. Very odd. Maybe she is writing off iowa.

user-pic

A bit risky for Hillery...
It has been Letterman who night after night has reminded people what an idiot Bush is.
It is Letterman who negotiated a contract with the writers...
I am sure he will be respectful..
However..

Not having The Daily Show covering this is the biggest void in my limited TV...
Heck Letterman was telling Bill jokes in
2007.

user-pic

Anonymous wrote on January 2, 2008 4:23 PM:
Obviously given up in Iowa
If she has time for this appearance
Also campaign workers are being pulled from Iowa to NH for Hillary's last stand.

Bye Bye Goldwater Girl
The end of the Bush-Clinton era is coming.
Celebrate


Where do you read YOUR news?? You are going to be very disappointed, Madamn Hillary will be our next President.

user-pic

As others have noted, this certainly seems like an odd move if the goal is to get out her voters in Iowa.

user-pic

Sounds like she has already written off Iowa. Meanwhile, Obama just got endorsed by the former Governor of South Carolina...more evidence of his electability vs. hers.

user-pic

Ot perhaps, Michael, in the age of technology, she will appear via satellite.

user-pic

Although come to think of it, if you were trying to rebrand yourself as the national frontrunner while discounting the importance of Iowa ...

user-pic

Drinking game: Take a shot every time she cackles.

PS: Don't try this unless you have a liver the size of a horse.

user-pic

Actually, in all seriousness, this can't hurt her. Her main problem is that voters believe she is a cold, calculating robotic machine sent back in time to marry a filandering politician, gain sympathy, then run for Senate and then president off of the back of this odd chain of events. anything that diverts attention from that and gives her a good forum to cackle in is good for her.

user-pic

Since nobody seems to sympathize with the striking Hollywood writers, it's probably a fine move for her. But I think she should show more principle and not appear on the show. The writers have a legitimate gripe.

user-pic

Unless the Letterman Show is live, she's appearing via satellite (from what I can tell his show tapes at 5:30 ET(4:30 or 7:30 on occasion). Also Clinton's last event is scheduled to start at 7:30 CT.

Any free publicity she can get will help in the final push--especially given how fluid things are on the ground in Iowa.

user-pic

Trevor, of course I am sure iowa gets letterman. Just from reading all this political "stuff" about how iowans are so touch feely and you have to be on the ground and rub elbows, etc., this seems like an odd move. She would probably get much more exposure on the evening news in iowa numbers wise, than she would number of people in iowa staying up late to watch letterman. Just a guess.

user-pic

Oops trevor, I misunderstood what you said, which is evidenced by keith's post. She's appearing via satellite on letterman? Keith as usual is right. My bad.

user-pic

Criminy, still reeling from the headline . . . Greg, I'm really beginning to think you guys do that on purpose.

Seriously, its not about Iowa. It's about New Hampshire and Supercalifragilistic Tuesday.

user-pic
I think she should show more principle and not appear on the show. The writers have a legitimate gripe.

No doubt, but they have no gripe with Letterman. They have reached a deal with him, so their writers are working for him and not picketing his show. To be very clear, I have no great admiration for Sen Clinton, and no love at all for picket-line crossers, but no one is crossing a picket line to appear on Letterman. This is a bogus complaint. There may be a million reasons to think less of Sen Clinton, but this is not one of them.

user-pic

>>Since nobody seems to sympathize with the striking Hollywood writers, it's probably a fine move for her. But I think she should show more principle and not appear on the show. The writers have a legitimate gripe.

user-pic

Hillary Clinton’s Recent Meteoric Rise in Wealth Pictorial Graph
http://thememlingindex.com/hillary_clinton_net_worth-wealth.html

user-pic
So what if Letterman made an agreement with the union. There is still a strike going on.

What is this supposed to mean. There is no strike against Letterman. I fail to see how one "honors" a union's strike by boycotting those employers which have reached agreements with the union. There is no picket line to be crossed here, so it is senseless to complain about Sen Clinton crossing a picket line.

user-pic

Well it will secure her win in NH, NY, CA and everywhere else... even if she doesn't win Iowa. Bill didn't win Iowa but won 2 terms as president and life was much better

user-pic
Why wouldn't she be barnstorming all over iowa and getting in the local evening news?

I don't get it. Is the implication that people in Iowa don't watch Letterman?

user-pic

Do some folks really not understand why HRC is going on Letterman tonight?
She could do a personal appearance in Iowa, and reach, what, 500-1000 people?
I'll bet there are tens of thousands of Letterman viewers in Iowa - and this is a good move re: labor, as Dave has settled with his writers after honoring their picket line.

user-pic

Way to go, Dave.

Unlike Leno etc., Dave owns his own production company which has struck a deal with the writers; he has shown 100% solidarity with the writers and supported them in their positions, and because he has independent ownership so he can do so. This is progressive capitalism at its best.

So the writers are happy with Dave, and I'm happy he's having Hillary on tonight.

user-pic

Wow, it's a good thing people here aren't political strategists. Letterman has an audience of about 3.6 million (she is running a *national* campaign, unlike her opponents). Say 50,000 of those are in Iowa. Free advertising on the eve of Iowa perhaps with a chance to make some inroads into a demographic that's not her strong suit. She did a good job on her last Letterman appearance ("As President, I won't be afraid to pull over and ask directions, am I right, ladies?" "I promise my VP won't shoot anyone in the face"). And Letterman's home office is in Sioux City, Iowa. What could be more natural?

user-pic

So your telling me that the writers who are still not working shouldn't picket the studio the film at? Why should they be happy about this side deal? So millions of people don't have to watch reruns anymore? What kind of a union is that?

It's almost as bad as the MLB union and the million dollars members they have. That union is a complete joke, yet we still want our entertainment.

The point being that there is a strike going on, and there should be a picket line period. And just what deal did they cut? Are the letterman writers going back to work or something??

I know that these shows are still allowed to go on during a strike. It's called doing business. And doing the business requires people to write the material. So my question is, who is doing the writing? Letterman and Leno? or are there others? Meaning replacement writers. Just like in any business, there are people who work there who are not in the union. Are they going to do the writing? Is John the janitor now John the writer? And how long can this go on?????????

user-pic

Onslow Memling, you're a troll - you publish your Web site in every thread, and it's quite simple to discredit with Googling "clinton income" to find out that Hillary got $15 million for her book 3 years ago, Bill's speaking income is steadily increasing ($10 million last year), and that they were paying off settlements and lawyer fees in 2001. So go away, otay?

user-pic

It's not much of a surprise anymore, now is it?

user-pic

This story is a little more interesting that HRC appearing on Letterman tonight. But that's me....

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/beverly-davis/obama-on-track-to-win-cau_b_79308.html

user-pic

I'm sure Letterman does have a good-sized audience in Iowa. The question, though, is how many of those particular Iowans are likely to go to the caucuses and support Clinton due to her appearance. In other words, a bigger audience is not necessarily a better audience if it is actually the wrong audience.

But I think Desider confirmed my suspicion: this may just be about rebranding Clinton as a "national" candidate, supposedly as opposed to her opponents. That of course is what Giuliani is doing as well.

user-pic

Brilliant move.
Yes, Dave (not Leno) has the blessings of the writers so the writers' unions will love this. AND she gets to contrast Letterman with the GOP's candidate crossing the writers' picket line. Not so good for Republicans in CA.

Since she'll also have the 2-minute ad up on all the news stations right before the caucuses, I think this is a very good way to wrap up her Iowa campaign.

user-pic

Anonymous 5:11 - I know you're sitting at a computer - is it too much to ask you to use Google to look up the terms of the settlement? "letterman return air settlement". Letterman signed an agreement with the union where his company takes responsibility for paying the union workers their existing demands. His WGA writers will be right there with him, not scabs.

user-pic

Anonymous wrote on January 2, 2008 5:11 PM

Are you brain damaged?

The Union has a settled agreement with Letterman. His writers are not on strike and are union. Lettermen's writers are not on strike, there is no strike against Letterman. There is no picket-line being crossed here at all. The union is AOK with Letterman's production company and show because they have a settled agreement with them.

What part of that is confusing you?

user-pic
So your telling me that the writers who are still not working shouldn't picket the studio the film at? Why should they be happy about this side deal? So millions of people don't have to watch reruns anymore? What kind of a union is that?

Okay, look. This is not complicated!

1. The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers failed to sign a contract the writer's union found acceptable.

2. The writer's union went on strike against the AMPTP members.

3. Letterman's production company, Worldwide Pants, one tv producer, independently signed a contract with the writer's union which the writer's union found acceptable. In other words, Worldwide Pants scabbed on the AMPTP. Since Letterman signed the contract, the writer's union halted the strike against Letterman.

4. The writer's union is now on strike against every AMPTP member except worldwide pants.

user-pic

Ugh... Anonymous wrote on January 2, 2008 5:21 PM was written by me. Somehow my computer forgot my "remember me" info over the holiday.

user-pic

In response to Anonymous @ 5:11 pm:

Letterman's writers are back at work and will be working per usual because Letterman's production co. reached an agreement with the union. Leno is going back to work without his writers because NBC has NOT reached an agreement with the writers.

This is similar to what would happen if, for example, the airline pilots assn. went on strike and they were able to reach an agreement with United but not American. If you flew on United you would NOT be crossing any picket lines or disrespecting any labor negotiations because an agreement had been reached between United and the airline pilots assn.

user-pic

Keith,

That is extremely interesting, but unfortunately not very well-sourced. That said, there is a certain obvious logic to Biden and Richardson supporting Obama in Iowa. If they can help Obama decisively beat Clinton while at the same time one of them finishes a strong fourth, that person may well be able to emerge from NH as the most viable alternative to Obama, effectively taking Clinton's place as the "experience" candidate.

user-pic

DTM, I "confirmed" your suspicion? I'm just a schmoe posing on the internet with no connection to anyone, doing his best not to speculate madly like so many around here. A friendly national program where you get to look warm and funny instead of the dragon lady pre-scripted image people have been complaining about? It's a no-brainer, whether it covers Iowa or the nation. But Letterman reaches Iowa, and with 1/100th of the country's population that could be about 36,000 viewers taking a rough dumb guess. Not a bad last minute connect. Whether the Letterman audience is "the wrong audience" - well, I imagine the campaign that's ahead by 20-25 points nationally has considered this. And of course Hillary isn't "rebranding" (another worn-out talking point) - she's been running a national campaign from the start. Her difference from Giuliani is that when she meets people, her ratings tend to go up. (of course there have been some rough spots blown out of proportion, but the trends are there).

user-pic

she guffaws. anyone who uses the term "cackle" is a bill kristol stooge.

user-pic

>>Greg DeLassus wrote on January 2, 2008 5:00 PM:
So what if Letterman made an agreement with the union. There is still a strike going on.
What is this supposed to mean. There is no strike against Letterman. I fail to see how one "honors" a union's strike by boycotting those employers which have reached agreements with the union. There is no picket line to be crossed here, so it is senseless to complain about Sen Clinton crossing a picket line.>What is this supposed to mean. There is no strike against Letterman.

user-pic

I just heard Hillary will be doing the TOP TEN on Lettermen.

I hope Hillary DOES Cackle. I love to hear her laugh.

user-pic

Clinton on Letterman tonight


Per Mike Allen, she taped a "cameo" in Cedar Rapids.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0108/7675.html

Letterman worked out a direct agreement with his writers and his writers have ended their strike and returned to his show unlike in the case of Jay Leno.

The search for intelligent life in the Obama land continues!

user-pic

"Maybe she is writing off iowa."


Nooooo....Iowans love the feeling of being national. Too much attention to NY, LA

user-pic

This is a great move. If she can manage to show people her warm and cuddly side, she'll win over many wavering voters who "know" her only through the caricature that the MSM and the wingnuts have created.

It is an excellent move that could make Letterman go down into history books as the "queen maker"... (should she win IA, watch for future candidate to fight for the "privilege" to get on "Late Night" in future caucus eves.)

Alternative, this might just be a metaphor about tomorrow night: it could be a very Late Night.

user-pic

Desider,

I didn't mean to imply you were officially working for the Clinton campaign (I would have no way of knowing). But they are certainly good about getting their talking points out to their supporters through both official and unofficial channels, and I do in fact think you are giving us a handy rundown on what talking points will be paired with this appearance.

user-pic

Good move, I say. The hours between 6:30 and 9:30 will be lost campaigning time - Fiesta Bowl, you know - so 10:30 is just right for viewing Letterman in Iowa with Sen. Clinton and Robin Williams (the other guest who would certainly never cross a picket line) Smart Dave!

user-pic
They are all in the same union, it doesn't matter who they work for and who owns what production company. One union. If they're in the same union as the rest, and they go back to work while the others strike, then that makes them scabs.

Nonsense. If the UAW strikes against the big three and then comes to an agreement with GM, the GM workers go back to work. The fact that they belong to the same union as the Ford and Chrysler workers is irrelevant. Once the union reaches an agreement with a given employer, those members are not only allowed but required to honor the terms of their contract, which involves working. By definition, if the union agrees to it then one is not a scab for going back to work.

user-pic

jak1 wrote on January 2, 2008 5:32 PM

Wow are you clueless.

As someone up-thread used the airline analogy, if one airline settles with the pilots union, those union workers who pilot for that airline go back to work. Same deal with automakers, if the UAW is going on strike with the big three, and Ford settles with them, the UAW workers go back to work at the Ford plant, but the ones striking against GM and Chrysler stay on strike.

user-pic

Well, DTM, I just put on my tinfoil thinkin' cap, and that's what I came up with all by my lonesome. I looked up Letterman's audience, Iowa's population, I know from the Pollster graphs on TPM what her nationals look like, took someone's inference that she didn't do as well with college students, looked up whether she'd been on Letterman before, watched her Top 10 list, and someone else came up up with the brainstorm that maybe just maybe she might appear via satellite. Of course I know the "Home Office in Sioux City" from watching Letterman. Man, that was a sweat-inducing 10 minutes hunting down those talking points - I must be a brain sturgeon or something. Of course if I were impartial, I would say: "Letterman appearance = abandoning Iowa" - it's oh so clear.

user-pic
The search for intelligent life in the Obama land continues!

Oh for pity's sake. What is this supposed to mean? I am an Obama supporter and have been at pains to make clear that Sen Clinton is not violating a picket line. Meanwhile, I defy you to point to any actual evidence that the folks who have (wrongly) complained that Sen Clinton is not honoring the strike are supporters of Sen Obama. The above is entirely unfair.

user-pic

Greg DeLassus wrote on January 2, 2008 5:49 PM

lol... I just used the big three as another example to try and explain it to jak1 just how nutso his asssertions are.

GMTA.

user-pic

DTM: Don't disagree about the sourcing (nothing more than rumor and conjecture at this point). That being said, it will have a profoundly greater impact on the caucus outcome than the latest stop on the 2008 "Please Like Me" Tour.

user-pic

Desider,

I will take you at your word. Indeed, since I came up with the same idea myself, obviously it would be odd for me to claim you could not also do so spontaneously.

All that said, I still think you are giving us a preview of the likely talking points, even though apparently you, like me, derived them independently.

user-pic

Okay, maybe I'm just slap-happy at this point, but the earnestness on this thread is the funniest thing I've seen since "A Mighty Wind." Between the cloyingly fulsome praise of her strategic brilliance of this masterstroke, the nonsensical and increasingly incoherent argument that this somehow has something to do with the writer's strike and the inevitable descent of that argument into volleys of ad hominium attacks, you guys are really killing me here.

If this keeps up, I can start skipping my daily trip over to taylormarsh.com for a dose of comically unhinged, overheated and over-the-top rhetoric over stuff that don't amount to nothing.

user-pic
NCSteve wrote on January 2, 2008 6:04 PM:

...the inevitable descent of that argument into volleys of ad hominium attacks, you guys are really killing me here.

Are you going for irony there?

user-pic

Another smart move by Hillary and Dave. She is his Senator from NY.

user-pic

DTM,

So are they "talking points" when they're obvious inferred reality? Right now my talking points say it's cold and dark outside.

user-pic

Desider,

I'm not quite sure what part of the phrase "Perhaps there is a perfectly reasonable explanation for all this" you didn't understand.

Next time read my post in entirety and spare me the attidude...and for the record...

google "Hillary Clinton Book Deal 8 million"

now google "Hillary Clinton Book Deal 15 million"

Otay!

http://thememlingindex.com/hillary_clinton_net_worth-wealth.html

user-pic
Are you going for irony there?

Among other things.

I was going to respond by with an over-the-top personal attack combined with some name-calling, but I figured someone out there would have missed the joke necessitating at least one more post to explain it.

user-pic

Desider,

No, they are only "talking points" if they have been prepared for the speaker in question. That is why in my last post I said "you are giving us a preview of the likely talking points", meaning that I was taking you at your word that you were not in fact working off talking points that had previously been prepared and disseminated to you in some fashion.

user-pic

I was wondering why it was so cold in NYC tonight.

user-pic

What is Hillary going to do to Letterman?

user-pic

Wow Letterman is a genius. With the writers strike, he gets Hillary to come on and talk about her qualifications, experience and life as a self-made, independent woman.

HILLARIOUS !!!!!!!!!!!

user-pic

Wow Letterman is a genius. With the writers strike, he gets Hillary to come on and talk about her qualifications, experience and life as a self-made, independent woman.

HILLARIOUS !!!!!!!!!!!

user-pic

Onslow, first you can Google Bill Clinton's actual list of speeches and how much he made for each for the last 7 years. He made what, $2 million in 2004, $7.5 million in 2005, $10 million in 2006 - that's $19.5 million. He got around $10-$12 million in 2004 for his book so we're up to $29.5-31.5 million. Hillary got about $15 million for hers and their salary/pension are over $2 million for the last 6 years - we're up in the , so that's up in the $46.5-48.5 million range. None of this includes Bill's investment company and other investment (house appreciation, for example). Up to 2003-2004, they were paying off a lot of lawyer and settlement fees - some $12 million or more. So none of this is surprising, but you act like it is.

So I gave you the "scrutiny" you asked for (yet again). Accept it. There is no there there. Find a life.

user-pic

DTM,
I suppose someone might need "Toes Go In First" as talking points for shoes, but most of us don't. Hillary didn't have to leave Iowa, being on Letterman for what, 10 minutes, was no big drain on her last day, with a lot of Iowa and national exposure to be gained. Contrast this with the Occam's Razor discarded theory that her appearance meant she was giving up on Iowa. Perhaps "talking points" should have been on this year's most overused phrase list.

user-pic

I don't really know all the details of what is going on...

This is normally the case for commenters railing against the tactics and decisions of the Writers Guild. So don't feel bad, you have a lot of company out there in the land of Clueless But Commenting Anyway.

But, in the possibility that you're reachable, let's try this one: The AMPTP in essence is trying to break the Writers Guild. It's union busting, pure and simple. But, by getting one struck company (Worldwide Pants/Trousers) to split from the AMPTP and sign a deal with the WGA, the Guild in essence now is trying to break the AMPTP.

It's a perfectly sensible tactic.

It also comes with other pluses: Strike talk on late-night TV -- expect tonight's top-10 to be strike related, and Robin Williams (tonight's guest instead of Trump) has been on the picket lines in NYC, so expect more from him.

Meanwhile, the Late Show writers, despite being back at work fair and square, will nonetheless continue to take daily shifts on the picket lines in NYC.

There's nothing confusing about this at all, for anyone who bothers to try to bring themselves up to speed on it, rather than just spouting off.

user-pic

Desider,

Just to clarify, what I meant was comments like this: "she is running a *national* campaign, unlike her opponents." That is what I think might be a future talking point.

But we shall see.

user-pic

Rumor has it that Obama will be a surprise first guest of Jon Stewart. Take that Hillaryland!

user-pic

The Bush-Clinton era begins to end tomorrow.
Say goodbye to the Goldwater Girl

user-pic

Hi DTM,

With Super Tuesday just one month away, it seems the new schedule begs candidates to run nationally. Again, I don't think this is a change in strategy at all. It wasn't long ago that the Clinton campaign was debating skipping Iowa completely, and their national numbers support this approach. But nothing's guaranteed, even with "inevitable", so they decided not to give away Iowa. We'll see.

user-pic

Obama just got endorsed by the former Governor of South Carolina

You mean former governor turned lobbyist Jim Hodges?

user-pic

Seems appropriate to me. I believe all right-thinking multi-multi-millionaires who work for massive media corporations should support Hellary.

user-pic

Desider,

Right, those are the sorts of talking points I am expecting (the new schedule diminishes the value of the early states, we were ambivalent about Iowa all along, our national numbers are what matter, and so forth).

user-pic

Josh,
TPM's site is being diminished by the unseemly, uninformed and inane postings that add nothing to the "public square" discussion. You need to consider where these open postings are taking your excellent and otherwise informative blog.
Examples of posters not offering anything to ponder as thoughtful dialog include folks that bomb throw and hide behind names like "Disider".

user-pic

don wrote on January 2, 2008 8:34 PM:
Obama just got endorsed by the former Governor of South Carolina...You mean former governor turned lobbyist Jim Hodges

That is laughable Don considering that Hillary has taken more money in from industry lobbyists than any of the candidate on either side.

She is a phony. She represents the status quo rigged political machine. And she's about to go down in flames. Maybe she'll cackle.

user-pic

Barack on Jon Stewart! Yeah!

How fitting. Hillary goes on Dave (still good but kind of dated and done). Barack goes on Stewart (hottest show in the land, much more in touch with today's issues, broad support across age groups and demographics). Art imitates life.

user-pic

b!X: It also comes with other pluses: Strike talk on late-night TV -- expect tonight's top-10 to be strike related, and Robin Williams (tonight's guest instead of Trump) has been on the picket lines in NYC, so expect more from him.

Meanwhile, the Late Show writers, despite being back at work fair and square, will nonetheless continue to take daily shifts on the picket lines in NYC.

exactly!

this is a huge PRO-union move both by hrc and by letterman/world wide pants.

it will be wall-to-wall union talk tonight.

and note that huckabee will be crossing the NBC picket lines to do leno's scab show tonight.

user-pic

i don't know where you guys are getting this obama on daily show nonsense.

first of all, the daily show isn't even on tonight.

even if it was, obama would be crossing a picket line to do it.

the daily show and colbert report will be back next monday i believe. without their writers.

user-pic

Obama will be on next Monday night

user-pic

How old were you the last time we had a president who wasn't a Bush or Clinton? It's been 20 years. I was 10.

I'm a Republican asking you to vote for change we all can believe in. Obama in '08!

user-pic

jakl wrote:

It's real simple. You are in a union, you are all in it together, one Union. It's all or none. You are free to go back to work at any time, but then you are a scab. So the writers are in a DIFFERENT UNION then the writers who work for letterman? What kind of a union lets some members go back to work while other members are still on strike?


jakl, you need to take a course in labor law. No one who appears on the Letterman show is crossing a picket line, and none of the writers who work for Letterman are scabs. They are no longer on strike, and the union is OKAY WITH THAT. Who are you to say they are wrong?

BTW, the real story here is Mike Huckabee, who publicly stated he supports the striking workers, and is glad he won't be crossing a picket line when he appears tonight on JAY LENO'S SHOW, where he will be greeted with picket signs calling him a SCAB.

user-pic

Obama will be on next Monday night

Could you give us a cite for this?

user-pic

For anyone interested, she did not actually leave Iowa to appear on the show. She appears at the beginning, before the opening credits via satellite.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080103/people_nm/screenwriters_strike_pix_dc

Not sure how this is supposed to help her Iowa campaign. I only skimmed the above comments, but I agree that it would seem to be a move to remind us that she's a "national" candidate in addition to fighting it out with the others in Iowa.

user-pic

Anonynous - You are so ignorant - David Letterman has negotiated a deal with the WGA - How old is everyone commenting on TPM - there's a correlation with Obama's media-attention and a nosedive in the intellectual quality of the comments on TPM - is everyone 20 and under?

Anonymous said: "So she's thumbs down to labor unions. Is she REALLY GOING TO CROSS A PICKET LINE???"

user-pic

How old were you the last time we had a president who wasn't a Bush or Clinton? It's been 20 years. I was 10.

Ah. Suspicions confirmed. Most of you Obama-ites are just too young to have a very long perspective.

I was 35. Believe me, Ronald Reagan, Gerry Ford, and Jimmy Carter weren't all that great, and Bill Clinton, for all his faults, was a breath of fresh air.

user-pic

To: "Drinking game: Take a shot every time she cackles."


I'll play this game with you when she's Madame President... I have a big enough liver.

user-pic

jakl wrote: "I don't really know all the details of what is going on, "


Clearly.

user-pic

"She is a phony. She represents the status quo rigged political machine. And she's about to go down in flames. Maybe she'll cackle."

Talk about "talking points" - in this case generated by the RNC.


"Barack on Jon Stewart! Yeah!

If Obama is on the Daily Show, it doesn't help him with Iowa voters tomorrow. And won't he be crossing the picket lines then? Can you say double standard?

user-pic
DTM wrote: Right, those are the sorts of talking points I am expecting (the new schedule diminishes the value of the early states, we were ambivalent about Iowa all along, our national numbers are what matter, and so forth).
This Talking Points Game seems like a fun one. Here are my suggestions for Clinton’s talking points after Iowa: “We’re going to bitch slap Obama in New Hampshire and leave Edwards there as roadkill. Then we’ll continue to Nevada, Michigan, Florida and South Carolina and kick the living daylight out of the panicking Obama campaign well before February 5.”

That’s my two cents anyway.

user-pic

DTM,
Get real, please.
Of course only the final national votes matter. The only question is whether early states create significant momentum. CNN had a funny line, "Iowa may determine the next President of the United States". Scratch that, "disgusting line" is more appropriate.

Look, I only read the papers/blogs. You know as well as I that Penn was slapped down last year for talking about skipping Iowa. You can look at a schedule - there are 24 states scheduled for Super Tuesday. Is that a "talking point" or simple reality - 1 month, 2 days between Iowa and Super Tuesday?

user-pic

DTM,
Okay, I figured it out from one of your other posts. When you open your eyes and state the obvious, you call it "common wisdom". When I do it, you call it "talking points". Just put it in your Babelyzer and we can talk freely. Orp. Grgl. Plet. Zmezt.

user-pic

Hillery had a 20 sec intro...that's it..
Letterman cooked hot in his support for the strike and had the written material to do it...

Jay and Conan will not make it without writers as was evident tonight.....

of course Huck crossed the Jay line...

ABC will have to settle or no Academy Awards...

Unions matter...

user-pic

Ted,
I'm sorry, the teacher is apparently busy and can't solve your issues right now. Perhaps I can be of help - what was the exact nature of your problem? What was the "bomb throw" that so scared you? What did you find "inane"? (I can provide you with a dictionary, perhaps you simply misunderstood). If it's "uninformed", well, inform me. We're all waiting to learn.

user-pic

All this talk about Hillary being on the Letterman show at least demonstrates an impressive focus on the subject. You might want to remind yourselves, however, of what Letterman’s guest is, whether she cackles or guffaws or simply smiles. In his email of yesterday, Michael Moore has summed up some of her quite succinctly. He wrote: “And yet, I am sad to say, nothing has disappointed me more than the disastrous, premeditated vote by Senator Hillary Clinton to send us to war in Iraq. I'm not only talking about her first vote that gave Mr. Bush his ‘authorization‘ to invade -- I'm talking about every single OTHER vote she then cast for the next four years, backing and funding Bush's illegal war, and doing so with verve. She never met a request from the White House for war authorization that she didn't like. Unlike the Kerrys and the Bidens who initially voted for authorization but later came to realize the folly of their decision, Mrs. Clinton continued to cast numerous votes for the war until last March -- four long years of pro-war votes, even after 70% of the American public had turned against the war. She has steadfastly refused to say that she was wrong about any of this, and she will not apologize for her culpability in America's worst-ever foreign policy disaster. All she can bring herself to say is that she was ‘misled‘ by ‘faulty intelligence.‘"

user-pic

dcshungu spins: "If she can manage to show people her warm and cuddly side..."

After 35 years of constant battling to show the world her warm and cuddly side, and two solid years of working with media image consultants, psychologists, hair/wardrobe/make-up specialists, and cackle coaches.... she has failed to do it. But but but, she will do it this time on Letterman for sure.

The reality? Hillary is tough, mean, dishonest, calculating, power hungry, warmongering, good judgment lacking, misrepresenining, acting, adultery enaabling, obfuscating, pandering, plastic, nepotistic, coporatist, lying USER. There is no soft, likeable, human side to show, unless she invents one fst and can sell it. Not likely.

user-pic

I for one welcome Hillary being up on Dave . . . Now maybe people will drop the Monica and the dress and the cigar thing now that Hillary and Dave are going public before millions of viewers . . . Oops that's not what they meant. Hmmmm.

It is good to see Clinton can always get a corporate media hand out . . . I wonder if Letterman will have a Democrat on next week to even things out?

user-pic

Just for those who wondered Hillary had a quick one-liner, written for her, taped and inserted at the beginning of the show before Letterman's entrance.

She said:

“Dave has been off the air for eight long weeks due to the writers’ strike. Tonight he’s back. Oh well. All good things come to an end.”

user-pic

After the letterman schtick, I hear that murdoch is giving her a full hour of free tv right before new hampshire next. That corporate media knows where there bread is buttered.

user-pic

Desider,

Well, I think we can agree that a candidate has to win the necessary number of delegates in order to become the nominee, and that will not happen for anyone tonight. As for what things will look like going into Super Tuesday, I assume we will be discussing that then. In the meantime, however, there is still the Iowa Caucus, and then several primaries.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address