« Quinnipiac: Dead Heat Between McCain And Romney In Florida | Home | Obama To Surround Himself With Kennedys At Rally Today »
Author Who Called Bill Clinton "First Black President" Endorses Obama
Barack Obama is picking up the endorsement of author Toni Morrison, who won the Nobel Prize in literature for her writings on African-American life.
The endorsement is special due to some famous words that Morrison wrote about Bill Clinton in 1998: "White skin notwithstanding, this is our first black president. Blacker than any actual person who could ever be elected in our children's lifetime."
Advertisement















Guess Bill cant really dance good enough for Toni.
Haha another putdown of Billary
Guess African Americans are leaving Billary's plantation
January 28, 2008 9:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Look you are doing nothing but running off the American public we are not interested in identity politics or social justice as the burning issue of our time. Read Chuck Schumers book Positively America, which won margin in 2006. This Liberal lecture and focus on one community is turning people off trust me, it was not that long ago that it almost destroyed the Party, I am in a swing State and people are getting ready to jump. Hysterical fringe negative hate baiting behavior on either party is same oh same oh.
You return to the Teddy Kenndey, Kerry and Clyburn wing of the Party marginalizing others at great risk of losing in 08 divided governments is not a bad thing..
January 28, 2008 9:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
I could've sworn that the Clinton camp already claimed Toni's endorsement a few months back. Am I the only one with this particular (false) memory? Or is she switching camps? Either way, good on her.
Here's to a newsworthy stream of endorsements (from both inside and beyond the Beltway) for Sen. Obama between now and the 5th, and here's to all the folks on the ground busting their butts to put a genuinely genuine, bright progressive in the White House this time next year.
January 28, 2008 9:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
This only says one thing. While the black community used to be grateful for Clinton's service to them, they abandon the cliton's with abandon once one with their skin color is running for office. How grateful!!!
January 28, 2008 9:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Another good endorsement for Obama. I think that he really has the capacity to inspire the country to greatness and that he has indeed risen above outmoded categories and narratives.
January 28, 2008 9:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
As much as I was telling myself that even if Hillary actually did pull off the nomination despite being an inferior candidate (yes inferior despite Paul Krugman and Josh TMP's Clinton hyping), I would vote for her in the end, after last week I decided no. Billary's ugly Southern Strategy underhanded racist politics simply turned my stomach. I figured that I would sit it out like fat drug addict Rush Limbaugh would if McCain were nominated on the R side.
I guess the dirty Rove-Clinton politics rubbed the fabulous Ms. Morrison the wrong way too.
January 28, 2008 9:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Joe - you're probably thinking of Maya Angelou. She did a radio ad for Hillary in SC on the same weekend as the Oprah event.
January 28, 2008 9:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am noticing more and more people switching away from the clintons to Obama.
I applaud this endorsement. And I look for more!
Al Gore, are you listening?
January 28, 2008 9:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Has anyone heard anything about the results of the New Hampshire recount?
January 28, 2008 9:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
I love Toni Morrison. I was already for Obama, so this makes no difference to me, but I guess that I do feel slightly proud to think that I share a candidate with so fine an author.
Meanwhile, re the NH recount: it stopped prematurely because the Kucinich campaign, which had originally commissioned it, did not have the money to pay for it. The limited number of votes that were recounted showed Obama actually losing a few votes and Clinton actually gaining a few.
January 28, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
As a black man, I've really taken offense to the understood implications underlying this "First Black President" as a term of endearment. As an Obama supporter I'm disappointed in BO for not calling it for what it is. The B side of Billary popularized the statement and reveled in it after his indiscretions with a woman close to his daughter's age.
When most say "First Black President" they refer to his philandering... and as a 29 y.o. black man who is faithful to his wife and tries to raise his born-in-wedlock children to be outstanding citizens it pisses me off.
I understand that Toni's reference did not have this in mind (hopefully). But it bothers me. Obama can't call them on this of course... but it's insulting. And the H side of Billary basks in the glow of his philandering ways. This crap really makes feel upset.
I'm more than a dancer and a philanderer.
January 28, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ouch, that's gotta hurt. Too bad for mr. bill's candidacy.
January 28, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's right anonymous - why can't they just shut up and stay in their place? Why do they have to actually decide for themselves what the want? Why can't they leave the thinking and heavy decisions to us white folks who've done SO much for them all these years. Those ingrates!
Hey anon - why aren't you complaining about women voting for Hillary? And while we're at it, why aren't you complaining about white people voting for white people?
BTW - I'm white and I'm voting for Obama next week. Maybe you consider me a traitor. I'd consider that an honor.
January 28, 2008 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
When most say "First Black President" they refer to his philandering
I've never heard that connection made before hearing you make it just now.
January 28, 2008 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Results of NH recount being posted here:
http://www.sos.nh.gov/recountresults.htm
January 28, 2008 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Think of this as a gauge of public sentiment, not an endorsement that's likely to shift it. Obama has done something, that, just a month ago, pundits confidently proclaimed he could never do - become the candidate of black America. There was a tremendous amount of buzz regarding whether Obama was "black enough." Endless columns citing Hillary's edge in support in early opinion polls that sub-sampled the black community. The consensus was that Obama would do well to split the demographic, but that it might end up providing an edge to Hillary - after all, Obama was a white man's black man.
What a difference a month makes. All of a sudden, the Clintons are trying to tag Obama as a candidate who can't cross-over to white voters, whose support is confined to the black community. And that community is not only supporting him to an extent that is literally unprecedented in a Democratic primary contest, it's also turning out to vote in stunning numbers. The rap on the black community has always been that it doesn't vote in proportion to its potential clout. This year, at least in South Carolina, that just hasn't been true.
So it's a good endorsement, but mostly a marker - Obama has arrived.
January 28, 2008 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
What Qtip said. Everybody quotes that one line from the Toni Morrison piece but nobody reads the piece.
Here's the full paragraph that line from which the "first black President" line is cherry picked:
"African-American men seemed to understand it right away. Years ago, in the middle of the Whitewater investigation, one heard the first murmurs: white skin notwithstanding, this is our first black President. Blacker than any actual black person who could ever be elected in our children's lifetime. After all, Clinton displays almost every trope of blackness: single-parent household, born poor, working-class, saxophone-playing, McDonald's-and-junk-food-loving boy from Arkansas. And when virtually all the African-American Clinton appointees began, one by one, to disappear, when the President's body, his privacy, his unpoliced sexuality became the focus of the persecution, when he was metaphorically seized and bodysearched, who could gainsay these black men who knew whereof they spoke? The message was clear "No matter how smart you are, how hard you work, how much coin you earn for us, we will put you in your place or put you out of the place you have somehow, albeit with our permission, achieved. You will be fired from your job, sent away in disgrace, and--who knows?--maybe sentenced and jailed to boot. In short, unless you do as we say (i.e., assimilate at once), your expletives belong to us."
It's not a piece about Clinton's policies. It's about how Bill Clinton's failings are the same failings of the worst negative stereotype of black males.
January 28, 2008 9:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think a Gore endorsement of Obama would clarify who is opposing the Clintons and why. Obama is and always has been the establishment candidate. Is it really that much fun getting beaten up by the Republicans in the general election? Is the Obama candidacy so precious that it's worth the Supreme Court, continuing the occupation of Iraq, continuing to destroy the middle class and, possibly, going to war with Iran? The one thing I'm grateful for is that if Mrs. Clinton is our candidate, she won't have to carry the Kennedy and Kerry baggage. Will be even better if she doesn't have to carry Gore's.
January 28, 2008 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
This and a nickle doesn't equal 6 cents.
January 28, 2008 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
For a person of change.....he's got the same old baggage coming along for the ride.lolololololol
January 28, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
if Mrs. Clinton is our candidate, she won't have to carry the Kennedy and Kerry baggage. Will be even better if she doesn't have to carry Gore's.
Lord knows, if there is one thing the Clintons don't need it is more baggage.
January 28, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Failings? What an unusual spin of a quote that is obviously about how the dominant culture treats blacks in America. What is so ironic is that now the blacks are treating Bill Clinton the same way. There is such a thin line between gratitude and resentment.
January 28, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
joejoejoe: Thanks. Was looking exactly for that piece of info.
blah: I guess I was wrong... that seems to be what she meant to.
I wish someone would call them on it. As much as I'm not a fan of HRC. I wish she would denounce this crap.
Quit laughing when they call your husband that.
Quit laughing when Robert Johnson, a literal and figurative pimp, takes a pause from degrading black women to degrading a black man.
In my perspective Robert Johnson's endorsement is and endorsement from the lowest of the low.
Stand up as a woman and say "no more".
January 28, 2008 9:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've defended Hillary Clinton on this site several times before. Up until recently, I have seen everything as fair game--the Reagan comments, the Rezko thing, the present votes--it's just politics and I haven't seen Obama rise above it. Also, I've seen many posters say that the Clintons were the ones injecting race into the campaign, and I just couldn't have been convinced of it.
But this weekend it all changed. Bill Clinton's Jesse Jackson comments were the last straw. Even if they didn't start the race thing, they are playing the game now. And it's disgusting. It's one thing for a black candidate to pander (note--i'm not accusing Obama of doing this), but it's another for a white candidate to marginalize a black candidate on the issue of his race. The worst part of all of this is that the Clintons aren't doing this because they're racist, I don't believe they're racist for a second. They're doing it for political gain. That's terrible, and barring a head-on apology from Hillary, I just can't support her anymore.
I've always liked Obama. I think he's somewhat weak, better at marketing himself than his policies, but now I reluctantly join the Obama movement. And I mourn the president that Hillary Clinton might have been if she'd only had a little integrity.
January 28, 2008 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Billy Glad - Of course the essay is more complex than my blog comment.
My point is an essay that uses a poor, fat, musician, philandering musician from a broken home as an example of "black" takes place in a far different space than the space Obama is talking about in his '04 speech where he says "children can’t achieve unless we raise their expectations and turn off the television sets and eradicate the slander that says a black youth with a book is acting white." A library is every bit as much a "black" place as McDonald's or a nightclub with a saxophone player.
January 28, 2008 10:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually Bill Clinton is highly respected and the black community is only alienating those that are not black and I am not sure many voters vote because of Toni Morrison; however I did love one of her books. These inflammatory infamous slanders and charges being made and now with old guard Liberal rich compound living Ted Kennedy, Kerrys weighing in and the JJ and MLK no one but a black person can say anything, is identity politics at its worse it may work in Mass but not out here in America. This raging of Liberal and the Black Community leadership like Clyburn that Hillary cant say the obvious about LBJ, and President Clinton is a racist because he contrast and compares Obama win with JJ is somehow racist must be a inside the Dem Party code because we do not feel obligated to jump on this marketing pitch.
The party elders and the left blogs are acting out everything America distains about this Democratic Party and it will cause no doubt a swing away of those that are being marginalized for a myopic focus. Take squirt gun insert in mouth pull trigger. Another Republican President with out a margin in Congress, not all bad but better than fringe Liberal control of all, fools.
January 28, 2008 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
So that leaves Bill Clinton, what? The first Uncle Tom president?
January 28, 2008 10:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
That is a special endorsement -- but as Morrison herself indicates, the "first black president" meme predates her piece (and the whole Lewinsky scandal) by many years.
To chumps upthread who claim it's about his personal failings -- no. Read the piece more carefully. It's about the rain of persecution brought down on a natural human being who challenged the real establishment by stepping out of line.
In particular, he stepped out of line by appointing more minorities than all the presidents before him put together.
As Morrison suggests, Clinton's men and women of color were the first to be hounded out of town by aggressive prosecutors and aggressive media ... for supposed transgressions that turned out at the end of the day to be irrelevant, picayune or imaginary.
January 28, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
One question:
If Bill Clinton thinks that Barack Obama's campaign is like Jesse Jackson's campaign in 1984 and 1988, does he also think that Hillary's campaign is like Dukakis' and Mondale's?
In both 1984 *AND* 1988, Jesse Jackson's loss of the party nominations in both 1984 and 1988 led to a dramatic increase in black voter apathy in the general elections, both for Michael Dukakis and for Walter Mondale... and neither Mondale or Dukakis engaged in the Clinton's racebaiting.
In May 1988, in the run-up to the general election, Michael Dukakis was on the top of the world. The economy was in a recession, Reagan's approval rating was at 42% due to Iran-Contra, and Dukakis had a 49% - 39% advantage over George Bush, Sr. according to the New York Times. Republicans were defecting to the Democrats, with 28 percent of those who said they voted for President Reagan in 1984 indicating that they preferred Michael Dukakis over Vice President Bush.
Michael Dukakis chose Lloyd Bentsen as his running mate, despite the fact that polls indicated that having Jesse Jackson as a running mate would increase his share of the vote by an additional 3%.
If Dukakis did have an extra 3% or so in the general election, the following states would've either been in his column or too close to predict: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, and Vermont.
The moral:
Black voters matter... as do energized younger voters. Without them, it's very hard to win in not just the southern states, but a whole bunch of other states too, where they are oftentimes the very thin margin between victory and defeat. It's not mentioned very often, but both black political volunteers and students often tend to be disproportionately active in doing a lot of the phonework and footwork for our party that others in our party all too often look down upon.
We can't afford another Dukakis or Mondale-style loss... and we can't afford another Clinton.
January 28, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Anonymous wrote on January 28, 2008 9:18 AM:
This only says one thing. While the black community used to be grateful for Clinton's service to them, they abandon the cliton's with abandon once one with their skin color is running for office. How grateful!!!
*****************************************
Yeah, that's exactly why Blacks are voting for Obama. I mean, why are White women & ppl of Roseanne's ilk bashing Oprah because of her endorsement of Obama? Because Oprah's supposed to vote with her vagina & support Billary the War Hawk.
Are you even paying any attention to the filthy campaign being run by Billary?
January 28, 2008 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well the First Black President and his First Lady have been impeached.
Word is that Camp Billary's in a turmoil over Big Bill. Reports resurfacing of a split and how they're trying to rein him in. Let's hope they fail. Now Obama has a surrogate of comparable stature to deal with the Big Dog
January 28, 2008 11:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just received from a pal who lives near Lyon
January 28, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
PS he's a French supporter of Barack HUSSEIN Obama
No wonder.
They hate our values
January 28, 2008 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
So; The Clintons tried desperately to get Senator Kennedy to endorse Hillary, and failing that, they tried to persuade him to stay neutral. Failing at that, now they have their vermin all over the blogs trashing the Kennedys.
Typical Clinton tactics. They craved Senator Kennedy's support, and once they did not get it, then they set their Clin-Tons of Smears and Slime Express in motion to destroy Senator Kennedy.
January 28, 2008 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is just absolutely hilarious and great. Yesterday, after I learned of the Kennedy endorsements, I wrote to Obama to congratulate him. Then I said, "Now you need to get Toni Morrison. :)"
Glad to know he's listening to my truly excellent advice. *:o)
January 28, 2008 12:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's depressing (and depressingly unsurprising) to see Clinton supporters now willing to trash not only the Kennedys but Al Gore as well, simply out of bitterness that their Little Princess isn't getting her rightful crown without a fight. Wake up, folks! Without Bill's help, Hillary would have NO CHANCE of winning the nomination. With his help, she will most certainly lose.
Please see Iowa and South Carolina for examples.
January 28, 2008 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hahahahahaaa, suck that Bill.
January 28, 2008 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink