Did all the Nevada LDS voters that switched from Republican to Democratic affiliation in order to vote for Jim Gibson (D-LDS) for Governor in the 2006 primary switch back yet?

Richardson has gotten somewhat better numbers in other Nevada polls (RCP has him averaging a little over 5), and of course he has plenty of time to turn that around.

For example if he has a surprise finish in Iowa (finishing a strong fourth or perhaps even third), I think he is well-positioned to build on that momentum in NH (again perhaps finishing third or even better). He would then have 11 days from NH to Nevada to make his case.

In fact, even if Richardson does not have a surprise finish in Iowa, I think he could still mount a surprise comeback in NH, and use that to make his case in Nevada.

Of course that is a lot of ifs, but they are based on the fact that it appears Richardson has established himself as the clear #4 in NH (averaging in the high single digits). And the polling I have seen suggests that NH voters are becoming increasingly aware of his depth of experience. So, if a good number of experience-oriented voters in NH are looking for a new home after Iowa (which is entirely possible), many of them may well end up gravitating to Richardson.

In fact Hillary has gone down from a 37 pt advantage over Obama to a 27 advantage over Obama. If that isn't a big change what is????

Local Obama folks called last night looking for people to work my area. Anxious to people walking houses but I really don't think anyone is going to pay any attention here until after the New Year.

No real advertising on the ground but when Obama came through last month 5,000 people showed up.

Hillary has a wide lead anywhere voters have not focused on the campaign. When they do, as in Iowa, New Hamphire and South Carolina, they see that Mrs. Bill isn't qualified to be president, has trouble giving straight answers, has a mean campaign, and as a Senator has shown terrible judgment.

Hillary's big lead in Nevada means they know her name. When they learn about who she is as a candiate, many and most will support someone else. It's a pattern state by state, and showing up nationally now. Poor Hillary, Bill was mean to her, the vast right wing conspiracy was mean to her, so were Edwards, Obama, Dodd, the media and now the pollsters. Should we elect Hillary the perpetual victim to lead the nation and the world? When it comes down to a vote, most people say NO!