« Hillary And The Drug Flap: Does Her Campaign Want Issue To Go Away? | Home | Thompson: My Most Prized Possession Is My "Trophy Wife" »
Obama: I Take Hillary "At Her Word" About Drug Comments
Barack Obama comments on Hillary Central Command's role in the drug flap, says he believes Hillary's promise that it wasn't planned:
“I take the Clinton campaign's word that they didn't know what this guy was doing and I understand all that," Obama said, "but the one thing I will say is I told my staff that if I catch you guys doing any kind of stuff like this you're fired. Period.""And I think what we need to do -- and I told this to senator Clinton yesterday -- is that we need to send a strong message to all of our surrogates and all of our staffs, that we don't play that," he said. "I know my staff has gotten that message because it's one that I delivered several months ago and I haven't seen that come out of their mouths."
Advertisement















Is it me, or do his comments reinforce (subtly) that HRC has no control over what's going on in her shop?
December 14, 2007 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
seems to me that, yes, he's subtly suggesting that Hillary hasn't sent this message and is raising the question of whether she will
December 14, 2007 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
All right, enough of the literary criticism about what people really mean when they say "the sky is blue."
Let's all be civil and go back to criticizing each other's characters in the accepted way: "textbook Washington campaign", not giving "straight answers to hard questions", etc.
December 14, 2007 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can't imagine why saying that character attacks are 'the fun part' would encourage this kind of stuff.
December 14, 2007 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know what would be a great move (at least in my opinion) if Obama gave a speech about the politics of fear--using the Clinton campaign's tactics as a launching point. It would keep the media story going during the holiday and would really solidify his message.
Just thinking out loud here, so I'm sure someone will tell me why this is a terrible idea.
December 14, 2007 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have no big issue with Obama experimenting with drugs but I think its careless to tell that to bunch of teenagers. Teenagers are stupid and they may think well its OK to experiment with drugs. After all look at Obama, it worked out fine for him. He is running for president. Experimenting with drugs is dangerous and studies have shown that some individuals are prone to become addicted even with one exposure.
If Hillary would go tell teenagers that she experimented with becoming a lesbian, the media will crucify her. Even though drug experimentation is far more dangerous than experimenting with a lesbian lifestyle.
December 14, 2007 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is the video of Obama talking to kids about his drug use. You decide if it is ok to tell kids about drinking and drug use in a school setting.
http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2007/11/20/obama-discusses-his-goof-off-high-school-days-to-new-hampshire-high-school-students/
December 14, 2007 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
First off, teenagers aren't going to experiment with drugs because a politician admits he once did. Do teenagers get drunk because Bush admits he used to? Teens' influences are first their friends, second their entertainers, third their families, fourth their churches/clubs/organizations ... and politicians are hardly on the list.
Second, Obama describes drugs as something not worth doing, so it's hardly encouraging anyone anyway.
Third, "studies have shown" that many studies are bullshit, done in order to get grants from promoters of drug-scare propaganda rather than to really do science. Most scientists, in fact, use some drugs in their youth, and many find drugs help open their minds to the mysteries which, as scientists, they explore - as anyone who has hung with the science students and faculty at any major university will know.
December 14, 2007 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jack,
Would you like your kid to be in a class room if their teacher tells them that he/she experimented with drugs? That teacher surely will be fired.
Also, next time when you go for a job interview tell the interviewer that you experimented with drugs and see if you get that job.
December 14, 2007 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
oops. Obama just lost points with me on the quality of his judgment and his honesty. Why in the world would he say he believes Hillary Clinton? We know he doesnt and shouldn't. A more honest statement would have been, "Hillary's sincerity will be demonstrated in her future actions and those of her campaign."
December 14, 2007 5:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bill Shaheen's wife was governor of New Hampshire and is running for the Senate in New Hampshire. He is a seasoned professional, not a freelancer. This was no mistake. Look at how the Clinton campaign has managed to milk the story all week.
"Get it out there," apologize, and then later "fire" the person responsible (thereby prolonging the story and getting the media to cover it again b/c of this new development) is a typical campaign tactic, and Clinton is running a very typical campaign. Ugh.
December 14, 2007 5:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, anyone who has ever used drugs should be banned from teaching or any other job.
December 14, 2007 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
go watch Mark Penn flack this story and see if you think it wasn't planned all along:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtQxyaweiYQ
I'm not saying Hillary knew, but Penn is such a slimeball...
December 14, 2007 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
These Anonymous posts trying to convince us of the horrors of drug use are pretty ridiculous.
December 14, 2007 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
When asked about past drug use, the obviously correct response is to half admit it and half lie, something along the lines of "I didn't inhale" or something.
December 14, 2007 5:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can't believe Camp Hillary is going to get away with it.
December 14, 2007 5:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
anonymous: "Even though drug experimentation is far more dangerous than experimenting with a lesbian lifestyle."
i think there are likely a few gay/lesbian folks out there that might take umbrage with your thought here, particularly the suggesting that one simply tries out various "lifestyles" looking for the one that fits. hmmmmm, i sure liked the time i was a lesbian. i guess i'll run with that one until the next fad comes along.
tell me, when did you decide you were going to be heterosexual?
December 14, 2007 6:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
2008 Presidential Election Weekly Poll
http://www.votenic.com
The Only Poll That Matters.
Results Posted Every Tuesday Evening.
December 14, 2007 6:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
He takes her word for it, but his comment about making sure it doesn't happen in his campaign says exactly what he thinks of her word, not much. Hilarious.
December 14, 2007 6:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, her word is worth about as much as the king's word, zippo. Very funny. Yeah, the clinton II people totally have not been playing up the drug issue on this site, naaah. They haven't been playing the race card either. I can't wait to see her get trounced in the primaries. The funny thing is that she is doing it to herself. Poetic justice.
December 14, 2007 7:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hahahaha
Dana Milbank:
And there's more where that came from, granny.
December 14, 2007 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
It would be nice if Obama asked his many supporters to not flood the blogosphere with attacks on Hillary (like the many posted above) that have nothing to do with policy. I am sick of reading posts that call her a bitch or a lesbian. It is pretty obvious that Obama (or someone on his staff) is coordinating this flood of "hate" posts.
December 14, 2007 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
little old lady,
Hillary inspires criticism because she is a dishonest, pandering, unqualified, corporate-fueled, wife who is trying to get elected president on her "husband's" record. First, citicism is not an attack, unless your are paranoid like Hillary. Second, most of those who criticize Hillary are not Obama supporters, yet, they simply love their country and know that Hillary would be a disaster of a president.
December 14, 2007 7:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am sick of reading posts that call her a bitch or a lesbian.
I fully agree!
Why I cheered when, having been asked by Ali G whether Hillary "drank from the fairy cup", Marlon Fitzwater walked off the set
December 14, 2007 7:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
little old lady,
You think "Obama or someone on his staff" is coordinating the posts at TPM? I guess it's possible that Obama is sitting at his computer monitoring TPM, but I think he has more important things to do at the moment.
The other possibility is that there are a majority of Democrats who don't think Hillary is entitled to the nomination, who would like to see some real change, and who don't want to see Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton.
December 14, 2007 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Howard Fineman, Newsweek - paraphrase Olbermann
December 14, 2007 8:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I’ve been tested, I’ve been vetted. There are no surprises. There’s not going to be anybody saying, 'I didn’t think of that, my goodness, what’s that going to mean?'
There's your "change agent" democrats.
What next "reformer with results"? Laura Bush 2012??
December 14, 2007 8:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
The bottomline is that it would likely be impossible to prove Clinton is coordinating these attacks, so it makes no sense for Obama to accuse her of doing so.
But he can note what leadership within a campaign is supposed to look like, and then let other people draw their conclusions as they see fit.
December 14, 2007 8:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's respons is
Statemanship PERSPONIFIED!
THIS is the type of Leadership AMERICA meeds.
Take the high road...RISE ABOVE IT!!!!!!!!
Do not wallow in the mud, that is there they want you.
Rise ABOVE it!
December 14, 2007 9:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anonymous wrote on December 14, 2007 5:52 PM:
oops. Obama just lost points with me on the quality of his judgment and his honesty. Why in the world would he say he believes Hillary Clinton? We know he doesnt and shouldn't. A more honest statement would have been, "Hillary's sincerity will be demonstrated in her future actions and those of her campaign."
WRONG!
You must make the world see the hypoccisy while at the same time exempifying the ideals that she espouses.
THAT is how you rise ABOVE it. By making others capitulate to the very ideals that America professes to be.
You have to make the world see how the person deviates fron those ideals and not wallow in the nuck and mire of their deviance from those ideals.
That is how you CONTRAST the difference.
December 14, 2007 9:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
2008 Presidential Election Weekly Poll
www.votenic.com
New YouTube Video!
The Only Poll That Matters.
Results Posted Every Tuesday Evening.
December 14, 2007 9:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Keith wrote on December 14, 2007 5:25 PM:
You know what would be a great move (at least in my opinion) if Obama gave a speech about the politics of fear--using the Clinton campaign's tactics as a launching point. It would keep the media story going during the holiday and would really solidify his message.
YES!!
Obama has to let the world see her hypocrisy juxtaposed with the ideals of what America is.
December 14, 2007 9:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary is always blowing hot air with her "experience".
Now, do we want/need Her experience :
How to belittle women not as smart as her?
How to court big corporations, insurance companies and HMO's?
How to close our eyes from seing our husband's philandering?
How to smear opponents?
How to dress?
Just would like to know what is the experience in that she will bring and what are the changes she has brought about and how are they doing today?
December 14, 2007 9:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Another Anonymous said: "That is how you CONTRAST the difference."
I have read you post 10 times. Sorry, no idea what you are trying to say.
December 14, 2007 11:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Uh oh guys, it seems that Little Old Lady has caught on to us. Maybe we should write to David Plouffe and suggest that he mix up the talking points he sends to each of us so that the coordination is not so obvious.
December 14, 2007 11:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Obama is taking Hillary "at her word" he must be on crack...
December 15, 2007 2:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Orange" doesn't want us to ask what people really mean when they say "the sky is blue." Makes me wonder: is s/he a little pink under the collar? Or a red sympathizer? Not a brown-shirt on this blog, but perhaps a Green? Nah, s/he's too yellow for that. Hillary or Obama: it's a pretty black and white choice.
December 15, 2007 3:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
If Hillary is so much more experienced and capable of results than Obama then why does she seem to lose almost of these sparring events? Why can't she draw on her vaunted experience and keep that huge lead? Why can't she use her vast capacity to be effective and finish off her opponenents?
I went to Obama because he is the obvious choice to be an agent of change. I'm sticking with Obama with enthusiasm because he's showing that he's also the much more likely to be dependable and effective.
December 15, 2007 5:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Other more balanced blogs are reporting on Charlie Rose's 12-14 interview with Bill Clinton, esteemed former president turned snake-oil salesman for nepotism.
One commentary worth reading is Marc Ambinder at The Atlantic:
http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2007/12/bill_clinton_well_he_just_puts_1.php
Of course TPM/EC would not report on it. You can't be pro-Hillary and report on the things that REALLY cast her and her campaign in terrible light.
Bill may feel compelled to abandon his duty to the nation and support his unqualifed, estanged wife in her presidential bid. But there is a big difference in advocating Hillary's candidacy and attacking her opponents, who are all experienced and loyal Democrats. Bill has every right to say anything true or false about Hillary, but what gives him the right as a former president to lie about her opponents?
Bill has lost forever his opportunity to mature into senior statesman. His ego and greed make him want to prove he can turn Eliza Dolittle into President of the United States.
December 15, 2007 8:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Anonymous said: "His ego and greed make him want to prove he can turn Eliza Dolittle into President of the United States."
Too funny. I can't stop laughing.
"My First Lady" starring Bill Clinton as Professor Higgins, and Hillary Clinton as Eliza DoneLittle.
Repeat after me: "The Lies Disquise Our Dishonest Corporate Ties"
December 15, 2007 8:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Little old lady, I am sick of posts that call her a b*tch or a lesbian. Uhh, I can't remember the last time I saw a post that called her a b*tch, which of course is unacceptable, and I don't ever remember a post calling her a lesbian. You must be confused.
December 15, 2007 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama said, "but the one thing I will say is I told my staff that if I catch you guys doing any kind of stuff like this you're fired. Period."
Let's see if Obama is a man of his word and fires John Millin, his Wyoming superdelegate who said just days ago:
I doubt Obama will walk the walk here anymore than he did with "Punjab-Gate" or "McClurkin-Gate" or "Geffen-Gate".
And I seriously doubt that the media will hold him any more accountable than what he holds himself. After all, his last name isn't Clinton.
December 15, 2007 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Freefall
Air of Inevitability Leaks from Clinton Balloon
The Democrat has gone from front-runner to freefall. What's up — and what's next?
December 15, 2007 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
OOOPS...LA Times Today
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-clinton15dec15,0,2904401.story?coll=la-home-center
December 15, 2007 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Fri Dec 14, 2007 at 11:30:49 PM PST
So why does Bill think Hillary would be better than Obama?
Because his Republican friends told him so.
Later he said that his friends in the Republican party had indicated that they felt his wife would be the strongest candidate, partly because she had already been "vetted" -- another subtle slap at Obama.
So Bill is now Hillary's attack dog. Classy.
December 15, 2007 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
I doubt Obama will walk the walk here anymore than he did with "Punjab-Gate" or "McClurkin-Gate" or "Geffen-Gate".
And I seriously doubt that the media will hold him any more accountable than what he holds himself. After all, his last name isn't Clinton.
---------------
that person from Wyoming has no official connection to the Obama campaign, he is simply a public supporter. he is certainly not the campaign's state co-chair. but hey, whatever furthers your point, despite its factual accuracy.
December 15, 2007 3:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
The next time Hillary apologizes for one of her officers bringing up Obama's teenage drug use, would someone PLEASE ask her about her history with drugs. Pretty please! I have no idea what it might be but she needs to answer it too.
December 15, 2007 4:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
December 17, 2007 11:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hm, it looks like I failed to close my blockquote after "Wyoming superdelegate..." Sorry about that.
December 17, 2007 11:50 AM | Reply | Permalink