Huckabee: "Don't Mormons Believe That Jesus And The Devil Are Brothers?"
It was only a matter of time before Mike Huckabee said something about Mormonism that they would find offensive — and it's now happened. In an interview with the New York Times Magazine, to be published this Sunday, Huck admitted that he didn't know much about Mormon theology, but did say this: "Don't Mormons believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers?"
In fact, as a spokeswoman for the Mormon Church told the Associated Press, Mormons believe that all are the spirit children of God, including all people as well as Jesus and Satan. "Christ, on the other hand, was the only begotten in the flesh and we worship him as the son of God and the savior of mankind," said Kim Farah. "Satan is the exact opposite of who Christ is and what he stands for."
Huckabee also demurred when asked whether Mormons are a cult: "I'm just not going to go off into evaluating other people's doctrines and faiths. I think that is absolutely not a role for a president."















"I'm just not going to go off into evaluating other people's doctrines and faiths. I think that is absolutely not a role for a president."
(takes a breath)
"Don't Mormons believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers?"
OK Huck. Hypocrite.
December 11, 2007 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
This guy is even crazier than I thought.
December 11, 2007 10:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you do a quick search you can understand why Huckabee would ask the question.
Here is what I found:
http://www.bible-truth.org/jesusbro.htm
December 11, 2007 10:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
What is there to be offended by, to me it sound more like a question than him stating what he knew they believed. Come on now the man already said he doesn't know that much about the Mormon doctrine, so why would the media keep asking him about it?
I LIKE MIKE!
December 11, 2007 10:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Our Huckleberry fiend pleads ignorance yet happens to know a damning this and a confusing that...
He pleads ignorance about AIDS long after Surgeon General Koop made it absolutely clear about the conditions under which HIV is communicated... and won't recant his remarks.
He has no idea of what the NIE is and that the annual report was released to a huge uproar on the night of Bush's disaster of a press conference... in the disbelieving company of largely conservative journalists.
His record as a greedy, rule and law breaking Arkansas governor outstrips Clinton.
His twisting of the parole process in the name of politics (and in the stupid belief that all Wayne Dumond's life needed was for Wayne's wife to leave him, truck to break down and dog to die to make the perfect country song) ain't unique but it did result in two rapes and murders almost immediately following his first-name basis friend Wayne's release. (One for which he was convicted... the other one in which Dumond was the sole suspect but not charged prior to his death in prison.)
Mike has shown in the course of just over a week that he has one political skill aside from glibness the Hucklebuck does the coverup by practice and by instinct.
And we know how well that turns out for the country, don't we?
I blame the press for him. Huckabee is a rerun of the same lousy storyline the media raised around Bush like the American flag -- "You just GOTTA have him at your next BBQ -- and you can run with him the next day."
Sheesh.
Also... his relationship with the press in Arkansas makes Nixon look like a gallant fan of the fourth estate.
Read up, Derek.
December 11, 2007 10:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
You want to know what Mormons believe. Here's what Mormons believe. I'm actually an atheist, so I don't believe most of this stuff myself -- although I always did kind of like the last one (#13) -- but if Romney was brought up in the Mormon church then he must have learned these as a young child, just like I did.
I don't know why Romney doesn't just say that.
December 11, 2007 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Some more quick searches on this tells me that most mormoms believe this is true. It doesn't bother me because I am not mormon, but there is legitimacy to the idea.
Here is what I found:
http://www.utlm.org/onlineresources/ldsteachingonlucifer.htm
http://www.ldsforums.com/Tough_Questions_t1144.html
http://www.truthnet.org/Tracts/Mormon/Mormonjesus.pdf
http://www.bible-truth.org/jesusbro.htm
December 11, 2007 11:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
What an unbelievable bigot this guy is turning out to be. How does the media feel now about all those "aw, shucks" and "charming" stories they wrote about him?
As usual, all they wanted was a horse race. They seem to have created a presidential candidate media Frankenstein all their own. Can they now dismantle before January? We'll see. Otherwise, it'll be up to us.
December 11, 2007 11:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shawn,
I'll admit it's been a few decades since I had anything to do with the Mormon church, but I think I'd remember being told something like that specifically. It's probably more just a matter of believing both men and angels are all god's children -- so if we all had the same dad, that would kind of make us all siblings. I'm not exactly sure where other faiths come down on the whole man angel thing (and frankly don't care because it's silly to argue about one's possible relationship with imaginary creatures) but it's possible that might be sticking point for some -- particularly for someone determined to find one.
December 11, 2007 11:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Even if they do believe the devil was the brother of Jesus, they still see him as an evil being; as a fallen angel like the Bible says. It sounds to me like Huckabee was suggesting that they in some manner worship the devil.
December 11, 2007 11:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who freaking cares if it's true or not? The point is that Huckabee knew what he was saying and the effect that it would have. That "doctrine" is standard anti-Mormon fodder and Huckabee knew that. He was reported as speaking at an anti-Mormon rally in Salt Lake as governor. He's a freaking Evangelical clergyman and he knows about Mormons. To act like this was just some casual question is just another example of how baseless this idiot is. This may be a valid question for someone looking to join the Mormon church but not someone running for president. He knew what he was doing. This infuriates me.
December 11, 2007 11:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shawn: For REAL truth about what Mormon's believe, go to the source www.lds.org. If you want to find out what other people THINK Mormon's believe, go to the sites you listed.
Derek: Go do some research. Huck is an active anti-Mormon. When the SBC went to Salt Lake a couple years ago to "Save the Mormons," Huck was there. As a Mormon living in Arkansas, I am outraged. But the few will rarely be heard. I'd also like to know where Huck stood on "the Negro question" in 1978. Huck is probably one of the most biggoted candidates we have. Now I am scared.
And for anyone else listening... the press and it's responders amaze me... You can take a perfectly legitimate statement and make it sound like it's a crazy cult teaching. It's all in the way you make the statement.
Do your homework.
December 11, 2007 11:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
CalD,
I wish we knew more of the context of this question. For example, I can say
this:
"A friend came up to me the other day and blurted out "Don't Mormon's believe that the Devil is the brother of Jesus?" I responded and said, I don't think that has anything to do with what we are here to talk about"
I sure hope the AP didn't take Huckabee's question out of context but I wouldn't put it past them based upon there huge amount of negative pieces they have been putting out on him DAILY.
I would rather have Romney in office than Rudy, but I prefer Huckabee.
One thing we have to remember folks.
The media loves to build this up to attack faith in general. They would love nothing more than to see people of faith tear each other down. This is evident by the spin they have put on things lately.
- Shawn
December 11, 2007 11:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe he's confusing Jesus and Satan with Dick Cheney and Barack Obama.
And just to set the record straight, they're cousins, not brothers.
December 11, 2007 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Peter Smith - Thanks I just did look at there website and here is a response they have that confirms this:
http://www.lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=2354fccf2b7db010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD&locale=0&sourceId=4a10ef960417b010VgnVCM1000004d82620a____&hideNav=1
December 11, 2007 11:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm afraid I'd have to go with "None of the above," on that one. Yikes.
December 11, 2007 11:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
lampwick:
ROTFLOL!!!
December 11, 2007 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Huckabee campaign already response to this.
http://www.mikehuckabee.com/?FuseAction=Newsroom.PressRelease&ID=425
Looks like this is nothing more than a hit piece on Huckabee like I thought. Its sad that the media is so desperate to go to this level to where they misrepresent Huckabee. The media has attacked both Mormons and Christians.
- Shawn
December 11, 2007 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm kind of torn between my agreement with Huck that Mormon theology is ridiculous, and my disagreement: everyone else's theology is ridiculous, too.
It's kind of scary that the GOP is going to base their nomination based on who has the same imaginary friends they do. Actually, I guess they all have the same imaginary friends. They're going to make their choice based on who believes what about which imaginary friend is related to whom.
It would be hilarious if they were running for student council treasurer or something, but the Presidency is really too high an office for that kind of thing to matter.
December 12, 2007 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Common Huck,
You are a graduate of a Bible School. This phrase is "anti-mormon 101" that is taught there. It is in all the literature the baptists (and others) print to scare their parishoners about Mormons.
If he truly didn't know that than he is TRULY more clueless than I though and not just a cuniving biggoted hate monger.
December 12, 2007 12:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Richard,
Don't by this article. It is taken out of context. Here is a response that the Huckabee campaign just released about this
http://www.mikehuckabee.com/?FuseAction=Newsroom.PressRelease&ID=425
December 12, 2007 12:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
As a Mormon Democrat that has lived in the South for several years, I find all of this really amusing. Huck is your typical Baptist prick that must attack other religions in his efforts to "save" people, and Romney is a hopeless flip-flopper that would say anything to get elected.
I think these guys deserve each other. Pass the popcorn.
December 12, 2007 12:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
The coverage of Huck's views on Mormonism are way beside the point. I think that more relevant issues for this fundamentalist candidate with a literal belief in the Bible would be:
1. Can we eliminate the budget for the National Academy of Sciences, as it is clearly out of step, with all of that Big Bang and evolution hoodoo?
2. Any global warming study that looks at data beyond 6,000 years ago is clearly wrong. (What Ice Age?) Shouldn't we just walk away from the whole Bali conference because it is based on such flawed science?
3. Since life begins at conception, shouldn't we outlaw most forms of birth control?
4.Shouldn't we be spending much more on Israel's security?
December 12, 2007 12:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Beliefs aside this does show that Huckabee knows how to play rough.
Has Karl Rove secretly been advising Huck?
This supposed "lightweight" candidate is not acting as one.
December 12, 2007 12:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gads... did we really think this was not going to happen? To say that mainstream Christens have a strong reaction to being grouped with LDS folks is a pretty big understatement.
So now we are going to have an extended national conversation about hats, gold plates and a guy talking to a burning bush (oh sorry that’s mine).
December 12, 2007 1:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know why y'all are so scared of Huckabee. You should be grateful he will take down Rudy and Mitt and then you can wipe the floor with him.
December 12, 2007 1:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Amen to that.
December 12, 2007 1:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
The GOP can't have it both ways. They need to dance with the ones that brung em. Huckabee's popularity has certainly proved that it's both foolish to think otherwise and to never think that that pandering could come back to haunt them. I'm tired of the silent bigotry of the right. Richard Land will come out and call the Mormon religion a cult, where are the rest of the Christians who believe otherwise publicly challenging Richard Land and the Baptists? Hmmm, that would be even uglier wouldn't it. I hope this episode will convince political leaders that they have a high price to pay for trying to game the religion side of the electorate.
December 12, 2007 1:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
To the mormons in the audience, I'm curious about #10 on CalD's list of mormon beliefs. As someone who believes Israeli influence (not jewish influence, israeli influence)in this country has gotten way out of control, what does #10 mean in practical terms?
December 12, 2007 2:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Joseph Smith believed the promised land is here.
December 12, 2007 2:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here is a bizzare cartoon that apparently has been banned. By whom I'm not sure, but it does explain, maybe that's the wong word, the possiblity that both Jesus and Satan were related. I'll have to admit it's out there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zy0d1HbItOo&feature=related
December 12, 2007 2:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Before anyone screams 'bigotry', why don't you sit down and realise that most Americans don't like Mormonism. I think Huck speaks for most of us when he questions a religion that has a very chequered past.
December 12, 2007 2:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
CalD, thanks. But what does that mean in practical terms?
I ask this because the mormon church is growing very quickly and they alkready have an overrepresentation in the upper levels of gov't. If they should get their wishes, what would this mean in practical terms for Israel and the US? Do they believe Israelis should move here and establish the new Zion, for example?
December 12, 2007 2:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
That would be Utah. Keep in mind that document I posted was written probably 150 years ago. These days Mormonism is a pretty ordinary protestant Christian religion in most respects. They have a few quirks but nothing as kooky as playing with poisonous snakes. They're just people who get up and go to church on Sunday then get up and go to work on Monday.
Anyway really don't think the good people of modern day Utah are in any way interested living in close quarters with a lot of swarthy middle eastern types. They pretty much define white bread middle America. To whatever extent any of them think about those old prophecies at all, they probably regard it as stuff that will happen by supernatural means at some far off future date of god's choosing, like any good mythology. Guess that would be one way to solve the Palestinian problem though, wouldn't it?
December 12, 2007 3:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
CalD, thanks for the thoughtful reply.
The Israeli people can have Utah if they want. OK, maybe not. :)
December 12, 2007 4:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hope this gets Huck elected. I HATE THE SAME PEOPLE YOU DO...MUSLIMS and MORMONS.
He's a uniter all right. Huck is everything the world imagines the USA to be. Sanctimonious puke.
He is the embodiment of all republican ideals: ignorance and hatred to further his greedy agenda.
So it goes.
Somewhere a large dog barked.
December 12, 2007 6:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
It seems these questions are asked with one purpose in mind - to play a game called "Got 'ya!" (the question on Mormons is TOTALLY IRRELEVANT to the election) - Since Huckabee is being discovered as the best candidate to be President, those who don't like him are setting traps (or trying to). He (Huckabee, in his answer) simply asked a question, and the answer is true, like it or not. They (Mormons) also believe Jesus Christ is an exalted man! Anyway, back on track to what really matters, GO HUCKABEE!!!
December 12, 2007 7:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's interesting that Hucabee's self-exculpatory press release claims the story was "out of context," yet did not provide the context.
It's quite clear that LDS considers Jesus to be the elder brother of Lucifer, and it's also clear that they are the the two most prominent "spirit children" of God.
This is like watching Godzilla v. Mothra. It's impossible to root for either of them, but it's great to see the blood flow!
Hucksterbee's own beliefs, like that dinosaurs and people were cotemporaneous and that God created the Earth 8,000 years ago, should next come under scrutiny.
December 12, 2007 7:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Straight off the lds website.
We needed a Savior to pay for our sins and teach us how to return to our Heavenly Father. Our Father said, "Whom shall I send?" (Abraham 3:27). Two of our brothers offered to help. Our oldest brother, Jesus Christ, who was then called Jehovah, said, "Here am I, send me" (Abraham 3:27).
Jesus was willing to come to the earth, give his life for us, and take upon himself our sins. He, like our Heavenly Father, wanted us to choose whether we would obey Heavenly Father's commandments. He knew we must be free to choose in order to prove ourselves worthy of exaltation. Jesus said, "Father, thy will be done, and the glory be thine forever" (Moses 4:2).
Satan, who was called Lucifer, also came, saying, "Behold, here am I, send me, I will be thy son, and I will redeem all mankind, that one soul shall not be lost, and surely I will do it; wherefore give me thine honor" (Moses 4:1). Satan wanted to force us all to do his will. Under his plan, we would not be allowed to choose. He would take away the freedom of choice that our Father had given us. Satan wanted to have all the honor for our salvation.
Romney can believe what he wants and it won't effect my vote, but Morman belief is a radical departure from orthodox Christianity which has never taught that Jesus and Lucifer are in any way "Brothers" of any kind or that Satan is a "son' of God just like Jesus.
December 12, 2007 8:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
No Mormon is going to deny that this is an actual point of doctrine. Yes, Mormons believe that Jesus and Lucifer (and all people that lived on this earth and the 1/3 of the host of heaven that fell to follow Satan) are siblings. To Mormons this provides even greater context to Lucifer's motives.
Mormons have no desire to conform to the view of "orthodox Christianity" (whoever got to decide what that is).
What is funny is how narrowminded the religious right is politically. Mormons vote 85% Republican. I would LOVE for the Repub candidate be someone that has a documented anti Mormon (or cult or whatever other lame title that helps a "Christian" group feel good about attacking the faith of another Christian). Finally Mormons would realize what a scam the "values" party really is.
But i agree. Huck would be brilliant for Dems. This guy has just begun to have his dirty laundry exposed.
December 12, 2007 9:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ouachita Baptist Bible College and Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary apparently don't offer courses in Comparative Religion or bother to teach their students about "other" forms of Christianity like Mormonism.
December 12, 2007 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Had a conversation yesterday with a very conservative Republican neighbor who was very annoyed at obsession about religion in the Republican party caused by THE LIBERAL MEDIA. He asked me do we even know what religion Hillary is or Edwards? This man was serious - is this what they are telling him on Fox and Rush - that the media is making religion important for Republicans - my jaw could not drop far enough.
December 12, 2007 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Jesus was the first one born of heavenly parents, and Lucifer was a younger sibling. Jesus is referred to as Lucifer's, as well as our, elder brother in the pre-earth life (Ibid.; and Milton R. Hunter, The Gospel through the Ages, 15).
This is a different Jesus than the Jesus of the bible. Christians don't believe that we are all literal spirt children of God. We are His creations. If being created by God means we are his children than wouldn't animals also be considered his children, afterall he created them?
December 12, 2007 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Christianity doesn't need to be examined because it's been around a lot longer than Mormonism so MOST American's know what they teach. Mormonism is hasn't been around as long and because they are so secretive about their doctrine, most people don't know what they believe. Why doesn't Mitt just throw out the articles of faith? Of course Americans are interested in knowing what exactly he believes, and since most don't they have every right to question it. We question where all the canidates stand on their views and I can't help but think those views are driven by their belief in a higher power. If the Mitt is a true believer of the Mormon faith, then isn't he called to share that with all people? So why is he so secretive? Is he afraid people will find out all the weird Mormon doctine, that most Mormons themselves don't know. Most Mormons haven't read the Journal of Discourse and they should because Brigham Young taught that all his sermons where to be regarded as scripture.
"There is not a man or woman, who violates the covenants made with their God, that will not be required to pay the debt. The blood of Christ will never wipe that out, your own blood must atone for it . . . " (Journal of Discourses, Vol. 3, page 247; see also, Vol. 4, pp. 53-54, 219-220.)
December 12, 2007 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am just surprised that Huckleberry did the heavy lifting on this smear job himself. Normally, Huckabee leaves the religous attacks to his 'uncontrolable' toadies al a Brownback.
The only thing Huckabee had on his side was pretense to piety. Now that this cherry is broken what does the bumpkin got? His diet the nation's problems away schtick? Chuck Norris kicking us all in our head?
Can't wait 'til Huckabee finishes imploding.
Tacredo in '08. Woo-Hoo! Why go half-way bat-shit crazy when you can go all the way!
December 12, 2007 10:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
"These days Mormonism is a pretty ordinary protestant Christian religion in most respects. They have a few quirks but nothing as kooky as playing with poisonous snakes. They're just people who get up and go to church on Sunday then get up and go to work on Monday."
Actually, I think you've hit on the reason this little civil war will not end until the Republican Armageddon brings us McCain or 9iu11iani. The bible thumping snake handlers slithering through the party are probably more upset by Smith's "hijacking of Jesus" than they would be if he had based his religion on Hinduism or something. Trying to argue that you are similar to them and don't really take anything too seriously or to extremes is like telling a T'ed up biker at the end of the Tour d'France that you like to ride bikes too. Not a pretty reaction.
The easygoing, let's get along, we're all brothers thing isn't going anywhere. Hiding Smith behind Jesus will only drive them deeper into their paranoid fit. They start hallucinating blond-haired western Shylocks lurking behind every rusted out Trans-Am and pink gazing ball in their yard.
They just aren't going to sit with the idea that you have this whacked out theology that you somehow want to softpedal and hide. To them, whacked out theology is something that you throw in other people's faces by threatening to quarantine them for abberant behavior. Anything less means you are a member of the U.N. plot to deliver us into the hands of the Jewish bankers or Muslim butchers.
I'm loving every minute of this civil war. It means McCain gets the nomination or else we walk all over their bloody corpses.
(Disclaimer...I have a rusted out Civic and maple sap buckets in my yard, and sometimes I think I see Cheney lurking out there.)
December 12, 2007 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here's the real issue. I believe the media left Huckabee alone, preferring to question Mormon belifs, because Romney seemed the most electable over Hillary. The Media would have loved to see Huckabee win the nomination because he "couldn't possibly win the general election." Now that he is surging in the polls, the NYT takes a comment - probably out of context - to show Huckabee as an intolerant Christian AND discredit Romney as a religious nut at the same time. I don't think it's an organized conspiracy, but I do think that the media has a definite interest in Hillary or Obama winning the presidency and driving the republican bloodbath to watch conservatives devide on issues that have nothing to do with leading and protecting America. How many papers and advertising could be sold over news stories covering the first woman, or first black president... America, put down the Kool-aid and vote the issues.
December 12, 2007 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lying sack of crap. Claiming he doesn't know about mormons is a bold faced lie. There is no way he is a minister in the south and doesn't know about mormons. He could "bash" mormons for 2 hours straight without using the same phrase twice. I respected Huckabee until I read about this. I'm supposed to believe he just accidentally let that slip out? Oops, did I say that? This is no different than one group of muslim hating and eventually killing another because they aren't muslim enough, or they are the wrong flavor of muslim. That isn't the America I want to live in. Huck is out of the race for me.
December 12, 2007 11:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
DON>>"How many papers and advertising could be sold over news stories covering the first woman, or first black president... America, put down the Kool-aid and vote the issues."
Probably not very many. Seriously. That's a snoozer. Now a jacked up, woman-hating, aids-quarantining, rapist-freeing Clinton conspiracy theorizing Arkie? That can sell some sheet, my friend.
BTW what are the "issues" problems that you have with Hill or Bama?
December 12, 2007 11:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bupalos, I'm the farthest from the type of guy to post comments like this (the previous was my third...ever). But I had to repost to disagree with you. I'm not talking the cable news, or "papers" literally. But the evening news and 'biographers' (who's parent companies own NYT, CNN, FOX, etc.) taking story after story of how this president rose above this and that to become the first blah, blah, blah.
My issues are not relevant since I'm pretty much on the fence looking at the green grass to the right. "jacked up, woman-hating, aids-quarantining, rapist-freeing Clinton conspiracy theorizing Arkie"?? I'm guessing you're nowhere near the fence and a 'issues' discussion would be pointless just like the pointless banter between Huckabee and Romney that only exists in the NYT and other news outlets that have forgotten that news is to 'report' rather than 'create' the news (not necessarily accusing them in this particular instance...I don't know that yet).
Who can take care of the needy Americans without breaking the back of our economy, protect Americans here and overseas, without breaking the back of our economy, and allow more Americans to succeed, WITHOUT BREAKING THE BACK OF OUR ECONOMY?? Well, I guess those are MY issues, but everyone should vote their own, not mine, not Romney's, Clinton's, Obama's, Huckabee's, and certainly not the Media's
December 12, 2007 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why is everyone so Mad at Huckabee even if he knows what Mormons believe and slipped that out? Maybe it was a rhetorical question. Bigger question here is it true. Why are Mormon's so ticked off it's true? Maybe they don't want everyone to know the truth. This isn't Mormon bashing, it's just info on what LDS believe? Mormons are so quick to label this as Mormon bashing rather than dealing with the facts.
December 12, 2007 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
See the chart on MormonInfo.org
December 12, 2007 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
If Huckabee doesn't believe satan / lucifer to be a fallen son of God, I'd like to know what he thinks of this:
Isaiah 14:12
How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
If satan ISN'T a son of God (ie. brother to Jesus) then what was he doing in heaven, and how is he fallen. To fall to some place low you have to start some place high.
The mormon theology on the background of satan makes way more sense (in the context of Christianity) than any explanation the huckster can come up with.
December 12, 2007 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mormons aren't ashamed it's true. I believe satan (Lucifer) is a fallen son of God and brother to Jesus, was kicked out of heaven for rebellion, and came to earth to try and make everyone else miserable like himself and to get revenge on God by trying to screw up his other kids.
Why would I be ashamed of that belief. It makes sense, it fits perfectly with the bible (Isaiah 14:12), and doesn't diminish God or Jesus in any way.
Hitler is also a son of God and brother to Jesus. He was a very bad person. Does that diminish God or Jesus? Is huckabee offended at that fact, too?
December 12, 2007 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
DEFENDING THE UN-DEFENDABLE...
How badly can the social conservatives damage the "big tent" (social, fiscal, security) winning coalition for president?
Just read every blog - 50% are filled up with bigots who want to fight about church doctrine and defend outragous statements which are not in the spirit of our constitutional form of government.
If Huckabee only had a lousy record on taxes, foreign policy, parols, ethics and the social conservatives liked his "style" well maybe you could defend the implosion and self destruction caused to our efforts to defend the White House from HRC.
However - the guy is an obvious "religious bigot" running a "christian candidate - anti mormon rhetoric campaign" - please stop posting bigoted anti mormon crap on these boards - you are scaring away all the Independents....and if you think you can win an election without the Independents you are not only religous "Taliban zealots" you are delusional in the practical aspects of American politics.
December 12, 2007 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
A few points:
CalD -
Mormons believe the gathering of "Israel" is a gathering of God's chosen people in the last days - i.e., people will begin to accept the gospel and gather in God's church. "Israel" refers to the House of Israel -- not the nation-state. Mormons are not anywhere near as interested in the Israeli nation-state and the Israel lobby as the Religious Right.
And the "literal" gathering was not originally thought to be in Utah -- it was supposed to be in Missouri. But the Mormons were driven out of Missouri by mobs -- that's how they ended up in Utah. The idea of a "literal" (physical, geographical) gathering has diminished quite a bit. The dominant view now is that the gathering is "in the Church" and not so much in a particular geographical location -- though I would imagine most Mormons are open to the idea that a future "literal" gathering could occur.
Nick -
It is true that roughly 85% of Mormons voted for Bush. But that's not the same as saying that 85% of Mormons vote Republican. Most Mormons tend to see themselves as fairly independent and willing to vote for whichever candidate best matches their values. That's been my experience anyway. The social conservatism among Mormons often leads them to vote Republican -- at least in the last 25 years or so -- but the fact is that prior to the GOP's push to make abortion and homosexuality and "family values" the centerpiece of its politics, Mormons were more strongly associated with the Democratic party and Progressivism. Personally, I wish they would get back to those times.
ExMormon -
The bible says plainly and clearly that we are God's children. (Rom 8:16-17) It does not say that animals are God's children. It also does not say, anywhere, that we are "creatures." And your conception of Jesus has much more to do with the Nicene Creed than with the bible. Evangelicals love to attack Mormons for relying on extra-biblical sources for their beliefs, but mainstream Christianity relies ENTIRELY on the Nicene Creed for its trinitarian conception of Jesus and God. Sounds extra-biblical to me.
TinTexas -
Mitt isn't being "secretive" -- he's just trying to keep his eye on the ball, which is politics and political issues. The ins and outs of Mormonism are not what matters. Getting into that stuff would only be distracting and divisive. Avoiding it is common sense and politically responsible -- not "secretive."
December 12, 2007 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
ExMormon,
No Mormon is "ticked off it's true" -- gimme a break. Just because you got sour about something and left the Church doesn't mean you have a mandate to go around bashing Mormons and slandering their beliefs.
Mormons believe that Jesus and Lucifer were brothers. We are all brothers and sisters, and children of God the Father.
Mainstream Christianity believes that Jesus is God-incarnate. It sees God as the only uncreated or self-created being, and Jesus is that God. (Thanks to the Nicene Creed and trinitarianism.) Satan is a creation of God. If Jesus is the uncreated God and Satan is a creature of God's making, then they cannot be brother.
But Mormons reject the Nicene Creed's trinitarian conception of God. We believe the bible, which talks repeatedly of Jesus as the *Son* of God, and refers often to Jesus standing/sitting *on the right hand* of God. Read Hebrews chapter one carefully. Read Genesis, where the proper translation is that God said "Let *us* make man in *our* image." We believe Jesus is a separate being from God the Father. He is God's First Begotten Son. We are all God's children, and Jesus is our elder brother.
It all boils down to differing conceptions of God and Jesus. No Mormon is "ticked off" about this.
We get ticked off when anti-Mormons try to bash and slander us for our beliefs.
That's all.
December 12, 2007 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
With this making news and all the reaction and interest, it's obvious to me that doctrine does matter. The fact is, despite what others may want to think, that many do care if their leaders are being led by the same God/Jesus as they are. What LDS don't understand is that Christians hold to Jesus being the unique Son of God. That means for them, they think that He's God the Son. He's the second person of the *only* God there is. Every other son of God is not a son with the nature of God. They are creatures with different natures (e.g., angels and humans). Jesus, for Christians, is exalted above anything imaginable, since He is literally the Creator of everything outside Himself--including us and Lucifer (Jn. 1:1-3, 14; Rom. 9:5; and Col. 1:13-18). LDS devalue Jesus since He didn't create everything. LDS don't even believe that there is a God for any world who is God by nature. Each God (since Mormons are polytheists) had to become a god, and is worshipped exclusively for that world. "Worthy" LDS hope to become gods of their own worlds to receive exclusive worship from their own spirit kids. But Jesus taught there is only one true God (Jn. 17:3), and He warned us of false prophets and false Christs that would come in the last days (Mt. 24:24).
December 12, 2007 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
(official web site)
----------------
ENSIGN
1986
I Have a Question
How can Jesus and Lucifer be spirit brothers when their characters and purposes are so utterly opposed?
Jess L. Christensen, Institute of Religion director at Utah State University, Logan, Utah: On first hearing, the doctrine that Lucifer and our Lord, Jesus Christ, are brothers may seem surprising to some -- especially to those unacquainted with latter-day revelations. But both the scriptures and the prophets affirm that Jesus Christ and Lucifer are indeed offspring of our Heavenly Father and, therefore, spirit brothers. Jesus Christ was with the Father from the beginning. Lucifer, too, was an angel “who was in authority in the presence of God,” a “son of the morning.” (See Isa. 14:12; D&C 76:25–27.) Both Jesus and Lucifer were strong leaders with great knowledge and influence. But as the Firstborn of the Father, Jesus was Lucifer’s older brother. (See Col. 1:15; D&C 93:21.)
...That brothers would make dramatically different choices is not unusual.
...We can only imagine the sorrow of our Heavenly Father as he watched a loved son (Lucifer) incite and lead a rebellion and lose his opportunity for exaltation. But we can also imagine the Father’s love and rejoicing as he welcomed back the beloved son (Jesus) who had valiantly and perfectly fought the battles of life and brought about the great Atonement through his suffering and death.
Link to LDS Church web site:
http://www.lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=2354fccf2b7db010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD&locale=0&sourceId=4a10ef960417b010VgnVCM1000004d82620a____&hideNav=1
December 12, 2007 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don>>"taking story after story of how this president rose above this and that to become the first blah, blah, blah."
Don, trust me...I've worked in publishing and I've worked in advertising and I for one would suggest that there is no financial media incentive on the kind of hagiography material you are talking about. None. Sex. Violence. Kooks. These things sell.
I can listen to any argument, and I think your issues aren't bad ones, if that's what you're voting on. You can take your guess on who's leadership will lead to those things, but really, people of intelligence and goodwill can disagree. I think of Huckabee as a close heir to Bush in all things policy beyond torture, and I can give you good reasons why Bush has been a total disaster on exactly the issues you list.
Why do you think that support for Obama has to be his skin color? Or Hillary her sex? Isn't that a kind of racism and sexism, even if you want it to be? You have every chance to talk about their positions, but you CHOOSE in your own mind to make their popularity all about sex and race. That says something to me.
December 12, 2007 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
MormonInfo says that mainstream Christians are worried about having a prez whose conception of God is different from their own.
So I guess mainstream Christians would be worried about having most of the Founders as their prez -- since the Deist conception of God is not trinitarian. (Deism is not the same as Christian, and many of the Founders explicitly denied a belief in the divinity of Jesus.) They would also be troubled by a Jewish prez, or a Muslim prez, or an atheist prez.
Let me ask you: Should we be more worried about a Mormon president, or about a huge group of people (Evangelical Christians) that thinks the only president who is not worrisome is the Evangelical Christian one?
Pardon me if I choose to be more worried about the latter.
December 12, 2007 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
If people of faith want to attack each other's beliefs, I say more power to 'em. I mean how ludicrous can it get? Debating the "truth" of made up stories about imaginary beings. Might as well concern ourselves with how Buffy banished Angel to the hellworld. The best that I can hope for is that an enduring battle of this sort ultimately reveals all such beliefs to be what they are: fairy tales for scared children (with whom I guess I have to include the vast majority of the adult population of the US.) Oy gevult!
December 12, 2007 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Most of the mormons I've known (and I have some in my extended family) have a kind of stepford vibe to me. Their theology seems to have been geared for the convenience of big daddy syndrome, which has evolved from it's roots in harems and serial porking the youngest women or oldest girls, to it's current emphasis on more modern forms of status, wealth, and power. They seem to be similar to your more conservative catholics, without so much repressed male homosexuality and with an extra dash of racial superiority syndrome.
Romney and his $200 million dollar family fit quite perfectly with my sterotypes of Mormons. We could do worse, because his personal ambition and lack of conviction on anything will make him a very weak president.
I think 9iu11iani and Huckabee are the only real disasters in the running, which almost guarantees the Republitards will eventually pick one of them.
December 12, 2007 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
All too often, authentic learning ends where faith begins.
December 12, 2007 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I truly believe that the founding fathers are rolling over in their graves over this outrageous nonsense. Why on earth in the 21st century is a political party getting in a fight about the nuances of particular religions??????? It is truly a travesty and doesn't represent what this country stands for and one of the main reasons why it was founded in the first place. It just makes me absolutely sick to the pit of my stomach. Unbelievable. How far our country has fallen.
December 12, 2007 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bupalos, Oh, come on! You MUST be in the media. I never said anything about reasons for the support of Obama or Clinton - let the assumptions run amok! I happen to know a little something about the media (and publishing) as well, and I must, respectfully, disagree with your assesment of what will sell.
The 'rightists' and the 'leftists' both have extreme issues, and I agree with the Bush presidency being a disaster (although thinking minds HAVE to agree that part of his crash and burn is the responsibility of the media being irresponsible), that's why I sit in the middle and watch for the person I most agree with and avoid publicly debasing any of the candidates. If it was easy, everybody who commented on this would run. Have some respect for all the candidates and make a decision based on YOUR beliefs and let others do the same.
I think your comments have betrayed your bias as you tried to paint a bias in me that simply doesn't exist.
December 12, 2007 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
2008 Presidential Election Weekly Poll
http://www.votenic.com
New YouTube Video!
The Only Poll That Matters
Results Posted Weekly Tuesday Evening At Midnight.
December 12, 2007 4:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
We're praying for truth.
www.choosejesusrightnow.com/bumpersticker
December 12, 2007 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
***Before anyone screams 'bigotry', why don't you sit down and realise that most Americans don't like Mormonism. I think Huck speaks for most of us when he questions...***
Steve,
Do you have the local Clan Wizard's cell phone number on speed dial?
Huckabee is to Republicans what Ralph Nader was to the Democrats.
Hillary cackles evil laughter from her dark tower while Bill smokes a cigar and searches for the Woolite. "We're back!" they cry. "Boohahahaha!"
December 12, 2007 8:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
A candidate’s faith may not matter to some, but if issues of faith are going to be discussed in the news, it is worthwhile to make some clarifying distinctions.
Mormonism is a cult, if you define cult as "Any religious group that deviates radically from orthodox teachings of historic Christianity, while adherents are claiming to be "true Christians" by way of some special revelation or privilege". There are many cults out there, Mormonism being one.
Christians and Mormons worship two DIFFERENT Gods.
Here are a few differences between what Christians and Mormons believe:
1Mormon – God was once a man like us.
1Christian – God was, is, and always will be God.
2Mormon – Many Gods, an unknown number of them
2Christian – One God. Isaiah 44 “I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God…Is there a God beside me? Yea, there is no God; I know not any.”
3Mormon – Salvation by grace AND works 2 Nephi 25:23
3Christian – Salvation by faith alone. Many verses, one example Ephesians 2:8-9
4Mormon – Men become Gods, have a marriage in Heaven and procreate children in Heaven (just as God does now)
4Christian – The idea that “Men become Gods” is blasphemy. Jesus said we will be neither married nor given in marriage in Heaven. Matthew 22:29-30
Mormons and Christians worship a different Jesus as well:
The Jesus of the Bible: Co-Eternal with God, without beginning or end.
The Jesus of Mormonism: Created by a God, who was himself also created. At one time this Jesus was not, then, having been created by God, became. This Jesus is thus less than God.
Each religion has a different Jesus, and a different God. One is Christian while the other is clearly not.
December 13, 2007 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
The previous posting by Core Theology reminds of Isaiah's reference to pagan theology as 'confusion and wind'. I am very disappointed in Mike Huckabee. Members of my family have been in the LDS Church from the beginning. I do a lot of family history research and have read the journals of my family who were forced from the homes in Missouri and Illinois, who were original settlers of Idaho and yet were forbidden the vote by the original constitution of the State of Idaho. It is very ironic to me that when the Mormons were forced from Nauvoo, Illinois after the murder of Joseph Smith and his brother who were supposed to be under the protection of Governor Ford of Illinois in the jail in Carthage, they appealed to every state governor in the Union for refuge. Most of them never answered, but the governor of Arkansas at that time did and he responded with a very thoughtful letter telling them he could not encourage them to come to Arkansas since he could not guarantee their physical safety, but he told them if they did not have the truth they would cease to exist and if they had the truth they would thrive no matter where they went. None of this anti Mormon banter will cause lasting damage to the truth. The reason I am so disappointed with Huckabee is because his question is straight from the usual anti Mormon talking points. It is an insult to my intelligence to try to tell me that the question was made in a sincere desire to understand what Mormons believe. If I wanted to vote for anyone so deceptive and disingenuous I could vote for Hillary.
December 15, 2007 12:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the cries of indignation weren't so loud, you could hear the violins softly playing "Oh Say, What is Truth?" in the background.
December 17, 2007 8:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
In the past, Mormons have voted for Republicans most of the time, especially in presidential elections. In Utah, Bill Clinton finished third--after Bush I and Ross Perot.
If Mormons were to stay home or vote Democratic in the 2008 election, Republicans could count on losing Arizona, Nevada, Utah, and possibly New Mexico. Here's to hoping.
December 17, 2007 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Don't Mormons believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers?"
If Huck kill/ignore read Book of Mormon then Satan/Demon will raise and attack him.
December 20, 2007 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mr. Shawn Troxel needs to learn how to do proper research. All of the websites you posted contain anti-mormon material. Anyone who is smart will go to the source, someone who is actually a member or to their real website, www.mormon.org. Nice try with the Huckabee push though.
January 4, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Huckabee knows much more about the Mormon faith than he claims. He has been known to have taken part in anti-mormon conventions. His question was a deliberate and sly attempt to attack Romney's faith.
Some of the Mormons I've met are some of the best people I know and feel they get picked on a lot more than they deserve.
January 4, 2008 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink