What a great way to determine criminal culpability... So much better than the old system.

How odd that a poll should come out saying the American people don't want to impeach the Prince of Darkness. Still believe the polls?

Rusmussen?, whom Larry Kudlow calls "an everyday must-read" report? How could you doubt it. Cheney must be making a comeback.

And "likely voters"? Who are they? Rasmussen decides. And why likely voters anyway? Are they going hold an impeachment election? Would be nice... Let the people decide.

I am a likely voter, and I agree that Vice President Cheney should not be impeached.

This sounds like a pretty negative poll for Cheney that is trying to be spun in his favor. 59% of the public thinks Cheney SHOULD be impeached or they haven't made up their minds. If anything, that is a resounding call for the Judiciary committee to start holding hearings and airing the evidence for the public to see for themselves.

Also, please remember that during Watergate the courts ruled that Executive Privilege cannot be claimed to block testimony or the release of documents if they are being used to investigate criminal acts by the Executive.

How was the impeachment scuttled? It was sent to the Judicial Committee, which is the next step. Call Conyers to expedite it.

41% to 31% against Impeachment? These kind of figures tell me there's REASON to Impeachment hearings. Whether or not it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt that VP Cheney should be Impeach will only be known if we have the hearings.

The only way to hear the TRUTH about what was said or done is by forcing the information to be out in the OPEN once and for all.

I sincerely hope the Judicial Committee will hold serious discussions and invite witnesses, for and against the Impeachment. If they don't they will be forever held in history as the group that could have gotten the TRUTH out there but for political reasons - refused to do so.

Coonsey's View
Political Blog and Forum
http://www.freewebs.com/coonsey/

Impeachment is NOT a judicial process, it is a Congressional process. That makes it, above all, a political process. Don't need to go far back to see how it works. Clinton's impeachment was pure unadulterated politics. All it took was rule by the thug party. Dems simply don't have the political will, the backbone so to speak, to impeach George or Dick. (And by the way impeahcing Dick first would be the way to go because you do not want Dick rising to the level of POTUS under any circumstances) In fact the Dems have bent over backwards to accommodate the criminality of the Bush administration as the most recent Mukasey endorsement illustrates. They are clearly afraid of the gangsters running our government. Otherwise impeachment would have been a done deal last year. One can only speculate on the reasons for their fear.

I'm willing to wait for the War Crimes trial. Invasion, murdering civilians, torture, occupation, theft of natural resources . . . that ought to do it.

I think Cy Guy put it best when he said that the chosen perspective was that 31% do not want impeachment, which is just a political, congressional, grand jury search for an indictment, while a more 'positive one would be that 59% want impeachment or an investigation looking into one, not a very high endorsement of Cheney. Imagine saying 31% don't want him indicted, how would it sound then? It's just incredible that we're even having this discussion. Richard Nixon was nearly impeached for true 'high crimes and misdemeanors against the Constitution'. Bill Clinton was impeached for allegedly lying about a blow job, although we know the political calculus this Republican party utilized to rationalize it, and 8 years later, we have come to this, talk of impeachment for starting a war, killing 1000s based on an ideologically driven lie, spying on your own citizens, then covering it up, stonewalling and lying about it, signing laws, then saying that you won't enforce or live up to them if you don't feel like it, torturing in the name of the US, then lying about it. It sounds like a legal and political no brainer to me.

I'm sorry I got my numbers all bass ackwards when I tried to follow up on Cy Guy's post. Anyhow, my view after that still stands.

I understand that impeachment is a pre-trial (in the House only with trial in the Senate -- see above comments -- actual criminal indictment and arrest, as well as any subsequent trial for "war crimes" ain't gonna happen) step. As for whether the majority of Americans understand, or could even correctly identify the Vice President of the United States, you may have a point there.