« Club For Growth Candidate Loses Special Election GOP Primary | Home | Today's Iowa News: Obama Hits Hillary On Ethanol »

Poll: Hillary's Lead In New Hampshire Shrinks

A new Rasmussen poll in New Hampshire finds that Hillary Clinton's lead in the New Hampshire primary has slipped by several points, although the changes are still within the margin of error.

The numbers: Clinton 34%, Barack Obama 24%, John Edwards 15%, Bill Richardson 8%. Two weeks ago, Hillary had 38%, Obama 22%, Edwards 14% and Richardson 7%. With a margin of error of ±4%, this could just be statistical noise, or it could be evidence of a real trend in the wake of last week's debate.


20 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

the poll was done by a sexist man, everyone luvs Hillary even Drudge.

what happens if her polls tank? Her supporters seem to have no other reason to support her .

and she is the worst Democratic nominee for the general we could choose

user-pic

I am still waiting on a post concerning the gallup poll that shows that 78% of republicans will vote against clinton II and obama has the support of 39% of republicans against 43% negative. Also, there are republicans organizing to help obama win it all in iowa and other red states. Why isn't that front page news? Obviously, there are alot of republicans that can't stand their choices so they are gravitating to obama. They sure aren't gravitating to clinton II. Talk about putting red states in play. We could have a nominee that unites the country and moves us forward as opposed to another divisive and bitter 4 more years of the same.

user-pic

As an Obama supporter, I have been a little frustrated. Then I read Andrew Sullivan's article and remembered why this candidacy is so important. I am hoping that there will be a pause in NH and Iowa and people will stop to say- it is only inevitable if we vote for HRC. If we can break the "spiral of silence" where those who support other candidates feel marginalized- we might have a chance of having someone other than Hillary. Thus, reinvigorated, I am getting in my car on Sunday and driving to NH to canvas for Obama.

user-pic

Well, surprise surprise...I have been reading these writeups for weeks, touting Hillary leading in this poll or the other, just on and on about her big leads...and despite looking for the MOE it was not in the write up

What do we have here today, now that Hillary is slipping...the MOE!

user-pic

66% of New Hamshire voters want to end the culture of corruption.

user-pic

Michael,

Alll that type of news will only be covered as historical significance to paint of picture of just how Obama won the Presidency after all these polls saying he was behind.

Nothing substantive or truly political significant will be covered about Obama until he is the clear winner. That is not the media narrative and they are sticking to Obama being 'naive and irresponsible'...he is inexperienced.

They are juxtaposes pictures of Pakistan and world conflict with Obama on Oprah, SNL and DeGeneres...to reinforce the image of him being a lightweight. The viewing public gains the perspective that this man is not ready and can't handle the world stage.

In the meantime the facts on the ground, his policy speeches, his key legislation, his grace under pressure and measured way of addressing the most important issues facing us ...will not be covered.

I wonder how Russer is going to skewer him on MTP this coming Sunday..will Obama have the opportunity to demonstrate his track record or will Russert simply ply him with dumb questions about his opponent Hillary?

In other words will the interview be more about Hillary than about what Obama himself brings to the table that allow him to lead with an unshakeable belief in the US Constitution, all that is good about America and how America can be great?

user-pic

thegolux,

I am fervently hoping that this last debate sounds the death knell for Hillary's candidacy. I believe it was her 'dean scream' moment and just as they replayed that moment over and over to make Howard look crazed, I beleive that Edwards AD has the same potential to hammer Hillary out of the race.

I only wish he had called it DoubleTalk instead of the Politics of Parsing.

DoubleTalk will hopefully be the Dean Scream for Hillary.

As much as I like Bill Clinton, when he came out this week defending Hillary with that swiftboat hype I was reminded of why they called him Slick Willy.

I am headed to IA this weekend to caucus for Obama.

Fired up! Ready to go!

Obama/Edwards 08

user-pic

This poll doesn't mean a whole lot. It's all within the MOE and could be nothing more than a slight variance in the numbers. Other surveys with numbers outside the MOE would be necessary to conclude anything meaningful. Edwards has launched tv in NH and Hillary is using direct mail up there. After a week or two of that you may or may not be able to measure a significant change. Edwards certainly must be hoping to do so.

user-pic

There is an awful lot of evidence available right now that Clinton's lead in various national and state polls peaked in mid-late October and is now down a bit from that peak. But even if that evidence continues to accumulate, such a trend would be neither surprising nor terribly significant given how far off the voting still is--unless perhaps you had been pushing the idea that Clinton had the nomination locked up.

user-pic

I support Hillary, but giving driver licenses to illegal aliens is a terrible idea. It will only encourage more illegal immigration. Hillary needs to take a moderate stand on this issue: required e-verify for all employees, stiff penalties, and border fence. And then, only then, limited amensty for those who've been here for 3-5 years. Liberal elites, as Democracy Corp and Rahm Emmanuel have pointed out, are out of step with most Independents and moderate Dems. Check out http://numbersusa.com/index

user-pic

Hillary is dropping in the Rasmussen daily tracking poll as well.

user-pic

The drop in her numbers and the uptick in Obama's are within the MOE. Her not moving up since the last poll is not.

I'm not convinced that the drop in her numbers is due to the debate. Her national numbers were falling in all the polling done Oct 23-27. With only two million viewers, I wouldn't expect any real change as a result of the debate itself. There may well be a change in her numbers due to the change in the buzz following the debate, but I wouldn't expect to see any of that for at least another week.

On the illegal immigrant driver's license thing, the problem isn't her answer. The problem was the very revealing way she responded when she was asked a question for which she didn't have a canned, focus-group screened, consultant-written response to robotically fire off. Forced to improvise, she reflexively tried to take both sides of the issue rather than just tell us what she actually thinks.

That slip illustrates the very real problem she's going to have governing if she wins. Her whole campaign had been built around getting people to believe that there is a "real" Hillary who shares all of their beliefs and is just concealing them in order to get elected.

Contrary to what many of her supporters seem to believe, this is not "savvy" or "smart" or "perfect campaigning." Instead, she's repeating the worst mistake of GWB's campaign (minus the part where the candidate is a complete imbecile, of course) and undermining her ability to govern effectively if she wins. By leading everyone to believe she'll make the decisions they want her to make once she wins, she's guarenteeing that once she actually has to start making decisions, a lot of people who voted for her are going to be angry and disappointed. This is what causes approval numbers to tank.

Reagan had this part right. Tell people where you stand early on. If they agree with enough of it to vote for you, they'll give you a pass on the stuff they don't like because they at least got a chance to decide how important it was to them.

user-pic

I agree with the posters above that the momentum is switching. There is directness with Obama that contrasts starkly with the secrecy of Clinton. I know she has a lot of history and has learned to fight and play politics this way. And I still respect her, I just do not feel at all inspired by her. But with the crash of the republican party - this seems to be our opportunity not just to become more progressive but also to become collaborative and I think that would be so good for the country. And when I say that - I mean collaborative with the best of the center and center/right. I think we have an opportunity for the country to be done with the influence of the far right which has been so dominant and so damaging. Yay!

user-pic

JFK464 on drivers licenses in NY for illegals:

It will only encourage more illegal immigration.

If I knew that my NY drivers license was that valuable, that people would actually leave their home countries to sneak in and buy one, I would have smiled when they took my picture.

What Hillary had trouble expressing in five seconds is that it was a move that Governor Spitzer made for practical reasons, involving security, money and highway safety. It certainly provides a demagogueable issue, but he is still politically secure after his landslide election, in the first year of his term. It is absolutely true that having the state government provide licenses for illegals (lawbreakers) is questionable. Maybe the government should also stop educating their children, providing police and legal services when they are victims of crime, and building highway underpasses for them to sleep under. The fact is that going through the process of getting a drivers license in effect registers illegal aliens.

It's a difficult issue that deserves more than a sound bite answer. Of course Russert was after a UFO sighting moment and he got it. Hundreds of Hillary supporters and opponents, including her husband, and Samantha Powers, have made her look like the victim, which is exactly what she doesn't need. Now she's claiming a bad day, which we all know is feminine code for. So much for a flawlessly run campaign and Maggie Thatcher image.

But it's early, and we can be thankful that the Democrats have such a strong bench if she does falter.

user-pic

Excellent points NCSteve. I just wish she would take some positions on things. Look decisive, lead, be president. There is no requirement that you have to agree with everyone on every single thing. And your observation about the problem governing is right on point. Go in with a mandate to change certain things and congress will back you up and go your way. If you don't have a mandate to do anything, nothing will get done and we will have 4 more years of stagnation and divisiveness.

user-pic

The potential significance of this poll, with Clinton's lead at 10% and well outside of the MOE, is the noise and feeding frenzy that it is going to generate about the Clinton "inevitability" train being delayed at the station..."Delayed" sounds about right to me.

user-pic

My point is that there is not orthodoxy on the left regarding illegal immigration. While Markos may call you anti-brown, the majority of African Americans are against amnesty for economic reasons (http://www.numbersusa.com/interests/blackamericans.html.

It certainly provides a demagogueable issue

I believe there is middle ground on this issue which addresses the very real economic concerns people have, and also recognizes that those illegals who have been here for many years should be legalized. I think it's both politically savvy and honors the Democratic tradition to address economic anxiety working people face, and illegal immigration is huge issue for many who make less than $100,000 (as Mark Penn write in Microtrends.

user-pic

Perhaps if flesh and blood Americans just woke up and reviewed Clinton's Senate voting record, Clinton would disappear from the polls all together.

Perhaps if the undecided folks made a choice or two the polls would look different.

Perhaps if the corporate media actually paid attention to the rest of the DEM field . . .

user-pic

Her national lead over Obama slipped by about 1/3. Her New Hampshire lead over Obama has slipped by roughly the same amount. Hopefully its a trend.

Hopefully, too, the Clinton campaign's overreaction to last week's debate will dispell the "flawless campaign" narrative that was being so aggresively pushed by the media. They managed to keep her poor debate performance in the news a lot longer than I would have ever imagined.

Edwards' "Double Talk" label is brilliant and can really stick if he can catch Hillary giving more non-answers in the next debate. Like I said before, unless she's suddenly afflicted with a an outbreak of candor she's incredibly vulnerable to the "Double Talk" charge.

user-pic

LJ: No it hasn't. Go take a peak at pollster.com. Clinton's national lead is exactly where it was in the last two weeks of October or maybe up just a tick since then.

As for the Rasmussen NH poll, who knows. But I would not get my boxers in a bunch too much until we see another on just like it. You might just be setting yourself up for disappointment. The MoE in a typical poll is for 95% confidence, meaning you kind of expect about one out of 20 or so to be off by more than that much. For now at least, this one has the look of an outlyer, although I would expect the race to tighten once everyone starts to advertise in earnest. Anyway, the next poll out of NH should tell us more.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address