« Poll: McConnell Ahead Of Dems, But Vulnerable | Home | 
Edwards Proposes Two-Year Waiting Period For Drug Advertising »
Edwards Proposes Two-Year Waiting Period For Drug Advertising »
Tancredo Retiring From Congress
Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-CO) has announced that he will not be running again for his seat in the House.
"It's the fact that I really believe I have done all I can do in the House, especially about the issue about which I care greatly," Tancredo said.
Tancredo's suburban Denver district gave 60% of its vote to President Bush in 2004, and is expected to remain in Republican hands.
Advertisement
Thank you God!!!
October 29, 2007 9:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
No!!!!! Wheldon is gone! Pink Sugar is gone! Santorum is gone!
What are we goning to do without the bat-shit crazy wing of the Republican Party?
Tancredo! Tancredo! I can't quit you!
October 29, 2007 9:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Cause for celebration throughout the country. One of the most hateful, disgusting bigots in the us congress. His portuguese ancestors can now rest easier with this parasitic hypocrit out of public life.
October 29, 2007 9:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmm, what's a wingnut to do; Fox analyst, armchair general of populist anti-immigration militia or third party insurgent?
October 29, 2007 9:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Rats from a sinking ship.
October 29, 2007 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
great news to be rid of Tancredo, though he won't make these House rankings of most vulnerable House seats any time soon.
October 29, 2007 10:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
back to the private sector, and may you get your racist little bottom kicked the first time you talk trash about your mexican neighbors. peace out, dick.
October 29, 2007 10:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I smell a scandal...
October 29, 2007 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe he can raid the Democratic debate tomorrow night before he goes.
October 29, 2007 11:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Another one rides the bus,
another one rides the bus,
And another one's on and another one's on...
Oh, oops! that's Weird Al's version.
Sorry.
Another one bites the dust...
October 29, 2007 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good riddance. He sees that he cannot do any more substantial damage to the country whilst in Congress, so he's leaving. We will not have to hear his bigoted rhetoric anymore. Perhaps he will join a Republican Sink Tank.
October 29, 2007 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
3RD PARTY! 3RD PARTY!!
October 29, 2007 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
It probably means that Tancredo will continue his campaign for president all the way to the convention no matter how poorly he does. So after the nomination is decided in mid-February of next year we will still have Tancredo and Ron Paul going on. I am sure the GOP looks forward to that.
The reason there are so many GOP retirees from the House is that it is tough to go from majority to minority status. If you go back to the 1994-1996 time period you will find that there was a large number of Democratic members of the House who retired as well after they lost majority status.
October 29, 2007 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
My guess is that he's retiring because he'll be getting out at the top of the game - his name recognition will be very high. So he'll be able to capitalize on that - striking while the iron is hot. In this sense, running for President is basically a way to ratchet up his star quotient, and therefore make more money. See also: Duncan Hunter.
October 29, 2007 2:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll miss him...kinda like the way I miss plague.
October 29, 2007 2:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
What WILL we do without the leadership of the man who wants to increase the number of Muslims who hate us by literally 1000%, via threatening to bomb Mecca and Medina? How can we, the American people, move forward minus his great philosophical statements, like this one regarding his reasons for supporting the "traditional marriage" amendment:
"[T]he state's interest in marriage is procreation. Population is power. Society needs a young generation to defend the country in battle, to support its programs with taxes and to carry on its culture and traditions."
THAT'S right. Traditional marriage must be promoted because we need to ensure a steady supply of cannon fodder and fillers of the pork barrel. 300 million people (and counting) just isn't enough; 4 million births per year (nearly twice the number of deaths) isn't enough. And somehow the government's promotion of traditional marriage will lead to more babies being born? and to fewer of those babies turning out gay?
Say "Goodnight", Tommy.
October 29, 2007 7:11 PM | Reply | Permalink