Dems Blast SCHIP Veto
The Democratic candidates are lining up against President Bush's veto of the SCHIP bill, with four statements out so far blasting the decision.
Perhaps the most colorful comes from John Edwards: "Instead of threatening the health care of children, it's time for Bush, and Republicans like McCain, Giuliani, and Romney to start picking on someone their own size."
The full statements are available after the jump.
"Today, we have witnessed a President that has turned his back on health care for children. Not surprisingly, in George Bush's administration, corporate cronies and insurance industry allies always come first, while children's health care comes last. In an America where nearly 9 million children don't have health coverage, Congress must do what is right and fight for these children and override Bush's cruel veto."Even more shocking is that Republican Presidential candidates, including Fred Thompson, Rudy Giuliani, John McCain and Mitt Romney are all lining up with President Bush and against health care for our children. Instead of threatening the health care of children, it's time for Bush, and Republicans like McCain, Giuliani, and Romney to start picking on someone their own size."
"It is outrageous that the president has decided to use his fourth veto to deny health care to four million American children. At a time when we're spending billions of dollars on a war that should never have been authorized and giving billions in tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans, today's veto of this bipartisan plan shows a callousness of priorities that is offensive to the ideals we hold as Americans. But George Bush doesn't have the last word, and I will keep fighting for the Republican votes needed to override his veto" said Barack Obama."As the wealthiest nation on earth, there is no reason we shouldn't be able to cover every child. As president, I'll sign a universal health care bill into law by the end of my first term that will cover every American, and cut costs more dramatically than any other plan offered by a candidate in this race. And I'll do it by bringing Republicans and Democrats together – like I did when I was in the Illinois state Senate, when I helped expand health care for an additional 150,000 children and their parents" continued Obama.
"If there's one thing all of us should be able to agree on, no matter what our political views, it's that our children should get the treatment they need when they need it. And when I'm president, they will" said Obama.
"This President's priorities are unconscionable. With the resources it takes to execute just over 3 months of the Iraq War, we could fully fund the expansion of health care for needy children that Bush vetoed. Indeed, today's veto is another reminder that this war is not only adversely affecting our security but also adversely affecting our other top priorities, and it's time for Congress to do what it must do to end it."
"With one stroke of his pen, President Bush has denied health insurance to 3.8 million kids who were due to get it under this bipartisan expansion of the Children's Health Insurance Program. He's willing to spend billions and billions of dollars in Iraq, but he's not willing to invest in our kids' healthcare. It is unconscionable and wrong. Every child in this country should have health insurance. The President's veto is a tragedy for the millions who don't."















I am glad Edwards is pressing the Republican candidates on this. We need to get them as much on the record as possible for this veto to make sure they suffer for it politically too.
October 3, 2007 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bush has nothing to lose. He's already got the record for the most inept, reprehensible, and corrupt administration in American history. No other president comes even close. This is just further evidence that he doesn't give a rat's ass about the American public, period. Never did, never will. However, since Bush appears to have compromising photographs of every Republican and about half the Dems, what are the real odds this veto is going to get overridden?
October 3, 2007 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Edwards has the money quote. I'm not sure how Biden/Dodd's "Iraq money" line will come across. I think Hillary's response dwarfs Obama's. Her response goes nicely with what she's said in the past and her effort to get CHIP initially is substantially more impressive than Obama's work in IL.
We need more imagery like Edwards and Clinton's. Obama may like the bipartisan talk, but if the GOP fails to override the veto, he's going to look silly. Bipartisanship only works if there is a two way street.
October 3, 2007 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
No one is saying it, perhaps because it would be political suicide, but I'll say it...Does anyone else see the hypocrisy in the Republicans' rabid desire to "protect unborn children" and their willingness here to turn their backs on children once they're born?
October 3, 2007 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink