« Fox News Poll Asks Respondents Whether They've Prayed For Bush | Home | Minnesota Dems Aiming For A Congressional Sweep »
Ron Paul Says Obama Shouldn't Be Condemned Over Flag-Pin Flap
Ron Paul has now become the first Republican Presidential candidate to say that Barack Obama shouldn't be condemned for saying that he won't wear an American flag pin because so doing is inferior to "true patriotism":
"A lot of people might condemn him," said Paul, "I'm neither going to condemn him nor praise him because I don't know his inner motivation.""He may be very, very sincere in what he is saying," he added.
Dems Hillary Clinton and Bill Richardson have both dismissed this whole thing as a non-issue. But as best we can determine, Paul is the only Republican who has as of yet.
Advertisement















As soon as someone condemns it, time to run a search for them on Google images!
That's why no one can do it who has ever been seen in public since 9/11 without the flag pin.
October 5, 2007 4:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ron Paul has a lot on the ball.
If he did not hate government so much,
he would be a good president.
The market does not and will not fix everything, or seek justice, or do what is necessary for the welfare of the public. Government's role should be to ensure that such things happen; it is not clear that Ron Paul sees the need for government.
He is, however, honest. He is the best Republican candidate by far. The others are total losers.
October 5, 2007 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does this lapel pin thing remind anyone else of the loyalty oaths in Catch-22? Same goes for "support the troops", uproar over newspaper ads, etc. At least in this case someone (Obama) finally came along and said "gimme eats!"
October 5, 2007 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
But he DOES eat Freedom Fries, right???
October 5, 2007 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ya know, the way all the stormtrooping brown shirts diddle their flag pins while pissing on the constitution makes me ill.
"When fascism comes to America it will be draped in the flag & bearing the cross"
October 5, 2007 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe Obama is absolutely correct. To me, it is no different than those who slap a "Support the Troops" decal on their foreign car and somehow believes it qualifies them as a patriot ...
October 5, 2007 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I suggested a protocol for lapel flag pins a few years ago;
1 Flag Pin = Never Served in Military
2 Flag Pin = Served, but no combat.
3 Flag Pin = Served, saw combat.
October 5, 2007 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I prefer to wear my silver ring that's adorned with a row of Vietnam War-era peace signs. That weems more appropriate.
October 5, 2007 5:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ron Paul is right on. His recent speech before the House on the True Patriots adds more.
(To a recent comment: Ron Paul is not anti-government, he supports rule of law. He abides by limited government and is for small government. I would imagine that Ron Paul sees justice as a key purpose for government.)
October 5, 2007 7:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
There was a Repub wore a flag pin
Jingo was his name-o
J I N G O
J I N G O
J I N G O
and Jingo was his name-o
Much ado about nothing. I applaud Obama for not goosestepping to the Repub tune.
October 5, 2007 8:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
i always thought the flag wasnt supposed to be turned into marketable products. i.e. pins, bumper stickers, blankets, car flags....(you know all that sh*tmade in china)i always found this disrespectful to the flag.....i guess im not a patriot.
October 5, 2007 9:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
If George Bush was wearing a 3 piece suit made out of the American Flag, he would still be lying to the American people every time he opened his mouth.
Does the suit make him patriotic?
October 5, 2007 9:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
A good answer, to the point yet not antagonistic.
When Hillary Clinton wins the Democratic nomination and Rudy Giuilani wins the Republican nomination, Ron Paul will be positioned to run as a third party candidate, and will pick up the votes of all the people who do not want to see Clinton or Giuliani as President.
Which is just about everybody.
October 5, 2007 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ron Paul is an anti-women's rights nutcase who introduced legislation defining that life begins at conception. Anyone who votes for Ron Paul is against a woman's right to choose. Period. Of course I've always had my suspicions about the roots of most of the virulant anti-Hillary rants on here.
Also, Paul opposes any form of universal government-backed healthcare plans, he opposes Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.
The end.
October 5, 2007 10:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
who was the comedian who said ..
.. yknow after 911 i was really affected and everything, but i didnt enlist or involve myself in anything or really plan on sacrificing much -- but i did put this little american flag pin on my lapel, because .. yknow .. it was the least i could do. literally, it was the LEAST i could do.
October 5, 2007 11:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
FLAGS!
October 5, 2007 11:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
In response to "colonpowpow"...
You have to understand that Ron Paul's approach is a comprehensive approach to the underlying problems. Rather than treating the symptoms, he means to cure the disease.
1 example: One of the main reasons why health care has become so unaffordable is because of the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government. They have created MASSIVE monetary inflation. That translates into price inflation - and less-affordable health care.
For some time now, there has been deflationary pressure on consumer goods because so much is now manufactured (cheaply) in Asia - holding down prices. So price inflation is partially hidden. Medical care, on the other hand, can't be off-shored, so the price inflation shows itself fully. The government also manipulates the economic data to underreport inflation.
We have a MAJOR inflation problem, and having the government pay for health care won't make the inflation go away, it'll only make it worse. We will go bankrupt if we continue on this path, then, not even the government will be able to pay for health care.
October 6, 2007 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
to colonpowpow,
When Ron Paul repeals the Income Tax and the IRS, you will be in a much better position to afford adequate healthcare insurance or other means of care.
When Ron Paul ends the federal war on drugs, the federal deficit will be greatly reduced, demanding less tax burden on future Americans, reducing prison numbers and greatly restoring our constitutional liberties
President Ron Paul will end the empire overseas and this will save $100 - $300 billion each year, a staggering amount that is unimaginable, and will reduce your taxes incredibly.
Ridding the USA of the Patriot Act and Homeland security will reduce the size and scope of the police state considerably.
Hilary will do none of this. A Ron Paul Presidency would allow the states to legalize or criminalize abortion but its a certainty that all west coast and northeast states would have legal abortions any America could go to get one, or you could go to Canada, Mexico or any other place in the world if you happen to live in Mississippi or Alabama.
Putting a federal law on abortion as a more vital priority than freeing hundreds of thousands of prisoners, ending the empire, ending the war in Iraq, and abolishing the income tax is irrational.
October 6, 2007 12:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
It seems to me that people are bored out of their minds! This is a non-issue that is being elevated to (hyperbolically) Whitewater-type crime and treason level... Can we move on now? Sen Obama is a patriot, pin or no pin...
October 6, 2007 12:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
fred mertz:
He "hates" government? What? He thinks federal bureaucratic government, or centralized planning, is inefficient and costly. He would leave most things up to the states and free market, it would work better. Justice WOULD be served under Paul's presidency - but stealing from one group to give to another is far from "justice", it's just legal plunder.
colonpowwow:
And anti-black rights, and anti-gay rights. He's for individual rights, a term that used to mean something. Now-a-days every group has some type of "right", and they shouldn't - everyone should have the same rights.
And as far as abortion issue. You really think a doctor who has delivered 4000 babies is going to support Roe vs Wade? A person who saw an abortion, where they put the crying baby in a bucket in the side of the room, is gonna be pro choice? Surely you jest.
And he'd leave it up to the states to decide. The people would make the choices, not a federal judge.
And I really do love how you think it is a bad thing that he's against SS, MC, UHC, etc. Universal Health Care DOESN'T work, Social Security is going bankrupt (and I'll be screwed for the future), and you think these are worthy programs? People should be able to make CHOICES, I should be able to opt out if need be! But I can't, because I /MUST/ pay for SS, and when I reach that ripe age of 72 (theyll surely raise the age), I'll have 2 bucks.
Yay?
October 6, 2007 1:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Saturday he should wear 2 pins. That'll show the world who the real patriot is....
October 6, 2007 1:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
“I prefer someone who burns the flag and then wraps themselves up in the Constitution over someone who burns the Constitution and then wraps themselves up in the flag” – Molly Ivins
October 6, 2007 8:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Finally, the phony symbolism standing in for patriotism is considered. Bush wears a flag pin, which he used to distract those who think in symbols while he lied to the world and send about a quarter of a million people to the other side of the plant to overthrow a stable anti-theocratic government and install nothing in its place.
The flag means something, and 2/3 of the stupid pins we see dilute that meaning.
(I think I like Ron Paul. It's a simpler, honester conservatism than Buchanan's, from what I've heard and read. Maybe I should hear and read more.)
October 6, 2007 8:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Marc Scott Emery writes: "A Ron Paul Presidency would allow the states to legalize or criminalize abortion but its a certainty that all west coast and northeast states would have legal abortions any America could go to get one, or you could go to Canada, Mexico or any other place in the world if you happen to live in Mississippi or Alabama."
What a stunningly clueless answer, coming, as all Ron Paul supporters seem to do, from a complete inability to see the big picture and imagine the circumstances of virtually anyone other than themselves. Spoken just like someone to whom it's never even occurred that many, many Americans don't have the financial, child-care and other resources to hop on a plane going across the country or "any other place in the world."
October 6, 2007 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ron Paul?
Seriously?
I love the convolutions people on a so-called progressive Democratic site will adopt in order to throw out 100 years of progressive, Democratic social policies (yes, government policies) in order to pitch a Republican/Libertarian who's going to not only win the presidency campaigning on anti-women's rights and abolishing Social Security, but then is going to get Congress to draft this legislation.
I hear Sancho Panza is retiring. Get your resume in now.
Oy vey!
October 6, 2007 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Brent Burk:
You need to quit listening to Rush and Fox and try a little rational independent thought ...
Why is it a centralized authority is inefficient when it comes to government, but somehow becomes efficient when it is applied to the private sector or the military? What would be the reaction of our largest corporations if they were told they had to decentralize and open separate management facilities in each state? We are a single nation and that requires national laws and a national authority. The fact is "the free market and leaving it up to the states" does NOT always work better. The fact is you wouldn't want to live in a completely free market without consumer protections and we would still have slavery in some states if if was left to the states. If you think the poor in this country have the best deal, why don't you quit working and go on welfare. The fact is our tax system currently favors the well-to-do and corporations more than it has in a century. In the words of Warren Buffet, "There is class warfare in this country and my class is winning." Take a look a the tax rates prior to Reagan which resulted in the growth of our middle class and compare them to what they are today. There is plunder going on today, but it is not going to the poor. Also, "bureacrats" are not some evil, alien race ... they are what is known as "staff" or "employees" in the private sector and preform the exact same functions.
I can see you are a member of the poor, oppressed white majority. Quit being a sniveling little wimp! Why is it that you are so afraid of competing with the poor, minorities and gays on an equal basis? (Which of course it still is not!)
As the saying goes, abortion would not be an issue if men were the ones who got pregnant. The fact is you don't have a dog in this fight so please spare us the rightous indignation.
Actually, universal health care DOES work ... in every industrialized country in the world except the U.S.! Furthermore, you don't see them scrambling to adopt our system, do you? Not only that, be even though we pay more for health care, we have worse outcomes than these other countries! The problem with SS is that the trust fund has been robbed (primarily by Reagan, Bush I and Bush II). Ask your parents how they feel about it. Also, as insurance agent, I can tell you that the federal government is more efficient in managing Medicare than are insurance companies in the private sector. As an example, administrative costs for Medicare are about 20%, but private insurance companies pay more than this just for commissions on Medicare Supplements, before you even get to their real administrative costs!
You're right if you think SS won't be there when you retire ... if we continue to elect republicans. The fact is that the philosphy of most of them now is to "starve the beast" or run up such debt that the government can't afford to provide any services.
What you fail to understand is that it isn't the poor, minorities and gays that are the problem ... it is the republican legislators you have elected over the last quarter of a century. They are very pleased with themselves over creating a "second gilded age," but go take a look at what happened after our first. As they say, those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
October 6, 2007 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Colonpowow, the '08 election is going to the Dems unless the ones on the Hill screw it up. It is a contortion, not a convolusion to tap one foot on a red circle, if only to point out that we're here together for each other, not for the government. National defense shouldn't be in defense of interested lobbyists or even defense of a government or an administration.
Government is a tool, and used wrong it can hurt. Using the wrong tool, or using only one tool hurts the user and the materials.
Contrast Paul with arch-reactionary opportunistic serial divorcee phony Guiliani, armageddonists Brownback and the other one, pinhead Thompson and the actor. Wingnut Ron Paul comes off as downright reasonable and philosophically consistent, and his is a voice unheard on Fox-type media.
I'd be libertarian, and so would the rest of us, if it didn't deny a role for the public in the public. We don't need a national consensus on abortion, for example, since it involves the behavior of a slim minority of less than half of us. We do need a national consensus on privacy (which should rule out national laws against abortion which of their essence discriminate against half the population based on a subjective judgement call), exploitation, tyranny and police states.
October 6, 2007 11:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
At the risk of using maybe this medium to support claims (of mine) on this medium, take a peek at the latest:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/055259.php
Ya see? See? This guy is the only consistent politician of our time. He's actually trustworthy. Were he and LaRouche college roommates or something? But it gave me a chance to inject foreign policy. It's his fault.
I don't want to see the UN strong enough to level anything about international politics; we all enjoy some stuff we'd have to give up to make everything really 'fair' and redistribute wealth among 'Earth Neighbor' nations (some of which really would like to see our undoing). But it's anther tool. We should run that place, but we don't because the world mistrusts this administration. At the UN we see the real-world effects of our generations of success and swagger as we empower other, smaller countries and burgs: some band together to nip at our heels.
Today we're in a resources face-off with China, which has access to the upper hand. Russia isn't really paying attention to us, they're more interested in access to resources in other markets to strengthen their position relative to Europe. And Iranian and South American despots are bellied up to the UN bar together, probably chatting about David and Goliath (or Lilliput) scenarios in NYC. Paranoia is only one way to deal with deal that.
I'd like to hear Ron Paul address Obama's internationalist approach specifically, to see how he'd tie our international influence to isolationism and contrast his own position with cooperation and allegience. Anybody know him? Could you ask?
October 6, 2007 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
But he DOES eat Freedom Fries, right???
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul86.html
Apr 2003
"It has now been fashionable to bash France and Germany and other friends if they are less enthusiastic for the war than we think they should be. Yet foreign corporations provide millions of jobs for American citizens. French companies alone employ over 400,000. There is a practical reason why offending the French and others may backfire on us."
October 6, 2007 12:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ron Paul on abortion, etc:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul100.html
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul240.html
"The notion that an all-powerful, centralized state should provide monolithic solutions to the ethical dilemmas of our times is not only misguided, but also contrary to our Constitution. Remember, federalism was established to allow decentralized, local decision-making by states. Yet modern America seeks a federal solution for every perceived societal ill, ignoring constitutional limits on government. The result is a federal state that increasingly makes all-or-nothing decisions that alienate large segments of the population.
This federalization of social issues, often championed by conservatives, has not created a pro-life culture, however. It simply has prevented the 50 states from enacting laws that more closely reflect the views of their citizens. Once we accepted the federalization of abortion law under the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, we lost the ability to apply local community standards to ethical issues. It is much more difficult for pro-life advocates to win politically at the federal level. Those who seek a pro-life culture must accept that we will never persuade 300 million Americans to agree with us. Our focus should be on overturning Roe and getting the federal government completely out of the business of regulating state matters. A pro-life culture can be built only from the ground up, person by person. For too long we have viewed the battle as purely political, but no political victory can change a degraded culture. A pro-life culture must arise from each of us as individuals, not by the edict of an amoral federal government."
October 6, 2007 12:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. Luckily, the good stuff about him, specifically his consistency, is expressed in flaw after flaw.
But if President Paul repealed the income tax, the result would be the impoverishment of everyone who'd pay the replacement tax. The government takes a 20% cut of every transaction- from the customer. (I assume he's for the national sales tax- ?)
Buying power goes away entirely as food prices float on the open market and subsidies are cut.
Everybody gets old, but when he cuts out SocSec, those old bastards are going to have to fight us and our kids for food and shelter. We'll have to watch how the boomer majority acts in the coming election, they have a lot to lose if this radical 'conservatism' becomes our new way of relating to our countrymen. Specifically, a safe retirement in a safe country.
A positive: Doesn't sound like he'd support a Constitutional Amendment requiring all Americans to wear the colors. Flip side: Repealing the income tax opens a Constitutional Convention in which every wackjob notion gets tabled.
October 6, 2007 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
The supposed pro-life agenda is going to face some real problems going forward:
http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idb/worldpopinfo.html
World Population Growth:
1960 - 3 billion
1974 - 4 billion
1988 - 5 billion
2000 - 6 billion
Projections:
2012 - 7 billion
2026 - 8 billion
2042 - 9 billion
These figures are actually very conservative. I have seen other projections that predict 12 billion people by 2040. This is unsustainable, folks.
Of course, nature has a way of dealing with overpopulation ... plagues. All it will take is a virus like AIDS (or worse) to evolve into an airborne strain and we will see a rapid adjustment.
October 6, 2007 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Right on, Monster. A "consumption tax" (sales tax) would have to be close to 20% to recoup what the government receives in income taxes. Not only that, but in the words of Ronald Reagan, "If you tax something you get less of it.". Hence, a 20% consumption tax is going to drive down consumption which will mean the tax will have to be raised in order to generate the needed income ... and so on, and so on and so on. It would drive us into the worst depression in our history.
The problem is not with the poor and middle class (what's left of it). Our top tax bracket was over 90% for decades prior to Reagan, but now it is in the 30s. This is a major reason we have seen the runaway levels of executive salaries ... at the expense of a living wage for the poor and many in what were once middle class jobs. Corporations are also paying an historically low level of taxes.
All these Walmart republicans who believe doing away with the IRS and going to a consumption tax would be good for them are the equivalent of prisoners on death row stating they favor the death penalty.
October 6, 2007 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
A consumption tax sounds good, but it would have a disproportionate impact on middle and lower income familes. Anyone who says he doesn't see that is either lying in order to promote it or just plain stupid. It's a ruse to get even more money into the pockets of those who already have it.
Besides, if we adopted a consumption tax and did away with the income tax tomorrow, how long do you think it would be before Congress would start granting reductions or exemptions on certain items, especially those favored by corporations and big donors? How about the next day?
Right now, as flawed as it is, the income tax serves a purpose besides raising revenue. It is also an instrument of implementing social policy. If you want people to take care of their children, give them a credit for child care. If you want people to be more energy efficient, give them credit for buying more efficient heating and cooling systems. If you want to stimulate the economy, give people a deduction of interest payments. Etc, etc, etc. How do you do that with a consumption tax?
October 6, 2007 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ron Paul would abolish the SLAVE TAX (any income tax is a slave tax because it says the gov't owns your labor), AND abolish the IRS, replacing it with NOTHING. If we did this, we would still be taking in as much $$$ as we did 7 years ago. Besides, how did we fund the gov't before 1913, when the slave tax was pushed down our throats?
Cut gov't, cut spending, bring all troops home, defend our own country, let Israel fight the Arabs, dismantle the WELFARE/WARFARE state and obey the U.S. Constition. (not new ideas...see the founding fathers for more info)
October 6, 2007 2:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
oooohhhh, SLAVE TAX. I guess this will be the replacement for the DEATH TAX. Nevermind that ESTATE TAX never affected more than 3% of the population ... or that it is favored by such people as Warren Buffet and Bill Gates as a means for preventing the creation of a permanent wealthy class.
I really get a kick out of all these wingnut republicans/libertarians who claim to be such proud patriots ... just as long as it doesn't involve any sacrifice on their part. The problem is that as a member of a society, you aren't entitled to a free ride. You can't just benefit from society, you also have to contribute.
And before you tell me how independent and self-sufficient you are and how you don't need any of the services of government, think about where you would be without them.
I wish we could put a group of these guys on a deserted island for a couple of years and then go back and not only see if they survived, but what sort of society they created.
October 6, 2007 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
And Tom, as far as reference to our founding fathers ... see Article 1, Section 8 of our Constitution:
"The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States ..."
October 6, 2007 2:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay Tom, thanks for Mr. Paul's take on the national sales tax. I think, however that in America you can get really rich, and that's good. But you can't get rich without lit highways and bridges you can drive goods across, and the whole get-rich opportunity wouldn't exist here without the protection of property afforded by a central government and the laws under whose authority crimes against you can be enforced.
The government doesn't own your labor. We live in a society. We all eat, get sick, prosper or fail, etc. Since we all eat, it makes pretty damn good sense we fiddle with food production. It makes sense to buy bulk for drugs. It makes sense to have someone watching to be sure those drugs don't cause us to commit suicide. You want to be personally vigilant? You want access to that six-pack? Chip in.
The fact that this gov't hasn't been keeping track of which drugs are poisonous is especially irritating. I fear my tax dollars are going disproportionately to private school bills of unproductive rich people who live in DC part of the year, and to other rich people getting fat off the fraud war.
But I want paved highways, air traffic coordination, one currency, lots of those things we all have because there's a government. No funds means no government but the will of the stronger. Would Mr. Paul join that club? He's joined and gets a salary from government.
Wait- hey thanks Tom. You just helped me realize he's another No-Government hypocrite in government. I withdraw my previous non-endorsement of the candidate and enter my indictment of his character.
Wheee,
October 6, 2007 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
There really is some truth in the republicans saying that government is bad ... because, as we have seen over the last seven years, with them in charge we do get bad government.
October 6, 2007 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry to hog so much space, but there is a movement afoot committed to demonstrating the failure of government. "The politics of failure have failed, we must make them work again!"
Apropos, a Fox reference.
This post started with lapel pins, and Obama's patriotism being at least entertained instead of outright dismissed by Ron Paul. I haven't heard anyone say Mr. Paul is incompetent yet. Is he in the habit of recruiting the least qualified for jobs?
Agree or not, he appears to be a better sort of person than the Appointer, the Decider and the AWOL Reservist- just wrong, not necessarily psychopathic.
October 6, 2007 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
The only thing that unites this country and its many states is the Constitution. The only candidate for president that gets it, is Ron Paul
California is different in culture to Iowa as to New Hampshire and Louisiana. The federal government can not be everything to everyone and this is truly the message of “Live and Let Live” that Ron Paul and his merry army is bringing to us all. Live as you wish in your state and culture, do not wish to change the cultures of other states and countries.
October 6, 2007 6:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes Dave. But every effort toward expanding the possibilities is American, not regional.
It's the ideal expressed in the Constitution. The good thing about Roe is that it curtails prohibitions from sea to shining sea. All Marriage is local though- just look down south or on the Utah border for a set of standards in which the northeast couldn't abide. Is the age of consent still 14 in Kentucky?
I favor keeping the amendments we have and not adding amendments that attract another cohort of legions of lawyers to complicate our lives more by intruding in our decisions in the name of the state. You can't force an American woman to reproduce. That's a good thing.
"He may be very, very sincere in what he is saying,"
October 6, 2007 7:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
"He may be very, very sincere in what he is saying,"
That sounds dickier every time I hear it (I'm saying it out loud).
It's an outrage! Condemn Ron Paul ! He owes Mr. Obama an apology.
October 6, 2007 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
The pin, made in China, was recalled due to excessive amounts of lead.
As they've experienced a toxic lead dementia, no wonder the behavior of our federal politicians has been so bizarre since 2001.
.
October 6, 2007 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
He is more candid and straighforward with his answers than most of the other candidates and I think this is his most endearing quality. However, when one begins to delve a little deeper into the specifics of many of his positions it is easy to see that he will never be more than a fringe candidate ...
A more centrist candidate from either party who took the same approach by showing the same willingness to go against the dogma of their party and run on their personal principles would be a formidable candidate.
Unfortunately, I am not sure any of them really have any core principles besides a desire for money and power!
October 6, 2007 7:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Proof that the End Times are here: The flag lapel pin has become the Mark of the Beast. Revelations says the Mark of the Beast appears on the AntiChrist's adherents. Without the mark, people can't engage in commerce, such as buying food. I guess you've also gotta have a flag lapel pin to run for elective office.
Gonna get me a lapel flag pin, so I can be raptured up with all the Bush-worshipping yahoos and fundamentalist Christians!
October 6, 2007 7:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
A small group of Algerian guys celebrating the close of a good shipping deal gave me a lapel pin off a US and an Algerian flag, crossed as if to show togetherness. Can I wear that?
October 6, 2007 8:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Flag pins, car truck ribbons, American Flags amassed behind every speaker....but no kid serving in Iraq. Enameled xenophobia?
October 6, 2007 8:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good+luck+with+your+site+in+the+future%21
October 24, 2007 12:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very+nice+work%2C+admin+%3A%29+Good+luck%21p
October 24, 2007 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
You+have+an+outstanding+good+and+well+structured+site.+I+enjoyed+browsing+through+it.b
October 25, 2007 4:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent+web+site+I+will+be+visiting+often.0
October 25, 2007 6:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice+site%21f
October 26, 2007 2:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nice+looking+site.+
October 26, 2007 2:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
I+just+wanted+to+say+WOW%21%2F
October 26, 2007 3:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hello%21%85
October 26, 2007 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
thank+you%21l
October 27, 2007 2:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
that%5C%27s+neat%21o
October 28, 2007 3:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
that%5C%27s+neat%21i
October 28, 2007 1:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Big+thanx+to+webmaster%21%3E
October 28, 2007 11:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very+good+web+site%2C+great+work+and+thank+you+for+your+service.%2B
October 30, 2007 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
excellent%21w
October 31, 2007 8:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very+good+site%21+I+like+it%21+Thanks%21w
October 31, 2007 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes%21+so+hold.o
November 1, 2007 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Really+good+site%2C+and+a+pleasant+suprise...+Good+Luck%21S
November 2, 2007 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good+job%2C+here+and+there%21%21
November 2, 2007 6:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Looking+for+information+and+found+it+at+this+great+site%85r
November 3, 2007 6:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Awesome%21%21%21a
November 5, 2007 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hi%21%0A
November 6, 2007 10:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent+resource+you%5C%27ve+got+here%21%21%21+Will+definately+be+back%21%21%21c
November 8, 2007 5:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
simple+but+quality%2C+thanks%21g
November 9, 2007 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks+a+bunch%21+
November 9, 2007 11:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks+a+bunch%21+
November 10, 2007 1:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks+a+bunch%21r
November 10, 2007 2:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
excellent%211
November 10, 2007 6:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice+looking+site.a
November 12, 2007 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
very+helpful%2C+thanks%21w
November 13, 2007 5:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nice+site%21d
November 13, 2007 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow%21%21%21%DF
November 15, 2007 4:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank+you%21f
November 16, 2007 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pretty+nice+site%2C+wants+to+see+much+more+on+it%211
November 17, 2007 12:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good+Site%21+Keep+Doing+That%21d
November 18, 2007 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hello+people%21t
November 18, 2007 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks+bro%21+Real+good+work%21b
November 19, 2007 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
This+is+a+great+tutorial+thanks%21%2B
November 19, 2007 9:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
thank+you%21s
November 20, 2007 11:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
It%5C%27s+a+very+good+site%21F
November 21, 2007 4:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank+you+very+much.n
November 21, 2007 8:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
This+site+truly+amazing%21%21%21s
November 21, 2007 10:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Big+thanx+to+webmaster%211
November 22, 2007 1:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
I+like+that%21r
November 22, 2007 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
It%5C%27s+a+very+good+site%21+
November 23, 2007 1:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
thank+you%210
November 23, 2007 8:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Really+perfect%21s
November 24, 2007 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank+you+very+much.%2F
November 24, 2007 4:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good+Site%21+Keep+Doing+That%21g
November 24, 2007 10:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks+so+very+much+for+taking+your+time+to+create+this+very+useful+and+informative+site.l
November 26, 2007 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great+Site+%2D+really+useful+information%21%2C
November 27, 2007 1:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank+you+for+you+work%21+Good+Luck.t
November 28, 2007 12:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank+you+sooooo+much%21w
December 3, 2007 8:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
thank+you%21
December 3, 2007 9:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
wow+nice%21o
December 4, 2007 7:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
I+like+that%21r
December 4, 2007 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
excellent+texture.e
December 6, 2007 12:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks+a+bunch%21v
December 6, 2007 7:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great+Site+%2D+really+useful+information%21e
December 7, 2007 3:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
O%2C+super+project.d
December 8, 2007 11:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent+web+site+I+will+be+visiting+often.n
December 9, 2007 12:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great+tutorial.o
December 10, 2007 1:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good+site%2C+thanks%21a
December 10, 2007 7:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow%21%21%21%B0
December 11, 2007 6:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank+for+making+this+valuable+information+available+to+the+public.%5C
December 11, 2007 11:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good+site%2C+thanks%21r
December 12, 2007 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nice+site%21h
December 12, 2007 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hello%21%5E
December 14, 2007 4:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
I+just+wanted+to+say+WOW%21s
December 14, 2007 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good+luck+with+your+site+in+the+future%21e
December 15, 2007 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Really+good+site%2C+and+a+pleasant+suprise...+Good+Luck%21+
December 15, 2007 6:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
thank+you%21f
December 15, 2007 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I+just+wanted+to+say+WOW%21D
December 17, 2007 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
that%5C%27s+neat%21s
December 18, 2007 3:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow%21%21%21%11
December 19, 2007 4:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good+site+%2D+you%5C%27re+a+pretty+good+writer.3
December 19, 2007 9:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Pretty+nice+site%2C+wants+to+see+much+more+on+it%21
December 19, 2007 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank+you%21+
December 21, 2007 4:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Looking+for+information+and+found+it+at+this+great+site%85%C9
December 21, 2007 11:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank+you+very+much.j
December 22, 2007 3:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank+you+for+you+work%21+Good+Luck.0
December 22, 2007 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very+nice+work%2C+admin+%3A%29+Good+luck%21
December 23, 2007 8:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
I+like+that%21c
December 23, 2007 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks+a+bunch%21a
December 24, 2007 8:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very+nice+work%2C+admin+%3A%29+Good+luck%21c
December 25, 2007 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
It%5C%27s+a+very+good+site%21%0D%0A
December 25, 2007 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hello+people%21+
December 25, 2007 6:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very+good+web+site%2C+great+work+and+thank+you+for+your+service.%2Bl
December 26, 2007 5:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank+you+for+you+work%21+Good+Luck.
December 26, 2007 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
It%5C%27s+a+very+good+site%21%0D%0A
December 26, 2007 8:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I+like+that%21%2B
December 28, 2007 12:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
very+helpful%2C+thanks%210
December 28, 2007 7:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
This+is+a+great+tutorial+thanks%21s
December 29, 2007 6:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks+so+very+much+for+taking+your+time+to+create+this+very+useful+and+informative+site.H
December 29, 2007 6:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good+job%2C+here+and+there%21n
December 29, 2007 6:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good+site+%2D+you%5C%27re+a+pretty+good+writer.n
December 29, 2007 7:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent+web+site+I+will+be+visiting+often.
December 30, 2007 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good+site%2C+thanks%21a
December 31, 2007 6:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
It%5C%27s+a+very+good+site%21%0D%0A+
January 1, 2008 10:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great+site%21%0D%0AO
January 2, 2008 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank+you%21%2D
January 4, 2008 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Looking+for+information+and+found+it+at+this+great+site%85t
January 4, 2008 9:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks+bro%21+Real+good+work%219
January 5, 2008 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank+you+for+you+work%21+Good+Luck.
January 6, 2008 6:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
I+just+wanted+to+say+WOW%21
January 6, 2008 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great+tutorial.+
January 7, 2008 5:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nice+effect.s
January 9, 2008 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow%21%21%21%5E
January 9, 2008 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I+just+wanted+to+say+WOW%21
January 10, 2008 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nice+resource%2C+very+interesting+reading...
January 12, 2008 6:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very+good+site%21+I+like+it%21+Thanks%21o
January 14, 2008 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent+web+site+I+will+be+visiting+often.+
January 16, 2008 1:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent+resource+you%5C%27ve+got+here%21%21%21+Will+definately+be+back%21%21%21b
January 19, 2008 5:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very+nice+work%2C+admin+%3A%29+Good+luck%21+
January 20, 2008 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice+looking+site.n
January 21, 2008 7:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice+looking+site.
January 22, 2008 7:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good+site%2C+thanks%21i
January 22, 2008 11:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very+good+site%21+I+like+it%21+Thanks%21w
January 24, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks+bro%21+Real+good+work%21e
January 24, 2008 6:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Really+perfect%21r
January 24, 2008 7:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very+nice+work%2C+admin+%3A%29+Good+luck%21r
January 26, 2008 1:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good+Site%21+Keep+Doing+That%21b
January 26, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
It%5C%27s+a+very+good+site%21+
January 27, 2008 1:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
I+just+wanted+to+say+WOW%21R
January 27, 2008 2:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
excellent%21u
January 29, 2008 1:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Really+good+site%2C+and+a+pleasant+suprise...+Good+Luck%21T
January 29, 2008 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent+web+site+I+will+be+visiting+often.d
January 30, 2008 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hi+our+little+brothers.%2B
January 30, 2008 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink