« Big Pickup Opportunity For Dems: GOP Rep. Jim Saxton Is Facing New Challenger | Home | GOPer Weller Announcing Retirement »

In Iowa, Edwards Unveils Education Plan -- Including Universal Pre-K

Standing in front of a Middle School in Des Moines today, John Edwards laid out an ambitious education agenda that includes everything from universal preschool to a massive overhaul of No Child Left Behind. Details after the jump.

John Edwards' plan covers a wide variety of issues. Here are some of the highlights:

1) Universal Pre-school
Edwards' plan would fund pre-school education in low income neighborhoods with the goal of expanding towards universal pre-school education. Attendance would be voluntary and families would pay for the service on a sliding scale. Edwards also wants to replicate North Carolina's Start Smart program on a national scale. Start Smart prepares young children for school by funding health screenings and family counseling in addition to child care and early education.

2) Create Incentives to Teach in Poor Schools
Veteran teachers and teachers who are certified for excellence would be eligible for $5,000 bonuses for working in schools with high poverty. Successful schools in poor areas could reward their teachers with a $5,000 bonus.

3) Recruit and Retain New Teachers
Edwards wants to create a National Teachers University, "a West Point for teachers," that would train 1,000 college students a year and waive tuition if they worked in low-income schools afterwards. To deal with high burnout rates among new teachers, Edwards proposes easing young teachers into the profession with lower workloads at first and by pairing them with veteran mentors.

4) Reform No Child Left Behind
Edwards wants to change NCLB to incorporate broader and more long term measures of student performance. His proposed reforms would also give states more freedom to distribute funds and implement their own reforms.

5) More Schools, Smaller Schools, More Integrated Schools
Edwards emphasizes smaller class and school sizes. Wading into one of the great controversial issues of the 1970s, Edwards says that racial and economic segregation are national problems. However, while acknowledging "income diversity is not a substitute for racial diversity," Edwards directly addresses only the economic end, calling on states to create more magnet schools in poor areas and to create incentives for middle class schools to enroll more poor students. To boost graduation rates among poor students, Edwards proposes schools dedicated to educating former dropouts.


5 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Sounds positive. Two questions: (1) how does he proposed to pay for this (and all of the other plans he has out (same question for all candidates)) and (2) he's awfully silent on what I think the biggest issue facing our schools: un- or under-educated parents. All of this is great, but if the parents aren't taking responsibility for the kids education, all the programs in the world aren't going to help.

user-pic

I like the broad points of emphasis, but I have to agree with Kieth on point (2)...and I'd also add that I'd like to see some emphasis placed on community values and culture as contributing factors to under-performing schools.

user-pic

It should be noted that all the candidates are in favor of pre-K at this point. At one debate, I think Biden went the furthest mentioning the need for counseling new mothers on options, which has proven effective where its been tried.

All candidates want more and better teachers and want to increase incentives to work in lower performing schools. I don't know a candidate who likes the way NCLB is run.

It's good that Edwards laid this out, but nothing he says is new or controversial in Democratic circles. Nor is it particularly "bold". I keep saying this, but other candidates will have similar proposals and that reflects the general consensus thinking on these issues, not copyig.

user-pic

None of this is really new, but the smaller class size issue is the most important of them all. The differences between smaller classes and larger ones has been thoroughly researched and there's no question any longer about the benefits. If class sizes shrink, education outcomes will improve everywhere. That doesn't solve every educational problem we have, but it will certainly make an important impact.

As for paying for it, while it is a valid question I would think if we can afford the Iraq war we can afford trying to provide adequate education for our children. I guess it doesn't bother me that Edwards may not have provided a mechanism for paying for this. You know they never ask such questions when it comes to any of the dangerous, idiotic and sometimes clearly insane defense projects that come down the road. I would suggest for starters though that we close down Bush's continuing star wars boondoggle and put all that money toward education.

user-pic

ok folks....still, Edwards outlines specifics on a problem. He doesn't just say there is a problem. The reason the rest of the Dems are vague on specifics is because their teams know that if you get specific...people will pick it apart.

But the fact that Edwards has been specific, to me anyway, demonstrates
he is not afraid of the picking.
Remember, Edwards wanted to challenge
Ohio in 2004.

Edwards knows and articulates the us against them. For those that don't
believe that...or for those backing candidates other than Kucinich, Edwards or Dodd....how confident are you that your progressive voice will matter after your vote?

Besides...it doesn't matter who we elect as President if we don't have 60 Dems in the Senate...
song for the day...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTW0y6kazWM

"If you want to end war and stuff, you gotta sing loud." ...Arlo Guthrie

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address