Has Meat Loaf tipped his hand?

Why do you say Hillary has "reestablished her dominance out there" when that seems to me to be far from clear?

Sheesh. Don't you people understand? It's all over. She's inevitable. She has a 40% majority and she's thus unstoppable. She's run a perfect campaign. She never makes a mistake and never will. Everyone loves her and anyone who doesn't will come to love her once they have a chance to get to know the "real" her through a few 30 second campaign commericals. She has sewn up all the endorsements that matter and anyone who endorses someone else doesn't matter. Move along. Nothing to see here. Honestly, why don't we just call off all these tedious elections they've got scheduled and get on with debating her inaugural ball gown choices.

Greg,

I have no idea who's ahead in the Hollywood Money Grab right now. It looks to me like Oprah is at least as big a get as Meathead, but that was last week, so whatever.

My gripe is that Hillary's Great Surge to Victory is a figment of her campaign's imagination that the MSM has swallowed hook line and sinker. Most exasperating of all, they've done it in exactly the same way, and by means of exactly the same "reporting" methods, they bought into Saddam's weapons of mass destruction.

The truth is that with the exception of one CNN poll in New Hampshire that had a 5.5% margin of error, Hillary--and everyone else--is exactly where they've been since at least 7/16. Ignore the Rasmussan commentary, which is tainted . . .

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2007/09/27/schoen/index.html

. . . and take a look at the actual daily numbers:

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2008__1/daily_presidential_tracking_polling_history

Nonetheless, her campaign said it officially, the MSM "checked" her assertion by asking unnamed sources with the same agenda (people like Doug Schoen, as blogged by Greenwald today) as her official spokespersons and then they started citing their own stories as evidence that the figment is true.

It's just a little disheartening see the MSM once again obediently fall into lockstep behind yet another Rovian reality control scheme.

This is the kind of comment that makes me think I probably won't care to be a "Democrat" if Senator Clinton doesn't win the nomination:

"Hillary only represents the spineless, soft, appeasement wing of the party and Reiner just joined it like a grasping schoolgirl."

You people treat Independents and moderates the way Republicans treat Blacks. Keep it up, and pretty soon all you will have left is yourselves. Then you can enjoy whining from the sidelines with no one who cares to even have you in the game. You must LOVE the political wilderness because you've spent years and years in it in the last 35 years!

I find myself disgusted with people who call themselves "liberals" these days. Some of you, I'm sure, will just flip me off with that comment.
So be it.
I see now why very few people are willing to identify as a "liberal" anymore. Liberals appear to have a very ugly side, as illustrated by megisi above.