Michigan Dems Release Letter In Favor Of Early Primary
A group of top Michigan Democrats, including both U.S. Senators and four out of six House members, have written a joint letter to Dem Governor Jennifer Granholm, state Democratic chairman Mark Brewer and state Republican chairman Saul Anuzis, making the case for their effort to have Michigan's primary held early, on January 15.
"We support efforts to make the overall Presidential nominating process more reflective of the diversity of this country, and strongly believe that manufacturing issues need to be part of the Presidential candidate dialogue," the letter says — a clear contrast with Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada, the thinly populated states that are currently allowed to go in January. "Embracing an early, inclusive contest would ensure that those issues are raised and our Michigan viewpoints are heard. An early, inclusive primary election is the best way to ensure the issues of trade, health care, and manufacturing are in the national limelight."
The letter has been released ahead of tomorrow's meeting of the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee, which is expected to vote for strong sanctions against Florida's planned January 29 primary. And if Florida is to be punished for a January 29 primary — potentially through having a significant number of delegates taken away from their allotment — then you can bet that stiff penalties are planned if Michigan goes ahead with January 15.
The Republican-controlled Michigan state Senate has already passed a bill to schedule the primary on the early date, and the bill now awaits approval by the Democratically-controlled House, plus Granholm's signature. Be on the lookout for national Democrats to lean on Granholm to veto the bill if it reaches her desk.
Read the full letter after the jump.
August 24, 2007The Honorable Jennifer Granholm
Governor
State of MichiganChairman Mark Brewer
Michigan Democratic PartyChairman Saul Anuzis
Michigan Republican PartyDear Governor Granholm, Chairman Brewer and Chairman Anuzis:
We are writing to indicate our preference for a presidential delegate selection process that embraces an inclusive and early primary in Michigan.
There has been much discussion in recent weeks and days as to what the best approach would be for Michigan to take for this Presidential cycle. We believe that it is vital that all Michigan citizens be provided with an opportunity to participate and have their voices heard in this crucial election cycle. A primary election provides the most inclusive process and highest voter participation.
In the 2004 Democratic caucus, only 164,000 people participated in a state of over 10 million people. By contrast, in the 2002 and 2006 Democratic and Republican primaries, 1.6 million voters and 1.1 million voters participated, respectively. It is critical that millions of people have the opportunity to participate in a process that is reliable and inclusive.
We support efforts to make the overall Presidential nominating process more reflective of the diversity of this country, and strongly believe that manufacturing issues need to be part of the Presidential candidate dialogue. Embracing an early, inclusive contest would ensure that those issues are raised and our Michigan viewpoints are heard. An early, inclusive primary election is the best way to ensure the issues of trade, health care, and manufacturing are in the national limelight.
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt observed that “the constant free flow of communication among us—enabling the free interchange of ideas—forms the very bloodstream of our nation. It keeps the mind and body of our democracy eternally vital, eternally young.” We, in Michigan, have a responsibility to provide a forum where the largest number of people possible are participating in this process, in what, quite frankly will be one of the most important elections of many people’s lifetime. Maximum participation should be the first and foremost goal with the goal of keeping this state’s future healthy and vital.
Sincerely,
Carl Levin, United States Senator; Andy Dillon, Speaker, Michigan House of Representatives; Debbie Stabenow, United State Senator; Mark Schauer, Michigan Senate Democratic Leader; John D. Dingell, Member of Congress; John Conyers, Member of Congress; Sander Levin, Member of Congress; Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick,
Member of Congress; Kwame Kilpatrick, Mayor, City of Detroit; Robert Ficano, Wayne County Executive; Jewel Ware, Wayne County Commission; Debbie Dingell, DNC Committee Member; Michael Tardif, DNC Committee Member; Richard Wiener, DNC Committee Member

Happy Hour Roundup »













This is getting insane by the day; first California wants to give 20 electoral votes to the GOP and now Michigan is bent upon pushing the election in 2007; when and how will this insanity stop? BUSH SHOULD INTERVENE and sign an executive order banning all this nonsense.
August 24, 2007 3:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why did Conyers sign it? Crazy.
August 24, 2007 3:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
When the current primary system of overstated power for a select few, Iowa and New Hampshire, is replaced by a fair and democratic system.
August 24, 2007 4:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rules are rules, even if they are made by the DNC and you don't like them.
Grow up and accept it, Michigan Dems.
Frankly, you should be ashamed of yourselves and deserve whatever punishment the DNC authorities serve upon you.
August 24, 2007 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
So you mean never?
August 24, 2007 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm having a Democratic primary at my house tomorrow afternoon. I'm also passing a law that says that my primary must precede all others by at least a year. Take that, Michigan!
August 24, 2007 4:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Set aside these Michigan bozos for a second... Are you telling me that the DNC is going to be first out of the box to "punish" Florida -- which will undoubtedly be another key battleground state in 2008 -- when the Republicans haven't done the same thing?
Has Dean lost his fucking mind?
I don't care if it's the right thing to do. I'm sick and tired of the Dems playing nice while the Republicans have no such compunction. I'm sorry, this is just beyond idiotic.
August 24, 2007 5:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
This whole brouhaha is idiotic and reads like a Rovian parting shot.
August 24, 2007 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sadly, yes, I guess that is what I mean.
August 24, 2007 5:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dude!
It was a Bush appointment by the Supreme Court in 2000 that started this shit. The only Executive Order we'll see about this stuff from Bush43 is a suspension of the election cuz it looks like a Demon-cratic tayer-er-ist might get electionifcated to his job.
August 24, 2007 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
To be honest, they aren't really punishing them in the normal sense, although I think they deserve punishment. They are saying that they won't have as many voting delegates to the Dem convention. So 20 people will care. I doubt this does much to effect the vote in Florida in 2008.
Might be a nice pander opportunity, however.
August 24, 2007 6:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's an educational moment for you and every one else who seems to think Howard has the ability to stop this:
HE DOESN'T
The DNC membership voted on the delegate selection rules last year. Howard is carrying out those rules.
Yes, and rightly so. And any other state that decides it doesn't like the rules.
August 24, 2007 9:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gimme a break. Who is bribing the DNC to keep the current little three first? Having these completely unrepresentative states go first has polluted the primary process for long enough. Making or breaking a candidate because of how they fare in Iowa. My god! We need states like MI and FL up front so we end up with a candidate who can actually win. In case anyone hasn't noticed, the current system keeps handing us losers. Um, Mondale, Dukakis, and Kerry come to mind. (Yes, I remember Bill Clinton, but his victory was a fluke largely due to Ross Perot—granted, Clinton may have been the best candidate and he did win the MI primary that year, but he didn't get a lot of popular votes in the GE either time; and while he was the best president of my lifetime, he did inadvertently set the stage for the rightwing takeover that followed him.) Maybe if a couple of diverse states got their voices in early, it would be a different story. Instead of someone of dubious value being coronated in NH, we might get someone who actually serves us. Rather than just saying rules are rules, how about we pressure the DNC to do something, shall we say, Democratic?
August 25, 2007 7:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe they should just hold their 2012 primary now.
This is getting ridiculous. Fiddling while Rome burns.
August 25, 2007 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
It sounds like your tin foil hat is a wee too tight.
Guess what: they did. Last summer, the entire DNC membership voted to accept the 2008 delegate selection rules. They also voted to accept the sanctions associated with violating the rules.
Last spring, any state that wanted to made a case for one of the two new prewindow primary slots. 10 states plus DC did. (Michigan was one of them.) OMG, it was--a Democratic process! Any state that wanted to had the opportunity to speak out!
Democracy in action, dude.
August 25, 2007 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink