« Dodd: Gonzales Turned Justice Dept. Into "Political Wing Of The Bush Administration" | Home | Hillary On Gonzales: "His Loyalty Was To The President, Not The American People" »

Louisiana Treasurer Switches To GOP — May Potentially Run For Senate

In a move that could throw a shadow over growing Dem optimism about making gains in the Senate in 2008, Louisiana Treasurer John N. Kennedy announced today that he is switching from the Democrats over to the Republican Party — a change widely seen as being a preliminary move towards challenging Democratic Senator Mary Landrieu.

In a statement posted on his Web site this morning, Kennedy said:

"I believe in certain fixed, bedrock principles: that government should be responsive and accountable to the taxpayers who pay for it; that economic growth originates in the private sector; that education is the best safeguard of liberty; that ethics in government is critical to people’s faith in democracy; that the values of faith, work, family, personal responsibility and individual liberty are the building blocks of a prosperous society. I have concluded that the Republican Party is the party that best reflects my values today."

Louisiana is one of the few states in the country currently trending Republican. After the election of Senator David Vitter (R) to succeed retiring conservative Democrat John Breaux in 2004, the state's Democratic base was further damaged by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, which caused many black voters to move elsewhere. If Kennedy follows up on his party switch with a run for Senate — which Karl Rove had been courting him to do — expect it to be a very tough race for the Dems.

Kennedy previously ran for Senate in the 2004 race as a Democrat, coming in third place in the all-party "jungle primary" election with 15%, behind second-place finisher Chris John (D) at 29% and David Vitter, the outright winner, who had 51%.

The full text of Kennedy's statement after the jump.

An Important Announcement from Treasurer John Kennedy... Monday, August 27, 2007

Dear Friends:

Your support and friendship are very important to me. I have always tried to tell you where I stand and what I stand for. That’s why I’m writing this letter.

I have decided to join the Republican Party. I wanted you to be among the first to know, and to hear it from me. It has been an honor to serve as your State Treasurer and I will seek my third term this October as a Republican.

Becky and I did not make this decision lightly. Nor did we make it quickly. For well over a year I have searched my heart and, as a good Methodist, prayed about this decision.

The reason for my decision is my beliefs.

I believe in certain fixed, bedrock principles: that government should be responsive and accountable to the taxpayers who pay for it; that economic growth originates in the private sector; that education is the best safeguard of liberty; that ethics in government is critical to people’s faith in democracy; that the values of faith, work, family, personal responsibility and individual liberty are the building blocks of a prosperous society. I have concluded that the Republican Party is the party that best reflects my values today.

I also believe in the power of ideas. Every advancement in art, science, technology, business, cooking and medicine has occurred only after someone challenged the rules and tried another way. My career in public service demonstrates my belief in the power of looking for a better way. For the past several years, it has increasingly been the case that those public servants who have embraced my ideas and my philosophy of trying new approaches are primarily Republicans. I am grateful for their support and their willingness to try something different. I also believe for this reason it is time to join the Republican Party.

Finally, I believe that Louisiana state government needs to change. It has to change. And it must change now. Otherwise, Louisiana will become a place our children visit when they come see us at Christmas, instead of a place they can live, prosper and raise their own families. I feel I can best contribute to that change as a Republican.

Some of you will support my decision. Others will not. To still others it will make no difference; I am, after all, the same person with the same principles, the same values and the same dreams. Regardless, I hope you will respect my choice and my reasons for making it. I also hope you will support my reelection as your State Treasurer.

I will end as I began: you will never know how much your support and friendship mean to Becky and me. Thank you.

Thank you, as well, for giving so much to Louisiana.


Sincerely,

John Kennedy


25 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

We'll see what happens. I wonder how Louisiana will deal with a party switcher like this? Are they that desperate to have someone run against Landrieu? Besides, she's Republican-lite anyway. What will be her down fall, if anything, is her placing too much faith in "HoJo" Lieberman.

user-pic

Good Riddance. I guess Dems can afford to loose one or two phony pols. With one or two Senate seats easily in Democratic target, I suspect that the loss of one shouldn't be seen as perilous.

user-pic

He says that he believes that gov should be responsive to the citizens and other good things that make life better. If he really believes these things why is he joining the Repubs? They don't seem to believe any of these things. One more opportunistic twit from the brain of Rove. This is the sort of thing we can expect from Rove now that he is out of the WH.

user-pic

Some people like to sabotage things, looks like he might someday up with a horse's head in his bed.

user-pic

Shorter Kennedy:

I'm a lying, cheating, perverted, greedy asshole, so I'm joining the GOP.

user-pic

Switching to the GOP on ethical grounds?!?!? The boy's not too bright, is he?

user-pic

I think Mr. Kennedy is confused as to which party is which. He says he believes in certain bedrock principles such as government being accountable to the taxpayers, that ethics in government is critical and the values of family and personal responsibility. Mr. Kennedy also states that he believes in the power of ideas in referring to science and medicine. Does he known that Senator Vitter is a Republican or is he just mixed up like President Bush in not knowing the difference between the Sunnis and Shites?

user-pic

i wouldn't worry too much right now. the way Louisiana is set up if you can clear the field on the dem side and the republicans run a few people you can split up support and when the run off happens be united.

Landrieu is still moderately popular where she could squeak out and outright majority win and not have a run off.

user-pic

Cooking???????

Science and medicine????? So he has stopped believing in evolution and stem cell research....

user-pic

Well, other than her marginal vote in electing the Majority Leader, Landrieu is about the most useless Senator we have. Not just her votes to support Bush, but the fact that she votes in support of Bush after what Bush and his appointees and his policies and his favortism have done for the state of Louisiana, she is a perfect example of a Dem needing replacement with a better one.

What she should do is switch parties and run in the GOP primary, where she might win it and would cause the GOP to spend a bunch of money just to win the primary.

Then have real a Democrat run and just pound Bush, the GOP, Vitter, Nagin, the Landrieu's, for their abject failure after Katrina, and their abject failure before Katrina. That way the Dems wouldn't have to deal with Mary Landrieu's moronic votes supporting The Man Who Let New Orleans Drown and Rot After the Flood.

user-pic

Landrieu's voter base (New Orleans) has been shattered due to Katrina, and Bush's failure to carry through on his promises. There has always been something of an attitude in the state against politicians from New Orleans; it has often been New Orleans vs the rest of LA in general elections.

Landrieu is tough, though. Her father was a long-time New Orleans politician, and she is very astute in the Louisiana political world.

Kennedy is a newby opportunist who got lucky. He smells blood, and he will fit right in with the modern Republican base -- he pretends to have ethics, and pretends concern for the ordinary citizen, and pretends accountability to taxpayers. Rove has probably swelled his head, etc.

If he is the only Republican running, the chances are it will just be him against Landrieu. The Democratic Party machinery, though, can make a big case about him switching as he has. Democrats in other parts of LA will not take that lightly and will be less prone to vote for him, even though Landrieu is from New Orleans.

Prediction: Landrieu will prevail.

user-pic

But this whole balance of the Senate is a little misleading. Rep have 21 to 14 seats up this term 2008 - Dems have strong candidates in the states to go against the Reps (just look at Cornyn in Texas)

I think anyone who aligns them selves with Karl Rove at this moment in time - is silly.

user-pic


IN RESPONSE TO DUCKMAN GR, who says, "Not just [Landrieu's] votes to support Bush, but the fact that she votes in support of Bush after what Bush and his appointees and his policies and his favortism have done for the state of Louisiana, she is a perfect example of a Dem needing replacement with a better one."

Believe me, the reason Mary Landrieu is in the Senate is that she had the political savvy and the organization to get out her vote. Any statewide Democratic candidate down here in Louisiana who takes a left-of-center approach cannot win. That's the reality. The voters' choice is either a Democratic realist or a Republican wingnut.
Which would you choose?

user-pic

It's something that just six weeks after Louisiana's highest ranking elected Republican, Senator David Vitter, made it clear that he cheated on his wife with prostitutes, Treasurer Kennedy declared that "I have concluded that the Republican Party is the party that best reflects my values today." Some great values, huh?

Hopefully Democrats will run a credible candidate against Kennedy, if only to get him on the record with answers to questions like "If re-elected, do you promise Louisiana voters to serve your full term?" and "If you're just going to run for another office next year, why should voters re-elect you to this office this year?"

Meanwhile, I would not say that this move "could throw a shadow over growing Dem optimism about making gains in the Senate in 2008." We always expected Louisiana to be the toughest Democratic defense, and one of only a couple Democratically-held states to even see a remotely competitive race. Solid Dem gains are still expected thanks to races in CO, NH, MN, ME, OR, etc. regardless of the Louisiana outcome. (And with $3 million or so in the bank, Landrieu still has the advantage.) Louisiana is just one race, and one we fully expected to be tough.

user-pic

IN RESPONSE TO DUCKMAN GR'S STATEMENT:
"That way the Dems wouldn't have to deal with Mary Landrieu's moronic votes supporting The Man Who Let New Orleans Drown and Rot After the Flood."

Mary Landrieu is in the U.S. Senate because she's a brilliant political strategist who knew that, to get elected, she had to recognize the realities of Louisiana politics, i.e., nobody who runs statewide on a left-of-center platform gets elected. She knows that and her campaign contributors know that.
The choice for Louisiana is between a moderate Democrat and a Republican wingnut like Vitter. Which would you choose?

user-pic
Solid Dem gains are still expected thanks to races in CO, NH, MN, ME, OR, etc. regardless of the Louisiana outcome.

There's a good chance of a pickup in Virginia, too. John Warner has not definitely said whether or not he will run, but he's 80 years old now, and he certainly was leaving himself good reason to decide to bow out ("what's best for Virginia") yesterday on MTP. I also seem to remember reading that he was not doing much in the way of fundraising, but I wouldn't swear to that.

If he does run, and former VA Gov. Mark Warner decides to take him on again, it could be a pretty close contest. If John Warner bows out, I think the Virginia GOP would have a hard time putting up a candidate who could beat Mark Warner.

At any rate, I don't see the Louisiana seat as being one that could "tip" the Senate, as the headline on the TPM main page implied -- not by a long shot.

user-pic

This has rove written all over it. It's all political...It's a shame the people of New Orleans are being treated this way to gain a possible political advantage.

user-pic
Well, other than her marginal vote in electing the Majority Leader, Landrieu is about the most useless Senator we have.

Hey! Are you forgetting Joe Lieberman? I'd like to. Alas....

she is a perfect example of a Dem needing replacement with a better one.

Amen to this. More and better Democrats, so that we don't have the albatross' of Landrieu and Lieberman in 2008.

user-pic

I agree it has Rove written all over it. Let's not forget he was "in charge" of the recovery effort. That is, in charge of clearing all those black Democrats out of the city and dispersing them throughout the country to try to ensure LA is a red state.

This would seem to be the next step in his recovery plan.

user-pic

I just can't imagine a GOP Senator named Kennedy, and it didn't work out for GOP Rep. Mark Kennedy in Minnesota in 2006. Nevertheless, Kennedy has a good chance of ousting Landrieu if he runs.

user-pic

The Democrats do not exactly have a sterling reputation in LA. For all the myriad faults of the Feds wrt Katrina, it was the Dems in charge of the crucial aspects of disaster response, and they failed miserably. Contrast this with Miss.

I suspect that Kennedy's biggest problem is that he was a Dem, and will be tainted with that responsibility.

user-pic

OK, I'll just say it -

We can add him to the long list of Republican men who look like cherubs.

user-pic

Kennedy said, "...that education is the best safeguard of liberty; that ethics in government is critical to people’s faith in democracy; that the values of faith, work, family, personal responsibility and individual liberty are the building blocks of a prosperous society. I have concluded that the Republican Party is the party that best reflects my values today."

I wonder if he means the Republican Party of Bush, Cheney, Tom DeLay, Cunningham, Abramoff, Gonzales and on and on and on. Let's see, he did mention "ethics," didn't he. Oh well, at least he did not use the word virtue. Now if he had, I would have to take some exception to the party of complete corruption so claiming anything such as having a virtue.

user-pic

He believes education -- presumably he means free education, mandated and paid for by The State -- is "the best safeguard of liberty" and yet he's going to join the party that believes that medical coverage for children paid for by The State is inexcusable socialism.

user-pic

Mary has squeaked by twice before, but has a good chance in this election. Kennedy is an opportunist with a goofy face and a weak voice. Louisianians still
want strong leaders not warbly voiced fence strattlers who take their orders from closeted homosexuals like Carl Rove.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address