Tim Johnson Says He'll Run For Re-Election | Home |
DCCC Worried About Hillary Donor's Contributions To House Candidates »
Breaking: Larry Craig Speaks Out About Men's Room Arrest
GOP Senator Larry Craig just gave a press conference in Idaho that was broadcast on CNN just moments ago. His key quote:
"I am not gay. I never have been gay."
Craig also said that he "overreacted" by pleading guilty, said he should have told his wife and friends about his arrest, and said he'd retained counsel to reexamine the situation. He also claimed that he'd been under tremendous stress because of the local Idaho press' ongoing investigation into his sexuality, and that this pressure had led to his mistaken decision to plead to a lesser charge.
Craig sounded awfully defiant. Particularly given that he didn't say a single specific thing about the charges against him or about what had actually happened that day.
More soon, including video. Stay with us.
Late Update: Here's the video...
...and here's Craig's full statement:
"First, please let me apologize to my family, friends, staff, and fellow Idahoans for the cloud placed over Idaho. I did nothing wrong at the Minneapolis airport. I regret my decision to plead guilty and the sadness that decision has brought to my wife, family, friends, staff, and fellow Idahoans. For that I apologize."In June, I overreacted and made a poor decision. While I was not involved in any inappropriate conduct at the Minneapolis airport or anywhere else, I chose to plead guilty to a lesser charge in the hope of making it go away. I did not seek any counsel, either from an attorney, staff, friends, or family. That was a mistake, and I deeply regret it. Because of that, I have now retained counsel and I am asking my counsel to review this matter and to advise me on how to proceed.
"For a moment, I want to put my state of mind into context on June 11. For 8 months leading up to June, my family and I had been relentlessly and viciously harassed by the Idaho Statesman. If you’ve seen today’s paper, you know why. Let me be clear: I am not gay and never have been.
"Still, without a shred of truth or evidence to the contrary, the Statesman has engaged in this witch hunt. In pleading guilty, I overreacted in Minneapolis, because of the stress of the Idaho Statesman’s investigation and the rumors it has fueled around Idaho. Again, that overreaction was a mistake, and I apologize for my misjudgment. Furthermore, I should not have kept this arrest to myself, and should have told my family and friends about it. I wasn’t eager to share this failure, but I should have done so anyway.
"I love my wife, family, friends, staff, and Idaho. I love serving Idaho in Congress. Over the years, I have accomplished a lot for Idaho, and I hope Idahoans will allow me to continue to do that. There are still goals I would like to accomplish, and I believe I can still be an effective leader for Idaho. Next month, I will announce, as planned, whether or not I will seek reelection.
"As an elected official, I fully realize that my life is open for public criticism and scrutiny, and I take full responsibility for the mistake in judgment I made in attempting to handle this matter myself.
"It is clear, though, that through my actions I have brought a cloud over Idaho. For that, I ask the people of Idaho for their forgiveness.
"As I mentioned earlier, I have now retained counsel to examine this matter and I will make no further comment."















So it was all a misunderstanding, he's not gay, yet he kept this whole incident secret from his wife? I'm convinced.
August 28, 2007 4:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
While reading this, the image of Rafael Palmeiro testifying before Congress about steroid use just popped into my head.
Weird.
August 28, 2007 4:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
So the local paper had been hounding him over the gay rumors for the last 8 months...but he was still willing play footsie with the cop in the next stall...?
August 28, 2007 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bush should be giving him his "full support" anytime now...
August 28, 2007 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has to stay in power. Can't stand losing power. Thought he could keep it covered up. (Did a good job for a while, actually.)
Good for him. This'll drag it out and make more waves.
Except that: "Alberto Gonzales resigned . . . hey, look over there, it's a Senator in a restroom."
Or, "American military forces are poised to kill thousands of Iranians . . . hey, look over there, it's a Senator in a restroom."
If he needed it so bad that he cruised airport restrooms, there's no way he'll keep it under control for very long, unless his doctor has prescribed something very libido-lowering.
So, now that we all know the "signals," how long before someone is in the news for beating the crap out of someone for having a "wide stance?"
August 28, 2007 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Vehement denial is always the first reaction. Remember our good friend Ted Haggard? Someone will come forward with more conclusive proof, then he will be forced to admit something. Right now, he's like a caged animal, whose first instinct is to fight.
August 28, 2007 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Poor Larry:
"I am not gay"
But what he meant to say was: "I am as bisexual as dog in the SPCA kennels."
August 28, 2007 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
He didn't deny the charges, he just said he was not gay.
So is he in denial, he's not gay, he just wanted to see what a little glory hole action would be like.
Reminds me of a Hedburg joke, "I don't have a girlfriend, I just know this girl who would we very angry to hear me say this."
August 28, 2007 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
A little late to retain counsel...after pleading guilty while under oath. Maybe his new attorneys should advise him not to run around telling anyone who will listen that he perjured himself.
August 28, 2007 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
He started the news conferenece with this:
"Thank you all for coming out"
August 28, 2007 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Two things about Craig's "statements":
Craig was "defiant" attempting to defend himself against accusations of being gay. But that's not what the whole incident was about--although hypocrisy is a big deal here, it's not the entirety of the case. Craig refused to answer any questions, still, one enterprising reporter seems to have interposed, "So what if you were gay?" That's ultimately the question--he was not arrested for being gay, nor was he arrested for breaking a law that directly relates to being gay. Yet, in every statement Craig made since the revelation surfaced, the most identifiable comment --repeatedly!--is "I am not gay; I have never been gay."
Second, Blitzer & Co. basically laughed off the entire statement as "one of the weirdest" ever uttered by an American politician. Given the solicitation triumvirate of Craig, Allen and Vitter, identified over the last couple of months, given these guys' concern over being seen as "gay", and, given Craig's voluntary plea deal that not only admitted his guilt, but also explicitly waived the right to counsel, Blitzer accurately observed that undoing the plea will be very hard, if at all possible.
August 28, 2007 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have no doubt he believes what he says. It's Orwellian GOP-speak at its best. I'm not gay, I just like to do it with guys in bathroom stalls. Like the no child left behind policy that leaves children behind. etc. etc. etc. I love to watch a good implosion and feel blessed to have never craved and/or been addicted to power to the extent he obviously is. How about thinking of the impact this will continue to have on your family, Senator?
August 28, 2007 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
He reminds me of Mr. Garrison from South Park.
August 28, 2007 5:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Angel Moroni Weighs In...
Smit the Shameless, just stuck a temple thong in Sen Wide Stance's mouth and threw him under the bus
"We remember Bill Clinton....It strikes me that we have yet another instance of a public official falling short of the standards of personal conduct we have the right to expect"
Romney's Idaho campaign manager fer crissakes
First Fredo, now Larry
FYI ...I have never had sex with that Senator and wouldn't if you paid me
August 28, 2007 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gotta love those GOP hypocrites, the GOP is the party that can't stop giving. Sadly, this man has personal issues, lying doesn't help matters, only gives his opponents more ammo!
August 28, 2007 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh and that gem: Idaho's Republican Governor's name is????
BUTCH OTTER
I'm not making that up. Go ahead. Google it.
August 28, 2007 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
@manu:
Butch Otter is still better than Butch Beaver...
August 28, 2007 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
And I think the Freudian slip at the beginning ("thank you all for coming out") gives him away. The guy is at this stage where a part of him really, really wants to get caught, while the other part is fighting the urge really hard. He if were truly at peace with his sexuality he'd just go the Vitter's route and hire escorts and do his thing discretely in an orderly fashion. But he can't because he's still closeted to himself - so he cruises bathrooms, hoping for what he thinks is a sort dehumanizing down-low anonymity - plausible self-deniability so to speak. On some level it is really sad, especially at his age - he's lived his whole life with this self-hatred and denial. While I loathe him for his bigotry, I also can't help but pity him.
August 28, 2007 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
EdtheRed: it all depends on your sexual preferences...
August 28, 2007 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
" I should not have kept this arrest to myself, and should have told my family and friends about it."
Things must be going swimmingly on the homefront, eh? "But honey, I never thought you'd expect me to tell you about every little misdemeanor I plead guilty to!"
He knows he's toast. He's just laying the path to announcing his retirement and blaming it on the Statesman.
Today's Republican party: The official party of racists, self-loathing closeted gays, and soulless plutocrats.™
August 28, 2007 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Things must be going swimmingly on the homefront, eh? "But honey, I never thought you'd expect me to tell you about every little misdemeanor I plead guilty to!"
oh, I think the wife is a beard and she knew it going into the marriage.
August 28, 2007 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not gay... but that guy sucking my cock sure is.
August 28, 2007 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've added stupid to treachorous and the many other unattractive qualities about this guy. The Press was unfairly hounding him about sexual proclivities and he manages to meander into a confusing toilet stance in a place crawling with security!
August 28, 2007 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I was so distraught over being accused of being gay by that newspaper that I admitted -- two months after the incident -- to soliciting sex from another man in a public toilet. That was a mistake.
"I did not tell my lawyer for fear he would think I was gay, and decided -- two months after the incident -- to plead guilty to soliciting sex from another man in a public toilet. That was a mistake."
August 28, 2007 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
All of it... said like a true authoritarian who thinks others are as shallow as him. All those who are loyal to you will show their true Christian, conservative, no nonsense Americanism by agreeing with everything you say, and question not one word. You said it, I believe it, that settles it. No Larry, we can't see through you. uh huh....
"Whether or not you will run? Yah!!
Sounds like Haggard's first response, only more arrogant.
August 28, 2007 6:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
His statement that he did not retain counsel is directly contradicted by the police report. According to the report, Craig appeared at the police station a week after the incident and demanded a contact number for his attorney. "Craig told me that he needs a contact so his lawyer can speak to him"
(http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/craig_report.pdf; page 6).
August 28, 2007 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Let me be clear: I am not gay and never have been."
Richard Nixon nods in approval. The circle is complete.
August 28, 2007 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess it depends on what the meaning of the word "not" is.
-
August 28, 2007 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
i started out like 8% of american males drawing pictures men's penises. That feeling of release and trobbing spirting was just my way of understanding the libreal left. It all started when i was a page...i blame the senate and the media for dogging my butt.
August 28, 2007 6:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
In other words,
"I am not a Gay!"
-
August 28, 2007 6:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
All over the macho world, and in books describing sexuality therein, there is a category: MWHSWM (Men Who Have Sex With Men). I've heard it bandied about this way: Women are for children; boys are for sex. Larry Craig's just one of those real macho guys who has sex with men because he CAN have sex with men, not because he's gay.
See?
August 28, 2007 6:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is a US Senator, an important and powerful man, by his own admission crumbling under police investigation and telling the investigators/interrogators what they wanted to hear. Yet, several "luminaries" in his party believe that under harsh interrogation tactics like waterboarding the "bad guys" will yield reliable information!?!
In this context, I wonder what is Senator Craig's position (and that of those supporting his sorry excuse) on government-approved, non-torture interrogation techniques.
August 28, 2007 6:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
As stated elseweher, in order to survive, however unlikely it appears, Craig's only option was to deny it all and state that he mistakenly pled guilty to hopefully avoid the embarrassment associated with a fight against a nazi cop with no evidence. He should stick with the story that he gambled and lost. Like any good christian soldier he now must embark on the fight of his life, preferably in a bathhouse setting lathered in baby oil.
August 28, 2007 6:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder what is Senator Craig's position
usually, it's on one's knees, or so i've been told.
August 28, 2007 6:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
He was just on a congressional fact-finding mission to Minnesota to examine the condition of our nation's failing infrastructure.
August 28, 2007 6:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ross Best wrote on August 28, 2007 6:55 PM:
He simply wanted to temporarily bridge the gap between the officer's upper and plower lips with a supporting rod.
August 28, 2007 7:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
When all else fails, blame the Press.
August 28, 2007 7:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Craig is so afraid of his sexuality that his next news conference will be to explain that he thought he was being accused of murder... was so afraid that he pled guilty.... but now is willing to go to trial for the murder...
August 28, 2007 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmm...
He says, "In June, I overreacted and made a poor decision."
What does this mean? As I understand it, his guilty plea was in August. The "incident" occurred in June.
Was his "poor decision" the decision to solicit gay sex from the police officer in the next stall??
August 28, 2007 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think Craig sounded like Frankie Five Angels during his second go around in the Senate.
August 28, 2007 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am not gay, and never have been.
I'm just on the down-low.
August 28, 2007 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
You've heard the adage, "Know your enemy." Apparently the religious right mean it in a biblical sense.
August 28, 2007 8:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course Larry is not gay. He is very ungay. The way he began "Thank you for coming out today..." proves he was an honest when he said no one advised him, cause NO ONE woulda told him to start that way. Larry didn't know what that meant, of course, cause he is not gay.
Larry, a very straight guy, was probably waiting outside the stall nearest the wall so he could feel more secure. He kept peeping in to see if the man in there was doing a #1 or #2 so Larry would know whether to wait for that stall. And as for his "wide stance," he is very tight back there like all of us good conservatives. Larry is no gay!
August 28, 2007 9:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I wasn't eager to share this failure..." -- what failure, if he's innocent? Don't you think if you had been falsely accused of something you hadn't done, and arrested for it, the first thing you would do is tell your family and friends -- "guys, you won't BELIEVE what happened to me" -- and why would you describe it as a "failure"? This guy's just sad, sad, sad.
August 28, 2007 10:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think Senator Craig is not gay. Gay is a lifestyle identity statement. Lots of men have sex with men and do not live a gay lifestyle. That is why being gay is a choice. Afterall, individuals can engage in homosexual acts without being gay.
There are individuals who have sex with men and vehemently denounce being gay. The CDC had to change their questionairre to do you have sex with men or do you sleep with men as so many men denounce being gay who are HIV positive.
So, there is an entire category of men who sleep with men but do not live a gay lifestyle. That is how they are, which is why many people understand that being gay is a choice. Whereas gay advocates will insist the person is in denial. I think not. I think sex is something you do and these men recognize that. They choose not to make their sexual behavior an identity. They choose to be individuals who have sex with men and live life with families and marriages.
To me it sounds like Craig is not gay, he likes having sex with men. What I found peculiar is why he chooses to get BJ's in bathrooms, what is the difference between a BJ from a man or woman?. Mouths are genderless. Do you think this is a case of a man who has a wife who doesn't give BJ's and it is cheaper and less risky to get a BJ from a male in a bathroom than a female prostitute?
Bill Clinton got a BJ from a woman and Craig got a BJ from a man...is this a crime? Is it just that it was in a public bathroom and not the oval office that makes it a crime?
August 29, 2007 5:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is Craig in Gannon's little black book of clients?
August 29, 2007 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink