« Another Man Overboard! Dole Says He's Likely To Ditch McCain | Home | Why Is Rudy Skipping Debate? His YouTube Greatest Hits May Explain All! »

Why Might Romney Skip Debate? His YouTube Greatest Hits May Explain All!

So why is Mitt Romney really threatening to skip the YouTube debate?


A rival campaign thinks it's got the answer, and it has sent Election Central a whole bunch of YouTubes of Romney's greatest moments to prove it.


The YouTubes the rival campaign sent us -- which we've got for you after the jump -- provide a fusillade of evidence of Romney's assorted flip-flops, ideological contortions and excursions into social liberalism. It would be simple for any knowledgeable YouTube user to take just one of these moments, edit out a small excerpt, and use it in a question within the YouTube debate format, in order to confront Romney.


Only John McCain and Ron Paul have agreed to attend.


In the Romney videos, you can watch Romney...Pledge not to impose his moral beliefs on others. Praise his mother's 1970 Senate campaign in Michigan as a pro-choice candidate. Discuss the experience of an in-law who died from a botched illegal abortion. Say the Boy Scouts of America ought to allow gays to participate. Completely distance himself from Ronald Reagan. And much, much more!


All the vids are after the jump. Enjoy!

Here goes...




Here's another piece of Mitt in his 1994 Senate campaign, talking about the need for campaign finance reform:



Here's a more recent news piece on Romney, from April of this year, discussing his experience hunting "small varmints," when it came out that the self-proclaimed lifelong hunter had only been on two hunting trips in life:



Here's the 2002 Mitt, denying that he ever asked for or accepted the endorsement of Massachusetts Citizens For Life. "I do not take the position of a pro-life candidate. I am in favor of preserving and protecting a woman's right to choose":



And when Romney was called out this year for his wife's contributions to Planned Parenthood in the 1990's, he simply placed a lot of distance between himself and Ann, and said her positions aren't relevant:


14 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

"Do you see this as another..."

"Flip-flop? Yeah, I see another John Kerry coming down the road..."

Mitt, you varmint hunter, say goodbye to your chances.

Romney's refusal to YT Debate now makes a lot of sense.

You just can't make this stuff up, can you?

By the way, since I hunt varmints (mice) in my house, does that make me a hunter?

user-pic

it is kind of priceless to imagine citizen questioners using this stuff...by the way, we have a similar package coming on Rudy...

user-pic

There's no reason why this can't be done even if Romney doesn't show up. The questioner can still ask the candidates that do show up to comment on Romney's floppiness.

user-pic
Only John McCain and Ron Paul have agreed to attend.

Beginning to look like maybe Ron Paul will be all alone on stage. That is one Republican debate I would enjoy.

Best, Terry

user-pic

Is there any possibility that the Republicans that dont show up will eventually score points with certain constituencies by that action?

user-pic

Eventually? The 27% that think GWB is God's second son are already rousing themselves up to a fervor to keep these computer-using blasphemers from tainting our sacred lack of political dialog. Romney and Rudy need the right-wing hit machine to do their dirty work, so they can't give in to reality now.

I do hope Walnuts sticks it out though. Love to see him graciously accept being outwitted by a snowman.

Or even better: talking fetus. I need to get to work on that...

user-pic

CNN could give the candidates that show up opening and closing statements AND let them address these youtubes..

user-pic

This is going to be the YouTube campaign. Romney can run but he can't hide from the video up on YouTube. His best bet is to confront the video.

Houston, the Republican noise machine has a problem. YouTubers are just like the netroots, except funnier. They are not going to be denied and they are not going to be silenced. I wonder if anybody saw this coming.

The Democrats all handled the YouTube questions pretty well. They simply repeated stock answers from their townhall meetings. Of course, Democrats have an advantage. They often work rooms with real people who are not pre-screened dittoheads.


Ron Byers

user-pic

which we've got for you after the jump -- provide a fusillade of evidence of Romney's assorted flip-flops, ideological contortions and excursions into social liberalism.

 Despite all this, polls show Romney would beat Clinton in the general election.

user-pic

Hunting mice is way more challenging than hunting cage-and-release birds (or lawyers) like Dick Cheney does. For Mitt they would be big game.

global citizen

user-pic

Cite?

user-pic

Kleefield posted it at Election Central yesterday, scroll through the headlines for Obama Stronger Nominee than Hillary.

user-pic

A couple of things in response to your comment: look at the characteristics of the respondents in that poll. I couldn't find where it was done, but that's a mighty conservative (relative to national numbers) group of voters. But more importantly, the respondents weren't asked Romney vs. Clinton. They were asked Giuliani vs Clinton, and Thompson vs Clinton (and Obama, of course).

And 41% of the respondents consider themselves Republican, while 42% consider themselves Democrat, and only 15% consider themselves Independent.


See Poll HERE

user-pic

Anyone else find it odd when Mitt speaks without useing his hands?

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address