« Breaking: Gates Distances Himself From Edelman's Attack On Hillary Clinton | Home | Video Surfaces of Rudy Screaming, "Bulls#$t"! »

Happy Hour Roundup

Mitch McConnell Lowers Expectations For Senate GOP In 2008

During a press conference today, Mitch McConnell said that the political map for 2008, with 22 Republican seats up for election compared to only 12 Democratic seats, means the odds are against the GOP getting back into the majority. "It would take an extraordinarily good day to get back up to 50," McConnell said. "So our goal is to stay roughly where we are."

The New York Times On The Ron Paul Campaign: Wackos?

Editor and Publisher gets an advance look at a feature on the Ron Paul campaign that's slated to run in this weekend's New York Times Magazine. The piece focuses on the, shall we say, eccentric sorts that have signed on to work with the Congressman. A prominent California Paul-Head has written to the campaign, "We're in a difficult position of working on a campaign that draws supporters from laterally opposing points of view, and we have the added bonus of attracting every wacko fringe group in the country." Paul himself seems to be unconcerned: "I have a lot of friends in the John Birch Society. They're generally well-educated and they understand the Constitution. I don't know how many positions they would have that I don't agree with."

Hillary's Attack On Bill O'Reilly — A Breakdown in Hillary-Murdoch Non-Aggression Pact?

Ben Smith makes a key point about Hillary's ongoing attack against Bill O'Reilly for smearing YearlyKos — it's decidedly out of keeping with the détente of sorts that exists between Hillary and News Corp.

CNN Falsely Asserts That Rudy Has A "Record On Terrorism"

CNN continues propagating the myth that the fact that Rudy was Mayor of New York on 9/11 means he has national security credentials.

CNN And Florida GOP To Host YouTube Debate

CNN has announced that the Florida GOP will co-host their YouTube debate, in which average people are invited to submit questions for the Republican presidential candidates. The GOP event will be held this September. And just a reminder: The Democratic YouTube debate will be broadcast this Monday night.

Whitehead Operative Admits Mistake: Don't Insult Constituents

An operative for the failed campaign of establishment GOPer Jim Whitehead in this week's Georgia special Congressional election admitted to The Hill that the campaign made a mistake by routinely insulting the district's liberal bastion of Athens, which turned out heavily for Whitehead's fellow Republican Paul Broun, himself an Athens resident, and propelled Broun to an upset victory. "There was a decision made early on to, basically, tell Athens to shove it and ignore them," said the source. "We didn't go to their debates; we got in a big confrontation with The Athens Banner-Herald. In retrospect, those things were a big mistake, because it really galvanized the Athens area against Jim Whitehead."

Blooper: Trying To Discredit Dems, Fox Accidentally Shows Dem-Friendly Poll

Great Moments In Fox News ... Oops. This afternoon on Fox News, host David Asman and Ann Coulter were reciting a standard litany of GOP talking points to the effect that Hillary Clinton and the Democrats being dragged down by those anti-war crazies in MoveOn. Then Asman was proceeding to the next talking point: "All right, let's talk about how all of this might be affecting the Democrats in Congress. I believe we have a poll that we can put up. Of course, it's true that George Bush's ratings are at an all-time low. But as bad as Bush's ratings are, look at Congressional ratings."



The problem is, the technical staff accidentally put up the wrong numbers — numbers showing Hillary Clinton moving into the lead over Rudy Giuliani. "Oh wait a minute, this is — this is the wrong poll," Asman blurted out. Confronted with poll data that ruined their whole thesis, Asman and Coulter simply continued asserting that the anti-war crazies were dragging down the Dems, as if nothing had happened.


13 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

L.M.F.A.O.!
wow, what idiots

user-pic

That's a well trained republican! Not even a dog could do better...well ok..a dog Does do better!

Bark...woof...sit..stand, roll over, "pat's the head, thats a good republican, party before country!

user-pic

It's always been difficult for the GOP to defend themselves with statistics...this is yet another example.

user-pic

HAH HAH!
/nelson muntz

user-pic

DAMN! The McConnell piece at the top o' the Round-up has got me fantasizing about the Dems picking up all 22 Senate Repug seats and ending up with a 70-2-28 make-up. When I get home tonight I'm going to have to take a hour long cold shower just calm down enough to get to sleep tonight.

user-pic

Li'l Annie Fanny-less remarks on Hillary giving in "to the Traitor Party." I think MoveOn's membership, as a class action, should sue her little ass off...oh, wait, she hasn't got one. She's had her ass handed to her so many times that...

Seriously, how can Fox News expect anyone to take them seriously, or expect anyone to listen to their complaints of unfairness over the Dems backing out of FOX-sponsored events.
I used to buy the idea of Dems getting on FOX to show those viewers that liberals are not blood-sucking baby killers. Now, I think Pelosi and Reid ought to invoke a $1000 per minute penalty, payable to the DCCC and DSCC respectively, on any Democrat in Congress who goes on FOX.
If Delay and Lott could successfully change the name of my party to the Democrat Party with a $50 fine (look it up) we should just cut them off.
And this includes the White House when we get that back. No FOX News, and no damned Washington Times at the gaggle. Let them make sh*t up. Hell, they do it now, anyway.

Sorry...just got going and couldn't help myself

user-pic

What's that old comedic line? "Don't confuse me with the facts." Your honor, exhibit A.

user-pic

It occurs to me now that a a true Fox News blooper is when they tell the truth. And boy, was this a blooper.

user-pic

"[Ron] Paul himself seems to be unconcerned: "I have a lot of friends in the John Birch Society. They're generally well-educated and they understand the Constitution. I don't know how many positions they would have that I don't agree with.""

The John Birch Society understands the Constitution!? Only if it's an instruction to be an anti-pluralist paranoid totalitarian.

That's actually rather funny: all them "Lefties" who believe the DLC and Hillary, et al., are too far to the right, and support war, are Democrats-in-Name-Only/Republican Light, buy into Ron Paul's whole package simply because he says -- says -- he's against war. Then it turns out that he -- as those who weren't born circa noon yesterday knew and said -- that Ron Paul is to the right even of the extreme right wing Neo-Con[artists].

Third party? John Birch Society!?

Ron Paul claims to be a Republican because he can't get elected as a "Libertarian," which is the fruit-loop party. Until the fruit-loops find the John Birch Society.

Want an exemplar of the "position" of the John Birch Society? Joe McCarthy. Coulter. Limbaugh. O'Reilly.

user-pic

Yeah, I believe Mitch McConnell -- especially when he says something I want to hear.

Beware a Republican bearing bad news for Republicans.

user-pic

Okay, let me understand this about the poll: The approval rating for Congress is "twice as low" as the president's, but those numbers are because of the Democrats? What about the almost-half of both houses that are Republicans?

Could it be--and I'm just thinkin' off the top of my head here--that people disapprove of the way the minority is blocking any significant action by the majority? Especially on Iraq?

Who's taking the polls that ask about approval for the Democrats ALONE and the Republicans ALONE. Ya think those numbers might tell a story that Fox would doubtless want to ignore?

user-pic

Here's the simple version. Answers on approval of Congress and/or Congressional Democrats fall into three categories:

1) The Republican base, who disapprove of Congress challenging the White House.

2) Dems and independents open to the Dems, who disapprove of Congress for challenging the White House, and failing.

3) Dems and independents open to the Dems, who approve of Congress challenging the White House even if it hasn't been completely successful. The simple fact that Congress is trying is a marked improvement over the way things were for the past six years, and enough to merit some measure of approval.


The first group guarantees a minimum level of Congressional disapproval, while the second and third groups are prone to fluctuations between each other. But this does mean that Congressional approval simply can't be high. It will instead range between bad and worse. But don't mistake this for high approval of the Bush agenda.

user-pic

I was never the best student of math, but exactly what does "two times worse" mean?

If the president is at 29%, then "one times worse" would be 0% and "two times worse" would be -29%.

I gotta admit, that really doesn't look good for the Dems.

DOH!

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address