« Poll: Hillary Leads, Obama Picks Up Six Points | Home | McCain's Iraq Speech Today Mentions Al Qaeda 15 Times »

GOPer Bunning: If You're Serious About Catching Bin Laden, Stay In Iraq

GOP Senator Jim Bunning just pulled off an interesting trick: This afternoon he voted against doubling the bounty on Osama Bin Laden's head — and defended the vote by saying he is more serious about fighting al Qaeda than the measure's sponsor is.

Bunning's proof that he's more serious about catching bin Laden? He wants American troops to stay in Iraq, and the bill's sponsor doesn't.

Bunning's amazing feat of prestidigitation came this morning, just after the Senate voted on an amendment to the Defense Authorization bill to double the reward for catching bin Laden from $25 million to $50 million. The measure was offered by Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND), a proponent of withdrawal from Iraq. The roll call vote was 87-1 in favor. The sole vote against was Bunning's.

Bunning has now explained his vote in this wonderfully surreal statement:

"Catching Osama bin Laden and other leaders of al Qaeda is something the United States government has already made a top priority. If Senator Dorgan truly supported our efforts to fight al Qaeda he would not support withdrawing from Iraq, a key battleground against al Qaeda and in the War on Terror."

That's right: If you're more serious about catching bin Laden, you should stay in Iraq.


7 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Well, it makes sense. Where did we catch Saddam Hussein? Iraq.

We never caught anybody in Afghanistan.

Let's stick with what's working. History has proven that we can capture nefarious evildoers in Iraq. If we stay long enough, we'll get Kim Jong Il!

thosethingswesay.blogspot.com

user-pic
We never caught anybody in Afghanistan.

Absolutely correct.

Bunning is just advocating what the drunk under the streetlight advocated. When asked if he had lost his keys under the streetlight, he said "No, but I can see what I'm looking for better".

Bunning's foreign policy approach, to a tee.

BTW, shouldn't there some sort of delirium alert every time Bunning opens his mouth? I think the more interesting question about Kentucky is not whether McConnell is going to get re-elected, but rather, why did Bunning get sent back?

user-pic

Is water in the south polluted or what?

user-pic

Oh, that one's easy. They launched a smear campaign against his opponent, a social conservative/economic populist Democrat, saying the guy was guy.

user-pic

You got me to do a bit of googling on that one, Eric.

Dang.

That's one crazy cat. Too bad it was 2004, when Boosh still had so much of his crimes and failures under wraps, or Bunning might be in a retirement home now. Where he belongs.

user-pic

You misspelled Bunning's name. Bunning's name is spelled:

A-S-S-H-O-L-E.

user-pic

OBL is perfectly safe: he is pushing a broom in Crawford as an illegal immigrant.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address