USAToday Offers Detailed Portrait Of Attitudes Towards Presidential Candidates
USA Today has taken a very detailed look at a bunch of its Gallup polls and has just released its findings. It ammounts to a detailed and eye-opening portrait of the public's attitudes towards the Presidential candidates.
Among the key findings:
* John McCain, the Iraq War's chief defender, is the number one pick of GOPers who think the war was a mistake -- a holdover from 2000, when McCain was the choice of more centrist Republicans.* Giuliani's support is "unlike that of any Republican nominee in at least a generation"; he fares better with more moderates than conservatives; more secular voters than religious ones; and with young people and women.
* Hillary Clinton has more African American backers than Barack Obama, with 41% of blacks supporting her while 35% back Obama.
* While Obama and Hillary are tied among college-educated voters, he trails her by a startling 21% among voters with a high-school education or less, potentially endangering his chances of winning the primary.
* Edwards, who of all the Dems is most vocal about battling poverty, fares best among white, affluent men.
Go figure. The rest is here.















June 11, 2007 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
From the article:
Lesson: most Americans are tools.June 11, 2007 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just to be fair to Americans, most people are tools. We don't hold the corner on that market.
June 11, 2007 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
benhocking why do you hate America people? LOL
June 11, 2007 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seriously this poll seems idiotic from the gitgo.
Repubs who think the war was a mistake side with it's most vocal defender? The guy said yday we'll be warring against Islamofacists or some such group
for at least as long as Stephanopolis is alive.
June 11, 2007 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
While I agree with the "tools" sentiment, there's an opportunity here for the Democrats if they're smart enough to seize it (always a debatable question).
I don't think most gun control advocates are really interested in taking whatever guns this dimwit uses to blow up critters, varmints, Bambi, etc. Some might think hunting is dumb and/or immoral, but that's absolutely meaningless from a policy standpoint; the law is the law.
Since he's using those guns for a lawful purpose, and presumably he isn't using automatic weapons with "cop-killer bullets" to take out Thumper, the gun control issue shouldn't even come up. Nothing anyone would propose is likely to impact him one bit (unless he's got a violent criminal record or mental disorder, I guess--but if he chafes at not being able to buy a gun for those reasons, screw him).
This enduring perception of self-righteous, judgmental Dems who want to confiscate guns for the sake of confiscating guns has to be destroyed. Fortunately we've got some good advocates on this now, from Jim Webb to (at least to some extent) Howard Dean. It's time to get them front and center, so they can clear the field of this stupid anti-Democratic stereotype and get people thinking about things that matter a lot more.
June 11, 2007 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think you missed the bit about people being tools. ;)
If a politician comes out against automatic weapons or "cop-killer bullets", then the NRA labels him as being anti-gun. The NRA then mails a list of politicians that are pro-gun and anti-gun to their members.
Guess who critter/varmint/Bambi-killer listens to?
June 11, 2007 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
John Holsinger, 58, a welder from St. Marys, Ohio, is unimpressed with his choices so far. "Ninety percent of them ain't worth a hill of beans," he says. Still, he has no doubts about his top issue: gun rights. "I squirrel hunt; I rabbit hunt; I deer hunt and so do my two boys," he says. "Somebody best not come to my house and ask for my guns."
Lesson: most Americans are tools.
Gad, am I ever fed up with brainwashed paranoid one-issue dupes. The NRA is not only lying about the Second Amendment, it is doing so as special interest front for the gun industry. Is there another industry that has wrapped itself in the flag more than the gun-nut/industry/lobby?
June 11, 2007 1:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
What happened? I recall there was recent polls showing Obama has the backing of black voters. Did I miss something?
June 11, 2007 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Forget it js it's Gallup.
June 11, 2007 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, you missed nothing. This is simply saying that a greater percentage of total overall black supporters are for Clinton and comprise 1/5th of her supporters. Whereas, there are fewer blacks supporting Obama and they make up 1/4th of his overall supporters. It is all about how you choose to look at the numbers.
If you are concerned about Obama having higher total black supporters than Hillary then it is a concern. If you want Obama's base to be as broad as possible and include blacks then it is not a concern. He has time to gain more black supporters, still. The gap between him and Hillary for black supporters was much greater 90days ago.
Honestly, without raw numbers we cannot tell if the total number of blacks supporting Hillary is less or more than Obama.
June 11, 2007 3:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think that this shows that, while we over here commenting at TPM Election Central know pretty well where each candidate stands on the issues (other than Romney, who changes positions on alternating Wednesdays) and want to start voting, for many voters, it's still very early and they only are working from impressionistic reactions to the candidates. While many voters are tools, I think we'll find that when it gets close to election day (say six weeks before), antiwar Repubs will gravitate away from McCain, and other voters, Repub or Dem, will start answering these poll questions in a way that makes more sense in light of where they are on the ideological spectrum and on the war. In other words, it's way way too early to draw any meaningful conclusions from the polls. (I don't want to sound superior though; I'm a poll crack addict, but I still try to note them and then try not to overread their importance),
June 11, 2007 4:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would love to make a bet against that thesis but my WAG is that McCain will be little more than a cipher, if he is still even an official candidate, 6 weeks before the "election."
Changing minds is hard work. Especially hard when there is not much to work with.
"Antiwar Republican" is an oxymoron.
Best, Terry
June 12, 2007 3:26 AM | Reply | Permalink