Report: Rudy's Company Continues To Employ Accused Child Molester
The must-read story of the day is by Alex Koppelman and Joe Strupp in Salon. It tells the tale of Monsignor Alan Placa, a longtime Giuliani employee and confidant linked to shocking allegations of child sexual abuse and cover-ups.
While elements of the story have been out there before, Salon adds a crucial new detail: Despite these allegations, Rudy's business, Giuliani Partners, continues to keep Placa on its payroll. The article claims Rudy believes Placa is innocent.
Placa first gained attention in 2002 for protecting abusive priests from their accusers, and a 2003 grand jury report described multiple witness accounts of Placa himself molesting children in his care. Placa and his fellow priests, accused in the report of "Rape, Sodomy, Sexual Abuse, Endangering the Welfare of a Child and Use of a Child in a Sexual Performance," escaped indictment only because the five-year statute of limitations had expired. Here's Salon's description of the appalling allegations against him:
The Suffolk County grand jury report, released eight months after Placa's suspension, includes evidence from three alleged victims. It states that in Priest F's first assignment, "he appears to have made feeble attempts at abusing a boy who was an alter [sic] server. ... He pulled up a chair next to the boy and put his right hand on his thigh. Slowly his hand began to creep up towards the boy's genital area. Alarmed, the boy covered his crotch. … The conduct repeated itself within a week."After his first assignment," the report continues, "Priest F was transferred within the Diocese to ... a school. Priest F was cautious, but relentless in his pursuit of victims. He fondled boys over their clothes, usually in his office. Always, his actions were hidden by a poster, newspaper or a book. ... Everyone in the school knew to stay away from Priest F."
While much has deservedly been made of Giuliani's ties to corrupt figures such as Bernard Kerik, Placa appears to be in a league of his own.
Salon's full expose is here.















Hmmmm. This isn't shaping up to be the best week for Rudy, is it?
First you have Bloomberg ("people need to get a life") throwing everyone into a frenzy over a possible run.
Then you have the "Crackheads for Rudy" resignation and indictment in South Carolina.
Now you have this little situation.
Rudy keeps him on because he thinks he's innocent? Uh huh. Anyone want to offer an over/under on how long this will continue, once this crap starts leaking out into the general atmosphere?
June 22, 2007 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I understand how this story is news worthy and perhaps provides more information into Guiliani and his firm, but the "must-read story of the day" Greg? Seriously?
While the report from Salon does indicate that Placa is guilty, the fact of the matter is that he isn't legally guilty. If I accuse someone of rape and provide less than substantial evidence, that person should be fired because he works at a company that is associated with a Presidential candidate?
Again. Newsworthy. "Must-read story of the day." Not at all. He's accused, Rudy believes him to be innocent, thus why Rudy's firm continues to employ him.
A news report indicating guilt doesn't trump the American legal system.
June 22, 2007 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
The post I wrote didn't say that the must-read-story is that we should immediately jail Placa. It's why Giuliani would continue to associate closely with someone with so many glaring question marks. The court of public opinion and ethics is not the same as the court of law. Saying that only convicted child molesters should be barred from his staff versus heavily alleged child molesters is a pretty high bar to set and one that most reasonable people would probably not agree with. Mark Foley, for example, has never been indicted but would you agree that very few came to his defense to say that he should have stayed in Congress on that basis?
So Rudy believes this guy innocent and hires him, sure, that's his right. As for me, I don't think there is any objective interpretation of the facts surrounding Placa that doesn't at least demand extreme suspicion. I find it fair, therefore, to factor this into my opinion of Rudy Giuliani as a person.
June 22, 2007 4:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
One the payroll because Rudy :"believes he is innocent?" What a change outlook from when he was US Attorney and thought nothing of ruining people's lives by convicting them in the media without even getting an indictment.
Case in point: Richard Wigton. He was a trader at Kidder Peabody. In February of 1987 Rudy sent his storm troopers into Kidder's headquarters to stage an public arrest for the media, ruing Wigton's career. Giuliani was never able to obtain even an indictment, yet refused to close the case. The matter was only dropped after two years and Giuliani's resignation as US Attorney. To this day Giuliani will not acknowledge there was anything wrong with the way the matter was handled, and refuses to apologize to Wigton for ruining his life.
I guess if you are an alleged child molester and work for Giuliani Partners you get the benefit of the doubt that Giuliani was never willing to give any of the people victimized by his many overzealous, mean spirited, publicity driven prosecutions.
June 22, 2007 4:14 PM | Reply | Permalink