Gravel Spokesman Explains Experimental Video Making Rounds: "It's Interpretational"
This video that's been making the rounds on the Internet is very ... interesting — it shows former Senator and current presidential candidate Mike Gravel doing nothing but staring into the camera for a solid minute, motionless, as if peering into the viewer's very soul. He then throws a rock in a pond and walks off into the distance. We asked Gravel's spokesman about it, and got some intriguing answers. But first, give it a watch:
Exciting, huh? We asked Mike Gravel's press secretary, Alex Colvin, what the point of it is. And Colvin tells us that there's no single, intrinsic point here at all.
Colvin's answer: "Where he's coming from is that, it's less about him coming across with a heavy political message in this video, as much as it is the message of the impression the viewer will have, looking at him."
According to Colvin, however, one element of this post-modern work does have a definite message: The part where Gravel picks up the rock and throws it into the pond. Colvin says this has "to do with the work with the campaign, the ripple effect of his campaign, his work as a politican and kind of the feedback we've got in South Carolina, in communities all across the country. Our message is rippling across the country. Then he walks off, we go on."
Colvin seemed honestly surprised when we informed him that many people viewing the video regard it — not to mention Gravel himself — as weird. "I can't understand the incredulous — there are a lot of incredulous responses we're getting. But that's it, it's interpretational."
Colvin clarified, however, that the vid was not merely a ploy to get attention. "Not at all, this isn't propaganda to get a reaction. This is not a reaction thing. Like I said, the senator is as much about the impression people can get from looking at the senator — it's as much about that as trying to get across a political message," Colvin said. "This is not about reaction at all. This is an expression of Mike Gravel."















It is perfect.
Actually, it would have been better if the rock were smaller so he could have actually thrown it overhand, rather than hefting it in there like a sack of potatoes.
Otherwise, it's perfect. It's the Zen Buddhist approach to politics! It's the politics of the future. He's millenia, perhaps eons, ahead of his time.
Also, I think he's breathing through his mouth. That's not good.
June 15, 2007 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
"A small stone may only make a small ripple at first, but someday it will be a wave."
It's performance art wisdom. Maybe a bit too abstract for most people but it's not kooky.
June 15, 2007 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think this is probably the boldest statement toward avant garde film making any presidential candidate has ever made.
Does that make him too Frenchy?
June 15, 2007 4:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
How wonderful. Man of few words; man of action etc. Unfortunately, he doesn't look healthy; his aura is that of someone who is self-concealing through agression; and his posture reflects some compression around the third chakra which usually leads to suffering through an over-reliance on abstract idealism.
June 15, 2007 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gravel's ads (especially the one with the fire) bring to mind the pre-introduction Infiniti "rocks and trees" ad campaign from 1989.
That campaign was also much derided, but it was effective in establishing the brand.
--
June 15, 2007 4:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
His brain fell out after the minute. He didn't recognize it for what it was. He threw it away. EPA will now be after him for polluting the water.
June 15, 2007 5:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
That might be the most fucked-up thing I have ever seen.
June 15, 2007 5:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's at least as entertaining as that smarmy pablum that the mainstream candidates put out.
Let's be honest- you're going to remember this one.
June 15, 2007 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
This clip by Gravel is not a campaign ad, but rather rare, thought-to-be-lost alternate footage that was to be watched by Edward G. Robinson as he lay dying to classical music at the end of the film "Soylent Green".
June 15, 2007 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Speak telepathically and carry big stones...
June 15, 2007 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Come-on Rove - Have W do one of these - I bet he can't make it past 30 seconds. And he'd miss the lake with his rock.
June 15, 2007 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Nader had done it, people would have called it brilliant.
June 15, 2007 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought it was wonderful!
Imagine, a political campaign piece where you are absolutely certain that the candidate is not lying to you!
This spot truly was groundbreaking!
June 15, 2007 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now THAT is funny.
June 15, 2007 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, I think it may be one of the Sopranos alternative endings....remember the lake scene earlier in the season? Clearly foreshadowing the stone toss here.
June 15, 2007 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clearly, it's a statement about the social consequences of global warming. Or personal debt. Take your pick.
June 15, 2007 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
....but no ducks....
June 15, 2007 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought the two ads were pretty clear:
"I'm here to make a splash/light a fire, and then walk away. Oh, and my ad guy is on pot."
My take, at least.
June 15, 2007 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
listen carefully: there's a faint quacking sound in the background ....
June 15, 2007 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
It worked.
June 15, 2007 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
His rock skipping could use some work.
June 15, 2007 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
His rock throwing skills are good, but could be better.
June 15, 2007 5:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wouldn't have. I ticked off a lot of people in Madison, Wisconsin, during the 2000 race, when I openly called Ralph Nader a narcissistic, paranoid jerk.
Of course, many of those same people have been forced to agree with me since then, as a result of world events.
June 15, 2007 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm surprised nobody has commented on the fact that his name is GRAVEL and he throw a big ROCK into the lake.
Not very good performance art, I don't think, though.
June 15, 2007 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
This was like the flower sermon of the Buddha. If you have to ask, you just don't get it. Here is a hint, look up the definition of the word "suchness".
"If you talk about it, even the simplest thing becomes complex and incomprehensible." -Herman Hesse
June 15, 2007 5:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
To clarify my remarks:
"It is Suchness, pure Suchness. We cannot say anything about it. We cannot say it is self, we cannot say it is not self, we cannot say it is God, we cannot say it is the universe, we cannot say it is a person, we cannot say it is not a person; the moment we say anything, we are within mind. If we use any concept here, even the concept of purity, simplicity, or whatever else, we are within the mind, and we are blocking that which cannot be named." (The Point of Existence, pg 412)
June 15, 2007 5:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
The interpretive question is, how does the splash follow from the stare? The best guess I have, linear and literal-minded type that I am, is that Gravel is challenging the viewer to drop a stone in the water as he has done. The stare means, "are you with me?"
June 15, 2007 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's pretty clear that Gravel has thought hard about the main issue facing the country today.
We are drowning under the weight of Araq.
June 15, 2007 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
My opinion is that his ad can say alot of things to alot of different people. For me,it demonstrates that he's not afraid to be judged by his actions. He's not afraid to look you in the eyes at the same time it points out that he can be determined, courageous and patient. It points out perhaps that actions are more important than words. Since there are no words spoken, I believe he's contrasting that these days, most candidates will say anything to get elected and forget what they've actually done in the past. The simplicity factor may cause ripples.
I hope he remembers to walk back and get his camera if he wants to make more avant garde political videos.
Honestly, its refreshing that a presidential political candidate is doing something like this.
June 15, 2007 6:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like it, particularly his staring-contest powers :). And I thought I heard on the daily show, it was 'what to do with 'a-rock', get it? Still, way too artistic for american audiences/voters unfortunately, and will not help I think. Maybe he should do a commercial about how he loves jesus and football next :)
June 15, 2007 6:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would hate to see that in HD.
June 15, 2007 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought he was making a statement about how he is not being allowed to talk much. The powers that be do not want to hear from him.
Then he chunks the rock to make waves anyway.
June 15, 2007 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, but the people you ticked off would have LOVED it in 2000.
June 15, 2007 6:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I... must... support... Mike... Gravel...
I... must... support... Mike... Gravel...
I... must... support... Mike... Gravel...
I... must... support... Mike... Gravel...
I... must... support... Mike... Gravel...
I... must... support... Mike... Gravel...
I... must... support... Mike... Gravel...
I... must... support... Mike... Gravel...
I... must... support... Mike... Gravel...
.
.
.
-Dave Adams-
June 15, 2007 7:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
sully18
His silence speaks volumes to me. He looked into the camera with power and grace.There was much more than you think there was here; there always is.
Looks like he knows how to drop the rock and move on.
Good symbolism.Anybody want to guess what the rock symbolizes?
June 15, 2007 7:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is a message to the hard core druggies. He's for legalization.
June 15, 2007 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
At least he wasn't lying.
June 15, 2007 7:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Instead of one stone, sholdn;t it have been a handful of gravel?
I can't wait to see the inevitable indy "Gravel Girl" production.
June 15, 2007 7:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder how many takes it took to convey nothing.
Strive for the ideal, but deal with what's real.
June 15, 2007 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, the telepathic simulcast not working?
June 15, 2007 7:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
.
June 15, 2007 8:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Interpretation 1: He can cause a splash without talking too much.
Interpretation 2: I'm Mike Gravel. And I'm CRAAAAAAZY!!!!!!!
June 15, 2007 8:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
1) Well, this makes more sense than any promos Hillary's put up there.
2) My girlfriend sez it means "It's not what you say; it's what you do."
3) Hours later it's still under discussion in the bloggies.
June 15, 2007 8:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Personally i think the ad had little or no meaning, and was entirely devised as a stunt. Possibly hoping that political commentators would pick up on the unusual nature of the ad, and would devote time to it and discuss it on their respective forums, thereby raising his recognition in the general public. Evidently the Gravel camp also feels that there is no such thing as bad publicity.
That's all i can come up with.
June 15, 2007 9:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think its brilliant --and if Gravel were 2nd tier instead of 4th tier, would have an impact.
The point of both ads is "think about Mike Gravel as president." "Rock" is pefectly timed.... you're waiting for him to do something, because nobody stares into the camera for that long, and so you winding up thinking, "what is this guy doing?" FINALLY he does something -- and his simple act of throwing a big rock into the lake immediately becomes a symbol for change, and his walk away from the camera is all about his independence -- and the odd thing is that we pretty much forget how weird it was to watch this guy staring at the camera.
The "fire" ad is far less effective, because it doesn't really provide any subconscious clues, or challenge the viewer like the "stare into the camera" does.
June 15, 2007 9:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
What an incredible waste of money trying to effect something profound. It wasn't, it just looked and sounded like what it was...stupid.
Good luck Gravel in making a political dent in this '08 campaign if that is all you have in your toolbox. Yuck!
June 15, 2007 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
By the way, was that a gravel he tossed into the pond?
June 15, 2007 10:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do you really think that it took a lot of money to film Gravel heaving a rock into a lake?
June 15, 2007 10:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Count the shimmers. I always do.
And the times we breathe, I note that, too.
And when I was a child, I put away childish things;
But not skimming rocks on ponds, as the shimmer and splashes alure.
Unless it doesn't skip, but sinks behind the first shimmer, then you've merely dropped it in the water, and of what significance is that?
Or perhaps I was thinking of my days in Fairbanks...
June 15, 2007 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe he's starring at us and telepathically channeling us to think about what we want to change. Maybe he thinks that he made a splash in the previous debates and he want's us to make a splash by rising up and taking action. His silence symbolizes the mainstream media's shunning of his views. His walking away says I will lead you just follow me. He's trying to test our intelligence, there's no doubt,...it's vague enough to keep us guessing and weird enough to keep us intrigued. I think it's definitely courageous to expose himself like that. We'll see what happens next.
June 15, 2007 11:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Think what he'd be able to film if he got more than $34,000 in campaign contributions.
http://welcome-to-pottersville.blogspot.com
June 16, 2007 12:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, Andy Warhol, the pop artist who delved into film-making in the 1960's as his artistic reputation grew, made films very much like Gravel's. He told his "super stars" (and some were indeed rising stars at that time, like Dennis Hopper) to just look into his camera and do nothing, or he would film a man sleeping, or eating an apple. If any of you have an opportunity, I recommend that you watch his films. They are more moving than one would expect.
June 16, 2007 1:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
My copy was a litle fuzzy, but at about 0:20 - 0:18 to go, he seems to walk across the water at the far end of the lake.
And if that's not the point of it, then it's sort of Gravel as the urban/up-dated Marlboro man ... Chris Matthews ought to have his man-love jones in a sweat as he watches it repeatedly...
June 16, 2007 1:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
~
Come on now folks ...
For over 30 years Dr euGene Scott was well known to stare into the camera and blow cigar smoke into your face for hours without saying one word.
~OGD~
June 16, 2007 1:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you guys telepathically deaf? That guy articulated a bold plan for Iraq, a visionary approach to global warming and the environment, and he must be an MBA, what with all that high-level economic analysis. His historical references were nicely chosen and relevant, and what a sense of humor! Truly, a great orator and hopefully, the next president of the United States.
June 17, 2007 2:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't speak Dutch, so I couldn't understand what he was saying. Thanks for the translation.
June 17, 2007 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
You guys are too conventional. boring. what do you want from him, some bullshit about his ideas for fixing health care?
The problems facing this country are stupidly, glaringly obvious. For the first time in 60 years we are faced with very simple choices on several major problems. these things don't require discussion, they require resolve.
He's got my vote.
June 17, 2007 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
In the circles that I run around in, "throw rocks in the pond" is a very common expression.
My interpretation is this.
We the people, need to think more, and 'rock the boat'.
Very powerful IMO.
June 17, 2007 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, don't get me wrong Lud. I thought it was awesome. A nice reprieve from all the hot air and supremely eloquent. At this point, there really is nothing left to say.
June 17, 2007 9:04 PM | Reply | Permalink