Election Central Morning Roundup
Clinton Campaign Manager: We Expect Obama To Out-Raise Us
In a possible case of playing the expectations game — or potentially a premature admission of being behind — Hillary Clinton campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle told the Chicago Tribune that Barack Obama's campaign will probably out-raise them in the second quarter, which ends at the end of this month. "He's raising a lot and it’s likely he will out-raise us this quarter. God bless, good for him," she said. "I know how difficult it is to raise money and I have admiration for how they do it."
Fred Thompson Addresses National Right To Life By Video
Pat Robertson's Christian Broadcasting Network has obtained an early copy of Fred Thompson's video address to the National Right to Life conference in Kansas City — a prime opportunity for Thompson to address his pro-choice leanings in his 1994 campaign. In a folksy manner, Thompson talks about different groups coming to see him in his Senate offices to talk about various business matters. "When you came to see me," Thompson says, "I always knew it was about something much more important than that, the most important thing of all in this World and that is life and I must say that those issues are even more profound to me as the years go by."
Immigration Bill: Back From The Dead?
Senate leaders have announced a new attempt to revive the immigration bill, possibly bringing it back to the Senate floor as early as next week. Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell have said that work on the bill will be restarted after the Senate finishes current debates on the energy bill.
Clintons Sell Oil, Drug Stocks
Hillary and Bill Clinton have liquidated a blind trust containing most of their assets, in order to eliminate any potential conflicts of interest and divest from companies in sectors such as petroleum and pharmaceuticals that might offend Democratic voters. The Clintons only learned what was in the blind trust when they were forced to disclose it to the public as a result of Hillary's presidential bid.
Spanish TV Debate Will Actually Be In English
All candidates at the proposed Democratic debate hosted by Univision at the end of the summer are going to be required to field questions in English, with their responses simultaneously translated into Spanish in order to create a more level playing field. Bill Richardson and Chris Dodd, the only two candidates who speak Spanish, are upset at the decision. Richardson's spokesman said that "This is a disservice to Univision’s viewers. It is a Spanish-language network and candidates who speak Spanish should not be penalized because other candidates do not."
Candidates Apply To Wyoming GOP For Senate Vacancy — Lynne Cheney Not On List
The Wyoming Republican Party has closed the application process yesterday for the Senate vacancy left by the death of Senator Craig Thomas. The state party will pick three names, one of whom will then be temporarily appointed to the Senate by Democratic Governor Dave Freudenthal. Notably not on the list of 31 names is Lynne Cheney, wife of Dick Cheney, around whom some rumors had been circling. One prominent name on the list is state House Majority Leader Colin Simpson — the son of former U.S. Senator Alan Simpson — who has already indicated that he will challenge Congresswoman Barbara Cubin in the GOP primary if somebody else is appointed to the Senate.
Richardson Endorsed By Hispanic New Hampshire Republican
Bill Richardson has picked up the support of Carlos Gonzalez, a New Hampshire Republican who ran unsuccessfully for Mayor of Manchester in 2003. "Governor Bill Richardson is by far the most qualified candidate in the race for President," said Gonzalez. To support Richardson in the primary, Gonzalez will be changing his registration from Republican to Democratic.
Year Of Green Conventions
Both Democratic and Republican parties are planning conventions designed to have minimal environmental impact, including such measures as recycled confetti and budgets for purchasing carbon offsets. Democrats are looking for hybrid vehicles to shuttle passengers around Denver. "You can make a lot of speeches, but in the end, you've got to back up the words," said Leah Daughtry, chief executive officer for the Democratic convention.















Of the 500 and something members of congress only Hillary Clinton’s financials were made available to the press.
June 15, 2007 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
At this point, it really doesn't matter to me who runs for President. I'm voting, once again, for Al Gore.
I'm already tired of this election cycle, and we still have more than 16 months to go...
GORE/OBAMA '08
PEACE
June 15, 2007 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, at least you probably weren't one of those people in '00 who said Gore was the same as Bush and now love Gore.
I know more people than not who are tired of this election. I don't think that is good for the top three. But I guess we'll see. They seem to be raising a lot of money.
June 15, 2007 11:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
If Gore runs, and when campaigning, shows he is speaking what he believes .. instead of listening to idiots like Donna Brazile and Bob Shrum .. he'd have my vote. The one result of the incessant drum beat of the race this early will be that people will increasingly tune out the MSM.
June 15, 2007 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
And I predict, Hillary will blow the celing off with her fundraising this second quarter. And here's why -
Terry McAuliffe said that "through May 17, Clinton’s second-quarter haul totaled $23 million in commitments" http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2007/06/08/will-clinton-carry-biggest-purse/
So lets say, between May 17 and June 30, conservatively, Hillary raises $15 million. That brings us to a grand sum of $38 million. No way Obama brings in anywhere near that figure.
June 15, 2007 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary is trying to offset the HUGE hit she will take in the Mike Moore film "SICKO" where she will be labeled a patsy for the health care industry due to her taking 850,000 in campaign contributions from them, around the same they gave Bush in 2000.
June 15, 2007 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, but "commitments" are different than actual donations. I can "commit" the maximum donation, but it most likely won't happen. I don't even want to speculate about why the Clinton campaign is saying this. It could be legit or trying to play games. Since I prefer Clinton over Obama I hope it's the latter, but Obama is clearly a gifted money maker.
June 15, 2007 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do you remember the 2nd presidential debate in 2000, where the candidates agreed on issue after issue?
As NPR's Neal Conan said at the time:
Bush described the debate as a "love fest" at the time because they were agreeing on so many issues.
NPR's post debate coverage, Gore-Bush 2000
It's easy to see the vast chasm between Bush and Gore now. That chasm was well camouflaged in 2000.
Bush didn't run on a platform of starting unilateral unnecessary wars, alienating our allies, imprisoning people indefinately without due process, torturing people, bankrupting our nation, spying on American citizens, purging U.S. attorneys for political reasons, throwing citizens out of tax payer funded events, and presidential power grabs. At worst he seemed like he would be bumbling and ineffective. There are few clues in the 2000 debates as to how horrible he would be.
And, quite frankly, Gore simply failed to make the sale. He distanced himself from a popular president who could have helped him. He was anything but the engaging and likeable guy we see in "An Inconvenient Truth." He was wooden, annoying, and tiresome.
Was it a mistake for me to vote Nader in 2000? Obviously. I guess I could say that it is President Bush who has made mistakes, or that if I had know then what I know now I never would have voted the way I did, but I'm not that disingenuous. I clearly made a mistake and I take full ownership for it. I was wrong.
But let's not pretend that the Bush and Gore we see today are the same Bush and Gore we saw during the 2000 campaign.
For a transcript of the 2nd 2000 debate:
Debate Transcript, Gore Bush 2000
Does anyone have a link to video of that debate?
June 15, 2007 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you look solely at a single debate, then perhaps you're right. But that is not typically something I do. As Homer Simpson would say, "You can use facts to prove anything even remotely true." There were clues (e.g. Cheney, other advisers and PNAC) that Bush would adopt a heavy handed, unrealistic foreign policy.
Not everyone liked Clinton's Foreign Policy, but it was as clear as day that he was diametrically opposed to the Cheney, Rumsfeld wing of neocons. It was also clear that Gore shared most of Clinton's FP philosophy. And he was always one of the voices on environmental issues nationwide and internationally. There was significant differences that could be asertained if one looked beyond popular coverage. Heck, I was 21 at the time and noticed it--and I'm not that smart.
This isn't meant to be a chastisement--well, kinda--but it's definitely worth looking at more than just debates and campaign speeches. For me, actions speak much louder than words. That's why I hesitate to support Obama or Edwards. Some like that they are not "career", but I like to judge the candidates on what they've done. How will E or O handle the right-wing smear machine and tough decisions? Frankly, I don't know and I'm not willing to risk that in the Dem primary.
June 15, 2007 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary may win the Democratic nomination; but I doubt she can win in the general election. The Democrats should focus on winning large majorities in the House and Senate.
June 15, 2007 3:41 PM | Reply | Permalink