House Dem Staffer: Liberals Are Worried That Leadership Will Cave On Iraq
Today the White House said No to all of Dems' offered concessions on Iraq, effectively telling the Dem Congressional leadership to take its "surrender date" and shove it deep into its posterior. So now what?
A Democratic leadership aide tells us that Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and Dem Rep. David Obey will be talking through the weekend to game out the next steps. Further talks with the White House are unlikely, at least this weekend, the aide says. So what do we make of the current political challenge facing Dems?
We checked in with a liberal House Dem staffer who is a sharp observer of Hill politics, and he gave us a surprisingly candid -- and dispiriting -- overview of the political situation. More after the jump.
Here's the situation in a nutshell, as best as we understand it. The White House says it simply won't accept any sort of timetable, even a waivable one. It says it won't accept any kind of benchmarks for progress in Iraq if there are any consequences for not meeting them. So aside from sending the bill back there are only two apparent possibilities left: Either the White House gives on one of these points. Or the Dem Congressional leadership caves and produces a bill funding the war until, say, September, with some sort of benchmarks but no accountability -- in other words, something that's effectively meaningless.
According to our Hill staffer, some liberals are beginning to fear that it will ultimately be the latter. They are persuaded that the Dem leadership will ultimately back down in hopes that other future legislative routes will prove more fertile.
"If this is what they go with, it begs the question, Why did we go through this whole exercise with the first supplemental and everything else?" our staffer asks. "What did we really accomplish?"
Worse, he says, aside from the fact that the benchmarks-with-no-accountability measure would be a substantive failure, it also contains a serious political pitfall. If the final compromise has (meaningless) benchmarks that the White House initially opposed, the possibility is that Republicans in Congress, by supporting such a measure, would be the ones perceived as having been the bridge of compromise between Congressional Dems and Bush.
"If the Republicans come across as brokering this deal, not only have we gained nothing, but they will have gained a lot," he says. "The Republicans will be the ones perceived to have brought Bush back into line. This is certainly not a gift we want to give them."
What about sending the same bill back to the President? According to our staffer, the perceived problem here is that House Dems have loudly proclaimed that a measure to fund the troops will have been created by Memorial Day. Recent polls suggest that Dems haven't done a good enough job explaining to the public that the Presidential veto -- not Congress -- is what's to blame for the lack of troop funding. So a repeat of the veto scenario is thus seeen as politically very risky, our staffer says.
"The storyline in the media would then be, `Dems fail to meet their own set deadlines, Dems in disarray,'" the staffer says. (Of course, sending the same bill back doesn't appear to be under consideration by the leadership in any case.)
So barring a situation where the standoff continues past Memorial Day, something Dems seem hell bent on avoiding, that leaves just options (a) and (b) above: Either the White House gives, or Dems cave. And some libs, at least, worry that it'll be (b). On the other hand, the Dem leadership insists it's committed to not giving Bush a blank check, and it has consistently hung much tougher than anyone expected and has steadily defied expectations in the process. So anything, of course, can happen.
Look, the whole process thus far in some ways has been very good for liberals. There have been straight up-or-down votes on ending the war in both the House and Senate. Progressives have gradually strengthened their hands in Congress.
But let's face it: The future -- the short term one, at least -- is looking uncertain at best. We'll know soon enough.















I'm worried they will cave, too. The only solution is to flank the bastards - impeach Cheney.
UA
May 18, 2007 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
it is looking more and more likely. I worry that the Dems will imagine that they can say, "We're doing this because funding the troops is the *responsible* thing to do, and the President is irresponsibly refusing to give. We're the real leaders."
Of course, what'll actually have happened is that Bush will have won.
May 18, 2007 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not to worry. They will.
With so many pretend Democrats from Hillary Clinton to Steny Hoyer, the liberals will be in the minority as usual.
Be interesting to see if Pelosi is willing to hang tough even on the losing side. I think she will not but could be pleasantly surprised as I have been with Reid.
Best, Terry
May 18, 2007 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gods forbid the Dems should take a risk: that seems to be reserved for the GOP. And why is it so damn hard for the Dems to make an effective case that the Dem Congress is the one that provided funding, and Bush is the one that prevented funding? It would be child's play for the Republicans.
May 18, 2007 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was shocked to read here a while back that Pelosi had said impeaching Bush (and I hope Cheney) was a waste of time. Something to the effect that Bush isn't worth the trouble. Maybe she will have to conclude regretfully that the only way to end the war is to impeach Bush.
May 18, 2007 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is negotiating with pliable GOP congressmembers simply not going to get anywhere? I mean, we all knew the White House was going to stonewall -- that's not news. But is it just not possible to put together 67% in both houses to get something better than a cave to the White House done?
May 18, 2007 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
"... impeach Cheney."
.... along with Gonzo and W.
Tom
May 18, 2007 4:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
imagine that - there may be negative process stories about the dems in the media. eeek, wouldn't that be an unlivable world! avoid, avoid, avoid at all costs!!!!
that way all we'll get are positive stories about dems!
May 18, 2007 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's this simple:
America has a surplus of people in the "fighting age" demographic. Due to any number of factors, the biggest of which is the simple fact of longer lives and working lives, most of these people are superflous to the people who matter.
Now, the only way we are gonna get these people where they belong (on a battlefield) is by having a war big enough to impose the draft. The War on Iraq is not that big yet.
But with bi-partisan co-operation, this enlargement of hostilities can be attained, there is still time.
And besides, it's so hard to get kids to move out of the house now-a-days.
May 18, 2007 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is absolutely ridiculous, especially considering the majority of Americans want the bill to contain timetables. Just send him the same fucking bill again and again and again. Jesus, why is this so freaking hard? Everyone agrees with you, morons! Stop even negotiating, that alone is a sign of incredible weakness. Bush is not going to give in on anything, it is like negotiating with a wall. Just send him the same bill and if he doesn't sign it, defund the stupid war like most of the country wants you to.
May 18, 2007 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tell your source that the leadership are idiots. We *knew* Bush was going to refuse anything which restricted his Imperial Dictatorial Powers.
The Democrats, if they want any political lives, have to welcome the standoff. They're going to have nothing but standoffs until Bush is removed from office, unless they surrender utterly, which would be a mistake of historic proportions.
May 18, 2007 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
We need to hunt this 'House Dem Staffer' and stick he/she/its head on a pike on the lawn in front of the House.
We each must call our Senators and Representative and tell them to beat George into submission.
Congress ignores e-mails as SPAM these days. Letters lay around waiting to be tested for pathogens for weeks. Phone calls and faxes are our tickets.
Most cell phones have free long distance these days . . . burn three or four minutes expressing yourselves.
May 18, 2007 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think right now anything will look like caving, so it may be best to minimize losses this time around and put in some non-enforcable benchmarks. At least it gives them visibility. And why not include minimum wage hike, money for stem cell research, a drug importation plan and medicare drug price negotiation in the bill.
May 18, 2007 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Send the Congressional Dems over to my place for some poker - I could use a windfall right now. I hope Mr. Obama in particular brings a full wallet.
Seriously, This situation is a direct result of Obama's and other Dems' piss-poor negotiating skills. Why should Bush back down, when the Dems promised to do so from the start?
"Hey Victor, I got nothin' (shows cards). If you raise me, I'll fold."
"Thanks, Barry. Raise."
"D'oh!"
$$$
May 18, 2007 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes by the so called moderates forcing the Dems to start from a weak position from the very beginning and publicly telling everyone how the Dems will compromise everything to prevent depriving the troops, the Dems will not only fail their constituents but provide the Republicans with great cover on Iraq. Great job Dems. Two failures for the price of one.
May 18, 2007 4:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
while i don't know what she meant specifically by waste of time, as much as i'd like to see them all frog marched out of there, i still have to agree with the sentiment.
how long, start to finish would an impeachment take? pretty much all the way to the very end of this term. it would become THE dominant daily political news. it would drown out all presidential campaigns. it would distract everyone away from governing and into the political theater. once commenced it would have to be won and so every bit of political capital every Dem had would have to be cashed in for the impeachment. meanwhile the VRWC machine would be in full attack mode, happy to have something other than Iraq to talk about. "Dems only care about political stunts! Dems just hate Bush!!" Dem discipline sucks and many would likely sista soulja this moment to distinguish themselves from everyone else. that would reinforce the argument that it's all just theater at the expense of american governance.
all the while, the white house would just keep saying, we're at war and these people care about is theater! over and over. bush could even become the oppressed underdog that people cheer for.
and, best case scenario, the impeachment succeeds. bush and maybe cheney are booted a few months early. yay.
May 18, 2007 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
'This time'? Here's a test question:
"If the Dems cave to this lawless misadministration yet again, their negotiating position will be (stronger, weaker) in the future?"
May 18, 2007 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe she will have to conclude regretfully that the only way to end the war is to impeach Bush.
Thus solving the Republicans two biggest problems for them! And then every Repub gets to run as a "post Bush" Republican without ever repudiating Bush or his policies!
Gosh, the only equally large favor the Dems could do for the Repubs is ignoring the plundering of the voter rolls.
Oh, sorry, they're already doing that.
When the Dems abandoned their natural constituency to compete for the "swing vote" they condemned themselves, in order to attract those who might very well vote Republican, to offering basically the same politics as Repubs. Differentiation from the Repubs, which should be the Dems. strength, instead turns out to be a weakness.
May 18, 2007 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why can't they tie the whole thing to the immigration bill?
This immigration reform will be Bush's only legacy. He will give a lot for it.
May 18, 2007 4:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly! The poker metaphor comes to mind so readily because it's so apt. The 28% Decider can't win in a showdown, but he knows his opponents well enough to judge that he doesn't really need cards.
At least at the casino I can take advantage of bad poker players and gain something from their ignorance. Here the whole country save the upper echelons of the GOP suffers.
May 18, 2007 4:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, impeaching is easy to do with a majority in the House and it just sends articles of impeachment to the Senate where they don't even have to take them up very seriously. Seriously, the problem here is that we misread the mid-term elections. Turning the repubs out went about as deep with the voters as firing a manager for a losing season. Americans want to "win" the occupation. They punished the Republicans for screwing it up. Rove got that, the leadership in Congress didn't. They overplayed their hand trying to tie funds to time tables. Better would have been funding accompanied by Feingold/Reid on a separate track. IMHO, that's how it is going to play out anyway.
May 18, 2007 4:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Doesn't it seem like they've sent the message from the outset that "if you wait long enough, we'll give in like we usually do"?
It's amazing. The Democrats are almost like Gen. McClellan in the Civil War, constantly overestimating the enemy's strength and underestimating their own. Needless to say, this makes it very, very hard to win.
May 18, 2007 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't get it. Send it back! Tell him, there's the money, take it or leave it. If he doesn't want it, he better bring the troops home NOW. Tell him, Congress has moved on and WILL NOT be revisiting the issue -- period.
May 18, 2007 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
And they looked from man to pig and pig to man and back again and soon it became impossible to tell the difference.
May 18, 2007 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ah, crap. Pelosi has been a liability from the goddam start. Not that most of the rest of 'em are any goddam better.
If they keep digging up dirt , & exposing this pack of murderous wackos mis and malfeasances, lies, corruption.........wait a minute- they wouldnt cave in there, too, will they?
Will Conyers, Leahy, & Waxman fold like a cheap lawnchair too?
Fer chrissake, most of the country is behind these fools.
I KNEW Pelosi was a big time mistake, a nitwit "inclusionary" move, symbolic horsecrap from git. She got the job because she hustled Dim bucks, NOT because she has a iota of leadership ability. And no, I aint afraid of "strong" women. Meet the Missus sometime. Point is, shes NOT a strong woman.
Give Murtha the goddam gavel, & get the hell out of the way, Nancy......
May 18, 2007 4:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm with you. Why not fund in small "emergency" portions, justified by on-going negotiations to maintain the status quo? There is no reason to cave when one is in tha majority specifically because the public voted you in specifically NOT to cave. It's absurd.
We all know that not one solider will go with out bullets or food; we all know the humvees will have gas; we all know the medics will have the necessary tools to treat battle-wounds; we all know that the public is roundly in the Dems' corner on this issue; we all know that the president has NO CLOUT with the public or his own party; most importantly, we all know that by the end of the summer the GOPers will be forced to assume a more Dem-like position in order to save their own asses.
I think (read: hope) that Reid is smart enough to understand this very simple reality.
I am also dubious about this staffer's assessment that the COngress hasn't successfully communicated their positiont to the public. Of course they have! The public bloody AGREES with their position.
Sheesh.
May 18, 2007 4:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
On May 18, 2007 - 4:39pm wglad said:
Americans want to "win" the occupation.
That is not quite an accurate statment. The Dems picked up seats in both houses because voters wanted "out" of Iraq - winning was not a condition. If the Dems cave in now, they will be punished in '08, for cowardice and for not honoring the mandate they were given.
May 18, 2007 4:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Send Bush the same bill, over and over. By the fifth veto, the public will get the message.
Remember the bitchslap theory of politics. Bush is weak and disliked. Time for him to receive a few slaps.
May 18, 2007 4:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cheney predicted this would happen. And when they do, he'll do a little dance, and maybe seize up.
Honestly, it boggles the mind to think that Democrats are still worried that the media might say bad things about them. Congressional approval ratings are dropping BECAUSE they're not fighting. They were elected to put some brakes on the Bush administration. Not doing so makes them weak.
I sense some of that invaliable DLC advice at work here. Some more of that "Let's give Bush his bill so we can get back to talking about domestic issues, where we really do well" advice that worked so well back in the fall of 2002.
Now that we have the majority, it seems like Democrats are still unable to legislate. Other than a few investigative committees (which, by the way, still haven't issued a single arrest warrant for any Republican administration official for perjury), I can't tell much difference between Democratic and Republican leadership. As the minority we couldn't stop the Republican juggernaut, and now it seems the Republican minority is just too powerful to allow us to legislate in the majority.
Karl Rove didn't have the NSA tap their phones and email for nothing. All that domestic spying reaps huge political dividends when push comes to cave.
May 18, 2007 5:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think corndog has this exactly right. If you consider the fact Abu Gonzalez has been criminally incompetent in both the performance of his duties and his defense of that performance, the fact is that he remains Attorney General. Barring the revelation of evidence that demonstrates the criminal activity that I think most of us who post here assume to have gone on (and to go on currently) in the administration, impeachment proceedings would, without question, redound to the Democrats' disadvantage.
May 18, 2007 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Send 'em the same bill again, Dems.
And, hold on: help is on the way! Freepi demand Bush's impeachment now. Hilarious!
http://wonkette.com/politics/dept%27-of-messy-breakups/beloved-right+wing-message-board-demands-bush-impeachment-261439.php
May 18, 2007 5:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
It doesn't seem like the Dems have a lot of choices, unfortunately....
May 18, 2007 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Suggestion: Have the leadership stop allowing the war costs be classified as “emergency funding.” This takes them off the books though they still exist.
Instead put them in with the regular expenditures. The official operating deficit will show how staggering it actually is.
Also consider a “Presidential War Surtax” to deal with this enormous debt. A fifteen to twenty percent surcharge an all Americans will get a lot of attention.
May 18, 2007 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not Pelosi, it's the conservatives in her caucus. Pelosi is adamant against the war. It's the gutless "moderates" who are afraid if their own shadows who won't stand up to Bush. It doesn't give her much room to maneuver. She's much more liberal than anyone else in the leadership.
The solution is to take the Murtha plan and fund the troops through July 31. Make Bush come back and make the Pubs vote to support him all over again, after they have heard from their constituents.
Folks need to remember just how long it can take to stop a war. It took almost 6 years in the case of Vietnam.
May 18, 2007 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I don't get it. Send it back! Tell him, there's the money, take it or leave it. If he doesn't want it, he better bring the troops home NOW. Tell him, Congress has moved on and WILL NOT be revisiting the issue -- period."
Agreed. God help us if the Democrats fall into the "there's nothing we can do" mode.
Send it back!
Bush has probably lost another 5-8% with the freeper crowd this week, too. By June he'll be in the low 20's.
Send it back!
Dems should care less and less how the media spins against them as the people who vote care less and less about crappy media analysis and framing. The vast majority is interested in having someone stand up the the lying bully.
Send it back!
Make it Bush's problem. We want out. Sooner rather than never.
kp
May 18, 2007 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Look - he's sticking tough. Dems should too. No benchmarks, no accountability, no money. Simple. End of story. No freakin' money, Mr. President. Your war is over this second, or its over on a timetable.
May 18, 2007 5:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
If it boils down to a lose/lose scenario for the Democrats, I suggest they lose by stopping Bush's war and just stop funding it rather than lose by yielding to Bush's demands and give him what he wants to continue a never-ending war without benchmarks or time limits. I'd rather lose and get something for it rather than lose by surrendering and then run away with my tail between my legs! Giving in to Bush will do nothing but make the Democrats look like the whimps Bush Republicans have been saying they are. I see that as about as bad as it could be.
May 18, 2007 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Congressional Dems need to stop listening to triangulating consultants.
Send the same bill back. Repeat the mantra early and often, 'We have repeatedly handed the President bills that fund our troops, set benchmarks for Iraqi progress, and a timetable for withdrawal, BUT the President is an intransigent baby.' The American people support all of these conditions on funding.
What's the worst that happens if Bushie never signs a funding bill? The military doesn't have the means to operate in Iraq, so either the Commander Guy withdraws them, or leaves them in harm's way. Sure the Dems will get some blame either way, but the blood will be on Bush's hands if he leaves them in Iraq.
Nobody wants soldiers dying, but Bush is going to leave them there indefinitely, where soldiers surely will continue to die. If we deny him funding, perhaps some soldiers die in a hurried pullout, but surely it will be fewer than if we stay, and for an infinitely more defensible moral position. Every soldier knows they may be called on to defend their withdrawing colleagues; sometimes paying the ultimate price. I don't think any of them consider it dishonorable to do so.
You can't negotiate with people who are iherently irrational, and won't give a modicum of respect to your position. Sure, you keep trying to talk and find middle ground, but you must be prepared to fight them, and kick their ass until they come to the table in good faith...or at least out of necessity.
May 18, 2007 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
For God's sake, just send the asshole a clean bill providing finding for 60 or 90 days, and then hold him accountable for significant progress before authorizing and more. This ain't rocket science. Murtha had this pegged weeks ago!
May 18, 2007 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Dems need to stop vacillating in the face of Republican false charges of "weak on defense, not supporting the troops, cutting and running" blah blah blah. Everytime the Dems back down they reinforce the Republican's charges and they show the country they have no backbone. In short, they look weak.
If the Dems drew a line in the sand on Iraq and, using facts, strongly counterattacked Bush and his gang in Congress they would have the majority of the country on their side.
I would go so far as to say; with enough counter attacks the Dems would soon have the Republicans backing down.
As if the Dems don't have enough ammunition against Bush vis a vis Iraq, now we discover he is against the raise in pay for troops fighting overseas.
With all the shit Bush and the Republicans piled on the country the last six years I simply cannot understand how anyone would back down from this gang and their specious charges.
The Dems also need to stop being potted plants when appearing on News Shows and allowing news anchors like Wolf Blitzer, Brian Williams, etc., to simply repeat Republican talking points and allow it to pass. Its time the Dems started disputing the anchors themselves.
Control of the 3 Houses of government is there for the Democrat's taking, they can only lose it by living up to their reputation by appearing as weak sisters.
May 18, 2007 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
If they cave now, it's third party time.
May 18, 2007 5:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
What makes any of you think that Bush will back down? Has he somehow become rational on this war? It takes two sides to negotiate a reasonable settlement. Now, it's time to crack the Congressional Republicans.
First, pass all of the add-ons (Katrina and every damned thing that was added in) and submit it to Bush.
Second, draft a two-month funding (request divided by 6) and immediately pass it, conference it and submit it to Bush.
Third, at the same time the second is passed, submit a 10-month funding bill with withdrawal deadlines, benchmarks and the 3.5% military pay increase.
Fourth, immediately draft budget requirements so money can't be moved around legally. Does anyone think this administration won't illegally move the money around anyway? At least this would provide a track record as the idiots are caught doing this.
Fifth, provide funding for troop and equipment withdrawal when the Idiot-in-Chief gives in.
Repeat the second and third steps ad nauseum to keep this issue before the public.
The Democrats have to crack the Congressional Republicans and there are already cracks in their stand. The pressure has to be kept up with bills and grandstanding speeches ad nauseum by the Democrats so it will hit the news. The Democratic candidates must also hit the same notes everywhere they go.
Obama was right to begin with--Bush plans on playing chicken with the troops. Bush will deny military pay and every damned thing else that's possible in the budget to keep those troops there. Bush is absolutely 100% convinced that he is right...it is time to break away all of his Republican support in Congress. Politicians will crack, believe me.
May 18, 2007 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about fighting back as opposed to caving in to a moron?
Tom
May 18, 2007 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
What happens if they don't pass a funding resolution/bill by July 1? Does anyone think that Bush is going to withdraw the troops? No, he won't. He will find a way to maintain them in Iraq but the military budget will take a huge hit, which might piss off the brass who aren't crazy about this war or Bubble-Boy and The Duck Hunter.
Mrgavel
May 18, 2007 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder if Bush and Cheney could be paid to abdicate by August. It would save lives and probably money, too.
May 18, 2007 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would be inclined to fund to September or October with benchmarks (that include reduced violence and reduced US casualties among other things including Shia-Sunni cooperation measures)and than when they are not met, and they won't be, send a bill that funds withdrawal and if it is vetoed do not pass another bill. Make this all clear in interviews now (other than saying that it is near certain that these things won't work, leave that for events as they unfold).
I really just do not see any other way. There is a chance that by the Fall there will be a few more Republicans on side. Whatever the costs I think that ending it now makes more sense than leaving it to '08, because this war will not end well so end it on the watch of the President that started it.
global citizen
May 18, 2007 6:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I still don't buy the arguments for why a shorter term funding bill is so doomed to failure. Even if it doesn't have enough support in the Senate at this moment, that doesn't mean that the House should not structure the bill that way.
Offer the blank check until September with reevaluation at that time. And stick by it in conference and force it to the floor in that form in the Senate. If it does not pass (who cares about veto-proof), that will raise even more serious questions for the Dems. But Senators (and even Reps, like Obey) who say they would not vote for that form of bill might be forced to reevaluate their posistions if that is the one that is presented. It still seems to be the strongest move and the best way to throw all failure-to-fund-the-troops arguments back in Dubya's lap. Especially if the WH approach to compromise remains "no compromise", "caving is for weaklings, like Dems", or "my way or the highway"!
May 18, 2007 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
The country wants a timetable. Keep sending it back, and keep reminding Bush and the press that Democrats have the American people behind them.
"Thank God George Bush is our president." -Rudy Giuliani
May 18, 2007 6:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well that's one way of instituting a benchmark.
May 18, 2007 6:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Offer the blank check until September with reevaluation at that time.
I actually don't know why this wasn't done already, since everyone -- including Bush and many Republicans -- have already said September seems to be the point in time when they know whether the "surge" will work.
Seems like a perfect time to reconsider, and shouldn't be too hard to sell.
May 18, 2007 6:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's the most depressing thing I've read all day. The cumulative weight of this presidency from the Florida recount down to this day is something I hope this country can recover from. I'm not certain that I can.
But the American people don't go to war lightly, and they don't back away from a fight lightly. And this president knows it.
All he's doing now is trying to bully the government into line so he can keep troops fighting (and dying) right up until the day he leaves office.
Perhaps the right approach now for a thinking presidential candidate is to say "Mr. Bush has his war, and nobody's going to take it away from him. But I promise if you elect me that the first words out of my mouth on Jan. 20, 2009, will be: Bring our troops home. Now."
The enterprising candidate can apologize to Americans for the losses of the past 8 years, and for the lives wasted needlessly because we attacked a country that hadn't attacked us. But the candidate can say "Well, it stops now, and God help the people who did this to our country." (And I'm not talking about the people in Iraq.)
I need a drink.
May 18, 2007 6:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're depressed --
I've been depressed since the Feingold-Reid vote with the realization that we have Dems who aren't really Dems... and if we win in 2008 they will still vote for the continued occupation of Iraq for either oil, defense contracts, and/or israel... arghh.
Wes Clark- “this time, we've gone too far.”
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3269155
If the democrats fold then Bush will prove that he is the decider that Congress cannot/will not hold him accountable. Checks and Balances -- poof = unitary executive.
May 18, 2007 6:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jessuz F-ing Kriest!
Who cares about the self-imposed Memorial Day deadline? Have any voters even heard of this? What the voters want is for the war to f-ing end -- NOW.
Strip out the extraneous crap, and send back the same damn bill they already passed, every damn week, for GWB's damn veto, until enough GOPers peel off to override the damn veto. There isn't a down-side -- they are doing what the voters want! And the theatre of it all will give them ample opportunity to present their message to the people. The only thing that can let down the Dems is the Dems themselves.
Damn, the f-ing Dems keep playing chess when GWB is playing poker.
May 18, 2007 7:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
And one more thing, call it the "Bring the Troops Home *NOW*" bill, and let the WH try to spin that as being anti-troops.
May 18, 2007 7:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Enough of the concessions. Enough of sweeteners and fucking raises for the troops. What do Pelosi and Reid think is going to happen? The US Army is going to rebel over 3.5%? Even if the soldiers did how would we know now that Bush is censoring everything they send from Iraq? This is about the war and only about the war.
The WH is saying they won't accept ANY bill from Dems but boy that Warner bill looks nice. Fuck that. Send the original bill back until he signs it and if he doesn't fund withdrawal and only withdrawal in the Defense bill. Then impeach Cheney and Bush.
May 18, 2007 8:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
The first thing the Dems have to do is to start saying as loudly as they can, as often as they can, that they have funded the troops. If they do go unfunded, it's on the prevaricator in chief.
May 18, 2007 9:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
SeeDee
Pelosi's BIG mistake, which sorta set the tone for her Speaker-ship, was to cave in to moderates and AIPAC when Dems organized this Congress and allow Steny Hoyer to become Majority Leader over John Murtha.
This act of betrayal of the voters by Pelosi (and certain other Dems) went almost un-noticed and un-remarked upon by the media at the time.
Maybe she has since attempted to atone for that mistake, but she is now in a position of weakened authority and efforts to end the useless war in Iraq suffer from that earlier mistake.
May 18, 2007 9:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's no doubt in my mind that they'll cave. They have that same old fear of looking weak on defense and terror, and they're going to climb right into that stupid tank all over again.
Joining their game means losing.
May 18, 2007 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think Pelosi best start acting as the the virtual President of the United States. Of course, not in the sense of giving orders that have to be obeyed or for heaven's sake plotting some sort of misbenighted coup but rather as the responsible indivdual at the head of the US government. Bush clearly is no longer acting for the United States. Take for example War Czar. This has zip to do with fighting in Iraq. Rather the goal is concentration of powers. Come time for a coup a War Czar would be of assistance to the neo-cons. Pelosi as virtual President is a constant challenge to Bush, Pelosi is much more responsible than Bush and two, a Pelosi who fails to back down is a public relations disaster for Bush. Somehow Iraq has to be kept front and center and Pelosi as virtual President can act along those lines. The troops have to be funded but that doesn't entail that Iraq has to be swept under the rug as Bush desires. Rather than a frontal assault what is called for is a sweep around the flanks. Of course, Pelosi takes on the role of virtual President for the United States rather than as a challenge to Bush who merits no attention. The less emphasis on Bush the better. If Bush is viewed as a yapping poodle rather than a barking pitbull Pelosi and the United States win.
May 18, 2007 9:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why don't they just pass a funding bill through the end of the fiscal year (e.g. Sept 30), with waivable benchmarks and no extraneous matters (minimum wage, farm relief etc.)
That gives the surge the funding it needs until Petraeus and Crocker testify; that gives Bush all the money he wants for the war (for a suitably limited period); that does not really constrain Bush's hand (or 'hurt' the troops in the field, since Bush can waive the benchmarks. If he again vetoes it, an attempt should be made to override it, and if that fails, no further congressional action should be taken--because, at that point, it will be obvious that Bush is exercising the veto simply because he isn't getting his way 100%. I really don't think, if this course was taken, the White House or the Congressional Republicans could explain to the American people why the President acted as he did, thereby denying the funding for the troops.
May 18, 2007 9:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm afraid I don't see the downside of sending along a bill Bush says he will veto. Our Dem staffer says this is perceived to be risky *because* dems have not adequately explained that it is Bush not Congress who is blocking funding. I don't follow the thinking here (even granting, as I think we must, that dems have not communicated effectively enough on this point). If Bush vetos he'll make our case for us... again! Having vetoed two spending bills how is it exactly that Bush will effectively blame congress for blocking funding?! Moreover, if there is a veto, dems can then push republicans to override. For the sake of policy, we must hope for success, but if republicans to override the veto we will at least have gained political ground by forcing them to align themselves closely with Mr. 28%.
Glaucon
May 18, 2007 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
" Pelosi as virtual President is a constant challenge to Bush, Pelosi is much more responsible than Bush and two, a Pelosi who fails to back down is a public relations disaster for Bush. "
Yeah, that would be a nice Pelosi. However, thats not the Pelosi we got.
Christ, Im a Repub, & Im sayin WE here. Dont that tell ya sumpthin?
May 18, 2007 10:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess it's a matter of interpretation. I'm looking at the 60% who oppose a specific March 2008 withdrawel date. My thought is that people can favor timelines and benchmarks and still imagine progress in the form of meeting timelines and benchmarks. All of that implies the possibility of "winning" something. The horse may learn to sing. Things seem to be converging on September now. I notice movement in that direction on this blog for instance. If the Democratic leadership can pull off an evaluation of the occupation in September that leads to withdrawing the troops, it will be an amazing achievement, considering the fact that the Congress was never able to cut off funds for the Vietnam conflict, even after Tet in 1968. It was 1973, after the Paris Accords had ended our military involvement, that Congress finally cut off funds for that war.
May 18, 2007 10:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Everybody knows benchmarks are BS: they will never be met.
Everybody knows Bush and his party suckered the nation into a BS war with BS.
Pitifully, too many Dems cowered at the margins or rode the stinking wave (Hila-ahem-ry).
Everyone is thirsting for stonger moves by the Dems. The crazies are forever going to try to blame the Dems for the fiasco no matter what (as they have been doing since the first day the roses failed to appear)... Iraq will (has?) become Vietnam - if only the Dems hadn't tied our hands.
The Dems owe it to the nation to end this thing. 60% or more will remember them as the ones who put an end to the madness despite the media jerkfest. People gave the Dems a landslide in the House in '06. To me, this was also a rebuke to the the media elites at CNN, ABC, NBC, the WaPo, the NYT et al., as they continued to try to intimidate the Dems into being less anti-war and advised them to take the high road to Broderism. The public rejected the republicans AND the major media last Nov. Americans have turned against the Repubs and the war despite the constant cheerleading.
Hence, forget worrying about the headlines unfavorable to Democrats - they will continue no matter what they do. (i.e the media's treatment of Pelosi in Syria) Dems stand up and take on the psycho-bullies and Americans will give them the majorities they need to continue to clean up the mess. The more messes cleaned, the more solid the margins. Why not go back to 300 in the House and 60 plus in the Senate like the days of yore?
May 18, 2007 10:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
That sounds like a winner politically. I'd even go so far as saying they can use benchmarks with no consequences, other than something to talk about in September. That gives Bush the money with no strings through this fiscal year and the people the benchmarks they favor. The problem is a lot of people are going to be maimed and killed between now and September in a failed occupation that can't possibly have an outcome that's good for America. We have failed to convince the American people that this occupation cannot be won. Most of us don't have a clue about who the factions fighting in Iraq are and what our relationship is to them. Whose side are we on? Who is going to be the last man standing? When America understands what the outcome of this civil war is going to be, they will be ready to set a date certain to redeploy our troops from Iraq.
May 18, 2007 10:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have read several accounts about Obama's exploits around the poker table in Springfield IL. He has a reputation for playing a very tough game. He apparently plays tight but seems to have excellent skills for knowing when to make his move.
Victor, I think your comments are a cheap shot. Obama was right from the start. He has been pushing the short leash. He voted for Feingold-Reid. He has been confronting Repubs out in the grassroots. Don't blame him because the Dems don't have the votes.
If you think just not passing any funding is a politically viable option then you know nothing about Congress and even less about the voters in this country.
May 18, 2007 10:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Will the Democrats fold? of course they will, its in their nature. Afterall just look at what they just folded on:
1) They've ended up supporting a secret corporate writtern "free" trade agreement that every Corporate front group is singing the praises of. Hey Pelosi and Rahm what are you two so afraid of that you refuse to release the legislation to the public and congress?
2) Supporting a corporate written illegal alien amnesty bill that creates a near perment class of indentured workers, opens the flood gates to near unlimited numbers of high skillled H1-B visa workers to come in and take American jobs. Something Bush has wanted ever since he took office.
The party of FDR and LBJ is dead, all we got are a pack of dirty old con-men and women(Pelosi).
May 18, 2007 10:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Two things:
1.) Constitutional crisis NOW. The people, the voters, have made it clear.
2.) Stop using the term "for the troops." Completely. The money is not for them. The money is "for the OCCUPATION." Or maybe "for the war." Or even "for the president's war." In fact, stop using the term "troops" completely. Try "forces" or something else. It slants the discussion to the point that no meaningful dialog is possible.
The same people who ask, "What kind of message will it send to our enemies and our troops in the field?" Are the people who will not grant pay raises and will let Walter Reid dissolve into a third-world hospital nightmare. They care nothing about "the troops" but they use that phrase to their advantage.
May 18, 2007 10:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is no functioning Iraqi government to meet the "benchmarks".
Tom
May 18, 2007 11:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Democrats need to send a bill with a benchmark to the president. The benchmark they should use is a vote by the Iraqi parliment to either request the troops to stay or ask them to leave. They need to make a big issue out of the point that the Iraqi parliament has already introduced a bill for consideration *with the backing of a majority*, asking us to remove our troops. Polls of Iraqi citizens suggest that almost 90% want us to leave.
We should be prepared to oblige. That would be very hard for Bubbleboy to veto. If he does, then it will be a nightmare for the Republicans. That can't be characterized as a surrender date; that's an up your nose with a rubber hose date. How do they justify that to their constituents? Chew on that one for a change King George...
May 18, 2007 11:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's see if I have what you are saying right?
- Patrick Henry would have rathered be right than president. Barack Obama would rather be a rightwinger than not be president? Right? :-)
What is "politically viable" and what is the right thing to do may indeed be quite different.
Given my druthers I prefer a candidate fighting a lost cause than winning a wrong cause.
It is not clear to me what Obama is fighting for. If he is just fighting to be president, then he is not the man I still think he is.
Perhaps it is not possible to become president without demonstrating you should not be.
I really don't get supporting the killing fields in Iraq as a good thing whatever the proposed strategy. But then nobody said I was real good at geopolitics.
Best, Terry
May 18, 2007 11:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't get me wrong, I like Obama. I just think his loose lips may have sunk this particular ship.
May 18, 2007 11:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
While this pisses me off as much as it does anyone (and perhaps more than most, since I have been fighting this crap for 40 years now), we have to look at the obvious: while the Democrats have a majority in both houses, it is a razor-thin majority that does not give the leadership the ability to hold tight to much of anything, particularly when you have the Blue Dog Democrats who can jump over and vote with Republicans and convince the world they're being "responsible," rather than the traitors they are. The facts are we have a 50-50 standoff in the Senate, since Joe Lieberman is not anyone who can be depended on to do anything but cause trouble while the little schmuck is his own "power base" (how I long for a majority in 2008 big enough to kick his worthless putz ass out of the party).
I'm almost of a mind to believe that the best we can hope for is a committment to keep trying, and the hiring of some public relations people who aren't the usual suspects among the professional Washington Dim-ocrats, to get out and find some way of telling the truth. Of course, playing against a media that is largely on the other side makes it hard too.
I wish I had an answer besides "slog on". I'll point out that in history some of the greatest victories come to those who are willing to just keep moving until lo and behold they discover they're "there." Not much, I'll agree, but when you have a party where party loyalty means trying to herd bees in a blizzard with a switch, we've come a lot farther than I expected.
What we have to do is convince the country that if they want the kind of change that is necessary, they have to give the party the majority that is necessary to overcome both the political opposition and the far right suckups in the media.
If this shit was easy, it wouldn't be important,folks.
May 19, 2007 2:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
I really,really, really wish corndog was wrong, but when you're right, you're right, and this is exactly the reality we find ourselves in with a 50-50 senate (LIEberman being not a Democrat) and a razor thing majority in the House. Basicaly what we have is an election last year that could be described the way Winston Churchill described the allied victories in North Africa: the end of the beginning. We have a long way to go and the best we can hope for now is not to lose ground to the enemy.
May 19, 2007 2:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've said it before in this thread, I'll say it again: until you have the votes to fight back, you cannot fight forward.
There's an old saying, that's an old saying because it is true: "when you strike the King, you must kill, or be certainly killed."
Much as we all sit around being pissed off, we do not have the ability to strike the King - and that is unfortunately a certainty. Yeah, he's got a 28% approval rating. He's also got a political party that is 50-50 in the Senate and close enough in the House to hamstring things.
When those facts change, the fight will change.
May 19, 2007 3:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Turning the repubs out went about as deep with the voters as firing a manager for a losing season. Americans want to "win" the occupation."
If you believe this, from reading polls and seeing answers to questions, you must be one of the younger generation who were the victims of "whole language" and never learned to read, thus never learning to think. You have things upside down and bassackwards - I would say you qualify as a Republican.
May 19, 2007 3:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
All that needs to be done is include the end of the Bush tax cuts in the bill, to pay for it. "To whom much is given, much is expected." Let those profiting from the invasion of Poland pay for it.
May 19, 2007 3:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
I would love to give this a 5 - it's exactly my thought. Exactly my thought until I look at a 50-50 Senate and a House "majority" that isn't solid enough to stand with the moderate morons jumping the fence. Which leaves them unable to do this, unless we want the Blue Dogs being "responsible" and voting with the Republicans to give The Invader of Poland what he wants.
May 19, 2007 3:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hreeby withdraw my comment to your earlier post. You obviously did learn to read and thus to think. :-)
May 19, 2007 3:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Terry,
Dear friend is there a full moon out tonight? You seem to be baying :-)
They simply do not have the votes. Blame the public for sending 49 Repubs and Lieberman and a few of his type to the Senate.
What the hell? Give Obama a break, he voted for Feingold-Reid and they came up nearly 30 votes short of what would actually be needed to pass the thing. Why is this Obama's fault? The left is getting increasingly loonie on this issue.
Obama is sending teams of canvassers out in NH to get voters to call Sununu and Gregg. What would you like Obama to do, that he isn't doing?
May 19, 2007 5:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
The whole Bush Administration hangs on the war; when the war collapses the Bush Administration collapses with it. The American people want the war stopped and the troops brought home. Far better than impeachment is cutting/blocking funds for the war. If this can only be done by sending the same bill that the President won't sign, fine. Sending no bill is another way.
The only true support of the troops is bringing them home.
Doing nothing may well be the best way to stop the war and bring down the disgraceful Bush Presidency.
May 19, 2007 5:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
This has nothing to do with Obama saying that the didn't want to get drawn into a game of chicken with Bush over the troops. Obama has been saying for months that he doesn't want to give Bush a blank check. He voted for Feigold-Reid.
This is about votes. The anti-war folks don't have enough for Feingold-Reid, they don't have enough to send the bill back, the way Edwards wants, because Smith and Hagel won't go another round. How is this Obama's fault? Your argument strikes me as nonsensical.
May 19, 2007 5:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
You can scream it from the rooftops, shout it to the sky, inscribe it on your tombstone and you are still wrong.
Going along to get along does not make one a leader. Maybe no one will follow you if you lead, but sheep are not admired for their independence and will.
There is a hollowed-out hull left of the strength that was once admired in John McCain. It came through again for a short time when the old soldier denounced torture in the debates.
An even braver, greater fighter once in Hubert Humphrey allowed himself to become a lap dog for Lyndon Johnson. That sealed his fate even against the ugly gnome, Dick Nixon. Being beaten by Nixon, one wag suggested, was like being electrocuted by a flashlight battery.
It is not good to lose in a worthy cause. It is worse to win in a bad cause.
Consenting to the bloodletting in Iraq is hardly noble whether one can end it or not.
Best, Terry
May 19, 2007 6:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
By proxy he did. And I give him credit for finally going that far though he refused to support it earlier when it might have been more helpful. All the other Democratic presidential candidates that could voted for Reid-Feingold too.
I am not asking for a refund of my small contribution to Obama but I am increasingly wary of the fellow. I may not even vote for him if he is nominated but will not stand and fight.
Best, Terry
May 19, 2007 6:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Benchmarks are B.S. The only metric that matters is the number of U.S. combat troops in Iraq. I propose zero by 1/1/08.
May 19, 2007 7:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
You must be a Rove secrert operative--refusing to fund troops at war by repeatedly sending Bush a bill knowing he will veto it is a sure way to hand control of both houses of Congress back to the GOP. Go ask Jim Webb, John Tester and Claire McCaskill if they think that yours is the single dumbest idea they have heard since being elected.
Democrats will never convince a majority of idependents--who are the part of the electorate that will count in 2008 and who were key to those three Senators winning-- that troops will not be bereft of ammo and supplies if all the Democrats do is enhgage in pointless game-playing over funding.
Democrats cannot end the war before 2009. Deal with that.
May 19, 2007 7:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
SeeDee is a fucking Jew-hater for injecting AIPAC into an issue nothing to do with AIPAC. AIPAC is not responsible for the fact that there are not enough votes in the House and Senate to cut off funding for the war.
May 19, 2007 7:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
bordersmuggler, please show us where Jim Webb, Claire McCaskill and John Tester won because they unequivocally stated during their campaigns they would vote to cut off funding for the war by March 31, 2008. Please show us where all 30 Democrats who took GOP House seats unequivocally committed to do that in the course of their campaigns. You can't.
May 19, 2007 7:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
You too are a fucking Jew-hater. Keep it up--watch thousands of Jews in Florida , New York and California help make Giuliani President.
May 19, 2007 7:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
WOW! That Half-Vast Rightwing Conspiracy must be more brilliant than anyone thought. LOL!
Best, Terry
May 19, 2007 8:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
LOL. I'll pass on becoming a Republican, but I wouldn't mind being younger. I wasn't even really young in 1968. I was young during the Korean conflict and I remember my father yelling at me at the dinner table for trying to say that the Russians had the bomb,too, and weren't going to go along with us nuking China. And he kept saying you don't know what the President knows, you don't know what the Congress knows. They have information you don't have. And he wasn't stupid. He was one of the guys who had just saved the world from Facism. But he just couldn't believe that his government could do stupid things. He always thought the reasons they did things would become clear later and make a lot of sense. I just can't imagine what he would have thought about Bush and Cheney. He was a Democrat all his life, so I suspect he would have thought they were part of some vast Republican conspiracy to destroy the American way of life.
May 19, 2007 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Feingold-Reid bill did not stop funding. There were loopholes in that bill that allowed for funding of combat troops.
May 19, 2007 10:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
"They have information you don't have."
I used to believe in that. LBJ and his Vietnam deception blasted me out of it. I have not returned.
Tom
May 19, 2007 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe they should outflank the GOP, put together a bill that will have a timetable, but that timetable ends in 2025.
The GOP has been playing the game of "We're almost there, any day now..." It's easy to defend and support and delude. Because they don't have to give any dates any benchmarks. But if we post the worst case options it will force them to put deadlines on themselves.
American's don't want 100,000+ troops in Iraq in 2015.
Just imagine the Sunday Talk Show thread...
GOP: We aren't going to have 100,000+ troops in Iraq in 2015.
Dem: Will we have 100,000+ troops in Iraq in 2010?
GOP: Of course we won't have 100,000+ troops in Iraq in 2010.
Dem: So will we be leaving Iraq in 2007, 2008 or 2009?
GOP: We'll leave when we are finished.
Dem: So if it takes until 2025, we'll still keep 100,000+ troops there?
May 19, 2007 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry corndog, I respectfully disagree.
Democrats have to stand for something, and if they aren't going to hold a criminal operation like the Bush Administration accountable for its crimes, really, then what the hell are they good for?
This isn't about political theater. Every time Conservative Republicans have come to power over the last 80 years or so they've tried to strengthen Corporate power and weaken the power of individuals. Every time. And quite frankly, over the long run that strategy has been working. They keep getting more and more corrupt, and more and more Authoritarian. They nearly got their "Permanent Republican Majority" established this time. If we don't make the major players pay for it now, the next time they or their annointed heirs get into power the PRM will become fact, and American Democracy will be history.
-Dave Adams-
May 19, 2007 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
The bill would provide have provided funding for a leisurely withdrawal.
Should withdrawal be quicker?
Yeah, I think so but that's a tactical rather than strategic decision.
Best, Terry
May 19, 2007 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
SeeDee
Nope, Emet18, not a 'Jew-Hater'...just not 'lover' of the thrust of AIPAC's present agenda.
May 19, 2007 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd like to look on the bright side here... the Democrats who wanted to give Bush more time and wanted "benchmarks" that were waiveable have just been told to by Bush to stuff it.
To me, this opens the door to the VERY short leash idea proposed by Obey "No strings attached" funding until July 31. (Especially if it includes a pay raise, and funds for veterans medical care) this proposal is perfect in terms of PR.... indeed, Congress should compel Petraus to show up and explain what will happen if Bush were to veto this kind of "no strings" funding.
May 19, 2007 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is FAR TOO LATE for the Democrats to lose their nerve now. They'll effectively be handing Congress back to the Republicans if they can't push this through.
John Edwards is right--send the same bill back to the White House as many times as it takes. And QUIT NEGOTIATING WITH THE SON-OF-A BITCH!
May 19, 2007 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
They've already done that. Obey stripped all the extraneous non military stuff (spinach, Katrina, flood, drought and other aid) out of the original supplemental and put it in HR 2207 which passed 302 to 120. May 10, that was the same day HR 2206 passed and HR 2237 failed.
So over 80 Repubs voted for HR 2207 once they couldn't claim it was hamstringing the troops. I wonder how many were railing at it as pork then?
Bush still says he'll veto it because it doesn't qualify as emergency funding. Most of these expenditures were passed in last year's congress by Repubs but they never got around to appropriating the money because they didn't pass one single domestic spending bill last year. Not one single one.
May 19, 2007 3:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just had a vision of your head exploding while you were writing this.. You're so funny...
May 19, 2007 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
AIPAC has been all over these Iraq/Iran bills. Advocating for obviously your and their "self-interest". It's their job, their stated reason for being to make sure our military remains in Iraq and if the right 'circumstances' arise attack Iran. You should know their agenda - as it sounds like you donate to them.
Israel's and AIPAC's agenda is very clear and very open now. Especially after Olmert's failed and planned in advance war with Lebanon. They are now paranoid about being left alone in the Middle East. They 'need' our troops to remain in the area, for their security and to maybe even finish off what the US and Israeli neocons tried to start!
AIPAC has also been quite open with its campaigning, fundraising and propaganda speeches. Promoting their new friend John Hagee, who is more than happy via his internet outreach videos, books and now AIPAC aligned speeches to preach to the world, Israel must be safe and oh yeah an attack on Iran would be of interest and benefit to us all us 'good' Christians.
Hagee and AIPAC propaganda fundraising nights such as these:
A right little war and political money faction coming together to make sure our troops remain in the Middle East to neutralize Iran and to bring on Armageddon.
Other than their obvious attacks on the Feingold-Reid bill, here are the other bills AIPAC has heavily lobbied to bring down.
BTW MURTHA the guy who supposedly wanted to hold Bush to account, and not give our insane President a blank check voted NAY on both the Defazio & Andrews amendments.
Interesting that, when 'recently' when in the spotlight: "Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), the chairman of the House defense appropriations subcommittee, voted against the amendments in 2005 and 2006. But it was Murtha, a staunch Iraq war opponent who this year pushed for the language in the supplemental prohibiting military action in Iran without congressional authorization." (The Hill)
It's a shame that the Defazio's and Andrew's amendments weren't really publicised in blogs, so that constituents (other than the AIPAC and CUFI rapid response emailer and telephone drones) might have had a chance to call and ask their representatives to support these amendments. There was not much press (even here) that they failed either.
So, YES Emet18 AIPAC did have a lot to do with there not being enough votes in the House and Senate.
May 19, 2007 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
The reason it is "so freakin hard" is cuz they don't have the votes.
They only passed the first bill with the reluctant help of Nelson and the votes of two Republicans, Smith and Hagel who are not willing to go another round.
Are progressives stupid? Have we forgotten how to count? They don't have the votes. Get off your ass and start trying to pressure Republicans rather than blaming Democrats.
With some hard work this summer, the Repubs will cave by this fall and force Bush to compromise. Until then stop whining and get to work.
Blaming Democrats, when the vast majority agree with you, but do not have the majorities they need to end the war, is incredibly counterproductive. Why is this so freakin hard to understand?
May 19, 2007 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Dems should pass a bill that gives Bush a blank check but raises taxes drastically on the wealthiest 1% to pay for it (perhaps on the oil companies as well). I've seen this idea posted on TPM before and don't know why people aren't echoing it...if it got bounced around the blogs enough perhaps it could achieve some momentum. This would put Bush in a terrible position-- his war or his friends. And hey, if the wealthiest 1% want to pay for the war, and the brainwashed (by the Armed Forces Network) troops want to keep fighting, then let them.
May 19, 2007 10:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg: Your article sounds the alarm that all is not well with the new DC Dems, and they have just been badly out-maneuvered. The WH coven now has them over a barrel.They are in a Catch-22 situation. But it is not their fault. The base has pushed them into this, because the base has not grasped the fact that logistics of withdrawal from Iraq and phony benchmarks can easily be married to a program to set the Dems up for a major fall in the few months just before the 08 elections.
I get the ugly feeling that in August of next year, after the Dems have been set up with an agreement to evacuate or withdraw from Iraq, the Republicans will roll out the very thing Andy Card said is never done: They will roll out a new product in August. During the drawdown and withdrawal, our troops will be hit badly, and the Dems will be held responsible for this. And the Republicans will be back in soaring 50s in the polls, yet again. Such a product!
The bad guys in Lebanon showed us just one means by which this attack can happen, and probably there are training programs going on, right now, for other operations, all ever more deadly, all aiming for that glorious moment. Is anyone stopping them? Is the Surge in Baghdad stopping them? Of course not. It wasn't intended to. And it can't. We need to withdraw, but, for the while, we are stuck there.
If you think the WH coven can't be that evil, just remember that before the 06 elections, many of our troops in Iraq were suddenly disqualified, in the midst of battle, from voting in that election. For some, their votes were suddenly invalidated, without just cause. Our own troops! The WH coven and their Torture Party don't care about our troops. It is more than obvious they loath the Constitution. They hold Americans in contempt, and, frankly, their "Torture Party" is just plain anti-American. (Special thanks to Scott Horton, of Harper's, for the meme.) No one, not even Hitler and Tojo, has done more to sabotage America, from the inside out and the upside down, as has the Torture Party, led by the WH Coven.
Whatever malfeasance you think the WH Coven is capable of performing, just put an exponent of your choice to that, and you will be so much closer to understanding their capabilities. And before the 08 elections, I think they will do anything, I said anything, to translate their twisted conflation of legal malinterpretation and social manipulation into raw force, which they think means *power*.
The Dems in DC (and the Independents) should NOT relax their vigilance, not for a minute. If they cannot perceive how they are being set up, we are in for far more than eight years of bloody Torture Party governance. I do not think this form of governance is sustainable by the United States, and the harm the Torture Party will cause to America, and to the world, will perhaps be something so terrible we would not recover from its devastation, not in this generation. Despite their loud denials, they are even resurrecting the Cold War. After all, it's good for business: Theirs. Robert Gates helped them to make good money on it before.
The DC Dems better put on their chastity belts and fasten their helmets. They're in for a tough ride, and they have to seek, among Republicans, those with true love of country, for a quorum big enough to come together to rescue the nation by impeachment. It has come to that. It has come.
May 20, 2007 1:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with this. I don't know why it is so terrible to fund the war through September. This is going to be a long process and public pressure on Republicans is the only way that anything at all is going to change before 2009.
This is going to be a long process and one that depends until 2009 on REPUBLICAN votes. Unless Republicans are willing to break with the President publicly over Iraq NO bill can move forward. And Bush knows that and knows that Republicans won't do that and Democrats don't have the votes to do anything, so he's safe.
Democrats can't even send the funding bill back to Bush and dare him to veto it again. They don't even have the votes for THAT.
So, in the game of chicken Bush wins. The only thing to do is to keep the funding going for another 6 months while trying to build public pressure and support for a cutoff. And hope that Republicans will eventually cave under public pressure.
Here's WHY, from the CNN Poll of 5/4/07:
Reality 101: Remember Condi Rice's statement that the White House considers ANY LIMITATIONS WHATSOEVER on his "constitutional powers" as Commander-in-Chief "unconstitutional?" If Congress funds the war, but imposes limits, Bush will ignore them and rely on his "inherent" powers. What are Dems going to do then, impeach him?
He'd love that. They don't remotely have the votes for that and it would be political suicide at this point, taking all focus away from Iraq as others in this thread have pointed out.
May 20, 2007 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]CHEAPest price VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/meniboaz]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY order ONLINE[/url] - order GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/ronnyverony]las vegas online casino[/url] - casino online password
BUY link PHENTERMINE
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/phenterminesite]BUY PHENTERMINE wiki[/url] - bargain BUY PHENTERMINE
BUY ONLINE pharmacy PHENTERMINE
[b][u]CHEAP CHEAPest in uk VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
December 7, 2007 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY GENERIC drug[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/nonavernona]CHEAPest price VIAGRA. BUY CHEAP VIAGRA ONLINE INTERNET-P
- discount GENERIC VIAGRA. BUY CHEAP VIAGRA ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
HARMACY[/url] - lowest prices CHEAP GENERIC VIAGRA. BUY CHEAP VIAGRA ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/nonavernona]BUY VIAGRA. BUY CHEAP VIAGRA ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY CHEAP[/url] - BUY VIAGRA. BUY CHEAP VIAGRA ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY CHEAP
[b][u]BON MARCHE VIAGRA EN LIGNE[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/mariamerabella]GENERIQUE VIAGRA EN LIGNE[/url] - VIAGRA GENERIQUE cialis le PLUS BON MARCHE
[b][u]Produit de substitution GENERIQUE LE PLUS BON MARCHE VIAGRA[/b][/u]
COMPRE VIAGRA mas barato
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/gogolmogol]MEDICAMENTO SIN MARCA de cialis VIAGRA[/url] - COMPRE VIAGRA generico barato
CIALIS cialis BARATO
[b][u]KAUFEN SIE PREISWERTEN on-line--VIAGRA VIAGRA[/b][/u]
cheapest SILDENAFIL
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/ronybarrony]KAUFEN SIE VIAGRA BILLIGST[/url] - KAUFEN SIE PREISWERTEN VIAGRA das ON-LINE-DEUTSCHLAND
[b][u] EREKTILE Funk
tionsstorungserganzung[/b][/u]
[b][u]MARKENLOSES CIALIS-MEDIKAMENT[/b][/u]
December 13, 2007 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE reader download[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.4softsite.info]DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE go live[/url] - DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE illustrator
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE download flash player[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.4softsite.info/manufacturer-Adobe.html?session=146011198080532]8.0 DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE digital elements[/url] - DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE creative CS2 editor guide image macintosh
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE audition[/b][/u]
December 23, 2007 12:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE illustrator[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.4softsite.info]DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE PHOTO SHOP classroom book[/url] - DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE CS2 illustrator real real world world
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE PHOTO SHOP elements 8.0[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.4softsite.info/manufacturer-Adobe.html?session=146011198080532]FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT reader[/url] - 8.0 DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE digital elements
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHE
AP ADOBE illustrator CS2[/b][/u]
December 27, 2007 1:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE illustrator[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.4softsite.info]DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE PHOTO SHOP classroom book[/url] - DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE CS2 illustrator real real world world
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE PHOTO SHOP elements 8.0[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.4softsite.info/manufacturer-Adobe.html?session=146011198080532]FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT reader[/url] - 8.0 DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE digital elements
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHE
AP ADOBE illustrator CS2[/b][/u]
December 27, 2007 1:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE illustrator[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.4softsite.info]DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE PHOTO SHOP classroom book[/url] - DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE CS2 illustrator real real world world
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE PHOTO SHOP elements 8.0[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.4softsite.info/manufacturer-Adobe.html?session=146011198080532]FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT reader[/url] - 8.0 DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE digital elements
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHE
AP ADOBE illustrator CS2[/b][/u]
December 27, 2007 1:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE illustrator[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.4softsite.info]DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE PHOTO SHOP classroom book[/url] - DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE CS2 illustrator real real world world
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE PHOTO SHOP elements 8.0[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.4softsite.info/manufacturer-Adobe.html?session=146011198080532]FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT reader[/url] - 8.0 DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE digital elements
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHE
AP ADOBE illustrator CS2[/b][/u]
December 27, 2007 1:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u] FREE DOWN
LOAD DREAM dummy mx WEAVER [/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net]4 FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM WEAVER[/url] - FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM mx tutorial WEAVER
[b][u] 7 FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM WEAVER [/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/info-Adobe_Dreamweaver_CS3.html?session=338701198804553]FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM training WEAVER[/url] - 8 FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM serial WEAVER
[b][u] FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM FREE tutorial WEAVER [/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/manufacturer-Adobe.html?session=338701198804553]8 FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM everything everything WEAVER[/url] - design FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM WEAVER web
[b][u] 8 FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM everything everything WEAVER [/b][/u]
December 28, 2007 9:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]2008 2008 DOWNLOAD CHEAP DOWNLOAD CHEAP[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net]2007 DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL computer dummy dummy tech[/url] - DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL DRAWING
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL r18[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/info-AutoCAD_2008.html?session=753971199674143]ANTIVIRUS FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP DOWNLOAD free SOFTWARE VIRUS ware[/url] - FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP pc pocket SOFTWARE
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL job[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/info-Autocad_2007.html?session=639891199674627]FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP WINDOWS xp SOFTWARE[/url] - DOWNLOAD FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP OEM SOFTWARE ONLINE
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL mac[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.org]FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP computer find SOFTWARE[/url] - DOWNLOAD FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP MICROSOFT SOFTWARE
January 6, 2008 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]2008 2008 DOWNLOAD CHEAP DOWNLOAD CHEAP[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net]2007 DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL computer dummy dummy tech[/url] - DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL DRAWING
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL r18[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/info-AutoCAD_2008.html?session=753971199674143]ANTIVIRUS FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP DOWNLOAD free SOFTWARE VIRUS ware[/url] - FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP pc pocket SOFTWARE
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL job[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/info-Autocad_2007.html?session=639891199674627]FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP WINDOWS xp SOFTWARE[/url] - DOWNLOAD FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP OEM SOFTWARE ONLINE
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL mac[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.org]FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP computer find SOFTWARE[/url] - DOWNLOAD FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP MICROSOFT SOFTWARE
January 6, 2008 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]2008 2008 DOWNLOAD CHEAP DOWNLOAD CHEAP[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net]2007 DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL computer dummy dummy tech[/url] - DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL DRAWING
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL r18[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/info-AutoCAD_2008.html?session=753971199674143]ANTIVIRUS FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP DOWNLOAD free SOFTWARE VIRUS ware[/url] - FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP pc pocket SOFTWARE
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL job[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/info-Autocad_2007.html?session=639891199674627]FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP WINDOWS xp SOFTWARE[/url] - DOWNLOAD FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP OEM SOFTWARE ONLINE
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL mac[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.org]FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP computer find SOFTWARE[/url] - DOWNLOAD FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP MICROSOFT SOFTWARE
January 6, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]2008 2008 DOWNLOAD CHEAP DOWNLOAD CHEAP[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net]2007 DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL computer dummy dummy tech[/url] - DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL DRAWING
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL r18[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/info-AutoCAD_2008.html?session=753971199674143]ANTIVIRUS FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP DOWNLOAD free SOFTWARE VIRUS ware[/url] - FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP pc pocket SOFTWARE
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL job[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/info-Autocad_2007.html?session=639891199674627]FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP WINDOWS xp SOFTWARE[/url] - DOWNLOAD FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP OEM SOFTWARE ONLINE
[b][u]DOWNLOAD CHEAP AUTOCAD PROFESSIONAL mac[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.org]FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP computer find SOFTWARE[/url] - DOWNLOAD FREE DOWNLOAD CHEAP MICROSOFT SOFTWARE
January 6, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]BUY VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY ONLINE CHEAP[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.doctorforum.buyusarx.com]CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - BUY CHEAP purchase uk VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]BUY CHEAP ONLINE prescription VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheap-cialis.buyusarx.com]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - CHEAP discount VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com]CHEAP CHEAPest in uk VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY VIAGRA.[/url] - BUY CHEAP ONLINE VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY VIAGRA.
[b][u]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY order ONLINE[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/viagra-side-effects.html]cialis GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - cialis GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY order ONLINE[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/viagra-cialis.html]CHEAPest GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - BUY CHEAP GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/buy-viagra-online.html]CHEAPest GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - order CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]BUY CHEAPest ONLINE place VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/vagra.html]GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY pill[/url] - BUY CHEAP meds ONLINE VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]BUY CHEAP ONLINE prescription VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/viagra.html]CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - GENERIC name for VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/cheap-viagra-buy.html]BUY CHEAP ONLINE prescription VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - CHEAPest price VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]BUY CHEAP ONLINE prescription VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
January 6, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]BUY VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY ONLINE CHEAP[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.doctorforum.buyusarx.com]CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - BUY CHEAP purchase uk VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]BUY CHEAP ONLINE prescription VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheap-cialis.buyusarx.com]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - CHEAP discount VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com]CHEAP CHEAPest in uk VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY VIAGRA.[/url] - BUY CHEAP ONLINE VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY VIAGRA.
[b][u]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY order ONLINE[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/viagra-side-effects.html]cialis GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - cialis GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY order ONLINE[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/viagra-cialis.html]CHEAPest GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - BUY CHEAP GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/buy-viagra-online.html]CHEAPest GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - order CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]BUY CHEAPest ONLINE place VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/vagra.html]GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY pill[/url] - BUY CHEAP meds ONLINE VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]BUY CHEAP ONLINE prescription VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/viagra.html]CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - GENERIC name for VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/cheap-viagra-buy.html]BUY CHEAP ONLINE prescription VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - CHEAPest price VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]BUY CHEAP ONLINE prescription VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
January 6, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]BUY VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY ONLINE CHEAP[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.doctorforum.buyusarx.com]CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - BUY CHEAP purchase uk VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]BUY CHEAP ONLINE prescription VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheap-cialis.buyusarx.com]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - CHEAP discount VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com]CHEAP CHEAPest in uk VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY VIAGRA.[/url] - BUY CHEAP ONLINE VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY VIAGRA.
[b][u]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY order ONLINE[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/viagra-side-effects.html]cialis GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - cialis GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY order ONLINE[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/viagra-cialis.html]CHEAPest GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - BUY CHEAP GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/buy-viagra-online.html]CHEAPest GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - order CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]BUY CHEAPest ONLINE place VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/vagra.html]GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY pill[/url] - BUY CHEAP meds ONLINE VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]BUY CHEAP ONLINE prescription VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/viagra.html]CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - GENERIC name for VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/cheap-viagra-buy.html]BUY CHEAP ONLINE prescription VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - CHEAPest price VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]BUY CHEAP ONLINE prescription VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
January 6, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]BUY VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY ONLINE CHEAP[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.doctorforum.buyusarx.com]CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - BUY CHEAP purchase uk VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]BUY CHEAP ONLINE prescription VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheap-cialis.buyusarx.com]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - CHEAP discount VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com]CHEAP CHEAPest in uk VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY VIAGRA.[/url] - BUY CHEAP ONLINE VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY VIAGRA.
[b][u]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY order ONLINE[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/viagra-side-effects.html]cialis GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - cialis GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY order ONLINE[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/viagra-cialis.html]CHEAPest GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - BUY CHEAP GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/buy-viagra-online.html]CHEAPest GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - order CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]BUY CHEAPest ONLINE place VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/vagra.html]GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY pill[/url] - BUY CHEAP meds ONLINE VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]BUY CHEAP ONLINE prescription VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/viagra.html]CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - GENERIC name for VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.newrxforum09.kokoom.com/cheap-viagra-buy.html]BUY CHEAP ONLINE prescription VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - CHEAPest price VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]BUY CHEAP ONLINE prescription VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
January 6, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Happy New Year 2008.!
January 11, 2008 4:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u] book FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM WEAVER [/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net]book FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM mx WEAVER[/url] - 8 FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM foundation php WEAVER
[b][u] FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM integration photo shop WEAVER [/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/info-Adobe_Dreamweaver_CS3.html?session=338701198804553]FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM serial WEAVER[/url] - design FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM software WEAVER web
[b][u] FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM mac WEAVER [/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/manufacturer-Adobe.html?session=338701198804553]creating FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM image map WEAVER[/url] - 8 FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM everything everything WEAVER
[b][u] FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM lyric WEAVER [/b][/u]
January 13, 2008 2:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u] book FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM WEAVER [/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net]book FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM mx WEAVER[/url] - 8 FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM foundation php WEAVER
[b][u] FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM integration photo shop WEAVER [/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/info-Adobe_Dreamweaver_CS3.html?session=338701198804553]FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM serial WEAVER[/url] - design FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM software WEAVER web
[b][u] FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM mac WEAVER [/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/manufacturer-Adobe.html?session=338701198804553]creating FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM image map WEAVER[/url] - 8 FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM everything everything WEAVER
[b][u] FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM lyric WEAVER [/b][/u]
January 13, 2008 2:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u] book FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM WEAVER [/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net]book FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM mx WEAVER[/url] - 8 FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM foundation php WEAVER
[b][u] FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM integration photo shop WEAVER [/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/info-Adobe_Dreamweaver_CS3.html?session=338701198804553]FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM serial WEAVER[/url] - design FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM software WEAVER web
[b][u] FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM mac WEAVER [/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/manufacturer-Adobe.html?session=338701198804553]creating FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM image map WEAVER[/url] - 8 FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM everything everything WEAVER
[b][u] FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM lyric WEAVER [/b][/u]
January 13, 2008 2:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u] book FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM WEAVER [/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net]book FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM mx WEAVER[/url] - 8 FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM foundation php WEAVER
[b][u] FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM integration photo shop WEAVER [/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/info-Adobe_Dreamweaver_CS3.html?session=338701198804553]FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM serial WEAVER[/url] - design FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM software WEAVER web
[b][u] FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM mac WEAVER [/b][/u]
[url=http://www.cheapsoftforu.net/manufacturer-Adobe.html?session=338701198804553]creating FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM image map WEAVER[/url] - 8 FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM everything everything WEAVER
[b][u] FREE DOWNLOAD DREAM lyric WEAVER [/b][/u]
January 13, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Valium? - #1 Anti Anxiety Medication in USA. ORDER ONLINE! NO PRESCRIPTION! Free Shipping.!
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/phenterminesite]Phentermine Online Pharmacy>>Free Shipping..!![/url] - Phentermine Online Pharmacy>>Free Shipping..!!
Phentermine 37.5mg - 4 month supply $299.! Free Shipping.!
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/cialis-achetez]ORDER CHEAP TRAMADOL[/url] - ORDER CHEAP dream ONLINE pharmaceutical TRAMADOL
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/ronnyverony]Play at Crystal Palace CASINO - Get up to $777 Free[/url] - Crystal Palace CASINO $777 Welcome BONUS
[url=http://www.newrxforum02.kokoom.com]"Save On Soma & Carisoprodol-get Free Shipping Too [/url] - Goodpills - LOWEST Soma PRICES!!!
[url=http://www.newrxforum02.kokoom.com/buy-cheap-carisoprodol.html] Carisoprodol & Tramadol 120 Free FedEx[/url] - Free Shipping on Carisoprdol Orders
[url=http://www.newrxforum02.kokoom.com/carisoprodol-online-buy.html]Best Prices on Carisoprodol [/url] - Buy Soma 30 pills for $99 Free shipping Visa only
[url=http://www.newrxforum02.kokoom.com/carisoprodol-order-soma.html] Carisoprodol & Tramadol 120 Free FedEx[/url] - Soma Watson brand & Generic Carisoprodol from $47.50 - Best Value -
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION aids
[b][u]BUY CHEAP GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/nonavernona]CHEAPest GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - CHEAP GENERIC
VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]CHEAPest price VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
EREC
TILE DYSFUNCTION help
VIAGRA GENERIQUE BON MARCHE
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/mariamerabella]ACHETEZ VIAGRA GENERIQUE BON MARCHE[/url] - Ordre de VIAGRA BON MARCHE EN LIGNE
PREISWERTESTER VIAGRA
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/ronybarrony]Preisnachlass ALLGEMEINER VIAGRA[/url] - KAUFEN SIE VIAGRA PREISWERT
ALLGEMEINE VIAGRA Nebenwirkungen
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION treatment
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/cialis-achetez]buy low-cost tramadol online[/url] - mail buy tramadol
January 14, 2008 4:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Valium? - #1 Anti Anxiety Medication in USA. ORDER ONLINE! NO PRESCRIPTION! Free Shipping.!
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/phenterminesite]Phentermine Online Pharmacy>>Free Shipping..!![/url] - Phentermine Online Pharmacy>>Free Shipping..!!
Phentermine 37.5mg - 4 month supply $299.! Free Shipping.!
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/cialis-achetez]ORDER CHEAP TRAMADOL[/url] - ORDER CHEAP dream ONLINE pharmaceutical TRAMADOL
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/ronnyverony]Play at Crystal Palace CASINO - Get up to $777 Free[/url] - Crystal Palace CASINO $777 Welcome BONUS
[url=http://www.newrxforum02.kokoom.com]"Save On Soma & Carisoprodol-get Free Shipping Too [/url] - Goodpills - LOWEST Soma PRICES!!!
[url=http://www.newrxforum02.kokoom.com/buy-cheap-carisoprodol.html] Carisoprodol & Tramadol 120 Free FedEx[/url] - Free Shipping on Carisoprdol Orders
[url=http://www.newrxforum02.kokoom.com/carisoprodol-online-buy.html]Best Prices on Carisoprodol [/url] - Buy Soma 30 pills for $99 Free shipping Visa only
[url=http://www.newrxforum02.kokoom.com/carisoprodol-order-soma.html] Carisoprodol & Tramadol 120 Free FedEx[/url] - Soma Watson brand & Generic Carisoprodol from $47.50 - Best Value -
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION aids
[b][u]BUY CHEAP GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/nonavernona]CHEAPest GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - CHEAP GENERIC
VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]CHEAPest price VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
EREC
TILE DYSFUNCTION help
VIAGRA GENERIQUE BON MARCHE
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/mariamerabella]ACHETEZ VIAGRA GENERIQUE BON MARCHE[/url] - Ordre de VIAGRA BON MARCHE EN LIGNE
PREISWERTESTER VIAGRA
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/ronybarrony]Preisnachlass ALLGEMEINER VIAGRA[/url] - KAUFEN SIE VIAGRA PREISWERT
ALLGEMEINE VIAGRA Nebenwirkungen
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION treatment
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/cialis-achetez]buy low-cost tramadol online[/url] - mail buy tramadol
January 14, 2008 4:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Valium? - #1 Anti Anxiety Medication in USA. ORDER ONLINE! NO PRESCRIPTION! Free Shipping.!
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/phenterminesite]Phentermine Online Pharmacy>>Free Shipping..!![/url] - Phentermine Online Pharmacy>>Free Shipping..!!
Phentermine 37.5mg - 4 month supply $299.! Free Shipping.!
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/cialis-achetez]ORDER CHEAP TRAMADOL[/url] - ORDER CHEAP dream ONLINE pharmaceutical TRAMADOL
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/ronnyverony]Play at Crystal Palace CASINO - Get up to $777 Free[/url] - Crystal Palace CASINO $777 Welcome BONUS
[url=http://www.newrxforum02.kokoom.com]"Save On Soma & Carisoprodol-get Free Shipping Too [/url] - Goodpills - LOWEST Soma PRICES!!!
[url=http://www.newrxforum02.kokoom.com/buy-cheap-carisoprodol.html] Carisoprodol & Tramadol 120 Free FedEx[/url] - Free Shipping on Carisoprdol Orders
[url=http://www.newrxforum02.kokoom.com/carisoprodol-online-buy.html]Best Prices on Carisoprodol [/url] - Buy Soma 30 pills for $99 Free shipping Visa only
[url=http://www.newrxforum02.kokoom.com/carisoprodol-order-soma.html] Carisoprodol & Tramadol 120 Free FedEx[/url] - Soma Watson brand & Generic Carisoprodol from $47.50 - Best Value -
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION aids
[b][u]BUY CHEAP GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/nonavernona]CHEAPest GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - CHEAP GENERIC
VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]CHEAPest price VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
EREC
TILE DYSFUNCTION help
VIAGRA GENERIQUE BON MARCHE
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/mariamerabella]ACHETEZ VIAGRA GENERIQUE BON MARCHE[/url] - Ordre de VIAGRA BON MARCHE EN LIGNE
PREISWERTESTER VIAGRA
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/ronybarrony]Preisnachlass ALLGEMEINER VIAGRA[/url] - KAUFEN SIE VIAGRA PREISWERT
ALLGEMEINE VIAGRA Nebenwirkungen
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION treatment
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/cialis-achetez]buy low-cost tramadol online[/url] - mail buy tramadol
January 14, 2008 4:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Valium? - #1 Anti Anxiety Medication in USA. ORDER ONLINE! NO PRESCRIPTION! Free Shipping.!
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/phenterminesite]Phentermine Online Pharmacy>>Free Shipping..!![/url] - Phentermine Online Pharmacy>>Free Shipping..!!
Phentermine 37.5mg - 4 month supply $299.! Free Shipping.!
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/cialis-achetez]ORDER CHEAP TRAMADOL[/url] - ORDER CHEAP dream ONLINE pharmaceutical TRAMADOL
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/ronnyverony]Play at Crystal Palace CASINO - Get up to $777 Free[/url] - Crystal Palace CASINO $777 Welcome BONUS
[url=http://www.newrxforum02.kokoom.com]"Save On Soma & Carisoprodol-get Free Shipping Too [/url] - Goodpills - LOWEST Soma PRICES!!!
[url=http://www.newrxforum02.kokoom.com/buy-cheap-carisoprodol.html] Carisoprodol & Tramadol 120 Free FedEx[/url] - Free Shipping on Carisoprdol Orders
[url=http://www.newrxforum02.kokoom.com/carisoprodol-online-buy.html]Best Prices on Carisoprodol [/url] - Buy Soma 30 pills for $99 Free shipping Visa only
[url=http://www.newrxforum02.kokoom.com/carisoprodol-order-soma.html] Carisoprodol & Tramadol 120 Free FedEx[/url] - Soma Watson brand & Generic Carisoprodol from $47.50 - Best Value -
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION aids
[b][u]BUY CHEAP GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/nonavernona]CHEAPest GENERIC VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - CHEAP GENERIC
VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]CHEAPest price VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/b][/u]
EREC
TILE DYSFUNCTION help
VIAGRA GENERIQUE BON MARCHE
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/mariamerabella]ACHETEZ VIAGRA GENERIQUE BON MARCHE[/url] - Ordre de VIAGRA BON MARCHE EN LIGNE
PREISWERTESTER VIAGRA
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/ronybarrony]Preisnachlass ALLGEMEINER VIAGRA[/url] - KAUFEN SIE VIAGRA PREISWERT
ALLGEMEINE VIAGRA Nebenwirkungen
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION treatment
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/cialis-achetez]buy low-cost tramadol online[/url] - mail buy tramadol
January 14, 2008 4:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE CS2 PHOTO real real SHOP world world[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.onlinesoft4u.com]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE PHOTO SHOP tutorial[/url] - DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE flash
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.onlinesoft4u.com/info-Adobe_Acrobat_8.html?session=453521198802388]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE system[/url] - DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE download
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE 8[/b][/u]
January 19, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE CS2 PHOTO real real SHOP world world[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.onlinesoft4u.com]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE PHOTO SHOP tutorial[/url] - DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE flash
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.onlinesoft4u.com/info-Adobe_Acrobat_8.html?session=453521198802388]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE system[/url] - DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE download
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE 8[/b][/u]
January 19, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE CS2 PHOTO real real SHOP world world[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.onlinesoft4u.com]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE PHOTO SHOP tutorial[/url] - DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE flash
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.onlinesoft4u.com/info-Adobe_Acrobat_8.html?session=453521198802388]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE system[/url] - DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE download
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE 8[/b][/u]
January 19, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE CS2 PHOTO real real SHOP world world[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.onlinesoft4u.com]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE PHOTO SHOP tutorial[/url] - DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE flash
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.onlinesoft4u.com/info-Adobe_Acrobat_8.html?session=453521198802388]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE system[/url] - DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE download
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE 8[/b][/u]
January 19, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/alias-maya-torrent.html]FREE CHEAP DOWNLOADABLE OEM SOFTWARE[/url] - DOWNLOAD OEM SOFTWARE ADOBE DREAMWEAVER CS3
DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 PROFESSIONAL
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/2007-internet-norton-security-upgrade.html]FREE DOWNLOAD CORELDRAW PROFESSIONAL FULL VERSION[/url] - FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD
[b][u]FREE DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE PHOTO SHOP download[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.onlinesoft4u.com]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE flex from source training[/url] - DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE CS2 hands PHOTO SHOP training web
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE 8[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.onlinesoft4u.com/info-Adobe_Acrobat_8.html?session=453521198802388]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE reader[/url] - DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE book CS2 illustrator
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE 8 FREE download[/b][/u]
BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/adobe-acrobat-reader.html]BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8[/url] - FREE DOWNLOAD FULL VERSION AutoCAD 2008 PROFESSIONAL
PURCHASE & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE FLASH PROFESSIONAL cs3
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/microsoft-windows-server-2003-full-license.html]FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD[/url] - BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD
FREE DOWNLOAD OEM SOFTWARE ADOBE DREAMWEAVER CS3
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/8-macromedia-studio.html]FREE DOWNLOAD FULL VERSION AutoCAD 2008 PROFESSIONAL[/url] - FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD
Adobe? Acrobat? 8 Professional software enables business professionals to reliably create
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/autocad-2006-custom-palettes-sort-order.html]BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8[/url] - BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
Adobe? Acrobat? 8 Professional software enables business professionals to reliably create
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/oem-macromedia-studio-8.html]FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD[/url] - BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/macromedia-studio-8-serial.html]FREE DOWNLOAD ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8[/url] - BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
FREE DOWNLOAD ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/microsoft-window-2003-server-enterprise.html]FREE DOWNLOAD FULL VERSION AutoCAD 2008 PROFESSIONAL[/url] - Adobe? Acrobat?
8 Professional software enables business professionals to reliably create
January 22, 2008 11:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/alias-maya-torrent.html]FREE CHEAP DOWNLOADABLE OEM SOFTWARE[/url] - DOWNLOAD OEM SOFTWARE ADOBE DREAMWEAVER CS3
DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 PROFESSIONAL
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/2007-internet-norton-security-upgrade.html]FREE DOWNLOAD CORELDRAW PROFESSIONAL FULL VERSION[/url] - FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD
[b][u]FREE DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE PHOTO SHOP download[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.onlinesoft4u.com]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE flex from source training[/url] - DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE CS2 hands PHOTO SHOP training web
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE 8[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.onlinesoft4u.com/info-Adobe_Acrobat_8.html?session=453521198802388]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE reader[/url] - DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE book CS2 illustrator
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE 8 FREE download[/b][/u]
BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/adobe-acrobat-reader.html]BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8[/url] - FREE DOWNLOAD FULL VERSION AutoCAD 2008 PROFESSIONAL
PURCHASE & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE FLASH PROFESSIONAL cs3
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/microsoft-windows-server-2003-full-license.html]FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD[/url] - BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD
FREE DOWNLOAD OEM SOFTWARE ADOBE DREAMWEAVER CS3
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/8-macromedia-studio.html]FREE DOWNLOAD FULL VERSION AutoCAD 2008 PROFESSIONAL[/url] - FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD
Adobe? Acrobat? 8 Professional software enables business professionals to reliably create
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/autocad-2006-custom-palettes-sort-order.html]BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8[/url] - BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
Adobe? Acrobat? 8 Professional software enables business professionals to reliably create
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/oem-macromedia-studio-8.html]FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD[/url] - BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/macromedia-studio-8-serial.html]FREE DOWNLOAD ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8[/url] - BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
FREE DOWNLOAD ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/microsoft-window-2003-server-enterprise.html]FREE DOWNLOAD FULL VERSION AutoCAD 2008 PROFESSIONAL[/url] - Adobe? Acrobat?
8 Professional software enables business professionals to reliably create
January 22, 2008 11:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/alias-maya-torrent.html]FREE CHEAP DOWNLOADABLE OEM SOFTWARE[/url] - DOWNLOAD OEM SOFTWARE ADOBE DREAMWEAVER CS3
DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 PROFESSIONAL
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/2007-internet-norton-security-upgrade.html]FREE DOWNLOAD CORELDRAW PROFESSIONAL FULL VERSION[/url] - FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD
[b][u]FREE DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE PHOTO SHOP download[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.onlinesoft4u.com]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE flex from source training[/url] - DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE CS2 hands PHOTO SHOP training web
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE 8[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.onlinesoft4u.com/info-Adobe_Acrobat_8.html?session=453521198802388]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE reader[/url] - DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE book CS2 illustrator
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE 8 FREE download[/b][/u]
BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/adobe-acrobat-reader.html]BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8[/url] - FREE DOWNLOAD FULL VERSION AutoCAD 2008 PROFESSIONAL
PURCHASE & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE FLASH PROFESSIONAL cs3
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/microsoft-windows-server-2003-full-license.html]FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD[/url] - BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD
FREE DOWNLOAD OEM SOFTWARE ADOBE DREAMWEAVER CS3
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/8-macromedia-studio.html]FREE DOWNLOAD FULL VERSION AutoCAD 2008 PROFESSIONAL[/url] - FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD
Adobe? Acrobat? 8 Professional software enables business professionals to reliably create
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/autocad-2006-custom-palettes-sort-order.html]BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8[/url] - BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
Adobe? Acrobat? 8 Professional software enables business professionals to reliably create
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/oem-macromedia-studio-8.html]FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD[/url] - BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/macromedia-studio-8-serial.html]FREE DOWNLOAD ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8[/url] - BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
FREE DOWNLOAD ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/microsoft-window-2003-server-enterprise.html]FREE DOWNLOAD FULL VERSION AutoCAD 2008 PROFESSIONAL[/url] - Adobe? Acrobat?
8 Professional software enables business professionals to reliably create
January 22, 2008 11:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/alias-maya-torrent.html]FREE CHEAP DOWNLOADABLE OEM SOFTWARE[/url] - DOWNLOAD OEM SOFTWARE ADOBE DREAMWEAVER CS3
DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 PROFESSIONAL
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/2007-internet-norton-security-upgrade.html]FREE DOWNLOAD CORELDRAW PROFESSIONAL FULL VERSION[/url] - FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD
[b][u]FREE DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE PHOTO SHOP download[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.onlinesoft4u.com]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE flex from source training[/url] - DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE CS2 hands PHOTO SHOP training web
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE 8[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.onlinesoft4u.com/info-Adobe_Acrobat_8.html?session=453521198802388]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE reader[/url] - DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE book CS2 illustrator
[b][u]DOWNLOAD VERY CHEAP ADOBE 8 FREE download[/b][/u]
BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/adobe-acrobat-reader.html]BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8[/url] - FREE DOWNLOAD FULL VERSION AutoCAD 2008 PROFESSIONAL
PURCHASE & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE FLASH PROFESSIONAL cs3
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/microsoft-windows-server-2003-full-license.html]FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD[/url] - BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD
FREE DOWNLOAD OEM SOFTWARE ADOBE DREAMWEAVER CS3
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/8-macromedia-studio.html]FREE DOWNLOAD FULL VERSION AutoCAD 2008 PROFESSIONAL[/url] - FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD
Adobe? Acrobat? 8 Professional software enables business professionals to reliably create
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/autocad-2006-custom-palettes-sort-order.html]BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8[/url] - BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
Adobe? Acrobat? 8 Professional software enables business professionals to reliably create
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/oem-macromedia-studio-8.html]FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD[/url] - BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
FREE BUY CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT 8 & DOWNLOAD
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/macromedia-studio-8-serial.html]FREE DOWNLOAD ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8[/url] - BUY & DOWNLOAD CHEAP ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
FREE DOWNLOAD ADOBE ACROBAT PROFESSIONAL 8
[url=http://www.cheap-software.healthagencyclub.org/microsoft-window-2003-server-enterprise.html]FREE DOWNLOAD FULL VERSION AutoCAD 2008 PROFESSIONAL[/url] - Adobe? Acrobat?
8 Professional software enables business professionals to reliably create
January 22, 2008 11:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
ORDER ONLINE SUPER-VIAGRA OR CHEAP downloadable OEM SOFTWARE ADOBE ACROBAT PRO & GET TEEN PORN MOVIES FOR FREE..!!
[b][u]EASY DOWNLOAD CHEAP OEM MACROMEDIA Fireworks MX 2004 - $39.95..!![/b][/u]
[url=http://www.softonlineforus.com/manufacturer-Macromedia.html?session=484451201297944]EASY DOWNLOAD CHEAP OEM MACROMEDIA Director MX v10.0 - $49.95..!![/url] - EASY DOWNLOAD CHEAP OEM MACROMEDIA Fireworks 8 - $39.95..!!
[b][u]EASY DOWNLOAD CHEAP OEM Autocad Revit 7.0 - $79.95..!![/b][/u]
[url=http://www.foruminfosoft.com/info-AutoCAD_2008.html?session=483951201338565]EASY DOWNLOAD CHEAP OEM AUTODESK Inventor Professional 2008 - $229.95..!![/url] - EASY DOWNLOAD CHEAP OEM AUTODESK Building Systems 2006 - $129.95..!!
[b][u]BUY CHEAP VIAGRA. CHEAP ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY ONLINE uk[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/nonavernona]CHEAPest in uk VIAGRA. BUY CHEAP VIAGRA ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY[/url] - BUY CHEAP GENERIC VIAGRA. BUY CHEAP VIAGRA ONLINE INTERNET-PHARMACY
[b][u]ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION doctor[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/dafnavaronin]ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION viagra[/url] - herbal ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION treatment
[b][u]improve ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.planetnana.co.il/gonzillaperony]ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION[/url] - generic ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION drug
[b][u]ALLGEMEINER VIA
GRA[/b][/u]
[b][u] EREKTILES Funktionsstorungsvitamin [/b][/u]
[b][u]KAUFEN SIE ONLINE Platz VIAGRA BILLIGST[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.kaufen-viagra.internetcivil.org]KAUF
EN - PREISWERT sagen VIAGRA wordpress
SIE ONLINE Platz VIAGRA BILLIGST[/url] - PREISWERTE VIAGRA bestellen ONLINE [b][u]PREISWERTESTER VIAGRA[/b][/u]
[b][u]KAUFEN SIE VIAGRA PREISWERT[/b][/u]
[url=http://www.1kaufen-viagra.net]PREISWERTESTER ALLGEMEINER netto-VIAGRA[/url] - KAUFEN SIE ONLINE VIAGRA BILLIGST
[b][u]PREISWERT PREISWERTEST im Vereinigten Konigreich VIAGRA VIAGRA VIAGRA[/b][/u]
SILDENAFILCITRATE india
[url=http://www.adsense4u.org/good/teen-sex.html] [img]http://www.adsense4u.org/good/1.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.adsense4u.org/good/2.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.adsense4u.org/good/thumbs_good.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.adsense4u.org/good/9.jpg[/img] [/url]
[url=http://www.adsense4u.org/good/teen-sex.html]free black teen porn[/url] - teen porn movies
teenteen sexteens for cashteensteen pornteen pussytiny teensteen modelsnude teenswet teensnudist teensteen modelteen girlshot teenstight teensnaked teenstight tiny teensteens in short skirts galleriesnaughty for teensteen lesbiansyoung teenssexy teensbunny teensteen fuckhot teenyoung teennude teenpetite teensteen titsteen assteens wearing thongsteen analteens gone wildteens in micro bikinisexy teenexploited black teensteen nudeteen lesbianbreast in teensblack teensyoung teen sexteen moviesjapanese teenshorny teensteen nudistteen titans hentaifree teen pornteen blowjobasian teenpre teennudist teensteens fuckingteen girlteen boobsteen topangabikini teensebony teenstiffany teentiny model teenssandra teen modellesbian teensteen orgasmteen slutsyoung teens flashing thongsteen fuckingteens fingeringhot teen sexcandid teen photographynaked teencasting couch teensteen titanspre teen modelsblack teenbusty teensdrunk teensteen stripexploited teensbusty teengay teensfree galleries of teensteen pantiesmoms teaching teens
teen slutsmells like teen spiritcute teensyoung teen pornasian teenshot teen girlstiny teenblonde teenteens dry humpingteen bikiniteen boysnn teenspetite teencute teenrussian teensteen tgpteen pregnancyteens in short skirts galleryteen pussyyoung teen pussytight teen pussyhot teen pussyblack teen pussywet teen pussyshaved teen pussypre teen pussyhairy teen pussyfree teen pussyteen pussy fucktiny teen pussypussy teencute teen pussyasian teen pussyteen pussy picspink teen pussynaked teen pussyteen pink pussysweet teen pussylittle teen pussyteen pussy fuckedsexy teen pussyblonde teen pussyteen pussy galleriesteen hairy pussyteen pussiesnude teen pussyteen shaved pussyteen black pussyteen wet pussyteen pussy fuckingbald teen pussyteen tight pussyteen pussy poundingfree teen pussy picsteen lesbian pussyteen girl pussyebony teen pussyfresh teen pussyteen topanga pussyteen pussy squirtingyoung teen pussy galleriesteen virgin pussyvirgin teen pussyteen girls pussyteen pussy cumteen pussy upcloseteen pussy squirtskinn
y teen pussyteen pussy lickingpetite teen pussydick in teen pussyfat teen pussybeautiful teen pussyteen pussyteen pussysteen pussy penetrationredhead teen pussysmall teen pussyteen pussy sextrixie teen pussyteen pussy close upteen pussy spreadhot teen pussy fuckedteen pussy stretchteen shaving pussyteen asian pussychubby teen pussyfree young teen pussy galleriesnice teen pussyperfect teen pussysquirting teen pussyteen girls eating pussyfree teen pussy gallerieswhite teen pussylatin teen pussyteen showing pussylesbian teen pussyteen lesbians licking pussyteen pussy galleryteen pussy lickteen pussy moviesteen pussy videoteen squirting pussyfree amatuer teen nude gallery college pussy blowjobfucking teen pussyjapanese teen pussyjuicy teen pussyteen pussy eatingtwo lips pussy teenhorny teen pussyteen cum in pussyteen girl licking hairy pussywet teen pussy fingerbusty teen pussyteen pussy videosbig teen pussylegal teen pussyhairless teen pussyteen pornfree teen pornyoung teen pornteen titans pornpre teen pornteen
porn movieshardcore teen porngay teen pornhot teen pornfree teen porn moviesteen porn galleriesasian teen pornfree teen porn videosteen porn videosporn teenblack teen pornteen lesbian pornteen titan pornteen porn picsteen porn clipslesbian teen pornsexy teen pornteen gay pornhomemade teen pornteen rape pornteen girl pornlesbo teen pornunderage teen pornteen porn vidsrussian teen pornteen porn picturesteen porn freeamateur teen pornteen porn sitesblonde teen pornhot sexy teen pornteen xxx pornillegal teen pornteen porn starsfree young teen pornteen pornteen porn thumbsteen sex pornfree teen porn picspetite teen pornreal teen porntiny teen pornfree teen porn vidsfree teen porn galleriesteen porn videovery young teen pornteen porn movieteen porn mpegslatina teen pornteen asian pornfree teen porn clipsfree gay teen pornebony teen pornteen anal porncute teen pornnude teen pornteen girls pornteen porn starfree young teen porn videosjapanese teen pornindian teen pornamature teen pornfree teen porn videoteen porn and
freechubby teen pornteen lolita pornxxx teen pornfilipina teen pornteen pornfat teen pornamatuer teen pornteen cheerleader pornteen titans porn comicsteen porn xxxteen hardcore pornhome made teen pornstreaming free teen porn+ teen pornyoungest teen pornfree asian teen pornteen porn reviewsteen boy pornlicking lesbo teen pornfree teen porn sitesredhead teen pornteen goth pornfree teen lesbian pornlittle teen pornextreme teen pornteen lesbo pornindia teen pornlesbo teen licking pornred head teen pornfemale teen pornfree black teen porn
[b][u]EASY DOWNLOAD CHEAP OEM MACROMEDIA Flash Communication Server MX - $39.95..!![/b]
[/u]
[url=http://www.softonlineforus.com/manufacturer-Macromedia.html?session=484451201297944]EASY DOWNLOAD CHEAP OEM MACROMEDIA ColdFusion MX 7.0 Standard - $99.95..!![/url] - EASY DOWNLOAD CHEAP OEM MACROMEDIA Breeze v3.07 - $69.95..!!
[url=http://www.foruminfosoft.com/info-AutoCAD_2008.html?session=483951201338565]EASY DOWNLOAD CHEAP OEM AUTODESK Inventor Professional 2008 - $229.95..!![/url] - EASY DOWNLOAD CHEAP OEM AutoCAD 2008 - $159.95..!!
[b][u]EASY DOWNLOAD CHEAP OEM AutoCAD Architecture 2008 - $159.95..!![/b][/u]
January 27, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink