National Dems Predicting Gains In Suburban Districts In 2008
Okay, this is interesting. A couple days ago I spoke with a few House Dem strategists who are surveying the 2008 electoral landscape. They are reasonably certain that they'll have substantially more success than in the past making inroads into GOP suburban districts across the country.
Indeed, here's a target list that the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has drawn up laying out what national Dems see as the key 10 vulnerable GOP House members in suburban districts:
* Connecticut 4 –- Chris Shays * Florida 13 –- Vern Buchanan * Illinois 10 –- Mark Kirk * Michigan 9 –- Joe Knollenberg * Nevada 3 –- Jon Porter * New Jersey 7 –- Mike Ferguson * Ohio 2 –- "Mean Jean" Schmidt * Ohio 15 –- Deborah Pryce * Pennsylvania 6 –- Jim Gerlach * Washington 8 –- Dave Reichert
Is this just DCCC bluster? Well, it turns out that a certain Republican agrees with the Dems on this one: Karl Rove. Compare the DCCC's list to Rove's own internal list -- revealed as part of a Congressional probe -- of what he calls "priority defense" races:
Jim Gerlach, Pennsylvania Vern Buchanan, Florida Robin Hayes, North Carolina Heather Wilson, New Mexico Marilyn Musgrave, Colorado Peter Roskam, Illinois Chris Shays, Connecticut Jean Schmidt, Ohio Thelma Drake, Virginia Barbara Cubin, Wyoming (Note: Rove also says that Cubin might not seek re-election.) John Doolittle, California Jon Porter, Nevada Jim Walsh, New York Deborah Pryce, Ohio Randy Kuhl, New York Mike Ferguson, New Jersey Joe Knollenberg, Michigan
Eight in common.
In an interview with me, the DCCC's political director, Jon Vogel, cited a bunch of reasons why he thinks the suburban electoral landscape is set to deliver more gains to Dems. Vogel's thoughts after the jump.
In the interview, Vogel laid out a bunch of reasons for this trend, including the decline of the taxes issue as a potent weapon for the GOP, gas prices and other "middle class squeeze" issues that preoccupy suburbanites, and the realization that the GOP has made a fiscal mess of the country -- "a huge issue for independent voters in suburban districts," Vogel says.
Vogel promises an intensive effort in suburban districts leading up to the 2008 elections, noting that the DCCC is already scouting for candidates to run against GOP Rep. Gerlach in Pennsylvania's sixth district.
But will such efforts allow Dem strategists to reproduce 2006's success next year? Asked if candidates who survived close calls in 2006 had in some sense inoculated themselves against a challenge in 2008, Vogel disputed the idea. He argued that it sometimes takes repeated challenges to take out an incumbent and said that the fact that Dems now control Congress allows them to shape the legislative agenda in ways that put pressure on vulnerable Republicans by forcing them into unpopular positions.
"If you look at Kentucky's third, it took a few tries to take out Anne Northup," Vogel said, adding that Dem control of Congress has "significantly helped our recruiting process. People now see that Dems can win, that people can run successful elections based on what we stand for, and that typical Republican attacks are not working. This is all very encouraging to someone who is thinking about running for Congress."
Interesting stuff. We'll be keeping you posted on all these and many other races here at Election Central.















I was called for a virtual townhall meeting Friday (conference call) out of the blue that my congresswoamn Judy Biggert, IL-13 set up. I never got a question in but she said we "have to win in Iraq" and Bush's tax cuts are growing the economy out of debt. She's about 67 years old, broke her personal term limits pledge years ago and is primed, even though she says she loves her job, to be turned out to pasture.
I think in the burbs of Chicago we can take out both Roskam (IL-06)and Biggert if we get good candidates and the funding. Repubs are killing themselves with their harebrained borrow and spend economics and war policies.
April 17, 2007 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Look, I'm all for Dem gains anywhere but it's a loooooonnnng way til then. Let's concentrate on the 1)the kids dying in Iraq and getting them out his mess, 2) the obstructions of justice 3)And simply trying to keep this country in business til the moron is gone.
April 17, 2007 12:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
As a resident of Washington-8, represented by "Sheriff" Dave Reichert, I would be delighted to see this seat turn Democratic. And the DCCC is correct in targeting a district that has increasingly trended Democratic in presidential elections.
Unfortunately, I'm not overly optimistic. Despite a strong, well-known candidate in 2000, Reichert was able to squeeze out a victory based on his reputation as a crime fighter. (After many years, Reichert was credited with finally catching the Green River serial killer.) Largely unnoticed was his abysmal management skills as King County sheriff and the fact that he left the office in the midst of scandals that emerged after his departure.
In 2004, Reichert faced a strong challenge from an energetic political newcomer. Unfortunately again, however, Reichert squeaked through, again based on his reputation and some careful chosen votes meant to demonstrate his "independence" from the Bush administration. In addition, his opponent, Darcy Burner, was unable to overcome negative advertising from the RNC and her own lack of experience.
For 2008, I'm hopeful that the DCCC does more than "target" this district. In order to defeat Reichert, it will take a concerted effort to highlight his obedience to the Republican House leadership, his inability to express coherent policy positions on a whole range of issues, and, frankly, his limited intellect.
It will also require a strong Democratic candidate who can compete in terms of name recognition and qualifications.
Here's hoping.
April 17, 2007 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I there a way to get one's own Senator on this list? Because I'd like to see Norm Coleman's name added.
April 17, 2007 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just noticed that Heather Wilson (New Mexico-1) isn't on the list. Why on earth not? Is it because her district doesn't qualify as "suburban?"
April 17, 2007 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
If I was a Republican strategist I'd be scared to.
What do Congressional Republicans run on in 2008? What is their issue besides Pelosi-phobia? That Democrats might end the war in Iraq? That Republicans some unfinished business they didn't get to in the past 10 years of Republican control?
Strangely, at the presidential level it looks like the Republicans are poised to try the same failed headfake to the center that Dems tried when they supported the war in 2002. Guiliani and Romney seem to be positioning themselves as the kinder, gentler Republicans as opposed to the nasty partisan Rove/Cheney/DeLay bunch. But really, if you want someone with moderate views on abortion and stem cell research, and moderate views on education, health care, the environment, why not vote for the real thing in Edwards, Obama, or Clinton? Republicans have tilted so far to the right over the past decade that when they turn to look back at the center they are finding that most of the Dems are already sitting right there.
April 17, 2007 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Her district is primarily "urban" as it is just Albuquerque and a little of the outskirts.
April 17, 2007 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
That would be the DS(enatorial)CC list not the DCCC list, but Coleman sucks enough to mention anywhere.
April 17, 2007 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Giuliani is not kinder and gentler, even if he is more moderate. Romney (at least as of April 2007) is not moderate on social issues.
April 17, 2007 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course they aren't.
However if either makes it through to the general election, I'd bet my firstborn that that is how they will run. Not as the heir apparent to Goldwater and Reagan, and certainly not as the 2004 version of Bush the war president. But as a socially moderate reach across the aisle and get things done practical sort of Republican.
Sort of like Bush did in 2000 where he deliberately blurred the lines as much as possible between himself and Gore.
April 17, 2007 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
8 in common. Looks like Rove has inside info on who will be in trouble, e.g., Doolittle, Wilson, that almost accounts for the rest.
April 17, 2007 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
To my knowledge, Norm Coleman rarely supports any issue with his vote that he claims to support with his mouth. He's one of the most duplicitous cretins in Washington. Happily, I've had the opportunity on two occasions to give him the finger. Last time I flipped him off, it was at the Minnesota State Fair. I believe he was in the middle of lying to someone about being against Bush's surge. I yelled, "Hey Norm!" and flipped him off. His wife/girlfriend/daughter/whatever saw me do it, but Norm was too busy lying to look my way. His wife/girlfriend/daughter/whatever thought it was funny, though.
April 17, 2007 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Reichert was elected in 2004, when Jennifer Dunn(R) retired. He beat radio talk show host Dave Ross.
In 2006, he faced Darcy Burner.
I have high hopes for State Rep. Ross Hunter, should he run. I think he might be able to pull it off.
April 17, 2007 4:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Given that it was at the MN State Fair, he probably just thought it was some new kind of food on a stick...
April 17, 2007 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I live in the IL 10th District. It's nice to see the D3C is focussing on this race. Dan Seals ran a strong grassroots race with very scant national support. He ran competitively against Mark Kirk without it and some national support could have put him over the top. Early indications are that he is considering running again. Also, there are rumors in the district that Mark Kirk may not be interested in running again. (Kirk also has had a couple of these virtual townhalls. My wife listened to one and tried to ask a question through the call in process. The question was never answered. Also, we went to D.C. for spring break. We contacted his office to arrange for a Capitol tour. His staff never got back to us. Not great constituent service.) There is no apparent successor and if he doesn't run, the Republican primary could be fractious. The voting patterns are definitely changing in the district and getting more favorable toward the Democratic party. Here's hoping.
April 18, 2007 9:16 AM | Reply | Permalink