« xxxx | Home | Tim Johnson Still Bringing In Donations »

Here It Is: Most Audacious Passage In McCain's Iraq Speech

Check out this snippet from John McCain's speech today about Iraq. It's a beaut:




Okay, let's take it line by line.


(1)McCain: "Before I left for Iraq, I watched with regret as the House of Representatives voted to deny our troops the support necessary to carry out their new mission."


This is interesting, and here's why. Dems voted to fund the troops, provided they're out by the Fall of 2008 at the latest. Does this mean McCain thinks the troops need to stay longer than that to "carry out their new mission"?


(2) McCain: "Democratic leaders smiled and cheered as the last votes were counted. What were they celebrating? Defeat? Surrender? In Iraq, only our enemies were cheering."


"Only our enemies" were cheering at the Dem passage of the withdrawal bill? But some polls show that majorities of Iraqis want us out.


(3) McCain: "A defeat for the United States is a cause for mourning, not celebrating. And determining how the United States can avert such a disaster should encourage the most sober, public-spirited reasoning among our elected leaders, not the giddy anticipation of the next election."


McCain is running for President, and this speech was being described by his own aides as critical to reinvigorating his campaign.


(4) McCain: "Democrats who voted to authorize this war, and criticized the failed strategy that has led us to this perilous moment, have the same responsibility I do, to offer support when that failure is recognized and the right strategy is proposed and the right commanders take the field to implement it or, at the least, to offer an alternative strategy that has some relationship to reality."


McCain is lecturing people about their relationship to reality? I don't mean this in a snarky way. If I were one of his handlers, I would have stricken that line out of worry that it might revive memories of his Baghdad Stroll.


34 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic
Democrats who voted to authorize this war, and criticized the failed strategy that has led us to this perilous moment...

Is he acknowledging the failure of our strategy? That is progress for him, if so. But I doubt he intended that reading of this comment. Still, it could be Freudian slip of sorts.

user-pic

McCain: Failure Czar v2.0

user-pic

It's interesting to hear him mention those who 'criticized the failed strategy' without mentioning that the person with the 'failed strategy' is still running the show.

And, not to mention, that the person who implimented the 'failed strategy' is unwilling to listen to everyone else. Instead it's "Just do as I goddamn say".

All the rug sales in Iraq won't help his campaign.

user-pic

one must not criticize a failed strategy; it only emboldens the enemy.

user-pic

The "right strategy" would have been to never put the military there in the first place, but those horses are out of the barn, obviously. The "right strategy" is to get the military the hell out of there, which is the conclusion that most of the Democrats who voted for the war have belatedly arrived at. It is certainly the conclusion that the country has arrived at. Senator McCain assumes in his speech that there is a military solution, if only we could find it. There isn't. There never was. The idea is an execrable rhetorical ploy to substitute militarism for patriotism.

user-pic

Yeah that #4 line is the icing on the cake huh? It's a 3 parter I think.

First, in between the "Democrats [...] who voted" he forgot to say "that this current administration lied to with doctored intelligence". That seems like a bit more than another example of "misspeaking" doesn't it? Oh John you're such a straight-talker! *wink-wink*

Second, isn't it convienient that now that we all recognize that the LAST plan was a failure now we all need to recognize that THIS plan is the RIGHT one. Yes indeed, we'll just take your WORD on that one. And the reconstruction of Iraq PROVES you all know how to pick the "right people for the job".

Third, in terms of reality I'm pretty sure that most Americans really want our troops home - now. That being the case it would appear that the Democrats really did offer a alternative strategy.

/sigh...

user-pic

What a filthy pig. I'm sorry, but I believe McCain has actually turned himself into someone who is more of a horse's ass, more dangerous and more partisan than Bush. It hardly seems possible, but that's how it's looking to me.

Democrats need to take this guy apart. Seriously. His career in politics needs to end.

user-pic

If the U.S. is defeated in Iraq, it will be b/c of Bush's "failed strategy," and it will most certainly not be b/c of the Dems passage of the funding bill with benchmarks for the Iraqi gov't in order to receive further support.

McCain is on the Bush bandwagon, supporting more of the same failed strategy of war without end, with no accountability for failure, no matter what the cost is to the U.S.

user-pic

"In Iraq, only our enemies were cheering."

In America, only the majority of Americans were cheering.

user-pic

I'm particularly fond of the idiotic assumption contained in this statement:

"Before I left for Iraq, I watched with regret as the House of Representatives voted to deny our troops the support necessary to carry out their new mission."

Yeah. It's the troops' mission now. Not Bush's. Not Cheney's. Not Gates'. Not Patraeus'. And certainly not anything the sovereign nation of Iraq came up with. Nope, it's the troops' mission. And it's NEW. Brand spankin' new. Full of hope and promise. And those damn Democrats aren't giving it a chance. JUST WHEN THINGS WERE FINALLY STARTING TO GET BETTER.

Damn Democrats. And you know what the worst part is? Those damn American voters put them up to it.

user-pic

His career in politics needs to end.

Oh, make no mistake, it's already over. This is it for him. His Baghdad stroll was the end, but he's got no money either, and nobody's giving to him. Toast city, Arizona.

user-pic

It is strange that none of the Republicans seem willing to say what a "victory" would consist of. Wouldn't a "victory" be removing our military from Iraq and letting the Iraqis govern themselves as they wish? That's my definition. With that, both the Iraqis and the Americans win - we call that a win-win strategy.

Of course, the last I heard, Congress is passing a funding bill to provide the troops in Iraq with what they need PLUS what they want - a fast track to return home on.

Hoppy in Sacramento

user-pic

"In Iraq, only our enemies were cheering."

OK, so if most Iraqis want us out of their country, then it follows that most Iraqis are our enemies. So then why are we even still IN Iraq, John?

The man needs to go to an "assisted living" home..... I think senile dementia may be setting in...

user-pic

The most wonderful thing is watching the Wingnut, including the "straight talk express" variety, quiver with anger because Americans have stopped listening to them. We are a pragmatic people. Zealots don't play well over time. Sayonara Falwell's boot-licker.

user-pic

Okay, lemme think about this for a sec...

Tens of thousands out demonstrating against the U.S. occupation -- obviously unhampered by the fear of suicide attacks.

How many of these demonstrations have we seen advocating FOR the Iraqi government and for the U.S. occupation?

I dunno, I was expecting something more along the lines of equal opportunity for diverse expressions of voices in a budding democracy -- that is, if it truly exists as more than some fantasy in McCain's mind.

user-pic

This is Stockholm Syndrom, GOP style. The North Vietnamese couldn't break him, but the GOP base did it. It's not pretty to watch an American hero being psychologically waterboarded.

But the GOP base is enjoying it. They have their way with him, but they'll never vote for him.

This is gonna be his legacy, not his heroism.

Sad.

user-pic

Bush's reelection was due to the Stockholm Syndrome.

user-pic

Ha ha.

McCain's an idiot.

user-pic

Thanks for highlighting McCain's monumental dishonesty. You are absolutely correct. Tomorrow you will see Broder and Richard Cohen and Ken Baer and the rest of the high punditry explaining why the McCain-Lieberman nexus is the way forward.

user-pic

Muqtada al Sadr (or someone like him) is eventually going to end up running Iraq. Al Sadr has realized that the only way to end the sectarian bloodletting is to unite the Iraqis against a common enemy. And that enemy is us. Hitler had his Jews. Bush had his "Shadowy Terrorist Network". And Al Sadr and Bin Laden have us.

The Republicans can define victory any way they like. Iraq is destined to become a theocracy--not a democracy. And until that happens, the fighting will never end.

user-pic

Yeah McCain, you're the Man! Let's blame it on the democrats, that Bush couldn't bomb Iraq to everlasting peace. That's reality! Maybe if we all had $100,000/minute security force protecting our asses every time we strolled a bagdad market we wouldn't have to worry about Al Qaeda following us home.

I wonder sometimes if he forgot what he went through in Vietnam? How many vietnemese died? Why didn't the "commies" follow us here?

What are his thoughts about anything that's happening within the Iraqi government. Benchmarks? Is the oil still flowing these days? It's amazing how silent these politicians are about what's being discussed within the very government they're trying to save.

The real fear is not that the enemy will follow us home. It's that the Iraqi government will someday want to have their oil sold in euros along with Iran. Afterall the euro has risen from 0.88 to 1.35 vs the dollar under Bush. Imagine what would happen to the dollar if opec decided to switch?

user-pic

Muqtada al Sadr (or someone like him) is eventually going to end up running Iraq.

I think you're right. Iraq is likely to become another Shiite theocracy. And what an awful thing for Iraq, it's women (who will face honor killings, arranged marriages, restrictions in their rights, forced wearing of hijab, etc.), its Sunnis (who will be massacred), its Kurds (who, at best, will live in some uneasy quasi-independence, perpetually threatened by Iran, Iraq, and Turkey), the U.S. (humiliated) and the world (see the above, plus, an even less stable Middle East, with growing pressure for a widespread Sunni-Shiia conflict).

It sure would be nice if this scenario were preventable.

user-pic

The last I checked, Congress passed a funding bill.

It's the President who's been blustering about how he's going to veto it.

Is McCain the best the Republicans have? Because the reality based world is working against him.

user-pic
Democrats need to take this guy apart.

Why do you think anyone can destroy McCain more thoroughly than he is doing it to himself?

Very sad I think.

Whatever - it's all over for John McCain.

Best, Terry

user-pic

IMO McCain appears to be drowning politically.

-Anyone have an anchor?-

-Dave Adams-

user-pic

McCain, following the lead of campaign adviser Mark McKinnon, looked like an inept high school actor, fumbling someone else's speech, struggling to follow the teleprompter. He has become such a pathetic,desperate figure, making blunder after blunder, becoming a laughing stock as well as an incoherent fool. McKinnon is as responsible for this painful destruction as McCain himself. Someone has to step in and end this ridiculous circle jerk of a campaign. This is embarrassing. McCain is making a mockery out of the American political process. This same process will eliminate McCain ,hopefully sooner than later. The end of McCain will be the complete humiliation of a good man led astray by an insatiable quest for presidential power and political glory. Go home John, it really is time.

user-pic

It's exactly the same argument these people have been making about Vietnam for 30 years. We were just beginning to win when the liberals & hippies made us get out.

user-pic

McCain an American hero? He was a war criminal.

user-pic

No, John needs to stay in the race, suck up all the money he can get. Let him win the nomination. Then the Democrats, if they get their act together will take the midde. WIN / WIN.
John McCain wins the nomination and we win the White House.

user-pic

~

I somehow got myself to sit through the entire CSPAN segment of McCain's "Somewhere Over the Rainbow" speech...

I have always prided myself for attempting to be an open minded pragmatist. I do try as hard as possible to look at all perspectives and evaluate the options that the various perspectives may provide. But when I attempt to deal with anything that comes out of McCain's pie-hole, no matter how hard I try to see this from his point of view, I can't seem to negotiate the contortions it takes to get my noggin that far up my asteroid orifice... while singing:

Somewhere over the rainbow
Bluebirds fly.
Birds fly over the rainbow.
Why then, oh why can't I?

~OGD~

user-pic

Agree. And to illustrate this point, one need only to skip over to the BBC and fiddle around with this interactive map to see it.

Here's the link (I hope):

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/in_depth/baghdad_navigator/


Checking the box that shows all the bomb attacks in Baghdad reveals a pretty scary picture. No wonder McCain was so armored up in his visit there.

I heard one Iraqi on NPR -- cannot remember his name or title -- saying that the life expectancy of a non-Iraqi outside the Green Zone is less than two hours.

user-pic

This seems to come out of the Kissinger, on of McCain's supporters, playbook. No matter how stupid the policy, no matter how ill considered or badly run the U.S. must see out the policy for time immemorial if necessary.

Daniel A. Greenbaum

user-pic

Not to beat a dead horse, but this statement illustrates why it would be better for Dems to nominate someone who was not complicit in authorizing this horrible war. It will be much easier for such a nominee to criticise the war and hold Repubs accountable. Obama anyone?

user-pic

Move to Canada.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address