Election Central Sunday Roundup
Romney Campaign Responds To Outrage Over Osama Gaffe
The Boston Globe reports that Mitt Romney's campaign is responding to criticism over his remark last week that "just trying to catch one person" — Osama Bin Laden — would not be worth the costs and effort. "Governor Romney believes that the terrorism threat posed by radical jihadists is larger than only one person," said spokesman Kevin Madden "Governor Romney believes and has stated time and time again that in order to confront these threats we have to focus on the larger problem of the global jihad and break down entire regional and global terror networks of Al Qaeda and others." We must again ask: What would the reaction have been if a liberal Democratic candidate had said this?
Obama Gets Better Reception Than Hillary At California Dem Event
Reuters reports that Barack Obama went over even better than Hillary Clinton at this weekend's California Democratic Party convention. "I am proud that I stood up in 2002 when it wasn't popular to take a stand and urged our leaders not to take us down this dangerous path," Obama told the crowd. On Hillary supporter dismissed Obama's appeal before the liberal activist crowd: "We have a very progressive left-wing constituency here in California. Obama's extremely talented, but this is Hillary's time."
Dodd Hits Debate Format
The New York Times reports that Chris Dodd was sharply critical of the format of this past week's debate. Speaking at the California Democratic Party convention, Dodd told the crowd, "That was a strange debate if I ever saw one. There were a number of issues that didn’t come up," including education and the environment.
Obama: "I Was A Little Nervous" At The Debate
Lynn Sweet at The Chicago Sun-Times writes that Barack Obama acknowledged before a Charleston rally that his performance at Thursday's debate was not his best. "Last night I was a little nervous," Obama said. Sweet argues that modern debate formats — notably 60-second limits for speaking — work against Obama's usual rhetorical style of "a very long windup to the pitch."
McCain Opposes New Hampshire Civil Unions Bill
The New York Sun reports that John McCain said he is against the civil unions bill that has passed the New Hampshire legislature and awaits a certain signing by the Governor. On the other hand, McCain is sticking with his federalist approach to the gay marriage issue, saying that this is a matter for New Hampshire alone. "If I were a citizen of New Hampshire, I would oppose it ... Anything that impinges or impacts the sanctity of the marriage between men and women, I'm opposed to it," McCain said.
Huckabee Says Son Made "Careless Mistake" In Gun Arrest
Mike Huckabee acknowledged that his son David made a "carless mistake" when he was arrested Thursday at an Arkansas airport for having a loaded Glock handgun in his carry-on bag, Radio Iowa reports. "It was in his briefcase, under his computer, and he just didn't remember it," Huckabee said. David Huckabee, who legally owns the gun and has a concealed-carry permit, quickly pled guilty to a misdemeanor count of posessing a weapon in a prohibited place.
Gallegly To Run Again
The Hill reports that Congressman Elton Gallegly (R-CA) says he will run for a twelfth term in 2008. Gallegly had attempted to withdraw from his re-election race last year after being diagnosed with an undisclosed illness, but went ahead with the campaign when his medical outlook improved and withdrawal appeared legally difficult. Although he said at the time that 2006 would be his last campaign, he appears to have changed his mind. "If for any reason there is a change in my position before the 2008 election, I will give ample notice, but that isn’t an anticipated thing at this point," Gallegly said.
Wichita TV Stations Refuse To Run Bloomberg Gun Ad
The Associated Press reports that CBS and NBC affiliates in Wichita, Kansas, are refusing to run an ad sponsored by New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg (R), that is critical of federal legislation by Wichita Congressman Todd Tiahrt (R-KS) that restricts information sharing between the federal government and local governments on gun purchases. The local stations say they were unable to verify the claims made in the ad, while Bloomberg says that the national networks should intervene.















I'm all for citizen Michael Bloomberg exercising his right to free speech by taking out an ad on any issue. But Mayor Bloomberg is a total jackass for running issue ads against another region's Congressman. As mayor, Bloomberg can lobby the Reps. and Sens. in his own city/state to work against Tiahrt's legislation. In a classic example of Bloomberg Liberalism, Mayor Bloomberg is in everybody's business but his own.
April 29, 2007 11:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
To be honest, I don't think Romney's Osama comments are all that wrongheaded. If there is one thing we have learned about terrorist organizations from Israel, Iraq, etc., it's that taking out the head often has virtually no impact on the organization itself, which is often very diffuse. From what I understand, Osama doesn't have all that much control over the individual al Qaeda cells (though I could be mistaken). Of course, the symbolism of catching/killing bin Laden would be unparalleled, but I've thought that we progressives have always prided ourselves as valuing substance over style -- and in this case, concentrating on intel and on breaking the terrorist networks and cells themselves -- rather than on catching bin Laden -- seems like the wiser approach.
April 30, 2007 8:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
First off, I'd like to say that I know very little about Bloomberg other than he's incredibly rich.
That said, how can one distinguish between "citizen" Bloomberg and "mayor" Bloomberg? I mean, I'm assuming he's using his own money for this ad, right? Does he temporarily cede his rights as "citizen" for the duration of his term as mayor?
April 30, 2007 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Romney is a putz who will say or do anything to get into office. He has no integrity. He is the perfect Republican candidate - all image, surrounding a core of greed, stupidity, irresponsibility, and lust for power. Which is pretty much the best that can be said of any of the Repugy candidates. I watched him here in Massachusetts from the beginning. He was an empty suit then, and now he'll wear whatever costume gets him into power. I think a clown costume would be appropriate.
April 30, 2007 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
We clowns protest.
Clowns entertain. Where is the entertainment you see in Romney? Laughing at the three stooges is pathetic.
Best, Terry
April 30, 2007 12:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
The editorial judgment of these TV stations in situations like this always seems highly, highly questionable. I think they need to relax their standards a bit in favor of allowing more speech. The ads that they do ban always seem very tame, and the reasons they give always seem either implausible or wildly hypocritical.
For instance, many stations/networks ran the Swift Boat liar ads, but they would not run apolitical ads for the United Church of Christ.
April 30, 2007 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
btw, I find it very fishy whenever someone at the GOP gets arrested at the airport while carrying a concealed weapon.
I strongly suspect that they do it for the publicity and to endear themselves for the NRA. I wouldn't be surprised if Huckabee's son did it on purpose to get some headlines for his dad.
April 30, 2007 3:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I assume you find it similarly fishy when someone in the Democratic party gets arrested at the airport while carrying a concealed weapon?
It just happened here in Virginia recently to one of Webb's (D-VA) people. At the time I thought it would probably help him more than hurt him, although I wasn't quite cynical enough to consider it deliberate. (Cynical != wrong, of course.)
April 30, 2007 6:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm saying as Mayor he has an obligation to use the levers of power at the disposal of the Mayor - the Reps in his city, the Sens in his state. By running an issue ad as 'citizen Bloomberg' in another state he's abandoning the process that 99.999% of Americans use which is to ask THEIR OWN Congressperson to look into it. By circumventing that process 'citizen Bloomberg' gets to feel good about himself but he's breached the etiquette of going to your own Reps first. And it won't be 'citizen Bloomberg' that gets the blowback for abandoning that etiquette, it will be the constituents of Mayor Bloomberg. That's bush league governance IMHO. Why should people outside NYC give New Yorkers a fair shake if their Mayor doesn't respect the process?
April 30, 2007 7:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
It depends on whether or not they are dependent on NRA support. Red State - Blue State sort of thing.
Did the Webb staffer thing happen at the airport? I thought I heard it happened at the Senate office building or something along those lines.
May 1, 2007 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are correct; in reading the story again, it happened in the Senate - because Webb handed him the gun as he was going into the airport. I.e., the staffer had the gun on him because Webb realized at the airport that he couldn't take it in with him. The staffer then forgot that he had it on him when he went into the Senate building. It sounds like a good story, but if we're willing to accept that story, we should be equally willing to accept the story if it came from a Republican.
I try really hard to be even-handed with the Democrats and Republicans, especially because I know I have a bias against the Republicans. (I'm not sure if it's fair to say I have a bias towards the Democrats - perhaps it's most accurate to say that my bias against Democratic politicians isn't as strong as my bias against Republican politicians. In the end, they're still politicians.)
May 1, 2007 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink