« Reid Adviser: Dems Likely To Fall Short In Tomorrow's Vote | Home | GOP Senators Again Block Debate On Escalation »

Webb Still Waiting For Answer From Rice On Iran

A month ago, Senator James Webb asked Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice whether it was the position of the Bush Administration that it has the power to take military action against Iran without permission from Congress.

Webb is still wating for an answer. From his speech late yesterday on the Senate floor about today's escalation vote:

"The Administration's view of its presidential authority to conduct unilateral military action against other countries, and particularly with Iran, was documented in President Bush’s signing statement accompanying the original authorization for use of force in Iraq October 16, 2002. I would urge my colleagues to read this language carefully. It states in part, `My signing this resolution does not, constitute any change in the long-standing positions of the executive branch on either the President’s constitutional authority to use force to deter, prevent, or respond to aggression or other threats to U.S. interests…'

"I have raised this language with Secretary of State Rice, as well as Deputy Secretary Negroponte. My question was whether the Administration believes that it possesses the authority to conduct unilateral military activity against Iran in the absence of a direct threat and without the approval of the Congress. I have not received a clear answer from either on that point. And that is troubling."


4 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Right now, my ONLY priotities are:

1) Prevent unwarranted military action against Iran

2) HALT the Holt bill (Rush Holt's HR811 revises HAVA.) Two
abominations MUST be striken despite momentum behind the bill.
[Josh, contact Voters Unite, Bradblog, Blackboxvoting.org, Rob Kall of opednews.com, etc.]

Think of the disaster if we fail on either.
Is anything else that important?

user-pic

So what? I am cynical about all this, including letters to anybody from Webb, Lantos, Waxman, et al. The only thing they understand is a metaphorical whack on the side of the head, like the vote, and even that doesn't deter them. What Webb needs to do, if he's serious, is ask for all the documents about this and subpoena them with a marshall going to Rice's office and asking for them. And if he doesn't get them, charge her criminally. That's the type of action they understand. The rest is all jaw-flapping and playing the victim.

user-pic

Where were these questions during the run up to the war? Where were the questions when Bush used signing statments to tell Congress "I can do whatever I want, you are irrelevant."? Take a look at Tom Ricks' excellent chapter on this in his excellent book "Fiasco". BTW, that chapter is appropriatly titled "Silence of the Lambs." I just hope this isn't just so much bluster, and if it isn't, that it isn't too little too late.

user-pic

To OCPatriot:

Exactly.
Regrettably this selfevident truth has not yet dawned on many Democratic pols. If they think they'll win in 08 because of the desaster the current admin. has caused and the power of their ideas, they are in for a big surprise. They don't have the GOP's propaganda machine and the only way to compensate for that critical disadvantage is to be aggressively, relentlessly, intelligently on the attack.

"Reformers have the idea that change can be achieved by brute sanity" (George B. Shaw).

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address