« Sources: Vilsack Dropped Out Because Of Inability To Raise Money | Home | Hillary On Vilsack: "Tom Has Made Iowa A Leader" »
Quote Of The Day
"It's great, isn't it? I love to see it when it happens on the other side."
-- GOP Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney, quoted by the Associated Press at an event commenting on the Hillary-Obama flap.
Advertisement















Just wait until they turn their sights on you, Mitt. What size flip-flops do you wear, by the way?
/cautiously optimistic
February 23, 2007 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. They couldn't have done a better puff piece if Romney or any Republican had written it himself. Makes it sound like there wasn't a single Democrat workign at that "solar-related equipment plant."
February 23, 2007 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I love to see it when it happens on the other side." Makes it sound as if smears usually came directed at the GOP, doesn't it? Perhaps God himself thinks so.
John
http://www.haberarts.com/
February 23, 2007 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mitt Romney: Another guy the the right-wing Christians won't vote for in the GOP primary. That list is longer than than the one of people they MIGHT vote for.
February 23, 2007 2:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't kid yourself. They'll all get together and hold their noses and tell the world that one of these clowns is the best man for the job since Abe Lincoln long before we're done tearing down our candidates as too close to Lieberman.
February 23, 2007 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Romney is right. Voters don't pay attention to smears from the other party. Voters are actually too smart for that. It is only when the smears come from the same party do they have traction. Like Bill Bradley calling Gore a lier.
February 23, 2007 2:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Make a note of what he said; it may be the first (and last) time he manages to tell the truth!
Jan Knaus
February 23, 2007 4:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've taken note of what Romney said, and do gree that it probably will be his only moment of sincerity. More's the pity. I previously viewed Romney as another Bush-clone wannabe, kissing up to the Religious Right for money and votes and was immediately put off. But to take delight in a disagreement between rival of the other party, is self centered. He's basking in others misery and thinking only of how it benefits him.
I wouldn't have voted for him anyway, but this display of opportunism clinches it.
As for McCain and Giuliani:
One is still living off a phoney reputation made on one day, six years ago, by being on camera, pretending he was being a leader. I think the New York emergency apparatus would have functioned quite well without him.
The other is still being described as a "maverick", but I think that mustang has been broken and tamed. He wants the White House too bad. He's let himself be saddle and ridden at the cost of his integrity.
February 24, 2007 9:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Romney is toast. As are Giuliani and McCain.
There is the odd belief that in this year of all years Social Conservatives will just be willing to buy into the same line of bullshit.
What did Social Conservatives actually get over the last six years? A couple of Supreme Court justices that really have yet to deliver on any part of their agenda. I mean Roe v Wade is still the law of the land. Plus they get some gravy from the Office of Faith Initiatives and family planning directors drawn from the abstinence movement. But can they really count on Giuliani or Romney appointing an anti-Roe Supreme?
The jokes and campaign attacks write themselves. And if the religious right leadership is not prepared to Stoop to Conquer, certainly I am.
If you don't think someone can't turn "Mormon Undergarments" "Giuliani Drag Video" or "Black Love Child" into fatal attacks on these campaigns you really have not been watching Republican attack politics from Nixon to today. These people don't play nice.
Now I suppose there is a scenario where Brownback and Huckabee flame out early and everyone lines up behind Romney, but I suspect there is a limit to the "hold your nose" factor. A lot of the uber-conservatives are openly claiming that a little time in the wilderness will allow them to sweat off the rot and that a purer Republican Party will come back from exile leaner and more fit for battle than ever.
These guys play well in Peoria today because by and large the media loves them, they fit convenient narratives: Maverick Senator, Heroic 9/11 mayor, Faced down Tax & Spend Democrats in Mass. Governor. Well those narratives melt down faced with predictable negative ads. "Manchurian Candidate" "Drag Queen" "Massachusetts Flip-Flopper" (the latter has to hurt considering).
As a Democrat I don't fear any of these guys in the General anyway. But the fact is they are the best chances of avoiding a Democratic rout in 2008, unless of course the Republican Party finds the courage to swing behind a truly Social Conservative, anti-war candidate.
"The only thing we have to fear is Chuck Nagel himself"
Nagel scares me. He could pull this off. But you can call Giuliani-Romney-McCain the Axis of Clowns. They are just too open for fair and unfair attacks from both Left and Right and can fully expect them.
What is that burning smell? The toast of the Republican frontrunners.
February 24, 2007 9:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
O dear marcf are you without a doubt certainly correct.
It is somewhat like when family talks about family. Folks believe family much moreso than non-relatives. After all, your relatives are suppose to know you better than the outside world. So, all criticism carries more weight and all praise carries far less as you relatives are viewed as heavily biased when delivering praise.
Nice little catch-22. The solution is of course for all family members to only say positive things always.
Reagan also told the GOP this when he told republicans it was unrepublican to attack their own party candidates in the primaries.
same thing here.
February 24, 2007 9:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
"There is the odd belief that in this year of all years Social Conservatives will just be willing to buy into the same line of bullshit."
Do you think that book by the man who worked in the Faith Based Initiative office, Koi (sp?) had a big impact on the social conservatives?
Don't those folks still tolerate Limbaugh(druggie) and that Bill (gambler) guy?
I do like the Giuliani-Romney-McCain axis of clowns line. good one
February 24, 2007 9:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Kinda ironic since they would have hated Abe Lincoln! Or George Washington, or Thomas Jefferson, or John F Kennedy, or even Eisenhower, for that matter.
Jan Knaus
February 24, 2007 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know, I have to say this whole flap over Geffen's comments have led me to a new prediction for the 2008 race. Specifically, that it will be between Evan Bayh and Phil Bredesden, or some other pair of candidates who aren't even in the race at the moment.
I just find it hard to believe that anyone can stand two years of this level of antagonism-- and this is just WITHIN the parties! Just imagine month after grinding month of Hillary vs. Rudy after month after month of Hillary vs. Barack and John, it makes one ill to contemplate.
Newt Gingrich is supposed to have a strategy of entering the race next January when everyone's sick of the frontrunners-- frankly I think if Newt Gingrich is looking for how much time needs to pass before most of America will consider him a viable candidate he should be thinking centuries, not months-- but the strategy could work for someone not already disliked by 90% of the electorate. Kerry was written off last time, then came from behind when it turned out that the 12 bloggers who loved Howard Dean represented about 13 actual voters. No reason this year why someone couldn't sit it out now, spend no money while the others spend theirs, and then come in with a fresh appeal about how disgusted they are by the process to date. I have a feeling they'd sail to the nomination if it keeps up like this.
February 24, 2007 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
That person could be Gore.
February 24, 2007 11:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
No i don't think it is a catch 22. There are many was to challenge your opponents without name calling. It is probably MORE effective, because you are trying to win over their adherents, you want to indicate that you are better, not that they are bad. Edwards is doing this very well these days.
February 24, 2007 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Romney is RIGHT!!!!! This is just getting started folks and it can ONLY get uglier.....
IF YOU HAVE ANY FRIENDS OR RELATIVES IN DENVER GET THEM OUT BY THE DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION that is my
advice to you now....
February 25, 2007 1:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
THINK SEATTLE RIOTS folks and if someone told me it will be uglier then CHICAGO 68 I WON'T BE SHOCKED...
February 25, 2007 1:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Rhetorically sex, drugs, and gambling are near the top of the Social Conservative agenda, but someone is still filling those seats at those Mississipi casinos and someone is buying that meth and someone keeps having more Social Conservative babies. None of that really strikes to the core.
What moves Social Conservatives is abortion and gay marriage. And among Southern Baptists you can throw in some not so latent anti-Catholicism and anti-Mormonism. Then add in the act that two of these guys are from New York City and Massachusetts.
McCain may skate through but the attack ads on Giuliani and Romney write themselves. The notion that they can sell the Social Conservatives with a message of "I was just kidding back then. Or. That dress was just a joke." seems like a stretch.
February 25, 2007 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
What is striking to me is how blissfully blind Romney is. As if nothing of the sort would or could happen on the Republican side.
I am not sure if he understands that just about every American has encountered Mormons in the form of two well dressed boys ringing your damn doorbell and trying to get you to convert. Southern Baptists and Catholics can dish out missionaries but I am not sure how well they take them.
Some political consultant somewhere is fully prepared to exploit that latent resentment, someone is fully ready to present those aspects of Mormonism that are most foreign to mainstream Protestant and Catholic beliefs.
Romney is laughing at what in context is a minor dustup between Clinton and Obama, yet apparently oblivious to the shitstorm coming his way. We'll see what happens when surrogates of his opponents start holding up the most distorted version of the tenets of his religion they can. And they will. Republican Presidential campaigning is always hardball.
February 25, 2007 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
"As if nothing of the sort would or could happen on the Republican side."
Where in his quote do you find that thought? I'm curious.
February 26, 2007 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was pretty sure that wasn't the case, given his total lack of preparatory moves in the key states.
But after watching him all over the Oscars last night, I'm beginning to think that's exactly the plan.
February 26, 2007 8:05 PM | Reply | Permalink