« WY-At Large: CQ: Cubin Slips After Slap Incident | Home | National Strategy: GOP Wives Cut New Ads For Scandal Plauged Husbands »
McCain Stars In Same-Sex Marriage Amendment Ads
John McCain appears to be as serious as ever about making nice with the conservative base. He's now starring in not one, but two ads backing Proposition 107, which would not only amend the state constitution to bar same-sex marriage of all kinds permanently, but also prohibiting cities, towns, and universities from providing benefits to unmarried domestic partners. The first of the ads -- which are paid for by the evangelical-backed group Protect Marriage Arizona -- is below; the second is after the jump.
Here's the second McCain ad:
Advertisement















Maybe McCain can hook up with Reverend Haggard.
November 2, 2006 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's something pathetic about a tortured war hero betting his election on denying health care to middle-aged spinsters.
November 2, 2006 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain is a pathetic man. Other people I know, Republicans and Democrats, have become turned off by him.
I don't think he'll be the next president. He's become disingenuous. Sad.
McCain equals MOTS...More Of The Same.
Are there any decent Republicans left?
November 2, 2006 7:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Off-topic: Is a Green Party candidate actually drawing 14 percent for Illinois Governor? Tell me that there's some mistake here.
November 2, 2006 9:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain seems to be intent on destroying whatever is left of his reputation. What is he going to do next, introduce a law bringing back stoning as a punishment for heresy.
Assimilated Press
Read God Fires Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson And James Dobson
November 2, 2006 9:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
No.
November 2, 2006 9:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why are people (particularly Dems) continually surprised at McCain's conservative views?
In politics, the sometimes enemy of your enemy isn't necessarily your friend.
McCain is against same-sex marriage. For a flag-burning amendment. Against including sexual orientation in hate crimes legislation. And so on.
Just because he clashes with Bush sometimes (then bends over in the end) doesn't mean he's a friend of the Democrat.
November 2, 2006 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
The conservative view should be for gay marraige because how can the state not recognize the holy sacrament of marraige that is bestowed by god?
really, not recognizing marraiges created by god is a *big* conservative sin.
November 2, 2006 11:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. What a maverick!
A Republican who opposes gay marriage!
Dissent Protects Democracy.
November 2, 2006 11:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it just me or does the voice-over guy sound like he's joking. Oh, I know these are a real commercials, but the dude sounds like he's from Comedy Central.
November 3, 2006 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Off-topic: Is a Green Party candidate actually drawing 14 percent for Illinois Governor? Tell me that there's some mistake here.
That's the way I would probably vote in Illinois if I lived there.
Voting for a crook is just not appealing while the Republican is hopeless.
What party faithful fail to understand is that McCain's conservative - I would rather call them reactionary - views have not gone unnoticed by any liberal.
(Of course, I can only speak for myself but I tend to the conceit that we liberals are an intelligent lot. :-))
Strict party-line voting is anathema to thinking sorts. Even Republicans refused to back David Duke.
McCain has gone way off the charts to the dark side. Terrible what people will sometimes do in the pursuit of power. Whatever small chance McCain ever had to be president, there is no chance at all now. Oddly McCain has not even enhanced his appeal to rightwingers.
The attraction of John McCain was his campaign to break the influence of the corrupt power brokers in the Republican Party. You think that would not have been a good thing?
The Daleys in Chicago have been as malign an influence as the Bushes in Texas. Because they call themselves Democrats does not make them any more appealing. The Daleys harmed the Democratic Party over the years in the same way the Bushes have now wrecked the Republican Party.
Welcome to the wilderness, Republicans. You earned it.
Best, Terry
November 3, 2006 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
And on torture.
November 3, 2006 12:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe Charlie Crist, who's running for governor here in Florida. I'm not voting for him and I don't agree with him on a number of things but he seems to be a rather old-fashioned Eisenhower Republican whom as attorney general, actually went after price-gougers and assorted other corporate sleezebags. He even supports civil unions for gays. The right wing wackos here were horrified when he won their primary.
November 3, 2006 5:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Re: There's something pathetic about a tortured war hero betting his election on denying health care to middle-aged spinsters.
Huh? McCain is on record as supporting universal healthcare. Has he changed his position?
November 3, 2006 5:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
So, along with AZ, there is a proposed anti-gay marriage constitutional amendment in VA and MA. Are there any other states considering this type of amendment or legislation this election season?
November 3, 2006 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't worry, he will once the corporate lobbyists get to him. He's such a fake.
The original comment meant that he is in favor of denying health benefits to domestic partners. If we had universal healthcare, that might not be an issue, but since we don't, it is an issue.
November 3, 2006 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
We'll see what happens on the actual election day. Supposedly the Green is doing well b/c the Dem governor, Blagojevich, has some associates (at least one of whom is a former GOP fundraiser) under investigation by Patrick Fitzgerald.
The Daleys can't even begin to compare to the Bushes. There are limits to the power of a mayor. None of them have even been governors. They have some corruption/machine issues, but hardly on the scale of the Bush family, intertwined as it is in world geo-politics.
Whether liberals notice McCain's views doesn't matter. The media will always give him a pass. We'll see what happens to him in the GOP primary, and whether the far right will forgive him for his (rather small and meaningless) past apostasy.
November 3, 2006 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
He's not for the marriage amendment, although this prop 107 sounds arguably worse.
Who cares about flag burning? I thought the whole point was civil disobedience, in which case you would think that getting arrested for violating the Constitution would be a bonus.
November 3, 2006 11:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not in MA this year. It got held up in the constitutional convention somehow.
There are 2006 ballot initiatives that would outlaw same-sex marriage in eight states (Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, Wisconsin).
http://www.glaad.org/media/resource_kit_detail.php?id=3911
You would think we'd be out of states by now! Hopefully there won't be any left by 2008.
Prop 107 sounds similar to the ballot initiative in Ohio, which went far beyond gay marriage and for that reason was actually opposed by a lot of Republicans, including Sens. DeWine and Voinovich (not that it mattered, but it does show how extreme McCain is to oppose not just marriage but civil unions and even domestic partnership benefits). If you ask people without marriage being part of the conversation, I think polls are getting close on civil unions and in favor of partnership benefits.
November 3, 2006 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
These ads are actually pretty sleazy and totally misleading as to the effects of Prop 107. They sound like Prop 107 will repeal divorce or at least wish for magic fairies to come down and fix all the broken marriages. Instead, it just discriminates against gays in myriad ways.
The ads don't even really mention gay marriage, and they certainly don't point how it could possibly impact straight marriage. It's one thing to say you favor traditional values or whatever, but another to pretend that somehow it weakens other marriages (to say nothing of how civil unions or domestic partnership benefits possibly could).
November 3, 2006 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you very much for that reply and link. It's of help to me in a project I'm working on.
RE: The MA constitutional convention, that amendment was defeated on Wednesday, 104 - 94 in the legislature. In the House it was 97 against, 62 for; and in the senate it was 32 for and 7 against.
link
November 3, 2006 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
I kind of liked Crist too and thought the same thing. Although I would never vote for even an Eisenhower Republican when a good hard working Democrat like Jim Davis is up. In the debate a few days ago Crist defended the Iraq war and Bush's handling of it (something I really don't believe Eisenhower would of done even)and so sadly my opinion of him fell 100%. Sad because he was probably the only Republican in the whole state of Florida that actually did a few good things for the people instead of himself.
November 3, 2006 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lincoln Chaffee... but he's about to be out of a job.
I like Orrin Hatch on copyright protection / intellectual property law. And... nothing else.
And Mike Bloomberg... who's really a Democrat.
I can't say I'm disappointed in McCain because I was never particularly fond of him to begin with. I mean, he strikes me as a decent enough person - someone who means well, and someone who, even when I disagree with him, is at least thoughtful about the issues and isn't basing his opinions completely on truthiness. But... I still disagree with him a good 95% of the time. I wouldn't expect him to be FOR gay marriage, and with '08 looming I wouldn't expect him to "stay out of it" either.
Let's be honest, there's only one reason any of us have any fondness for McCain - the 2000 primary. He got screwed by Bush - so we feel symapthetic. But that wasn't gonna make him, like, change parties or anything.
More importantly, he learned his lesson in 2000: fall in line with the fundies if you want to have any chance at winning the primary - we saw Dole melt down and kowtow to the RR back during his presidential run, and we saw Bush Sr. do it before him. And in those days fundies weren't nearly the political force they are today.
And McCain's voting record has always been Evangelist-friendly. He's far, far to the right. The RR's problem with him wasn't that he didn't walk the walk - it was that he didn't talk the talk. He's always been a hardcore Republican, he's just got Democrat style.
November 4, 2006 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mc Cain will seve as a exceptional commander and chief
January 28, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mc Cain will seve as a exceptional commander and chief
January 28, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mc Cain will seve as a exceptional commander and chief
January 28, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mc Cain will seve as a exceptional commander and chief
January 28, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink