Wingnuts Have New Theory On Who's Behind Foleygate: The Clintons
It was only a matter of time, really. Wingnut radio hosts and bloggers have found a new target to blame for Foleygate: The Clintons. Rush Limbaugh has just promoted this line on his radio show, saying: "The Clinton war room is at full speed on this." And wingnut blog Red State warned that a "Clinton front group" was driving this story. The evidence that the Clintons are behind this? It's almost comically thin, really: It's actually based on the fact that a group funding robo-calls on Foleygate is headed by a guy who worked in the Clinton White House from 1993 until 1995. More after the jump.

I have been discussing, ladies and gentlemen, that the Clinton war room is at full speed on this, and looks like I was more right than I even knew. It seems that there's a group out there called American Family Voices, and it's a lib group. The president of this lib group is a guy named Michael Lux, L-u-x.They've registered as both a commercial enterprise and a nonprofit enterprise. This outfit, American Family Voices, is now doing a lot of push polling out there to Republicans. For those of you in Rio Linda, push polling is they're just making gazillions of phone calls out there. You answer the phone and it's a recorded message, and the recorded message is telling Republicans to call their Republican House members and urging them to ask for the resignation of Denny Hastert and the rest of the Republican leadership. Now, who is this guy Michael Lux? Well, Michael Lux served in the White House from January of '93 to January of '95 as a special assistant to the president for public liaison. In 1992, Lux served as the constituency director on both the Clinton-Gore campaign and the presidential transition. So these people, Clintonoids are trying to take out Denny Hastert.
Clinton Front Group Behind Foley Phone BanksPhone calls are going out nationwide to Republicans from a group called American Family Voices, the group is run by Mr. Mike Lux, who was in the Clinton WhiteHouse from 1993 -- 1995 as aide to President Clinton and former political director of People for the American Way. So the Clinton war room is in full operation, smear smear, destroy destroy, it's the Clinton way. The group asks the call recipient to call their Republican member of Congress and demand that the Republican leadership resign for covering up the Foley affair.
The Clintons are back, the game plan is the same, the only problem is the Internet is available to find the facts, and spread the word.
You really can't make this stuff up. There's simply nothing that the chumps and easy marks who make up the audiences of Rush, Red State and company won't believe.















There's been a consistent pattern in recent defenses: blaming the messenger by calling the news politically motivated. Pierro's tried it, too. Now, almost invariably, as here, it's simply another lie. But I also want to ask, who cares? If someone can't live with a party he or she sees as having condoned Foley for so long and accordingly leaks the info to the press, should the press be ashamed to report it? Should indeed that person be ashamed?
Of course, the GOP has always tried to criminalize leaking itself, except when, as with Plamegate or the runup to war, it's part of the strategy. The attitude reflects a distrust of free expression and a savvy control of power. But it and the current line of criticism also has the aroma of that infamous problem with reality-based thinking. Yeah, the facts are against us; they're too liberal.
John
http://www.haberarts.com/
October 5, 2006 11:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
JohnW1141
October 5, 2006 11:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Use /blockquote, inside of .
October 5, 2006 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you're using rich-text, you have to hit a new line and then click the left-arrow button to get back to the left margin.
Dissent Protects Democracy.
October 5, 2006 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
JohnW1141
I tried that originally and it didn't work, I restartd AOL and now works, thanks
Strange thing happening though. If I post my comment before I use
Here's how I use Blockquote:
Type/
October 5, 2006 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Also note this, as described in the article in The Hill:
Translation: If you expose wrongdoing during an election, it's dirty tricks, if you do it when it's not an election, it's a hit piece, because there's no particular "reason" to bring it up then.
This needs to smacked down, and hard. Part of the reason this is drawing such interest now is because it's an "accountability moment," to use one of their favorite terms. A Republican staffer who was disgusted with this wanted Foley, and perhaps the leadership, to be held accountable for their actions and inaction, and did it pretty effectively. Deal with it.
October 5, 2006 12:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
There methods have never changed. But, this is not a football game. Every American ends up living with the side effects of the policies crafted by the winning team. So, the means they use to win, disinformation, mystification, mythification, reification, leave the public unable to understand how different policy positions will affect their personal lives. There is this enormous gap between everyday reality--and the BIG MYTHS ginned up by the Republican public relations mouthpieces. But the reality on the ground--an unsustainable economy, certain ecological disaster, war, violence--are strangely detached from the idea that Democrats conspired to influence public opinion before an election--How again?? Oh Yes, by insinuating a Democratic mole into the Page System--then luring a weak minded gay congressman into a dangerous liason--then hanging onto the information until it was time to spring the trap. REPUBLICANS DO NOT LIVE IN THE REAL, PRAGMATIC WORLD. THEY ARE LOST IN PSYCHOTIC FANTASYLAND!!!!!!!
"If you talk about it, even the simplest thing becomes complex and incomprehensible." -Herman Hesse
October 5, 2006 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
My vote is to stop obsessing about this Foley topic and move on to the abuses of the citizenry by the individual in the White House.
October 5, 2006 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rush doesn't know the difference between push polls and robocalls.
October 5, 2006 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hope the Clintons are behind this. Then I'd have hope that Hillary will be brutal enough to win in 2008.
October 5, 2006 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink