« AZ-05: Hayworth Attributes White House Talking Point To "Our Enemies" | Home | CT-05: Murphy Rebuffs DCCC Calls For Negative Ads: "I Want To Sleep At Night" »
NY-26: RNC Rushes In To Bail Out Reynolds
Incoming! Via Ben Smith of The Daily Politics, it looks as if the Republican National Committee is rushing in to bail out NRCC chief Tom Reynolds. The RNC has a new ad attacking Reynolds's Dem foe by saying that people should get ready for "higher prices" because "Jack Davis wants tarrifs on many of the products you buy." It seems the RNC is referring to Davis' call for retaliatory tariffs on goods from China -- a position awfully similar to a bill recently co-sponsored by GOP Senator Lindsey Graham. As Smith notes, it's Davis's message which "clearly connects with people in Buffalo." View it here.
Advertisement















That's one of the most pointless ads of the cycle. That's not going to move any actual voters, although I'm sure it's going over well with the think tank crowd. I hope they made a big ad buy!
October 18, 2006 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Democrats have got to stop saying "I'm with McCain". It's just helping him for 2008! Any bill that McCain sponsors that Dems could support should have a Dem co-sponsor who can then be cited. As for Barack, he's done nothing. He's telegenic and fits the cosmopolitan image popular on the left, but that is no substitute for substance. On the one hand, this is not a bad ad or a bad riposte from Duckworth. On the other, Dems have to stop holding these two up as the leaders.
October 18, 2006 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oops, looks like I posted that in the wrong thread. Sorry. On this ad, I think Davis should hit back directly "I support tariffs to keep American jobs from going to China" and let Reynolds advocate sending the jobs away. I think most Americans understand that if we keep the jobs here, junk at Walmart becomes a bit more expensive. It's the typical boycott free rider problem: if I boycott walmart for exporting American jobs, it's not enough to hurt walmart, but I'm paying higher prices. That doesn't mean I won't support the government doing it even if it means higher prices. And the tariff income could potential offset deficits or taxes anyway.
October 18, 2006 9:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
WOW! The only way Jack Davis could be luckier is to have drawn Katherine Harris as an opponent.
Come to think of it, Reynolds may be worse than Katherine Harris.
For sure that ad by the genyuses at the RNC should help a lot and hurt little.
Best, Terry
October 18, 2006 11:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
So let me get this straight.
The RNC is going to throw money at ineffective ads shoring up a well-funded incumbent, while their less-funded candidates sink in the polls across the country?
Sweet.
October 19, 2006 12:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
I noticed another ad last night for Tom Reynolds on my Buffalo ABC channel, (I live in Toronto and we get the Buffalo feed). This one was refering to Jack Davis being a millionaire and wanting to raise the retirement age to "steal money away" from people's retirement plans. According to the ad because Davis a millionaire he doesn't need a retirement plan so that's why he wants to raise the retirement age and cut funding to social security.
October 19, 2006 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
An article about Davis in The Buffalo News that recently appeared (before the freak snow storm a week ago) made a pretty interesting point. They quoted an academic who asserted that if Davis is elected, he will be the first industrialist to enter the domain of Federal politics in this era of globalization that is so rapidly de-industrializing the U.S. economy. Davis will represent the entreprenurial side of a HUGE constituency of people who have seen their employment opportunities along with their pay and benefits shrinking for the last couple of decades. While an economic rationalist will tell you that the tide of history cannot be rolled back, raising the profile of the free-trade vs fair-trade debate is something that is urgently needed. The lack of environmental and labor standards in WTO, NAFTA and CAFTA agreements are proving to be major flaws that deserve serious reconsideration. Otherwise we really are locked into this inexorable race to the bottom while trashing the environment and lowering the human condition along the way. Meanwhile the NRCC clumsily flails with this poorly designed message. My farmer neighbor was a Reynolds supporter until Foley-gate. He now doesn't believe a single word of Reynolds' defense. The pulse on the ground is that Davis may be an odd duck, but he shoots straight and cannot be bought. Reynolds puts party above children. Game over.
October 19, 2006 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink