MN-06: Bachmann: "God then called me to run" for Congress
Much of the coverage of GOP candidate Michele Bachmann's now-notorious event at a megachurch has focused on the potentially-illegal endorsement she received from a pastor. But there's another element of her appearance that has passed unnoticed: She expounded on the extent to which she communicates directly with God about her campaign. Bachmann revealed that she decided to run for Congress after she and her husband got the go-ahead directly from God: "And we said 'Lord, is this what you want? Is this Your will?'" God's answer: Yes. More after the jump.
In her speech, Bachmann revealed that she and her husband fasted and prayed for a couple days in order to receive word from God on whether or not to run:
“And in the midst of that calling, God then called me to run for the United States Congress. And I thought, what in the world would that be for? And my husband said “You need to do this.” And I wasn’t so sure. And we took three days, and we fasted and we prayed. And we said “Lord, is this what you want? Is this Your will?” And after — along about the afternoon of day two — He made that calling sure. And it's been now 22 months that I've been running for United States Congress. Who in their right mind would spend two years to run for a job that lasts for two years? You'd have to be absolutely a fool to do that. You are now looking at a fool for Christ. This is a fool for Christ.”
Bachmann was inspired to marry her husband by a prophetic vision:
And the Lord then led me to this man...Marcus Bachmann, my husband — led me to him, and showed me that this was also part of my calling, that my calling was to marry this man...We were praying one night, a girlfriend and I, not Marcus, and the Lord gave each one of us [Michele and Marcus] the same exact vision. And it was this: it was a picture of me, marrying this man in the valley where his parents have a farm in western Wisconsin."
Bachmann claims that the impact of the Foley scandal — which turned Bachmann's Dem challenger Patty Wetterling, a child-welfare activist, into a leading Democratic voice, boosting her in the polls — is divine intervention.
"In the midst of him making this calling sure, what's occured in this particular race is that this congresssional seat — one of 435 in the country — has become one of the top five races in the country and in the last week has become one of the top three races in the country and you may have seen now God has in his own will and in his own plan has focused like a laser beam. After this scandal that came up about a week or so ago he has focused like a laser beam with his reasoning on this race."















God help us all...
October 18, 2006 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Best line:
"You would have to be absolutely a fool to [run for Congress for 22 months]. You are now looking at a fool"
I didn't hear her say "Are you sure?" Asking God if he's sure would be pretty funny. Some of us have a really wishy-washy God I guess.
October 18, 2006 4:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I didn't hear her say "Are you sure?"
=======
You're right; I made a small error in transcribing. It's been corrected. Thanks for the keen eye.
October 18, 2006 4:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am so glad I sent Patty Wetterling money a few months back. Bachmann is more than a little too Stepford for my tastes.
October 18, 2006 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know how Katherine Harris is sort of funny-creepy?
Bachmann is just creepy-creepy.
October 18, 2006 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
BREAKING: Evangelist K.A. Paul announces God to accept responsibility, resign.
October 18, 2006 6:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please, god, please! Do that rapture thing and take all these selfish egotistical dipshits up in the air! It might help fill the ozone layer that they are so happy to deplete, and it would leave our world such a happier, saner place!
Notice that god never "sends a message" to people to just be quiet; to stop shopping; to refuse donations.
I know someone very well who is a "missionary." Know what that means? She doesn't pay one cent of taxes; even sales tax. She spends tons of money on herself -- all from other peoples' tax-deductible donations. When I asked her about her jewelry and expensive clothes she said that it made the people she was ministering to feel like she respected them more. Right!
Jan Knaus
October 18, 2006 6:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Be submissive to your husband? Does this mean that he's the one really making all of her political decisions?
October 18, 2006 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for picking up on this but I do think I deserve at least a thanks for the tip off... after all isn't that what you are asking us to do in the locations of hot races?
http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2006/oct/17/mn_06_poll_wetterling_expands_lead_over_bachmann#comment
October 19, 2006 1:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you need proof for the existence of God please consider that Wetterling was running behind Bachmann until Foleygate broke. (She is now plus 5 over the Bachmannator). Bachmann is even less accomplished than Gil Gutknecht in MN-01. (She has never authored a major legislative bill during her term in the MN state senate.) The real gain with Bachmann's incipient defeat is the retirement of Mark Kennedy from Congress. Wetterling winning is a 2fer for the Democratic Party.
I am predicting that the Democrats will pick up MN-01 and MN-06 in the November election. I think that Coleen Rowley has an even chance of unseating Jackboot John Kline.
October 19, 2006 6:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
This lady is nuts. God told her who to marry. God tells her, through her husband, to go into tax law. Be submissive to your husband. God told her to run for Congress.
It's sickening that anyone could support her to represent them in our government. These religious nutjobs need to read the Treaty of Tripoli - they're getting too big for their sanctimonious britches.
-awood
October 19, 2006 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Taught the law from a biblical world view?" Tell me she's kidding. Does Oral Roberts actually have an accredited law school that teaches this crap?
October 19, 2006 5:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's a clear violation of the tax code.
October 20, 2006 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
You left out the great part about God telling her husband to make her become a tax lawyer.
I think the god whose calling they was hearing was Mammon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammon
I may be wrong about this one, but I'm pretty sure God doesn't call anyone to become a tax lawyer. Husbands who want their wives to make a lot of money may tell them to, but I have serious doubt as to whether Jesus would have such dire need for more tax lawyers as to call to their husbands upon their wives' graduation from Oral Roberts University.
I guess she can help with the whole "Give unto Caesar" thing. Maybe she can defend this church from the IRS now.
God calling her to run for Congress actually sounds pretty reasonable compared to God calling her to become a tax lawyer, if you ask me.
October 20, 2006 6:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Followed by: "You are looking at a fool for Christ."
Can't argue with that assessment!
October 20, 2006 6:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
It should be, but I don't think it is. The tele-evangelists don't pay taxes on the millions they collect from the poor slobs who think they'll have eternal life if they only donate to the Falwells, the Grahams, et al. Their donations are tax-free also.
To me it is a scandal. If a church catches on fire, does the fire department come? If it gets robbed, do they call the police? What roads do their "flocks" travel on to sit and listen to entreaties to pay more for the "lord's work." Who pays for the police, the fire department, and for roads -- Answer: many people do. Many people who are NOT baptist, jewish, muslim, presbyterian, catholic, methodist (or any others that I don't have the space to list here). Why should non-believers subsidize religion? Why should the government subsidize religion? Answer: Religion should NOT be subsidized any more than it should be interfered with (which is the ONLY thing the Constitution promises)
If churches, and their leaders paid taxes we could make a serious dent in our national debt. Why shouldn't they?
In the mean time, "religious people" such as ministers, missionaries, etc, pay no taxes while spending money sent in by people who get tax breaks for donating in the first place. (And they don't seem to feel guilty about it either)
Maybe I'll start my own church. I'll borrow from the past: years ago, on a 60's TV show -- LaughIn, Flip Wilson started his own church:
"The Church of What's Happenin' Now"
That's gonna be my church! What a great scam! Wait. I just can't do it. This atheist is too moral for such shit.
Jan Knaus
October 22, 2006 6:39 PM | Reply | Permalink