MT-SEN: Bizarre Saga Of Yanked Anti-Burns Ad
It's hard to know what to make of this one. A Montana TV station has yanked a DSCC ad attacking Conrad Burns because the ad contains foul language -- that is, foul language from Burns. As we reported yesterday, the DSCC's new ad slams Burns for his now-notorious remark that firefighters did a "piss poor job" battling a Montana blaze. Now, however, a local TV station is refusing to run the ad because the language is "offensive" and it fears fines from the Federal Election Commission, the Montana station KPAX-TV reports. Given that the foul language in question is that of Burns, it's kind of funny that he's the one benefitting from the station's decision. More after the jump.
KPAX-TV didn't specify which station is declining to run the ads. But the controversy is doesn't end with that one station: KPAX-TV is also reporting that the Montana Broadcasters Association is urging stations not to run it. And the Burns campaign is even attacking the DSCC over the ad, claiming that the Dems are only airing it to get publicity -- an intriguing strategy, since attacking the ad will ensure that it only gets more publicity.
(To watch KPAX's report, go here and click on the link which says: "New campaign ad against Sen. Burns stirs controversy.")
At any rate, here's how DSCC spokesman Phil Singer responded to the whole fight:
"These words are from Conrad Burns and no one else. And we would encourage all those who are concerned with the language that Senator Burns used to take it up with him."
As noted above, it's hard to know quite what to make of this one.















The DSCC should just blank out the"offending" words and just show the ads with "expletive deleted" - it would actually make Burns words seem worse than before. The ad is really good and should not be just dropped
September 21, 2006 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why didn't they just *bleep* the bad words? We all know what the bleep means so the ad wouldn't lose any effectiveness.
September 21, 2006 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
As one who urinates regularly I'm offended Burns uses a demeaning description of this important bodily function to expresss his displeasure with Montana's firefighters' efforts. It's his business if he wants to see Montana's forests burn to the ground - though I must say that doesn't sound like a winning strategy to me - but he ought to lay off slurring all Urino-Americans by dragging us and our excretions into his fight to destroy Montana's woodlands.
September 21, 2006 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am utterly appalled that the Democrats would run a campaign advertisement just to get publicity. In fact I can't imagine any political party running an ad to get publicity. That's why most political ads feature your worst memory of a college professor lecturing on the arcane history of how that party came into existence. When those ads generate too much publicity, they switch them to print ads, that feature pages of the telephone directory where their party is listed. Duh!
Hoppy in Sacramento
September 21, 2006 5:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, you know, it wouldn't be a problem if not for that ----expletive deleted---- Liberal Media!
Jan Knaus
September 21, 2006 7:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
When did "Piss poor" become one of the words you can't say on TV, I don't seem to recall it being one of George Carlin's famous 7.
September 21, 2006 8:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Better still: break into the ad with 'What Conrad Burns said about firefighters can't be broadcast on network television.'
September 22, 2006 2:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Better listen to the album again. It's #2 in the list.
No story here. You can't say "piss" on the air, and everyone knows it.
September 22, 2006 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
My thoughts exactly.
September 22, 2006 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink