« OH-15: Kilroy Challenges Pryce To Strip Ney's Pension | Home | GA-08: Reclusive Swift-Boat-Funder Now Targeting Dem Barrow »
MO-SEN: National GOP Dumps Nearly A Million Bucks Into Race
This race is getting hotter. The National Republican Senatorial Committee just plunked down nearly a million bucks to target Claire McCaskill, the Dem challenger to increasingly endangered GOP Senator Jim Talent. Records just filed with the Federal Election Commission show that the NRSC yesterday dumped $836,379 into the race, almost all of it for ads. Get ready for slime time.
Advertisement















Claire is going to be hard to slime. She has run several state wide races. Probably as vetted as any candidate in the country. That said, we are all going to have to put on hipboots and raincoats here in Missouri. The NRSC is coming to town. The slime ads start now.
Too bad the Democrats won't respond in kind.
Ron Byers
September 20, 2006 4:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hope that the Democrats, in all races, do not "respond in kind" to slime. I really like this idea as an alternative approach (wish I had saved record of the source of the idea). Take part of a "slime ad" and copy it. In the Democrat's ad, have the Democrat "present" this as a sample of the opponent's tactics. In the other half of the ad, take the high road in stating what this Democratic candidate does stand for, what her or his agenda is for the people.
September 20, 2006 5:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now would be a good time for all those Democratic Senators sitting on piles of cash to start spreading it around a bit. Are you listening, Diane? Can you hear me, Hillary?
September 20, 2006 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Christie,
I hate to be negative - but how many elections have democrats LOST by taking the high ground? In fact, we LOSE them consistently because the average voter is trained to respond to sound bites, not detailed and considerate policy statements.
They call us cowards and terrorist sympathizers, and we offer proposals about health care and job training?
Guess what the average un-informed voter remembers the day before he/she goes to the polls? (Don't forget, George will likly "stop" another 2-3 terrorist plots within a few weeks before the election) - leaving everyone feeling scared and vulnerable.
Job training/health care promoters or freedom loving terrorist fighters?
We either fight back and call them the incompetent chicken-hawks that they are, or we live in perpetuity on blogs and chat rooms, feeling good about ourselves because we didn't sink to their level.
I would rather be in charge.
Randy
September 20, 2006 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, they can't. Senators' campaigns committees have the exact same maximum contribution limits as us regular people. I think $5,000. Same if they have a "Leadership PAC." It's not like Hillary can write a million dollar check to match the RNC dollar for dollar.
They can encourage their donors to write checks to Claire's committee, or to some 527 working in the race. But that's about it.
September 20, 2006 5:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, Ron it's a damn shame the Democrats won't respond in kind to the Republican slime that is on the way. It doesn't matter that Claire has no dirt to be dished out. They will simply make it up or call her a commie, soft on the terrorists, whatever they can think of just like they did Jean Carnahan who should be running for reelection today. Instead of making sure the people of the state know exactly what a right wing extremist Talent really is they will give him the typical pass and hope that people just realize magically that the Democrat is the better choice. It's appalling. All they have to do is take Talent's ads claiming he is a nonpartisan legislator and show what a contemptible idealogue he really is and how he has supported every extremist measure the GOP has put forward.
September 20, 2006 5:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
As I've said before, Bush and his cohort in Congress are looking at the possibility of their worst nightmare coming true;
Henry Waxman chairing a committe with subpoena power. This year the Republicans will be pulling out tricks even 'they' were reluctant to pull in past campaigns and elections. In my opinion, up to this point, this election is the most important in our history. If Democrats don't win at least one House and get some control over the right wing policies of Bush and this Congress, and that gang are again given full control, what do you think is coming? Where will the United States be in two years? Maybe a better questions is; 'WHAT' will the United States be in two years?
September 20, 2006 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Christie
Talent is setting on a giant pile of money. He is on the air 24/7. Trying to remain close has been a struggle for Claire. By respond in kind I meant it would be really, really helpful if the National Democratic Senatorial Committee were to dump a lot of money on Claire.
About $20,000,000 is going to be spent in favor of a stem cell proposition in the run up to the election. Claire favors the proposal. Talent opposes. Claire should benefit from the issue.
I don't want national Democrats to forget that Claire's name is not going to be mentioned in the issue ads.
When Talent has the air to himself he jumps ahead. When Claire reminds Democrats how little Talent has done for them she returns to the lead. We have to keep Claire's name in front of the public. Otherwise, Democrats will not win the Senate.
Frankly, I am not too worried about slime ads in this race. Both candidates are very, very well known.
Ron Byers
September 20, 2006 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
It’s in the book; it’s in their playbook; they (Republicans)don’t know how else to handle things except negatively. There is no sense of reality here, only Republican “spin”. It will continue until the election and, if they prevail, we can expect it to continue unabated. So, please, don’t act surprised; and above all don’t act as if it won’t happen again and again. One more point: The Republicans have mastered one technique and use it very well: It is called “first strike.” They frame the argument and the Democrats have to respond to it. If only some smart Democrat had come forward, immediately, and said, “Expect this to happen, expect this type of campaign from the Republicans,” they might have taken the “first strike” capability away from the Republicans. And, by doing this, they might have begun to show how the Republicans are bending events to remain in power.
The Democrats have been out of power for so long they're afraid to lose any handhold they have. It is important to vote for them, nevertheless, to balance the Republicans who have lived up to Lord Acton's maxim: "Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely." Sure the Democrats are scared, timid, afraid to speak out. So what? Does our analysis of it help the situation? Republicans lie. They continue to lie. The Republicans (and that includes Lieberman) tell lies so they can stay in power. Why is everyone so surprised by this, so astonished, so affronted by it? If you expect them to lie, and anticipate it, as opposed to being blindsided by it, as Kerry was by the swiftboating, then you will perpetually be the victim. And the Democrats have a long history of being aggrieved, of being the victims. Continue along that path, and once again you'll be a victim. As Morris Dees discovered, when you fight back, hit them hard, sue them where it hurts, make them pay dearly for each lie, then you will not be blindsided any more.
Second, it seems to me that the Democrats have been playing the victim, as in "Poor me!", for much too long. First, they let the Republicans mount an attack on them and their positions. Then they act surprised at the "bad" Republicans for doing this. Then they protest, calling what the Republicans do "despicable" or "dirty tricks" or "untrue". All of which only makes the Democrats look even more like victims. And so they dig their own fate. I also sense that, when they do this and ring their hands, they are hoping the Republicans will receive their comeuppance from some mysterious force, and that they will self-destruct of their own accord. Act like a victim, end up like one. So go out and vote for a Democrat, no matter how weak, get your friends to vote Democratically, and act to help others do the same.
September 20, 2006 6:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
But my point is ... it needs to be done, and quickly. Prevaricating, wringing ones hands, hoping the Republicans will self-destruct will do nothing to stop them from putting Bush's minions back in power. And, if you want more years of what we now have, stand around and play the victim.
September 20, 2006 6:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I tend to agree. Taking the high ground doesn't seem to work. Kerry thought he was doing that, and look at what happened to him. You need to be a street fighter to survive this time around.
September 20, 2006 6:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Every election since 2000 has been the most important in this country's history, at least since the 1860s.
But historians will see 2000 as the big one.
I recall Hal Holbrooke's character in wall street: A man looks into the abyss, if at this time the man finds his character, its what keeps him from falling into the abyss.
Our society is hanging by its thumbnails over the abyss.
This election represents nothing more than the ability to keep our thumb nails clutching for another two years.
We lose this election and well be down to one hand cleaning to the ledge with neocons boot heel resting on the knuckles.
2008 looms even larger. God help us all.
He that hath a trade, hath an estate - from Poor Richards Almanac - Benjamin Franklin
September 20, 2006 10:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary just gave a million to the DSCC, she's been actively fundraising for other candidates, and her Senate campaign has invested heavily instate so that massive landslide will drag half a dozen house seats into the victory column alongside her.
September 21, 2006 11:00 AM | Reply | Permalink