« GA-04: Bloggers Welcome! Johnson Invites Them To His (Almost Certain) Victory Party | Home | CT-SEN: Lamont Leading, But Race Tightening »

CT-SEN: Lamont's Web Guru Says Lieb Camp Didn't Respond To Offer Of Help

Here's another take on the whole Lieberman campaign web site hacking whodunit. It comes courtesy of Ned Lamont's web guru, Tim Tagaris. He's pretty upset about this whole thing.

Tagaris tells us something interesting. He says that not only did the Lamont campaign offer to help the Lieberman camp with their Web woes, but that the Lieberman campaign didn't even respond to the offer.

“At first I was sympathetic to the possibility that this might be a hack. We offered to send them technical support, we offered to host their website on our server,” Tagaris said. Tagaris adds that Lamont’s campaign manager called Lieberman four hours ago. "They haven't responded," Tagaris says. Then he really got warmed up -- more after the jump.

Tagaris took the Lieberman camp to task, charging that this might not have even been a hack at all.“They’re completely taking advantage of the fact that most people don’t know anything about technology. It’s par for the course with them: they treat reporters and treat people like idiots.” He says that the site came down not because of a hack, but because “they pay fifteen dollars an hour” for their site, and it couldn’t handle the traffic.

Tagaris insisted that what really happened was that traffic overloaded the server, and because Lieberman's site is the largest on there, it got knocked off the server. "You kick the fat kid off the bench," Tagaris said.

At this point, Tagaris was really rolling along. “This reaffirms even more in my heart that [Lieberman] does not deserve to be senator,” he said. “He’s run a slimy campaign from the beginning, because he can’t talk about the issues."

Tagaris paused, then let Lieberman have it one last time: "His campaign should be embarrassed from the senator on down.”


6 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I'm trying to make sense out of this comment, attributed by Paul Kiel to the "webmaster" of joe2006.com:

"When we take the site down, the server is fine."

Implying that when they try to reload the site, the server becomes . . . something other than fine?

So, um, WtF? Does this make as little sense as I think it does?

user-pic

I wondered about that comment as well. They certainly sound incompetent at best, to be charitable, and full of it at worst. I think time will tell which one it was.

There does seem to be a lot of false indignation coming out from the Lieberman camp, which they dial up and back depending on who is asking the questions (i.e. Paul Kiel vs. NYT). That makes the whole thing look a lot more like a ploy. If so, I have a strong feeling that it will massively backfire on them.

Even if it's not a ploy, it's still irresponsible to blame what appears to be the work of one random person on the Lamont campaign.

If someone slashed the Joementum bus tires, would they blame the Lamont campaign and insist that Ned Lamont apologize personally?

user-pic

Well . . . yeah. Of course they would.

user-pic

Does anybody with an ounce of grey matter still functioning believe ANYTHING liars like Lieberman (or Bush, Rumsfeld, MSM/Fox gasbags etc etc) say anymore? 

user-pic

Aargh! Double post! My browser's been hacked!

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address